|
|
| daily menu » rate the banner | guess the city | one on one |
|
|
#281 | ||
|
Sara je vo(Sarah is bull)
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Scottsdale, AZ - USA - Sarajevo - BiH
Posts: 1,116
Likes (Received): 0
|
Quote:
![]() I live in North East Scottsdale, right next to Fountain Hills pretty much. I agree on the "seljaci" thing, all the normal folks went to Germany, Austria, UK, Australia, etc...America got 90% of the rejects lol. We couldn't get out because my dad was recruited, and then we pretty much got stuck in Sarajevo through the whole siege, finally left in 1997. Damn Aussies wouldn't accept us! If they did I'd have an awesome Aussie accent right now...How disappointing.
__________________
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#282 | |
|
Jotun
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: PHX/SF/SRB/ARG
Posts: 45
Likes (Received): 0
|
Quote:
To be honest, I'm glad you didn't because I hate the Australian accent but yeah, I left Sarajevo in August of 1995. I'm not really sure if my parents requested a specific area of the US or another country to visit but to be honest, I like it here. There's definitely a lot of things I hate about the city but that's bound to come up anywhere you live. In all the cities I've been to, Phoenix is still one of my favorites all-around.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#283 | ||
|
Sara je vo(Sarah is bull)
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Scottsdale, AZ - USA - Sarajevo - BiH
Posts: 1,116
Likes (Received): 0
|
Quote:
I LOVE the Aussie accent, its amazing. I have no accent of any sort so its sad, I have to fake mine. However, I must admit, my Indian and Russian accents are phenomenal. We didn't get to 'pick' where to be placed, they just placed us where they wanted lol. I don't hate where I live, in fact I love where I live, but that's because I grew up in Phoenix, so its a natural thing to be attached to your hometown.
__________________
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#284 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: GDL
Posts: 1,142
Likes (Received): 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#285 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: GDL
Posts: 1,142
Likes (Received): 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#286 |
|
Hong Kong
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 71,053
Likes (Received): 838
|
Phoenix's sizzling heat to test new light rail
2 July 2009 PHOENIX (AP) - While a 6-month-old light-rail line in the nation's fifth largest city has exceeded expectations so far, its operators are now facing their biggest test -- Arizona's sizzling heat. No other city in the country has to run a commuter rail under Phoenix's unforgiving conditions, with summer temperatures that regularly top 110 and once soared to 122 degrees. Those conditions will test the system's equipment and could dissuade riders from walking to rail stations and waiting for up to 20 minutes for a ride. Tiffanie Griffin of Phoenix said the heat will stop her from riding the light rail as soon as she saves the $1,500 she needs to get her car a new transmission, hopefully by the end of the month. "Sitting here in the heat waiting for the light rail is frustrating," said Griffin, who gulped ice water from a giant plastic cup as she waited for a train on a recent 108-degree day. "You're just getting off of work, you had a full day, and it's hot as heck out here." Phoenix has had a reasonably mild late spring and early summer, only beginning to hit its normal high of around 107 degrees for this time of year at the end of June, said Ken Waters, warning coordination meteorologist for the National Weather Service in Phoenix. Now that the heat is here, there's no end in sight until September, Waters said. While METRO light rail CEO Rick Simonetta said he suspects some people will find other ways to get to work when it gets extremely hot, he thinks a recent fare increase will have more of an impact on ridership. Valley Metro, the region's mass transit agency, raised the price of a one-way ticket by 50 cents to $1.75 on Wednesday. An all-day pass increased by 40 percent from $2.50 to $3.50. "A 40 percent increase is pretty significant," Simonetta said, adding that consultants estimate the bump will lead to at least 10 percent fewer riders. An average of about 34,000 people now ride the light rail on any given weekday, about 8,000 more than operators had hoped for. Monthly ridership peaked in April with about 1 million passengers, but decreased to 928,000 riders in May. Preliminary data shows there were 807,000 riders in June. Light rail officials attribute some of that drop-off to the end of the college year and to snow birds, people who leave the Phoenix area in the summer for more forgiving climates. Simonetta said he thinks the heat will be more of a test of the light rail's equipment than its riders. "The first summer is really sort of the test to make sure that everything was (designed) right, it was constructed right and that it's operating correctly," he said. "So far, no major problems that we see, but you know that we just had our first 110-degree day, and we know there's lots more of those." In Sacramento, Calif., 108-degree weather in late June caused overhead wires to sag and disconnect from light-rail trains in the city's business district, disrupting service for about five hours on two days and leaving passengers stranded in the heat. Simonetta said Phoenix's trains and stations were designed specifically for extreme heat. The outdoor stations provide shaded areas and cold water fountains, and trains have heavy-duty air conditioning and heavily tinted windows. People in other hot environments throughout the world ride commuter rails in big numbers despite the heat, and Phoenix likely will be no different, said Rod Diridon, executive director of the San Jose, Calif.,-based Mineta Transportation Institute, a nonpartisan research institute that conducts transportation policy studies. "I think it's just a matter of getting used to it," he said. "The people of Phoenix have embraced the light-rail system overwhelmingly. Now it's a matter of a population that loves light rail adjusting to the summer." Michael Roller of Phoenix said he'll only ride the light rail in the summer, because his daughter uses his car to get to her job as a lifeguard when she's not in school at the University of Arizona. "The heat doesn't affect me," said Roller, who was wearing a long-sleeved cotton button-up while waiting at a light-rail station recently. "I've been in Arizona all my life. I'm used to it." Phoenix was the last of the country's largest cities with a public rail line before it opened in December, becoming the latest Western city to try to flout urban sprawl and car culture and get people on public transportation. The 20-mile, $1.4 billion startup line runs from north-central Phoenix through downtown and then east through suburban Tempe and Mesa. More than 30 more miles are planned to open in Phoenix, Tempe, Mesa and Glendale by 2025. Heat is more than a matter of comfort in the Phoenix area. It kills more people than earthquakes, floods, hurricanes and tornadoes combined in the U.S., according to the Centers for Disease Control. Dozens of mostly homeless and elderly people die in the Phoenix area every year, and hundreds more experience heat-related illnesses that can cause a rapid heart beat, throbbing headache, dizziness, nausea, confusion and unconsciousness. |
|
|
|
|
|
#287 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Washington, D.C.
Posts: 40
Likes (Received): 0
|
Here's a video about the Light Rail in Phoenix
http://www.theworldedition.com/video...light-rail.php |
|
|
|
|
|
#288 |
|
BANNED
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Manhattan, New York, USA / Born: Santo Domingo, DR
Posts: 3,288
Likes (Received): 1
|
Many new developments, nice for the city.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#289 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 2
Likes (Received): 0
|
Quote:
Not only that, but now Im understanding that there are hardly any places to "use the bathroom" along the routes and at most of the stations. Look at Dtwn. Sacramento Ca. That place is saturated with shade trees. However the climate is much cooler there. But in Dtwn. Phoenix there are little to none in terms of shade trees and very hot. WHATS WRONG WITH THIS PICTURE! ![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#290 | ||
|
Sara je vo(Sarah is bull)
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Scottsdale, AZ - USA - Sarajevo - BiH
Posts: 1,116
Likes (Received): 0
|
Quote:
__________________
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#291 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 67
Likes (Received): 0
|
take more picture of phoenix at night and beautiful sunset.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#292 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 67
Likes (Received): 0
|
Our city need to work on our pollution and smoggy. Its really bad over here.
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Maybe it was smoke from Los Angeles' fire? lol Here are some nice pictures ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Note the lack of older buildings in this relatively new city ![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
#293 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 12
Likes (Received): 0
|
Quote:
I do have to agree with Krasna in that PHX (really, the metro area as a whole) did not plan for the level of growth the Valley would sustain over the next decade or more. Being a person from a larger city (Chicago), I do realize that PHX is still growing and developing. However, one thing I can agree with is that the transportation infrastructure is still developing. Although the light rail is a step in the right direction, my personal thought is that the Valley does need a regional rail system akin to Metra in Chicago. The costs of expanding the light rail could be used to develop a regional rail system and, like Metra, they could work with UPRR to share track lanes/space to serve outlying communities such as Buckeye and Queen Creek. As for the development of taller buildings in downtown Phoenix, I am thinking that taller buildings could really not be developed in PHX due to the multitude of flight lanes to Sky Harbor which would mean that it would not only take local, county, and state, but also FAA approval. When you think about it, cities such as Chicago have no fly zones for their downtown (Daley's rationale for that was more security related than anything else). Planes go through downtown PHX with regularity due to the proximity of Sky Harbor to downtown. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#294 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Vancouver, Tdot
Posts: 747
|
Phoenix was hot when I was there last summer, 115. But sometimes I miss the heat.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#295 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 2
Likes (Received): 0
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#296 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: City by the Bay
Posts: 71
Likes (Received): 0
|
Does Phoenix have any height restrictions on there downtown buildings because of it's proximity to the airport?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#297 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 2
Likes (Received): 0
|
Height Restrictions
As far as I know Phoenix has no formal height restrictions but each proposed tower is subject to review by the FAA.
In my opinion Phoenix doesn't need to concentrate its towers in the flight path burdened Downtown area, the "Uptown" area along Central Ave theoretically should allow unlimited tower height. The Downtown was robbed of its character in the 70's and tall buildings won't necessarily save it. Also I think that Phoenix shouldn't have to force its vertical growth in one spot, especially in a city so poised to capitalize off of mountain views.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#298 |
|
BANNED
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 305
Likes (Received): 1
|
Cool
Last edited by Drecun; June 26th, 2010 at 09:07 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#299 |
|
BANNED
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 305
Likes (Received): 1
|
Cool
|
|
|
|
|
|
#300 | |
|
Whiskey Tango Foxtrot
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: ELP ~ ABQ
Posts: 29,651
Likes (Received): 1375
|
Quote:
Plan seeks to protect Sky Harbor flights Ginger D. Richardson The Arizona Republic Phoenix is changing the rules that govern how tall downtown buildings can be in an effort to better protect flights into and out of Sky Harbor International Airport. The proposed changes, which are still under discussion, could actually allow taller high-rises in some areas of the city's core while reducing height in others. But it's likely that in most areas, the height of structures will be capped at 40 stories, roughly the height of Bank One Center, downtown's tallest building. "That really is our controlling factor," Aviation Director David Krietor said. "We don't want to build anything that would make it worse." advertisement The situation poses a unique problem for Phoenix because it marks the first time that two of the city's top priorities have collided. Sky Harbor, a massive economic development engine, has always enjoyed a privileged position in which its desires came first. But in recent months, Mayor Phil Gordon and the City Council have put billions of public dollars into downtown redevelopment projects in hopes of revitalizing the city's core with hundreds, if not thousands, of full-time residents. In many ways the effort appears to be working, and that's the problem. Interest in downtown living has skyrocketed, with many developers proposing residential condominiums up to 50 stories high. All the talk is making the airport nervous. "All around Sky Harbor is of concern to the Federal Aviation Administration and should be of concern to the city of Phoenix," said Jane Morris, special projects administrator for the Aviation Department. "Our role at the airport is to look at all of the factors that affect us." Most of downtown is not in Sky Harbor's flight path. Instead, the concern stems from the fact that some of the proposed developments, if built, could force the FAA and the airlines to change emergency takeoff and landing procedures. Those procedures are a complicated set of rules and technical guidelines, but the basics are this: On the rare occasion that one of an airplane's engines would fail, there are mandatory actions a pilot must take to land the aircraft safely. The actions could involve deviating from standard flight paths and are further complicated by such factors as ground and air temperature, aircraft weight and rate of ascent. An increase in the number of tall buildings around the airport would make it more difficult to get airplanes to the ground safely in emergencies. The FAA, which works with the airlines to set the procedures, cannot control whether a high-rise is built, but it will make a ruling on whether the building poses a potential hazard. Such was the situation several years ago when a plan to build the Arizona Cardinals football stadium in Tempe was scuttled because of its height and proximity to the airport. In most cases, when the FAA rules that a proposed structure poses a risk, cities don't build it. But if a city opts to move forward, the FAA moves in and changes the flight procedures. "We have to do what is right for the traveling public," said Donn Walker, the FAA's regional spokesman. That can result in mandates that planes carry less weight in the form of fuel, passengers and cargo, which, in turn, reduces the capacity of the airport. And that's the one thing Sky Harbor, which is among the nation's busiest airports, doesn't want. "If there were, theoretically, a lot of high obstacles nearby, we would have to reduce the weight of our airplanes in hot weather," said Carlo Bertolini, a spokesman for America West Airlines. "We'd reduce fuel (and) cargo first, and try to do passengers last. But it would affect our operations." The current height rules have been in place since 1971 and are severely outdated, officials said. They allow buildings to range from 250 to 500 feet in the downtown area, with taller structures allowed along Central Avenue, if first accepted by the airport, city Planning Director David Richert said. nd although aviation officials have not worked out exactly what the new regulations will be, they do say that they don't anticipate allowing structures in Copper Square to be taller than about 500 feet, the approximate height of the Bank One Center. The building is the state's tallest. In some areas of the core, like the Warehouse District, buildings will not be allowed higher than about 22 stories, the approximate height of the Bank One Ballpark and the yet-to-be built Summit at Copper Square condominium project. That area, ironically, also has a special zoning overlay that is more restrictive than the airport's proposed rules. Those rules state that any building within the district, generally defined as the area south of Madison Street, from Seventh Street to Seventh Avenue, cannot exceed 56 feet, or 80 feet with a use permit. To build a taller structure, a developer needs special variance approval from the Board of Adjustment. Gordon and others at City Hall are convinced that the proposed changes won't affect the momentum they are trying to create in downtown, even though the regulations appear to have helped scuttle at least one development plan in the downtown area: a proposed 50-story condominium tower on the site of the old Ramada Inn-Downtown. "They can and they will co-exist," Gordon said. "There's this theory that says, to be a great city, you have to have great downtown skylines. And while I agree that downtown should have the highest buildings in the city, not every building will be, or needs to be, a skyscraper." From the AZ Republic: http://www.azcentral.com/arizonarepu...xheight12.html |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Tags |
| phoenix |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|