|
|
| daily menu » rate the banner | guess the city | one on one |
|
|
#7841 | |
|
Aviation Enthusiast
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Mumbai
Posts: 500
Likes (Received): 41
|
Here is some interesting Info on the ATC Tower:
Paint chosen for new ATC tower to last 15 yrs: Experts Quote:
, especially on the BIG Glass panels and the Lighting.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7842 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 5,235
Likes (Received): 1730
|
OT, the creature which inspired the CSIA logo,one of them actually resides in the city, in JVPD
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7843 |
|
Notorious
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Bombay
Posts: 270
Likes (Received): 6
|
![]() Woh...I thought u couldn't keep the national bird as a pet! Cognizable Offence. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7844 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,726
Likes (Received): 16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7845 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Mumbai / London
Posts: 939
Likes (Received): 56
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7846 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,726
Likes (Received): 16
|
We already know that the PRT car shown in the image is at Terminal 5, Heathrow. It works, and BAA are taking it seriously enough to have a Head of PRT, so you never know.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7847 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 2,051
Likes (Received): 0
|
Those pods look like something out of Logan's Run.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7848 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 8,468
|
Quote:
__________________
Infrastructure Geek :) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7849 |
|
Aviation Enthusiast
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Mumbai
Posts: 500
Likes (Received): 41
|
While the Pod Car system might work well, the first priority should be to relocate Slums, and clear the Airport periphery, enabling a FULL SE Pier, increased capacity and somewhat lesser Security Risk. Afterwards, integration with Metro III should be the priority. Followed by extension of Metro III to join suburban Central Rail line at Kanjurmarg or Vikhroli. I'm sure GVK knows what DIAL is going through now, and it better analyze the pros and cons!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7850 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Mumbai / London
Posts: 939
Likes (Received): 56
|
+ 11111
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7851 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 347
Likes (Received): 8
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7852 |
|
Bangged
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Aurangabad/Mumbai
Posts: 932
Likes (Received): 56
|
connect pods to eastern suburbs and extend SEAR to Vikhroli it will give huge boost to development in eastern bombay
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7853 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,726
Likes (Received): 16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7854 | |
|
indiadreams
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Mumbai
Posts: 2,281
Likes (Received): 115
|
Quote:
But, what helped GVK was a stepwise execution so that it checks the profitability at each stage (however it is not great for the city). Though the terminal is not yet ready,a significant proportion of redevlopment cost is already capitalised (T1 and T2 renovations, T1C construction, airside developments and little bit of city side infrastructure). MIAls' revenues grew at a healthy rate of around 10-15%, almost same as the other 3 PPP metro airports although the traffic growth is constrained due to capacity issues. MIAL's revenue increased 11% in 2011-12, though traffic grew around 7-8. This is inspite of the fact that MIAL is yet to realise full scale revenues from city side development and non-aeronautical revnues in the new terminal. http://www.gvk.com/files/pressreleas...6a2e6e154b.pdf DIAL's revneus is available in the economic assessment report posted in DIAL thread and both DIAL and MIAL have reveneus in the same range for the last 2-3years. I believe, GVK is taking congnizance of the situation in other PPP airports. At the same time, it has the comfort of step wise execution, which gives it decent return atleast until now and is expected to continue so in the near future given the premium traffic it handles. Last edited by Indiadreams; August 9th, 2012 at 09:18 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7855 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 121
Likes (Received): 1
|
are most of the members here in ssc in civil engineering or architectural designing??? just asking........
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7856 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 172
Likes (Received): 12
|
Quote:
Me second to the same thought... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7857 | |
|
Aviation Enthusiast
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Mumbai
Posts: 500
Likes (Received): 41
|
Quote:
And regarding the Capacity constraints, I highly doubt how come they have arrived at the standard 32 - 36 Aircraft Activity per hour mark and subsequent CAP on slots! The number could be valid on certain days (weekends) and certain Peak hours (0500 - 0900 & 1700 to 2200). But otherwise, during various spot sessions, I have seen the Runway unused for as long as 20 minutes at varied times of the day. I hope its not capacity denied, as against Capacity asked for and possible to handle. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7858 | |
|
Aviation Enthusiast
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Mumbai
Posts: 500
Likes (Received): 41
|
Quote:
Conversely, if the line were to terminate at CSIA International Airport itself (and not go onwards to MIDC/Chakala), Pax from South Mumbai would definitely use it, but the burden might increase on the Metro Operators, and the Metro itself would not serve the entire purpose. Similar might be the case if a whole and sole line is constructed from Vikroli (say) to the Airport Terminals. While Option 1 is somewhat dependent on Crowds in Line III, given the larger benefits of Option 1, Metro Lines should be preferred to bring Flyers as close as possible to the Airport Area, after which Pods/Sky Trains could fill in the 'last-few hundred metres' gaps! And I think this is Mantra world over. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7859 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 172
Likes (Received): 0
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7860 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Mumbai / London
Posts: 939
Likes (Received): 56
|
Quote:
but below is my query... @T5 image ![]() If you see the pod car line (blue colour) is elevated but the road are at the ground level... only when its about the enter the terminal it goes below the ram... but this ram was designed keeping pod car line in the planning.... but in T2 mumbai ![]() if you see that only the green line drawn are the roads without any other elevated bridge i.e. SEAR or Metro.... and the red (metro) & blue (SEAR) where there is no option to get the pod cars elevated..... and to add they have not plan for this initially and most of the construction for elevated road are done.... so any change is not possible i guess isn't it... So how are they going to do this... go over the current elevated road or under and will that be a good option to do.... and where will it connect to... like at heathrow they connect to car park... there isn't any such point near T2 Mumbai... lets see if we can get the presentation which they made to MIAL..... |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Tags |
| bom, csia, mumbai, mumbai airport |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|