Go Back   SkyscraperCity > Continental Forums > North American Skyscrapers Forum > United States Urban Issues > Southeast

Reply


 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old June 9th, 2005, 10:58 PM   #1
citykid09
Registered User
 
citykid09's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 346
Houston: Engineer proposes I-45 tunnel

Houston: Engineer proposes I-45 tunnel
June 8, 2005, 10:12PM
Engineer proposes I-45 tunnel
Heights resident says expansion alternative less harmful to area
By TOM MANNING
Chronicle Correspondent

A Heights engineer believes a tunnel under Interstate 45 would alleviate problems associated with widening the freeway.

Gonzalo Camacho, a public engineer and member of the citizen group called the I-45 Coalition, has spent the last three months presenting a plan to local civic groups, city officials and the Texas Department of Transportation that would turn I-45 between Beltway 8 and downtown into a tunnel.

The proposal, Camacho said, would have significantly less negative environmental impact and would create far less disruption for both commuters and neighborhood residents than proposals by TxDOT that call for the creation of four "managed lanes" in the center of I-45.
To read the article click here: http://forum.skyscraperpage.com/show...threadid=78335
citykid09 no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old June 9th, 2005, 11:17 PM   #2
The Great Hizzy!
Professional Pain In The
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 170
Unless he's talking about tunneling the section from just north of White Oak Bayou to just past the I-45/US 59 interchange, I don't think the idea is:

1) Feasible
2) Necessary.

The 45 from the North Loop to White Oak is trenched and is the most asthetically pleasing of any stretch of the I-45 inside the Beltway. Moreover, TxDOT's cheap asses aren't going to be looking to spend too much on new freeway projects here given the amount of money that they've spent on the Katy, the West Loop and some of the other freeways around the state such as in San Antonio and DFW.

I could be wrong, though, and would certainly welcome a tunneled 45 around downtown. Otherwise, I'm not sure of the purpose.
The Great Hizzy! no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old June 10th, 2005, 02:14 AM   #3
citykid09
Registered User
 
citykid09's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 346
I think the article said that a tunnel would be cheaper than an both an elevated freeway and trenced freeway. The only the cheaper is ground level, and all of the others besides the tunnel are bad for pollution.
citykid09 no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old June 10th, 2005, 05:00 PM   #4
citykid09
Registered User
 
citykid09's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 346
I'm guessing it will look something like this:
citykid09 no está en línea   Reply With Quote


Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT +2. The time now is 10:10 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

SkyscraperCity - In Urbanity We Trust

Hosted by Blacksun, dedicated to this site too!
Linux server management by DaiTengu
Forums Directory