|
|
| daily menu » rate the banner | guess the city | one on one |
|
|||||||
| Transport, Urban Planning and Infrastructure Shaping space, urbanity and mobility |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 947
Likes (Received): 0
|
NET Phase Two
I think this post deserves it's own thread. Hopefully this thread stays existent until we get the long awaited speech from Darling on NET Phase Two.
Quote:
so "within months" would be February (gone), March (gone!), April, May... I can't wait for the decision on the Tram extensions! There's no way he could withdraw funding from phase two. Last edited by Insignia; April 26th, 2006 at 06:16 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 947
Likes (Received): 0
|
for those who don't know...
NET Phase Two is the collective term for the project to build extensions to Line One of Nottingham Express Transit (NET). The Project is managed jointly by the promoters of NET - Nottingham City Council and Nottingham County Council. The extensions are Line 2 to Chilwell and Line 3 to Clifton. The route lengths of Line 1, Nottingham is 14Km. Line 2 will be 10 Km and Line 3 will be 8 Km. The total length is 32 km. The number of NET Stops will be 24 (Line One) and 28 for (Lines 2 & 3)
Last edited by Insignia; April 26th, 2006 at 06:14 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 6,738
Likes (Received): 0
|
It's kind of been mentioned on here before - Phase 4 for NET has been 'released'...
See http://www.nettrams.net/ (a VERY reliable source of info on NET). |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 6,738
Likes (Received): 0
|
Having said that - it is 1st April - so don't take too much notice of it - not yet anyway.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 947
Likes (Received): 0
|
I noticed they were digging under the Bridge which Line 1 Runs on from Station Street just this morning walking from the Station.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 6,738
Likes (Received): 0
|
It won't have anything to do with future plans.
Since phase 2 (lines 2 and 3) haven't ben funded yet, and I don't think Nottingham is going down the Manchester route of starting construction without funding, I'd imagine it may simply be people investigating if it's possible to use the tunnel in the future. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 947
Likes (Received): 0
|
......
Last edited by Insignia; April 26th, 2006 at 06:14 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Prepare to die.
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Wakefield, Little Satan
Posts: 21,068
Likes (Received): 218
|
Exactly - the tunnel is already full of heating pipes and all sorts of other service gubbins, and the Victoria Station area has been taken up by the Victoria Centre car park.
As much as I'd love to see a new route through the tunnel, giving the Vicky Centre its own underground station, I can't see it ever happening...
__________________
This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine. Last edited by CharlieP; October 25th, 2006 at 07:26 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 947
Likes (Received): 0
|
well eventually NET will expand to become a more complex network. And eventually NET will also operate a Subway system in Nottingham. They will operate NET commuter Trains too.
Last edited by Insignia; April 26th, 2006 at 06:09 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 6,738
Likes (Received): 0
|
Looks like a (positive) decision is very very close.
Locals are in very positive mood, and the 'decision' has now gone from the DfT to the Treasury. |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Nottingham
Posts: 687
Likes (Received): 1
|
That sound likes excellent news Metrolink. What is your source for that?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 6,738
Likes (Received): 0
|
Local councillors and an MP from the region.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
ball bag
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: crime
Posts: 1,908
Likes (Received): 5
|
needs to happen really
__________________
Shhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 6,738
Likes (Received): 0
|
Very good news.
Positive announcement expected in Parliment tomorrow at 9:30am. Radio Nottingham will be devoting tomorrow to tram day (available on the www). Interviews starting about 7:30am apparently. |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 6,738
Likes (Received): 0
|
from the local MP...
Nick wrote: 1. Tram decision at last ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ After inordinate delay, we finally have a decision on government funding for the Beeston/Chilwell tram extension (and the other extension into Rushcliffe), and the decision is yes. This means that: - If the scheme goes ahead, the Government is willing to pay 75% of the cost. The remainder will be covered by the City Council, private investors and a one-off County contribution. From the purely financial perspective, this is good news: it means that in our area we will get a new public transport scheme which is over 90% financed by other people. - The next stages are as I understand it these: a) The City and County Councils vote to confirm that they still want to do it. They need to do this twice with a six-week gap, to ensure that the decision is not taken in haste. It is, however, a formality: the Labour majority on both councils were elected on a platform of supporting the tram; the Conservatives, who opposed it, are now pro- tram at a national level (it's not yet clear whether local Conservative councillors will agree). b) The Secretary of State decides whether to hold a Public Inquiry. I shall strongly urge him to do so - I don't think the issue can possibly be described as so uncontroversial that it should simply sail through without discussion. c) Negotiations can be completed between the councils and people and businesses who would be adversely affected, and compensation paid where agreement is reached. d) The inquiry, with an independent Inspector, will run through 2007. Anyone in the area can submit views for or against. e) The inspector will report in, probably, early 2008. If he approves the proposal, perhaps with modifications, contracts can be issued. If he rejects it, the scheme fails, though in theory the councils could start again with a new application taking into account his reasons. f) Construction will take around 3 years, with each stretch of the route from the City to Bardills having probably two three-month periods of disruption (the first to clear utility cables, the second to lay tracks etc. g) The best guess for actual routine operation is 2012. For balance, these are the arguments against. First, it's a substantial subsidy from taxpayers nationally: like trains, trams do not break even without subsidy. Second, it will mean displacing one retirement home (Neville Sadler Court) and potentially noise issues for several others. Finally, disruption in remodelling the high road in Chilwell (which will be widened in parts) will be substantial, and some business and homes (e.g. Gwenbrook Avenue) will be seriously affected. My position has always been a bit more mixed than many colleagues, since I have to represent constituents who will be adversely affected by the route, and I will be submitting a range of objections to ensure that their concerns are fully heard at the public inquiry. I was, however, in favour of the Government agreeing funding. We have to be serious about public transport if we aren't to be total hypocrites when we worry about climate change and pollution. The tram in Nottingham is probably the most successful public transport project in Britain since the London Tube: it came in almost on time, and it is running with more passengers than expected and a handsome surplus on operating costs. It would in my view be eccentric to leave it at a single line instead of building on success with an integrated network, and disastrous for our area if we were the only part left out. Eventually I hope to see Stapleford and Kimberley connected as well (and in the short term I'm working to get a shuttle bus from Kimberley to the Phoenix Park terminal). |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 6,738
Likes (Received): 0
|
never say I don't give you the information on here first.
Anyway, now official... http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/n...re/6082026.stm Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Nottingham
Posts: 687
Likes (Received): 1
|
Well done Metrolink for getting the "exclusive"
![]() I know Im biased but the people at NET really seem to know what they're doing. Line 1 works brilliantly well and the future plans for the NETwork will take things to a whole new level - it really will be the best and most integrated public transport system outside of London. |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 6,738
Likes (Received): 0
|
from the DfT...
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Slough
Posts: 2,790
Likes (Received): 52
|
I wonder if relatively quick decision reflects the fact the fact that old Mr Indecision, Mr Darling is no longer transport secretary.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 6,738
Likes (Received): 0
|
Relatively quick decision???????
They've been waiting well over two years for a decision - the government have had all the information they needed for expansion since just after line 1 opened. This is anything but a quick decision. It's also going to be 6 years until they actually see trams running (similar, but not quite as bad in Manchester). We have SO MUCH red tape and obstacles in the way of projects in this country. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|