daily menu » rate the banner | guess the city | one on oneforums map | privacy policy | DMCA | news magazine | posting guidelines

Go Back   SkyscraperCity > World Development News Forums > General Urban Developments > DN Archives



Global Announcement

As a general reminder, please respect others and respect copyrights. Go here to familiarize yourself with our posting policy.


Reply

 
Thread Tools
Old April 25th, 2008, 03:36 AM   #1061
autumnriver
Registered User
 
autumnriver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,740
Likes (Received): 19


Source: www.ce.cn
THIS IS OFFICIAL NEWS.
This reports says:
1. One of these two designs will be chosen as the final. The first, the "dragon" design, is by Gensler, USA; the second, the "spire" design, is by Norman Foster, UK.
2. Both designs are 580m. There will be an observation deck. Floor count will be disclosed later. Advantage of the "dragon" design is that a spire can be added to the top to increase the height.
3. Construction will start this year, if things go well. But it will not be finished before 2010.

"上海中心"确定高度580米 具体层数尚无定论


1.龙型方案由美国GENSLER建筑设计事务所设计 张贤贞图


2.尖顶型方案,由英国福斯特建筑事务所设计 张贤贞图


昨天下午,在上海市十三届人大常委会第三次会议会场的走廊内,一件逼真的建筑模型吸引了来往人大代表们的目光,因为在这件浦东陆家嘴的模型上,有两个现在看不到的建筑:一件呈黄色,像拉长的金子塔;另一件呈白色,像倒置的火炬。

原来,这些模型是上海中心大厦建设发展有限公司负责人专程带到市人大的,目的是听取人大代表对“龙型”和“尖顶型”两个规划方案的意见。

这也是有望刷新“世界第一高楼纪录”的超高层地标建筑——“上海中心”的两个方案的首度曝光,其中将有一个作为“上海中心”的最终建造规划。

相关负责人透露,无论是“龙型”还是“尖顶型”方案胜出,确定设计且通过审批的“上海中心”最快将于年内实现开工。

具体层数尚无定论

根据制定于1993年的《上海陆家嘴中心区规划设计方案》,金茂大厦、环球金融中心所在地以及陆家嘴Z3-2地块,将建设3幢超高层的标志性建筑,形成“品”字形布局。其中,陆家嘴Z3-2地块是“上海中心”所在地,现在该地块原租期已满,土地收回等准备工作也都完成,只待“上海中心”方案确定、择日动工的消息。

2006年上海市政府已经启动全球方案征集计划,当时包括国际著名的美国SOM建筑设计事务所、美国KPF建筑师事务所等都提交了正式的设计方案,国内上海现代建筑设计集团也组织了集团内部的设计单位进行设计。此前美国SOM建筑设计事务所在其官方网站公布设计的方案,其建筑被称为“Shanghai-Center”。但这一方案在项目正式启动之后不久就被否定。

2007年12月15日,上海陆家嘴金融贸易区开发股份有限公司(600663)发布公告称,董事会同意入股上海中心大厦项目45%的股权。条件是以该项目用地约2万平方米作价24亿元入股,并另出现金3000万元,总计24.3亿元。此次入股之后,陆家嘴将联手上海另两家地产巨头———上海城市建设投资开发总公司(占股51%)和上海建工地产集团(占股4%)合作开发。

项目立项之后,由全国知名建筑专家组成的评审团体将在全球征集的19个方案中初步筛选出9个初选方案,此后再从9个方案中选出4个,最终圈定一至两个方案作为最终实施候选方案。如果最终只选定一个方案,则项目方案在4月18日公布,而目前为两个方案,可能会征集公众意见再进行定案。

目前,“上海中心”的项目建议书已获得市发改委批复同意,有关规划设计方案正在论证阶段,具体层数等细节问题尚无定论。

两方案总造价相当

早报记者昨日同时获悉,经过层层专家筛选之后,最后入围“上海中心”项目建筑设计方案的,分别为国际顶尖级建筑大师NormanFoster领导的英国福斯特建筑事务所和美国GENSLER建筑设计事务所的方案。

据悉,拟建的“上海中心”两个设计方案高度都在580米,分别比金茂大厦、环球金融中心高出近160米、88米,以层高5米计算,约相当于多建32层和18层。

早报记者昨天在会议现场看到的黄色模型是龙型方案,由美国设计,从外观上看,有点像一条盘旋上升的龙,“龙尾”在大厦顶部盘旋着上翘。

白色的是尖顶型方案,由英国设计,大厦在交错的钢筋掩映下,犹如一只摩登“竹笋”破土新生。尖顶型呈笋型结构,下部宽阔,由三点支撑,到最高处变成一个尖顶。尖顶型方案外观新颖漂亮,不过,整个建筑只依赖3个支撑点承载,对施工将是个考验。

据相关负责人介绍,两个方案规划总体造价相当,但建造起来各有难度。龙型方案的优势在于顶端还可以借由天线进一步“长高”。

将建沪最高观光平台

据上海中心大厦建设发展有限公司负责人介绍,与东方明珠、金茂大厦、环球金融中心一样,“上海中心”也将会有自己的观光平台,从高度上而言将是上海最高的。

有关负责人透露,“上海中心”2010年前不可能建成。不过,它将肯定会与金茂大厦、环球金融中心等组成上海超高层建筑群的“金三角”,其高度也将超过高度为420.5米的金茂大厦和高度为492米的环球金融中心,以及中国台北101大楼的501米,成为中国第一高楼。

来源:东方早报
__________________

Highcliff liked this post

Last edited by autumnriver; April 25th, 2008 at 11:37 AM.
autumnriver no está en línea   Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
Old April 25th, 2008, 04:05 AM   #1062
z0rg
fok julle naaiers
 
z0rg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Madrid
Posts: 24,723
Likes (Received): 15902

The height is quite disappointing imo.
__________________
What is dead may never die, but rises again, harder and stronger.

More than 300 supertall projects on going in China.

Highcliff liked this post
z0rg no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old April 25th, 2008, 04:16 AM   #1063
xXFallenXx
Registered User
 
xXFallenXx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Temecula, CA
Posts: 3,859
Likes (Received): 170

I think the hight is good, it should give it a balanced feel.

and both designs are great!
__________________

Highcliff liked this post
xXFallenXx no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old April 25th, 2008, 05:27 AM   #1064
dodge321
Registered User
 
dodge321's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 317
Likes (Received): 121

Am I the only one who doesn't like the pointy pyramid tower? It'll look so out of place.
__________________

Highcliff liked this post
dodge321 no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old April 25th, 2008, 05:41 AM   #1065
OMH
Registered User
 
OMH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Munich (currently living in Toronto)
Posts: 569
Likes (Received): 14

I think i prefer the Gensler design out of these two, though Foster's design looks also pretty good, but whatever design will be chosen,it'll be a great addition to Shanghai's skyline,though IMO the height could be a bit higher,somewhere around 650-700m would be a perfect height IMO.
__________________

Highcliff liked this post
OMH no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old April 25th, 2008, 05:51 AM   #1066
Krattle
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 437
Likes (Received): 12

That pyramid thing has almost the EXACT same facade design as SOM's design for that thing fin San Fran and as the Moscow Tower. I much prefer the elegance of the first tubular design
__________________

Highcliff liked this post
Krattle no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old April 25th, 2008, 05:58 AM   #1067
helghast
Registered User
 
helghast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,374
Likes (Received): 147

lets hope the pick the dragon design. cuz they can increase the spire to over 580m to 600m
__________________
"If you put the empire state building on top of the Sears Tower then it's reasonable to say you'll be in the neighbourhood," Mr Baker says.

Highcliff liked this post
helghast no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old April 25th, 2008, 10:46 AM   #1068
Skymyhusband
French dwarf
 
Skymyhusband's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,848
Likes (Received): 60

I said it before: it's proportionnal!

492 SWFC / 421 Jin mao = ~1.17

492 x 1.17 = ~575

It's thought as a climbing spiral related to the 3 major skyscrapers in Pudong.

:Urban planning:
__________________

Highcliff liked this post

Last edited by Skymyhusband; April 25th, 2008 at 11:27 AM.
Skymyhusband no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old April 25th, 2008, 11:06 AM   #1069
LeMoN-SK
Regular Fool
 
LeMoN-SK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Bratislava
Posts: 2,851
Likes (Received): 81

Agreed.
LeMoN-SK no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old April 25th, 2008, 12:04 PM   #1070
davee08
Registered User
 
davee08's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 633
Likes (Received): 29

its much better to have the three towers in proportion rather then having a 600m+ tower which may ruin the view nonetheless i don't mind either proposal they are both great and wouldn't mind if they built both
__________________

Highcliff liked this post
davee08 no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old April 25th, 2008, 12:58 PM   #1071
Myster E
Registered User
 
Myster E's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Birmingham
Posts: 1,286
Likes (Received): 73

...
__________________

Highcliff liked this post

Last edited by Myster E; April 25th, 2008 at 01:05 PM.
Myster E no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old April 25th, 2008, 01:05 PM   #1072
Myster E
Registered User
 
Myster E's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Birmingham
Posts: 1,286
Likes (Received): 73

Quote:
Originally Posted by z0rg View Post
The height is quite disappointing imo.
Have to agree with you all the way, orginally I thought the 580m SOM proposal looked fine until I saw Gensler's, 580m is too short arse, build it at least 650-700m! I thought it would be at least taller than the Chicacgo Spire and Russia Tower.
__________________

Highcliff liked this post
Myster E no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old April 25th, 2008, 01:19 PM   #1073
coth
pride leader
 
coth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Moscow
Posts: 21,630
Likes (Received): 6818

second is unbelievably ugly in my opinion...

this one is just ok
http://img90.imageshack.us/img90/134...3014547ry0.jpg
__________________

Highcliff liked this post
coth no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old April 25th, 2008, 01:35 PM   #1074
big-dog
Registered User
 
big-dog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 14,080
Likes (Received): 6839

The final two

__________________

Highcliff liked this post
big-dog no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old April 25th, 2008, 01:40 PM   #1075
xXFallenXx
Registered User
 
xXFallenXx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Temecula, CA
Posts: 3,859
Likes (Received): 170

What is going on in the top of the Gensler building? Looks complicated.
__________________

Highcliff liked this post
xXFallenXx no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old April 25th, 2008, 01:45 PM   #1076
Densetsu
Non-registered User!
 
Densetsu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,685
Likes (Received): 129

the dragon design is obviously better. I agree that the height is dissapointing. I expected a height around ~650 meters. Anyway its certain that it will have more than 100 floors
__________________

Highcliff liked this post
Densetsu no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old April 25th, 2008, 01:46 PM   #1077
kix111
Registered User
 
kix111's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Shanghai / Auckland
Posts: 6,014
Likes (Received): 2929

looks like that toilet ring thing lol lol

i liked the older version better, the one that says "H" on the top, probably a helicopter landing place
__________________

Highcliff liked this post
kix111 no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old April 25th, 2008, 01:51 PM   #1078
xXFallenXx
Registered User
 
xXFallenXx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Temecula, CA
Posts: 3,859
Likes (Received): 170

Quote:
Originally Posted by kix111 View Post
looks like that toilet ring thing lol lol

i liked the older version better, the one that says "H" on the top, probably a helicopter landing place

i agree.
__________________

Highcliff liked this post
xXFallenXx no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old April 25th, 2008, 02:14 PM   #1079
MasonsInquiries
B-MORE than u strive for!
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Baltimore/Columbia, Md.
Posts: 2,257
Likes (Received): 13

beautiful tower indeed!!!
__________________

Highcliff liked this post
MasonsInquiries no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old April 25th, 2008, 02:41 PM   #1080
autumnriver
Registered User
 
autumnriver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,740
Likes (Received): 19

If you "unwrap" the "dragon" design, you get this thing in Kuwait City:

Al Hamra Tower
1

2
__________________

Highcliff liked this post
autumnriver no está en línea   Reply With Quote


Reply

Tags
china, gensler, hypertall, lujiazui financial center, pudong, pudong new area, shanghai, shanghai center, supertall

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Related topics on SkyscraperCity


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 06:59 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Feedback Buttons provided by Advanced Post Thanks / Like (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2017 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2017 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

SkyscraperCity ☆ In Urbanity We trust ☆ about us | privacy policy | DMCA policy

Hosted by Blacksun, dedicated to this site too!
Forum server management by DaiTengu