Go Back   SkyscraperCity > European Forums > UK & Ireland Architecture Forums > Projects and Construction > Liverpool Metro Area

Reply


 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old July 31st, 2005, 04:41 PM   #1
John Matrix 1985
Get to the Chopper
 
John Matrix 1985's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: a quiet retreat in California
Posts: 537
New Anfield

Has there been any progress on this recently or is it still being delayed because the NWDA are being dickheads & interfering?

Have not heard anything on this for a long time, even though LCC actually approved the plans.
__________________
Why don't you get Bennett to do it? - sounds like something he'd get off on
John Matrix 1985 no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old July 31st, 2005, 05:55 PM   #2
Red scouser
European Champion
 
Red scouser's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 416
Nothing new mate. NWDA refusing to cooperate and give the funds this area so badly needs. Dead quiet from Liverpool FC who had hoped for a spring 2005 start on site. I would say the new stadium and area improvements are very much in jeopardy.
__________________
L I V E R P O O L
European Capital of Culture 2008
World Heritage Site
Two Premiership Football Clubs (one good, one bad...)
Home of The Beatles


Red scouser no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old August 1st, 2005, 01:03 PM   #3
John Matrix 1985
Get to the Chopper
 
John Matrix 1985's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: a quiet retreat in California
Posts: 537
Quote:
Originally Posted by Red scouser
Nothing new mate. NWDA refusing to cooperate and give the funds this area so badly needs. Dead quiet from Liverpool FC who had hoped for a spring 2005 start on site. I would say the new stadium and area improvements are very much in jeopardy.

Yet another big project that could go on the bonfire, this really pisses me off, although I love the present ground, the club are never going to be able to compete with the big 3 - even Newcastle have a bigger ground. The are is in desperate need of regeneration, its an embarassment sometimes, especially when we play foreign teams. The only ground i've been to in a similar area is Boca Juniors and you just want to get away straight after the game incase you get done over. I bet thats what some people feel like going to Anfield. I saw some Japanese guy taking photographs of burnt out flats by the Pitz once, probably taking them back home to show the folks!
__________________
Why don't you get Bennett to do it? - sounds like something he'd get off on
John Matrix 1985 no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old February 14th, 2006, 06:26 PM   #4
Paul D
The Lennon Instinct!!
 
Paul D's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Liverpool A World Heritage City
Posts: 6,399
New Anfield is back on track after £10m grant.

A major breakthrough in Liverpool F.C's plans for a new stadium is revealed today.

more here
Paul D no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old February 14th, 2006, 06:55 PM   #5
scouserdave
BANNED
 
scouserdave's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Liverpool 6, Halewood, Cantril Farm, Luton ferfuxake!
Posts: 2,783
Funnily enough I was in Arsenal's Emirates Stadium today. If it looks half as good as this fucker, I'll be more than happy
scouserdave no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old February 14th, 2006, 07:01 PM   #6
westisbest
Justice for the 96
 
westisbest's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Greater Liverpool
Posts: 3,664
its nice that Emirates stad, Maybe we should get ours sponsoured by an Airline, Easyjet arena, C'mon lets play
__________________
Liverpool FC

18 League Titles
5 European Cups
westisbest no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old February 15th, 2006, 01:00 AM   #7
Tony Sebo
Registered User
 
Tony Sebo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Liverpool
Posts: 16,368
Dave... you say that you're no good at abstracts... those roof span pics are fantastic compositions!
Tony Sebo no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old February 15th, 2006, 02:22 AM   #8
LABlue
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Near Los Angeles
Posts: 834
New Analfield sponsors

Thought Scandanavian Air Services would be more in line for you kopites.

How do you expect to get Crouch through planning ?

LABlue no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old February 15th, 2006, 11:59 AM   #9
Toadboy
Scarecrow Killer
 
Toadboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Liverpool, in the North of England but not of it
Posts: 5,758
Quote:
Originally Posted by LABlue
Thought Scandanavian Air Services would be more in line for you kopites.

How do you expect to get Crouch through planning ?

Stick a flashing red light on his head.

The airline suggestion holds some water actually, Everton are looking at some sort of tie up with a far eastern carrier, Man United aready have some sort of deal, Liverpool have spoken to Middle and Far Eastern airlines etc.

I like the idea of the SAS Stadium though, the urchins will be buzzing.
__________________
REINSTATE CLATTS
Toadboy no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old February 15th, 2006, 12:03 PM   #10
Doug Roberts
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Liverpool
Posts: 2,394
Daves pictures of the Emirates stadium are as usual fantastic, I wonder how long it will be before he's taking pics of the new Anfield??
__________________
Doug Roberts

Try not. Do or do not, there is no try. Yoda
Doug Roberts no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old February 15th, 2006, 01:48 PM   #11
scouserdave
BANNED
 
scouserdave's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Liverpool 6, Halewood, Cantril Farm, Luton ferfuxake!
Posts: 2,783

Thanks Doug. Hopefully, I'll know someone who knows someone who owes a favour to someone who'll allow me access to the site. That's how it works
BTW
I've just uploaded 90 Gooner Stadium pics to:
http://www.**************************/emirates/
scouserdave no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old July 13th, 2006, 11:46 AM   #12
John Matrix 1985
Get to the Chopper
 
John Matrix 1985's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: a quiet retreat in California
Posts: 537
Liverpool have 2 weeks left to come up with a masterplan to save the new stadium otherwise the 9M funding will be withdrawn - can't see this happening unless some good samaritan stumps up some cash. Liverpool FC have had 2 or more years to sort it and haven't done a tap.
__________________
Why don't you get Bennett to do it? - sounds like something he'd get off on
John Matrix 1985 no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old July 13th, 2006, 08:18 PM   #13
Pietari
Just something
 
Pietari's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,504
Quote:
Originally Posted by John Matrix 1985
Liverpool have 2 weeks left to come up with a masterplan to save the new stadium otherwise the 9M funding will be withdrawn - can't see this happening unless some good samaritan stumps up some cash. Liverpool FC have had 2 or more years to sort it and haven't done a tap.
Hmmm. they do seem to have lost the plot (quite literally.)

Still if one week in politics is a long time two weeks in football is even longer.
__________________
Business & leisure...
Current investment of £4.5bn+
www.liverpoolwaters.co.uk
http://www.wirralwaters.com/
1,000 maritime companies on Merseyside, employ 26,000 staff with an annual turnover of £2.5bn,15% of the Merseyside economy. The Port of Liverpool handles over 40m tonnes of cargo & 150,000 ship movements a year. The River Mersey is the UK’s 3rd busiest estuary.
http://www.shipais.com/index.php
The Merseyrail network runs 700 services a day, the most intense of any in the UK apart from London Underground.
http://visitliverpool.com/
Pietari no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old July 18th, 2006, 02:14 PM   #14
Pietari
Just something
 
Pietari's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,504
Arrow Liverpool FC stadium plans 'won't collapse' .....

http://icliverpool.icnetwork.co.uk/0...name_page.html

Liverpool FC stadium plans 'won't collapse' Jul 18 2006

Daily Post

LIVERPOOL FC chief executive Rick Parry is insisting the club's new stadium plans for Stanley Park will not collapse.

Doubts have been expressed over the scheme to replace Anfield with a 60,000-capacity stadium as the cost is claimed to have spiralled to nearly £190m.

Liverpool must also come up with proof they have raised the money for the new ground by the end of the month, or they could lose grants totalling almost £20m to cover the new stadium's outside infrastructure from the EU and the Northwest Development Agency.

Liverpool have been in lengthy negotiations to raise the capital from the private sector, and Parry, in a BBC Five Live interview, said: "There is a lot of work going on and the situation is coming to a head relatively soon.

"We are certainly looking at a matter of weeks and it is still something we are determined to bring off. Too much work has gone into it for us to fail at this hurdle."
__________________
Business & leisure...
Current investment of £4.5bn+
www.liverpoolwaters.co.uk
http://www.wirralwaters.com/
1,000 maritime companies on Merseyside, employ 26,000 staff with an annual turnover of £2.5bn,15% of the Merseyside economy. The Port of Liverpool handles over 40m tonnes of cargo & 150,000 ship movements a year. The River Mersey is the UK’s 3rd busiest estuary.
http://www.shipais.com/index.php
The Merseyrail network runs 700 services a day, the most intense of any in the UK apart from London Underground.
http://visitliverpool.com/
Pietari no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old July 18th, 2006, 03:10 PM   #15
kung_fuzi
Registered User
 
kung_fuzi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Liverpool
Posts: 1,870
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pietari
http://icliverpool.icnetwork.co.uk/0...name_page.html

Liverpool FC stadium plans 'won't collapse' Jul 18 2006

Daily Post

LIVERPOOL FC chief executive Rick Parry is insisting the club's new stadium plans for Stanley Park will not collapse.

Doubts have been expressed over the scheme to replace Anfield with a 60,000-capacity stadium as the cost is claimed to have spiralled to nearly £190m.

Liverpool must also come up with proof they have raised the money for the new ground by the end of the month, or they could lose grants totalling almost £20m to cover the new stadium's outside infrastructure from the EU and the Northwest Development Agency.

Liverpool have been in lengthy negotiations to raise the capital from the private sector, and Parry, in a BBC Five Live interview, said: "There is a lot of work going on and the situation is coming to a head relatively soon.

"We are certainly looking at a matter of weeks and it is still something we are determined to bring off. Too much work has gone into it for us to fail at this hurdle."
Great news.
Not so great for the Echo and other ground sharers though.
kung_fuzi no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old July 19th, 2006, 04:43 AM   #16
LABlue
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Near Los Angeles
Posts: 834
Just get on with it !!!

The sooner both clubs get their arses in gear and accept that ground sharing isnt going to work the better.

Let the redshite build their new ground - the area could really do with investment and we can bugger off to Central Docks , Gillmoss or whever we are supposed to be going this particular week. (well anywhere other than the Kirkby Tesco Trolley Stadium please)

At this rate Metroplex may have finshed Wembley before both clubs.
LABlue no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old July 20th, 2006, 12:18 AM   #17
JUXTAPOL
800th birthday in 2007
 
JUXTAPOL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Liverpool
Posts: 4,189
What with St-Helens Rugby League considering gap funding from "N.W.D.A." for their new ground, we may see the possibility of the N.W.D.A. "Trying", (pun intended), to force one of the football clubs into a share with the rugby club.
JUXTAPOL no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old July 27th, 2006, 01:47 PM   #18
kung_fuzi
Registered User
 
kung_fuzi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Liverpool
Posts: 1,870
Cash is in place for new AnfieldJul 27 2006

By Chris Bascombe, Liverpool Echo


LIVERPOOL FC have assured European moneymen that cash to pay for their new stadium is in place.

Club officials will not attend a key meeting today when the future of £9m of European Objective One funding earmarked for the Stanley Park scheme could be decided.

But the Reds have already told the European Objective One committee that they have the resources to press ahead with the £190m, 60,000-seater stadium.

The European money will not be used to pay for the ground, but for the regeneration of the deprived Anfield and Breckfield communities nearby.

The Objective One committee had set a deadline of today for the club to confirm it has the privatemoney to pay forits share of the project.


In theory, it could now decide to take the money away from Liverpool if it is not happy with what the club is saying.
But it is far more likely that they will instead accept that progress is being made and extend the deadline to give the Reds more time to firm up their proposals.


Liverpool are hopeful the funding will remain in place, although club insiders insist if the decision goes against the club, it will not spell the end of their stadium plans.


Club officials acknowledge the loss of the European grant would be a significant blow, but would not derail the process of leaving the current site.


Chief executive Rick Parry recently spoke of his confidence Liverpool will secure the multi-million pound investment they need to build the complex on Stanley Park.


The club has been in talks with several interested parties, with at least one thought to be at an advanced stage.


The overall project needs more than £18m from Europe and the government to pay for the regeneration of Stanley Park and the surrounding area.


Land occupied by the current ground will be turned into Anfield Plaza, a new public square lined with homes, shops and leisure facilities.


Two weeks ago, senior councillors voiced their fears that this part of the scheme could fail if Liverpool are unable to come up with their share of the stadium cash.


Cllr Flo Clucas, executive member for economic development, said: "Even though European funding will not be used for the stadium itself, the stadium is seen as a vital part of the regeneration project.


"If the stadium money is not forthcoming, regeneration will not take place in the way currently envisaged.


"If this particular package does not come together, it will not be the public sector's fault, it will be LFC that failed to bring cash to the table."
kung_fuzi no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old July 27th, 2006, 09:03 PM   #19
City on The Water
BANNED
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 705
This peverse notion that a stadium will regenerate an area. There have been two large stadia either side of Stanley Park foe over a 100 years and only decay has set in.

Get them away from residential areas, that is not where they belong.
City on The Water no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old July 27th, 2006, 09:23 PM   #20
eyeam
Registered User
 
eyeam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Liverpool
Posts: 905
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/mai...7/sfnbo228.xml

Liverpool ground to a halt
By Mihir Bose
(Filed: 27/07/2006)



Everton might get one over on their Merseyside rivals Liverpool by moving into a brand new stadium before them.

Liverpool's plans for a new ground have become so bogged down that they are in danger of losing up to £20 million of European funding, which has been earmarked for stadium infrastructure work.

The clock on this European funding, which comes via the north-west regional development agencies, is ticking and the club has been told that as this money is coming from this year's budget Liverpool must convice them that they are serious about this new stadium by the July 31, or the money will be allocated elsewhere.

However, progress on the new stadium has been so slow that costs have risen inexorably. Having started with an original estimate of £70 million the stadium could cost £190 million. One of the main problems has been finding an investor. On Tuesday rumours swept Merseyside of yet another consortium bid, which would be Liverpool's seventh potential bidder in the last year.

The latest rumoured bidder consists of Dermot Desmond, Celtic's largest shareholder, with John Magnier and JP McManus, once friends of Sir Alex Ferguson and investors in Manchester United.

Everton, in contrast, have no potential investors and a long-term stand-off in their boardroom between chairman Bill Kenwright and director Paul Gregg to deal with.

Despite this, the club is looking at three sites and confident they could build a 50,000-stadium, with an option to increase the capacity to 70,000, for around £100 million, at a cost of £1,500 a seat.

There are three potential sites, the first is near Aintree, which Peel Holdings, a major property developer of the region, may help to build. The other sites include one near Speke airport and another in Kirby, which will involve a Tesco development, the company's chief executive Sir Terry Leahy being a keen Everton supporter.

Everton's income of £60 million may be half that of Liverpool's, but their debt of £27 million is also a third of Liverpool's debt which is nearly £80 million.

But Goodison sources are confident that if all goes well they could be in their new home by 2009, unlike Liverpool who have said that even in a best-case scenario their new stadium will not be ready until 2010.
eyeam no está en línea   Reply With Quote


Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT +2. The time now is 09:07 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

SkyscraperCity - In Urbanity We Trust

Hosted by Blacksun, dedicated to this site too!
Linux server management by DaiTengu
Forums Directory