|
|
| daily menu » rate the banner | guess the city | one on one |
|
|||||||
| Tall Talk general news, discussion and announcement forum about skyscrapers |
| View Poll Results: ??? | |||
| Petronas Towers, Kuala Lumpur |
|
489 | 53.97% |
| WTC Towers, NYC |
|
417 | 46.03% |
| Voters: 906. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#41 |
|
Power of creation!
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Moscow
Posts: 573
Likes (Received): 0
|
Guys, are you fuckin' crazy? It's so cruel... It seems like compare two people, who is more beautiful. "Oh, sorry, i forget, one of 'em is dead now, but it's ok, let's compare"
|
|
|
|
|
|
#42 | |
|
User
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: NYC
Posts: 5,651
Likes (Received): 2
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#43 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Kuala Lumpur
Posts: 2,392
Likes (Received): 1
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#44 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 264
Likes (Received): 1
|
The WTC TWINS are (were) the best i loved that boxy look of them and that plainless look and they shined all colors you can think of orange, pink, yellow, grey, white, red. there architecture was not that bad, ive seen worse buildings. the towers were always called bad architecture becouse there were no shapes in them.
Last edited by paul.skyscrapercity; August 2nd, 2006 at 06:51 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#45 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 311
Likes (Received): 0
|
i bet if its not the WTC, people wouldnt speak highly of two grey boxes. The structure of WTC is boring at best, although its just...so...iconic. And it fits right in NY. However, talking about skyscrapers, Petronas is simply better looking IMO
|
|
|
|
|
|
#46 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 409
Likes (Received): 0
|
The twin towers in reality were very ugly buildings the desing and the buildings themself were to simple,it is only by the fact that the towers were destroyed that they became a symbol, the symbol of new york before the towers were destroyed was the empire state building, in my opinion the Petronas Towers have a much better desing than the WTC
Last edited by Ginza; August 2nd, 2006 at 10:39 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#47 |
|
livinginurbansac.blogspot
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 184
Likes (Received): 0
|
World Trade Center, New York!!! The design was simple but made an impression.
PLUS: the observation deck was on the roof!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#48 |
|
Celebrity Fitness
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Shah Alam
Posts: 1,586
Likes (Received): 0
|
Petronas Towers
|
|
|
|
|
|
#49 |
|
Just A Pilot... :-)
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Enewetak Atoll
Posts: 528
Likes (Received): 0
|
Petronas, I simply prefer the look of glass over gray, and round and tapered over boxy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#50 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 397
Likes (Received): 0
|
World Trade Center for me
|
|
|
|
|
|
#51 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: KL,Malaysia
Posts: 1,344
Likes (Received): 18
|
Duh....Petronas for me. The votes would've been different if WTC were still around. Only now that it's gone that they got many votes........
|
|
|
|
|
|
#52 | |
|
Lingkod-Bayan
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: CEB, SIN
Posts: 10,397
Likes (Received): 157
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#53 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: New York
Posts: 2,579
Likes (Received): 4
|
WTC! I always liked the twin towers when i was a kid...
__________________
My New York by Krzycho |
|
|
|
|
|
#54 |
|
De Lomas de Zamora
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Buenos Aires
Posts: 1,006
Likes (Received): 0
|
I liked the WTC...although Petronas have a better design..
__________________
BUENOS AIRES:LA PERLA DEL PLATA Guía de la Construcción de Lomas de Zamora FOTOS VARIAS DE BUENOS AIRES(18 FOTOS!!) Argentina en google earth ROJO, REY DE COPAS POR SIEMPRE |
|
|
|
|
|
#55 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: New York
Posts: 2,579
Likes (Received): 4
|
I agree...
__________________
My New York by Krzycho |
|
|
|
|
|
#56 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: MIAMI
Posts: 512
Likes (Received): 0
|
Petronas for me but I think this thread should be closed cause WTC is is no longer around...a lil insensitive and cruel to be comparing one that exists and one that has 'deceased'...especially when it was being destroyed by terrorists and thousands dead.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#57 |
|
BANGKOK
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Bangkok
Posts: 13,129
Likes (Received): 1
|
I like them both but Petronas is more beautiful.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#58 |
|
Administrator
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Toronto
Posts: 52,799
Likes (Received): 302
|
Uhmmm. Bad taste. A lot of people died there... let's let it rest, ok? I vividly remember visiting WTC on many occasions and I remember the day it blew up and I just don't feel like putting it through a beauty pageant. Bad karma all 'round.
__________________
Please visit my photoblog! Montréal | Mexico | Niagara-on-the-Lake | Brazil | Hamilton aka "The Hammer"! "Fine words butter no parsnips"-17th Century proverb. |
|
|
|
|
|
#59 |
|
Je suis tout à vous
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 14,938
Likes (Received): 688
|
WORLD TRADE CENTER
__________________
๏̯͡๏♥๏̯͡๏
|
|
|
|
|
|
#60 |
|
Derp?
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Groningen
Posts: 1,281
Likes (Received): 132
|
I find the Petronas Towers much more beautiful (they are a true piece of art as far as design concept goes, imo.), so they get my vote.
The WTC is much more impressive, and fits into its surroundings much better - they completed the Lower Manhattan skyline, and that skyline in turn added to the appearance of the WTC. But in essence they are big boxes: extremely iconic, impressive and in a way even pretty elegant, but not really beautiful when compared to the Petronas. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|