daily menu » rate the banner | guess the city | one on one

Go Back   SkyscraperCity > Continental Forums > OZScrapers > Urban Spaces > Skyscraper News & Discussion


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old March 31st, 2006, 05:47 AM   #1
laxor
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 186
Likes (Received): 0

What were people smoking in the 60's & 70's?

The amount of beutiful buildings that were destoryed during this period in Melbourne, Sydney etc is criminal. By the same token every building that was built during this period is ugly!
laxor no está en línea   Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
 
Old March 31st, 2006, 06:11 AM   #2
Amaruu
BANNED
 
Amaruu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 481
Likes (Received): 0

I guess they didnt have the benefit of hindsight that we have now.

Melbourne didnt demolish all of its buildings back then. The city still has some grand old buildings which blends in well with the newer stuff.
Amaruu no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old March 31st, 2006, 06:21 AM   #3
Blindfold
I said love, I said pet
 
Blindfold's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Perthonality & Brixtonite
Posts: 1,300
Likes (Received): 3

Tell us about it!

Its one of those periods that makes today's architects, planners and the general public cringe.

Perth also lost a shocking amount of beautiful architecture in this period. The CBD's office core is almost devoid of anything older than 1960. The loss of Perth's CML Building in the 70's (which was architecturally similar to those around Australia and Perth's first skyscraper, is a travesty). It was obviously much more viable to demolish and rebuild higher during this period. A lot of older buildings were just unsuitale for changing office needs.

Thankfully Perth's retail precinct has much more heritage but still a lot was lost.

The very same can be said of the UK which has some of the worst 60's/70's planning and architectural distasters imaginable. Thankfully they are slowly being corrected. These include the clearance of whole neighbourhoods either due to WW2 bomb damage or slum clearance and the construction of cheap high-rise, high-density housing. These developments were both unsightly and disasterous on a social level and are now being pulled down. London's Elaphant & Castle is a perfect example. In fact nearly all British cities have examples somewhere. Slum clearance/bomb damage and the resulting high-rise tower blocks were a national phenomenom. Hello Glasgow and Birmingham!

The City of London (financial core) and most of the East End was devasted during WW2 and lost much of its heritage to be rebuilt in the 60's/70's with monstrosties.

I could go on about this forever but i'm sure there are some more knowledgable people on these forums who can go on and on about this topic......
__________________
This world spins, but not for YOU!
Blindfold no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old March 31st, 2006, 06:30 AM   #4
Wilko
Aussie Aussie Aussie
 
Wilko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 888
Likes (Received): 2

I call them 'Horror Blocks'
__________________
MELBOURNE
Essendon Football Club BOMBERS FOREVER
Wilko no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old March 31st, 2006, 06:45 AM   #5
christarrant
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,084
Likes (Received): 0

Makes me wanna puke.
I assume that every American and Aust city did similar stuff in the 60's and 70's, to varying degrees ???
Paris looks like a city where the inner ring is wonderfully preserved ( I know that the outer burbs are pretty average). Wonder what they did differently to Oz ?
I think Sydney lost the most stuff.

Last edited by christarrant; March 31st, 2006 at 06:53 AM.
christarrant no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old March 31st, 2006, 06:46 AM   #6
crawf
©
 
crawf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 5,127
Likes (Received): 19

Quote:
Originally Posted by laxor
The amount of beutiful buildings that were destoryed during this period in Melbourne, Sydney etc is criminal. By the same token every building that was built during this period is ugly!

I tottaly agree, Adelaide has lost some its grandest buildings to ugly things

tho not all of Adelaides grandest buildings have been lost - thankgod
__________________
The Australia Guide
crawf no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old March 31st, 2006, 06:58 AM   #7
Blindfold
I said love, I said pet
 
Blindfold's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Perthonality & Brixtonite
Posts: 1,300
Likes (Received): 3

Quote:
Originally Posted by christarrant
Paris looks like a city where the inner ring is wonderfully preserved ( I know that the outer burbs are pretty average).
Paris was occupied by the Germans and wasn't bombed to f*ck like London in WW2 plus Hitler wanted Paris as the capital of his empire. However, don't know what thet did that was so different to Australia to retain so much of their rich history in the centre.
__________________
This world spins, but not for YOU!
Blindfold no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old March 31st, 2006, 07:13 AM   #8
zulu69
selling my body since 88'
 
zulu69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Sydney
Posts: 2,147
Likes (Received): 1

Yeah i hate most of the stuff during this era. It really doesn't age well either to make matters worst. The only good to come out of it is to preserve our heritage even more now.
__________________
Sydney: Australia's NYC.
Form is Temporary. Class is permanent.
YNWA.
zulu69 no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old March 31st, 2006, 10:08 AM   #9
JayT
Like whatever....
 
JayT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Brisbane/Gold Coast Queensland Australia
Posts: 7,974
Likes (Received): 85

Quote:
Originally Posted by laxor
The amount of beutiful buildings that were destoryed during this period in Melbourne, Sydney etc is criminal. By the same token every building that was built during this period is ugly!
It was called progress - the war had ended and a brave new world of consumerism had dawned. People looked forward to the future - and lived under a cloud of possible nuclear holocaust at any time.

Have a look around at the architecture happening right now - there are similar things happening now that were happening in the 50s and 60s.
__________________
My Current Favorite Cities & Regions: SINGAPORE, Iskandar (Malaysia), Macau/Zhuhai (China), Curitiba (BR), Blumenau (BR), San Francisco (USA)
JayT no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old March 31st, 2006, 10:28 AM   #10
KJBrissy
...........
 
KJBrissy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 9,361
Likes (Received): 138

It makes me sick every time I think about the georgous pub that got pulled down to build the Hilton in Brisbane. What I think is wierd about a lot of this, is the amount of undeveloped land that wasn't touched, yet they rip down a heap of buildings for their ugly highrises. Thank God we're now building taller to hide them all!!!
__________________
"Traditionally what has hurt people has not been rising interest rates but rising unemployment. I don't care what rate you're paying, if you have a mortgage five times your income and you lose your job, you're toast."

Gerard Minack, chief economist at Morgan Stanley.
KJBrissy no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old March 31st, 2006, 11:47 AM   #11
Anton
Life's A Beach
 
Anton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Coruscant
Posts: 1,107
Likes (Received): 0

Quote:
Originally Posted by laxor
The amount of beutiful buildings that were destoryed during this period in Melbourne, Sydney etc is criminal. By the same token every building that was built during this period is ugly!

I agree too many glorious buildings were lost. But i can't agree that all that were built in that period were bad. There were some stunners. Australia Square, 140 William, Reserve Bank Building, AMP Centre. ICI. These are slowly becoming respected nowadays.

Also, we It's funny how we relate to architecture and the fashion of the time. Ie, when it is new most stuff looks at least OK (even if it is crap), then when it is 50 years old EVERYTHING looks beautiful even if it was crap at the time. the in between time, the architecture is derided - like now, anything built in the 60's and 70's is considered shit. Back in the 80's, anything in the 50's to 60's was considered shit. Back in the 1960's, anything pre-war was considered terrible - yet ALL new buildings then were considered great.

When i was a kid, anything Art Deco was considered garbage. now it's all the rage - even shit art deco. When my Dad was a kid, Federation was considered crap, but it's been "in" for at least 20years now.

The point being, everything new looks at least OK and we always see everything very odl through rose coloured glasses - not everything that is old was or is good.

SYdney's GPO (today)
__________________
I wanted spirit, but I found alcohol
I wanted soul, but i bought myself some style
I wanted to meet God, but I got religion.
Anton no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old March 31st, 2006, 11:54 AM   #12
James Saito
Registered User
 
James Saito's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Sydney
Posts: 1,091
Likes (Received): 0

Does it mean Q1 will be considered as an ugly building in 20 years time?
James Saito no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old March 31st, 2006, 12:09 PM   #13
Anton
Life's A Beach
 
Anton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Coruscant
Posts: 1,107
Likes (Received): 0

Quote:
Originally Posted by James Saito
Does it mean Q1 will be considered as an ugly building in 20 years time?
nah - 5 years.

Seriously though, some arcitecture lasts, but most dates - until its reaches the magical 60 years and then it's all good. lol
__________________
I wanted spirit, but I found alcohol
I wanted soul, but i bought myself some style
I wanted to meet God, but I got religion.
Anton no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old March 31st, 2006, 12:21 PM   #14
christarrant
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,084
Likes (Received): 0

In 10-20 years time we will be talking about the following precincts and wondering WTF happened to taste and style !!!! >>
1- Docklands apartment towers ( apart from a couple of them )
2- anything white or beige in the southern Syd CBD + inner south
3- anything near Storey Bridge in Bris CBD
Infact they were already redundant peices of crap even before they were designed.....

Last edited by christarrant; March 31st, 2006 at 12:38 PM.
christarrant no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old March 31st, 2006, 12:23 PM   #15
KJBrissy
...........
 
KJBrissy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 9,361
Likes (Received): 138

Too scared to say Admirality???

I reckon Devine will have a lot to answer for, especially in Brisbane!
__________________
"Traditionally what has hurt people has not been rising interest rates but rising unemployment. I don't care what rate you're paying, if you have a mortgage five times your income and you lose your job, you're toast."

Gerard Minack, chief economist at Morgan Stanley.
KJBrissy no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old March 31st, 2006, 01:13 PM   #16
CULWULLA
Registered User
 
CULWULLA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 46,864
Likes (Received): 32

We have had many threads on "lost treasures".
One of the reasons many 1880's boom scrapers of melbournes gold rush period were demolished in 1960's and 70s was beacuse most had quite small floor plates and were virtually useless with the new wave of giant office towers coming through. Companys like CML wanted new premises and this ment demolshment of the 1896 blgd and erection of a new larger 20storey block. Some were saved like Stock exchange,Olderfleet,Stalbridge chambers,safe deposit,lombard bldg,national mutual ect.
sadly great skyscrapers like-APA,Finks,Fed coffee palace,all the 4prell buildings,Oxford chambers and many more were razed from existance.

federal Coffee palace


Colonial Mutual Life (Originally Equitable life assurance of USA) of 1896
probably Australia;s greatest pre 1900 skyscraper?



just look at its grand entrance>

how could anyone put a jack hammer to this?




its replacement
V



Most were replace with worthless substitutes.In the 60;s and 70;s office bldgs were in the infancy and flat top boxes were the most modern design.
And that was just in melbourne. sydney had many great bldgs demolished for an inferior design.

sydney's first "skyscraper" was the 7storey/31m Mutual Life Bldg of 1889. The magnificent bldg stood for 70 years cnr george/wynyard sts and was replaced with a 60's box.
sorry for small pic'



T&G was Sydney's tallest in 1930 but that wasnt enough to save it from another 70;s box


another grand skyscraper from 1919 UNION HOUSE was pulled down to make way for the giant towers of QANTAS & NAB in 70's.




thank god bldgs like AWA TOWER were saved from demolishers.

__________________
Sydney Harbour Bridge -1932, Sydney Opera House- 1973, Sydney Tower- 1981, Crown Hotel- 2015..
CULWULLA no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old March 31st, 2006, 02:02 PM   #17
Randwicked
Яandwicked
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Austfailia
Posts: 689
Likes (Received): 0

They were smoking concrete, duh.
__________________
Coming soon to TV: High Performance Vehicles : Low Performance Drivers
Randwicked no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old March 31st, 2006, 02:14 PM   #18
Avatar
Galactic Ruler
 
Avatar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Sydney
Posts: 5,631
Likes (Received): 58

Quote:
Originally Posted by James Saito
Does it mean Q1 will be considered as an ugly building in 20 years time?
LOL it depends who you ask. Maybe it's already ugly
__________________
$5 fun time.
Avatar no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old April 1st, 2006, 07:02 PM   #19
crawf
©
 
crawf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 5,127
Likes (Received): 19

Quote:
Originally Posted by CULWULLA
.

federal Coffee palace
OMG, how could they let this glorious building be demolished :O, tho this is just one of many elegant buildings demolished in the 60s,70s,80s in our major capital cities
__________________
The Australia Guide
crawf no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old April 1st, 2006, 08:06 PM   #20
Adam from Oz
Registered User
 
Adam from Oz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 560
Likes (Received): 1

imagine that as a restored, very exclusive set of apartments.

DROOLS!

cul, which city did the most destruction?

Cheers,

Adam
__________________
Sydney and Melbourne
Adam from Oz no está en línea   Reply With Quote


Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT +2. The time now is 01:56 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Feedback Buttons provided by Advanced Post Thanks / Like v3.1.2 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2013 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2013 DragonByte Technologies Ltd. (Resources saved on this page: MySQL 23.08%)

SkyscraperCity - In Urbanity We Trust

Hosted by Blacksun, dedicated to this site too!
Forum server management by DaiTengu