daily menu » rate the banner | guess the city | one on oneforums map | privacy policy | DMCA | news magazine | posting guidelines

Go Back   SkyscraperCity > World Development News Forums > Megatalls

Megatalls Discussions of projects under construction at least 600m/2,000 ft tall.



Global Announcement

As a general reminder, please respect others and respect copyrights. Go here to familiarize yourself with our posting policy.


Reply

 
Thread Tools
Old May 1st, 2014, 02:58 PM   #1
jackedi07
YoutubeChannel:Jackedi07
 
jackedi07's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Kretinga - Alicante - Sapporo
Posts: 175
Likes (Received): 522

SAN LUIS | Solar Wind Energy Tower | 686m | 2250ft | Pro

Big, Tall, Sustainable: Solar Wind Downdraft Tower Planned for Arizona




Annapolis-based Solar Wind Energy Tower Inc. has received approval for a US$1.5 billion project that would result in the tallest structure in North America. The proposal calls for a 686-meter (2,250-foot) tower in San Luis, Arizona that would use ambient desert heat to create a draft to generate electricity.

The site, 32 kilometers (20 miles) southwest of Yuma, was chosen after several years of analyzing multiple sites in the Southwest with software developed by the company that can accurately calculate and predict energy production. The program used local weather data to determine the tower dimensions and financial performance, resulting in the San Luis location being chosen for the project.

The city of San Luis has approved the project, agreeing to extend the necessary rights of way and provide water. The tower works by misting water at the top of the tower, causing the air to cool and gain density. The draft created by the air sinking through the tower would be forced through a ring of turbines at the tower’s base, generating electricity. The structure, which resembles a nuclear plant cooling tower, would be capable of generating energy at an average rate of 435 megawatt-hours over the course of a year. July and August, as the hottest and driest months, could see a peak rate of 1,200 megawatt-hours.

http://www.ctbuh.org/News/GlobalTall...US/view.aspx#!
__________________
jackedi07 no está en línea   Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
Old May 1st, 2014, 04:59 PM   #2
ThatOneGuy
Psst! Check my signature!
 
ThatOneGuy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Toronto - Bucharest - Freeport
Posts: 21,482

This thing would be huge! Even if it's approved I can't see it happening.
ThatOneGuy no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old May 1st, 2014, 09:17 PM   #3
droneriot
Urban Hermit
 
droneriot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Cydonia Mensae
Posts: 4,659
Likes (Received): 2612

Does anyone know if downdraft towers are more or less efficient than updraft towers (the ones that are surrounded by a huge greenhouse and the hot air is going up the tower, moving the turbines in much the same way as this tower)? The latter were proposed in numerous locations and none were ever built. I don't know if 1.5 billion for 435MW is really cost-efficient, either...
droneriot no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old May 2nd, 2014, 06:42 PM   #4
KillerZavatar
also known as Wally
 
KillerZavatar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Düsseldorf
Posts: 11,330
Likes (Received): 8231

i love these, finally another proposal like that

on our flipboard we also had this article, which made me think to reopen the old thread, but the news you have are far more accurate and a new thread is better since it seems to be a different project, just the same concept.
KillerZavatar no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old May 2nd, 2014, 07:26 PM   #5
droneriot
Urban Hermit
 
droneriot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Cydonia Mensae
Posts: 4,659
Likes (Received): 2612

No, not the same concept. The previous proposals were updraft towers, which work differently. Hence my question above.
droneriot no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old May 2nd, 2014, 07:37 PM   #6
KillerZavatar
also known as Wally
 
KillerZavatar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Düsseldorf
Posts: 11,330
Likes (Received): 8231

oh right, they had solar panes at the bottom instead of these turbines
KillerZavatar no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old May 2nd, 2014, 07:49 PM   #7
droneriot
Urban Hermit
 
droneriot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Cydonia Mensae
Posts: 4,659
Likes (Received): 2612

Actually solar updraft towers have turbines, too. I am referring to the proposals made by a company called Enviromission or something, in Arizona, Australia, and Namibia I think. They have a huge greenhouse in which air is heated, which is then blown up a huge tower into the cold air in the upper atmosphere, and turbines generate energy from the massive winds that creates.

There's another type of solar tower which is far older and exists already, mainly in spain, where there's a water boiler thing on top of a tower, that is heated by an array of mirrors, but I don't think the old thread had any of those.
droneriot no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old May 2nd, 2014, 07:58 PM   #8
KillerZavatar
also known as Wally
 
KillerZavatar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Düsseldorf
Posts: 11,330
Likes (Received): 8231

the old thread was all about enviromission.
KillerZavatar no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old May 2nd, 2014, 08:00 PM   #9
ZZ-II
I love Skyscrapers
 
ZZ-II's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Near Ingolstadt in Bavaria
Posts: 33,502
Likes (Received): 6525

Interesting project. But i've problems to believe this will really be build in the near future.
ZZ-II no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old May 2nd, 2014, 08:01 PM   #10
patrykus
Registered User
 
patrykus's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Poland
Posts: 3,778
Likes (Received): 1794

Well, currently the most powerful wind turbines, 8MW Vestas V164 cost around $10 million a piece. You'd need 54 of them to get 435 MW output and that would be around $543 million, a third of the cost of that monster. Obviously a single powerplant like this would be way more reliable than bunch of wind turbines but still the pricetag doesn't look too convincing for those in power who could put money on it.

But regardless, such megatall monster would be something truly breathe taking if build
__________________
PolishTowersU/CPolishTowersU/CPolishTowersU/CPolishTowersU/CPolishTowersU/CPolishTowersU/C
PolishTowersU/CPolishTowersU/CPolishTowersU/CPolishTowersU/CPolishTowersU/CPolishTowersU/C
PolishTowersU/CPolishTowersU/CPolishTowersU/CPolishTowersU/CPolishTowersU/CPolishTowersU/C
PolishTowersU/CPolishTowersU/CComingSoon/CPolishTowersU/CPolishTowersU/CPolishTowersU/C

patrykus no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old May 2nd, 2014, 08:21 PM   #11
droneriot
Urban Hermit
 
droneriot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Cydonia Mensae
Posts: 4,659
Likes (Received): 2612

The question is where a start-up company is going to get one and a half billion from.
droneriot no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old May 2nd, 2014, 08:44 PM   #12
patrykus
Registered User
 
patrykus's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Poland
Posts: 3,778
Likes (Received): 1794

Keeping in mind wind turbines are way cheaper, They won't

If that wasn't clear enough I was comparing building 54 stand alone wind turbines to building this monster.
__________________
PolishTowersU/CPolishTowersU/CPolishTowersU/CPolishTowersU/CPolishTowersU/CPolishTowersU/C
PolishTowersU/CPolishTowersU/CPolishTowersU/CPolishTowersU/CPolishTowersU/CPolishTowersU/C
PolishTowersU/CPolishTowersU/CPolishTowersU/CPolishTowersU/CPolishTowersU/CPolishTowersU/C
PolishTowersU/CPolishTowersU/CComingSoon/CPolishTowersU/CPolishTowersU/CPolishTowersU/C

patrykus no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old May 2nd, 2014, 08:46 PM   #13
droneriot
Urban Hermit
 
droneriot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Cydonia Mensae
Posts: 4,659
Likes (Received): 2612

Well, if they do, I want the name, address and phone number of that bank.
droneriot no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old May 2nd, 2014, 09:32 PM   #14
Jay
Registered User
 
Jay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: California to Barcelona
Posts: 4,054
Likes (Received): 1863

Don't see this happening but it sure would be awesome!
Jay no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old May 3rd, 2014, 09:47 PM   #15
Jasonhouse
Senior Button Pusher
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Tampa
Posts: 16,393
Likes (Received): 2460

Wrong forum though. This is an industrial project, not an occupiable building.
Jasonhouse no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old May 3rd, 2014, 10:53 PM   #16
KillerZavatar
also known as Wally
 
KillerZavatar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Düsseldorf
Posts: 11,330
Likes (Received): 8231


the height is still significant enough i think. after all it is a free standing structure over 600m.
KillerZavatar no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old May 3rd, 2014, 10:59 PM   #17
Blue Flame
Get Silly!
 
Blue Flame's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Lexington,KY
Posts: 2,369
Likes (Received): 575

What a hideous monstrosity! It looks like a nuclear reactor tower, only ten times as large. It is extremely unlikely that they would build this anyway, though.
__________________
A cynic is nothing but a realist with experience.
Blue Flame no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old May 4th, 2014, 01:37 AM   #18
Gendo
Registered User
 
Gendo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: SE Idaho
Posts: 1,548
Likes (Received): 77

Quote:
Originally Posted by patrykus View Post
Well, currently the most powerful wind turbines, 8MW Vestas V164 cost around $10 million a piece. You'd need 54 of them to get 435 MW output and that would be around $543 million, a third of the cost of that monster. Obviously a single powerplant like this would be way more reliable than bunch of wind turbines but still the pricetag doesn't look too convincing for those in power who could put money on it.

But regardless, such megatall monster would be something truly breathe taking if build
Actually, you would need 3 times as many of those Vesta V164. Wind turbines average out over time to, at best, 1/3rd of their rated maximum output, and that is in the most ideal windiest locations. Much of the time the wind isn't blowing anywhere near fast enough for that 8MW output. So overall, if they can actually build this tower at that price, it would be competitive with the cost of a comparable wind farm.
__________________

Miami High Rise liked this post

Last edited by Gendo; May 4th, 2014 at 01:49 AM.
Gendo no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old May 4th, 2014, 01:50 AM   #19
Kyll.Ing.
Registered User
 
Kyll.Ing.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Trondheim
Posts: 1,084
Likes (Received): 3617

Provided that they both work equally well, I don't see what advantage this has over the solar updraft tower. This thing consumes water, which has to be pumped almost 700 metres up - which requires a pretty huge amount of energy (it's basically a high-pressure hydroelectric plant in reverse). Besides, a lot of the infrastructure would be at the top, meaning that regular maintenance would involve a trip up the tower. In comparison, a solar updraft tower has all its machinery at ground level, the tower basically being a huge chimney. You'd only need to travel up there to replace bulbs in the aircraft warning lights, all the fancy parts will be reachable by semitrailer if need be. As a bonus, the greenhouse at the bottom could be used to farm stuff.
__________________
Poe's law: You can't impersonate stupidity without somebody mistaking it for the real thing.

Major Deegan liked this post
Kyll.Ing. está en línea ahora   Reply With Quote
Old May 4th, 2014, 01:57 AM   #20
Gendo
Registered User
 
Gendo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: SE Idaho
Posts: 1,548
Likes (Received): 77

Just some Vesta V164 power output to wind speed numbers for you. 8MW @ 46.8kph; 5.5MW @ 36kph; 2MW @ 26kph

Some offshore locations this Vesta turbine is intended for may beat the 1/3rd of maximum rated power output, but generally the most ideal land locations for wind turbines range between 1/4th to 1/3rd.
Gendo no está en línea   Reply With Quote


Reply

Tags
megatall

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Related topics on SkyscraperCity


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 01:09 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Feedback Buttons provided by Advanced Post Thanks / Like (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2017 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2017 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

SkyscraperCity ☆ In Urbanity We trust ☆ about us | privacy policy | DMCA policy

Hosted by Blacksun, dedicated to this site too!
Forum server management by DaiTengu