|
|
| daily menu » rate the banner | guess the city | one on one |
|
|||||||
| Miami ģ Development News | Also includes Broward and Palm Beach Counties |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#61 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 378
Likes (Received): 27
|
lets ruin one of miami's most valuable assets (its beach) by building a train on it...nice.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#62 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: miami
Posts: 1,650
Likes (Received): 7
|
^ exactly. The beach may have plenty of space, but I doubt you'll find more than 5 people who want elevated stations there. Most of the plan I like, it just needs to be tweaked. The stations have to be bulky because of elevator shafts, escalators, platforms, gates etc. Not that it couldn't be done gracefully, but when has that ever been a part of Miami planning?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#63 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Miami
Posts: 96
Likes (Received): 0
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#64 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Miami
Posts: 1,104
Likes (Received): 3
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#65 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Boca Raton/Boston
Posts: 1,032
Likes (Received): 3
|
I don't mean to take sides BornInTheGrove, but I'm gonna have to agree with Verticus on this one. If you take a good look at those columns for the monorail line, they ain't that bulky; at least they're not as bulky as some of the skyscrapers you'll find up and down Collins Avenue. Afterall, it's not like Verticus is saying build the monorail through Haulover Beach Park or tear through Star Island (ha, I'd love to see that though). If you take another look at those columns along the beach, I think they would be great posts for freshwater showers, making it a dual purpose post for beachgoers to rinse off after hopping into the ocean and sand. And if several of those beachgoers are in fact residents who live out west (say Doral or Kendall) and know how big of a pain it is to drive between the two destinations, they'd probably love a monorail that takes them to all their favorite spots in Miami Beach! Think about it: Pearl, News Cafe, Lincoln Rd., the Convention Center -- all a 5-10 minute monorail ride from Downtown Miami. And if the monorail station links to Metrorail, the accesibility is pushed even further! MIA, U.Miami, Jackson Memorial, Dadeland, etc. If Miami and Miami Beach are developing high into the air to become leading meccas for the 21st century, then perhaps their transportation options should look higher into the air for accessibility. Props to Verticus; I love your idea and say you should take it to State Govt. for their opinion.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#66 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: MIAMI
Posts: 3,260
Likes (Received): 0
|
Quote:
, I second that my Friend Maybe 2020 , it might break ground, and be completed by 2025 '26 ?, '27 ?, '28 ?, '29, '30 !!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#67 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,026
Likes (Received): 0
|
You gotta say, the view from the monorail would be FANTASTIC, it would be a tourist attraction in and of itself. And I think it would be wild to have those whizzing by every few minutes. I remember when I was little I thought those were the coolest things on earth, especially as they would pierce the skin of the Contemporary resort Hotel and then disappear inside the building.
__________________
Arch Photographer |
|
|
|
|
|
#68 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Miami and Boston
Posts: 4,726
Likes (Received): 21
|
http://www.miamitodaynews.com/news/060824/fyi.shtml
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#69 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Miami
Posts: 1,104
Likes (Received): 3
|
This makes a lot more sense.
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#70 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 40
Likes (Received): 0
|
Sounds good to me, I really hope it happens but if there is a conflict with the City of Sweetwater then maybe we should look at an option of making the east-west link till NW 107 Ave Station. Then make a BRT or LRT down 107 Ave. Instead of the Kendall link having a Metrorail line go down 117 Ave., I think we should make a BRT or LRT which could be done with local funds and in a short amount of time. We maybe able to have a BRT or LRT line going down Kendall and another going down 107 Ave. before the feds even accept the east-west corridor. Then again, having FIU at the end of a metro rail line is more or less what the feds are looking for. I will be attending the meeting also.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#71 |
|
Pull My Finger
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Miami
Posts: 24
Likes (Received): 0
|
I have a class at 8:00 PM that day so hopefully I can make it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#72 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 40
Likes (Received): 0
|
Here's an update on the situation of the new 107 Ave. option for the East-West Metrorail Corridor. The meeting, which was held on Wednesday the twentieth of September, had a good showing. There was such a good showing that the meeting was moved from the average sized FIU Ballroom to Graham Centers auditorium. The crowd was about evenly split, it was comical to see how split the crowd was. One side of the room was the vocal FIU crowd included Student Union reps, Teacher Union reps, Alumni and regular students from the FIU community. On the other side was the more aged crowd with Sweetwater residents, business men and 5 Sweetwater representatives including the mayor and vice mayor.
The meeting started with the HNTB project manager explaining the project . It got interesting when it came up to the part of the N.W. 107 Ave. alignment. The alignment will consist of moving the NW 107 Ave. station to the current location of the Bill Sidel's Nissan dealership. The track will then curve towards the south down the median of NW 107 Ave. till the FIU Engineering campus, btw the entire segment is elevated. Once the line reaches the Engineering campus the line will shift to the east of NW 107 Ave. onto FIU property in which a station will be made. Now is where the alignment gets tricky, the line will then move down NW 107 Ave. and cross over the NW 107 Ave. and Flagler intersection to the west side of SW 107 Ave. The line will run down the west side of SW 107 Ave, making columns on some parking spaces of businesses located in the vicinity. The tricky part is once it gets closer to SW 8th St. in which the county may have to buy some pieces of land or maybe entire parcels in order to accommodate the columns. Once it reaches SW 8th St. the line will move across the intersection and onto the median of SW 107 Ave. It will move down till SW 16th St. (JOSE CANSECO ST.) where the line will cross onto FIU property and make a station at the Miami-Dade Transit bus station area. With the addition of the 107 Ave. option a new rail yard for the metro rail is being proposed for the open area between NW 12th St. and NW 14th ST on the west side of NW 107 Ave. After the explanation of the new option, the meeting was open for discussion. The FIU side was giving good arguments about how the area can grow to become a nice walk able urban community. Sweetwater's argument was that the Metrorail will split the small city in half and will cause too much noise and bring things into the city they don't want. Sweetwater has an idea of sticking to the Status Quo. Mean while FIU wants to be able to stop having to run a bus from the FIU main campus to the Engineering campus and not have to add another bus to connect their students to the station on 117 Ave. if that option is selected. It only makes sense to make Metrorail stations in places where people can access them in various ways, rather it be by walking, biking, riding the bus or driving by car. If the NW 117 Ave. option is accepted I would not want so see how NW 117th Ave. will look like once the station is built. A station in which people can only access by car or bus. There will be more workshops dedicated towards the new 107 Ave. option. The meeting was just to address the public and get some feedback. Last edited by qbanaso86; September 25th, 2006 at 10:06 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#73 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Miami/Orlando, Florida
Posts: 1,846
Likes (Received): 3
|
"Sweetwater's argument was that the Metrorail will split the small city in half and will cause too much noise and bring things into the city they don't want. "
what will it bring into the city? people? or are they arguing that mass transit users are undesireables? because I've heard that arguement before and it's totally baseless.
__________________
Metro Miami...1000+ highrises completed & under construction. |
|
|
|
|
|
#74 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 40
Likes (Received): 0
|
I'm telling you their argument was that they want a small city setting. Thats contradictory to the annexation they were trying to pass to make there city stretch till NW 25th Street which got turned down by voters for like the 3rd time. Plus, the city is already split by 107 Ave. and Flagler which both split the city more than any Metrorail will ever split it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#75 | |
|
Contents Under Pressure
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: philly/miami
Posts: 6,130
Likes (Received): 27
|
Quote:
This is a "city" founded by stranded Russian circus clowns (you may look it up for verification) and is STILL run by clowns who---in some bizarre alternative universe---actually think anybody on God's Green Earth gives a crap about "anti-Castro" resolutions in lieu of having an intelligent, working government. Give those in the pathway a Golden Parachute to move somewhere better and let Metrorail go where it NEEDS to go to actually be a working system. Yeah, those "undesirables" just can't wait to exit a Metrorail train....walk down the steps...and steal a bunch of ham croquetas under a heat lamp. WE MUST STOP METRORAIL IN SWEETWATER! IT IS A CASTRO PLOT! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#76 |
|
Pull My Finger
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Miami
Posts: 24
Likes (Received): 0
|
^You sound rather bitter just because they say no to a train.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#77 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Miami
Posts: 96
Likes (Received): 0
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#78 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Miami and Boston
Posts: 4,726
Likes (Received): 21
|
Just some population stats to add the debate that "Miami isn't dense as those northern cities and cant support a working public transit system":
Here are the densities of the largest Urbanized Areas in the US (basically metro populations minus the sparse far flung suburbs): http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Largest..._United_States Here are the top 10 largest UA's ranked by density: 1. Los Angeles: 7068.3 2. New York: 5309.3 3. Miami: 4407.4 4. Chicago: 3913.6 5. Washington: 3400.8 6. Detroit: 3094.4 7. Houston: 2951.1 8. Dallas: 2946.4 9. Philadelphia: 2861.4 10. Boston: 2322.6 Miami & LA do not have the lower density suburbs seen in most other US cities. Of course as West Kendall & Fontainebleau show, density does not always equal walkability. |
|
|
|
|
|
#79 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Miami
Posts: 1,104
Likes (Received): 3
|
I always interpreted undesireables as bums and homeless using the 'shelter' of the column and overhead tracks to sleep under... also the potential for these areas to be used by drug dealers and users, because of the resulting darkness created from said overhead tracks and columns.
These are some of these arguements used to do away with the I-395 elevated expressway between the MacArthur and I-95 and replace it with a depressed expressway. (The main arguement for the depression is that I-395 acts as a seperater of Downtown and "Midtown", not to mention it looks unsightful looking north on Biscayne) I'm not agreeing with the folks from Sweetwater, I just understand their arguement, even though its a weak one. The Police exist for a reason. |
|
|
|
|
|
#80 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Miami
Posts: 96
Likes (Received): 0
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|