daily menu » rate the banner | guess the city | one on oneforums map | privacy policy | DMCA | news magazine | posting guidelines

Go Back   SkyscraperCity > World Development News Forums > General Urban Developments > DN Archives



Global Announcement

As a general reminder, please respect others and respect copyrights. Go here to familiarize yourself with our posting policy.


Reply

 
Thread Tools
Old December 15th, 2010, 08:48 PM   #4901
Pfeuffer
BANNED
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: eurasia
Posts: 1,929
Likes (Received): 405

from where has this shot been taken ?
Pfeuffer no está en línea   Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
Old December 15th, 2010, 09:42 PM   #4902
london_marcus
Registered User
 
london_marcus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: London
Posts: 655
Likes (Received): 38

Parliament hill on Hamstead heath i think
london_marcus no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old December 15th, 2010, 10:52 PM   #4903
Pfeuffer
BANNED
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: eurasia
Posts: 1,929
Likes (Received): 405

thanx
Pfeuffer no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old December 15th, 2010, 11:04 PM   #4904
katia72
Registered User
 
katia72's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Oslo
Posts: 223
Likes (Received): 9

WOW...nice view!
katia72 no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old December 16th, 2010, 02:28 AM   #4905
tylerburbank
Registered User
 
tylerburbank's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Gibraltar
Posts: 250
Likes (Received): 10

amazing! absolutely gut wrenchingly stunning!
tylerburbank no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old December 16th, 2010, 02:18 PM   #4906
BodgeJob1
BANNED
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 623
Likes (Received): 17

Nice Render by "Ensignia" in the UK Forums showing a completed Shard in context with the other towers in The City That are UC or starting in 2011...




1. Heron Plaza 148m
2. 100 Bishopsgate 165m
3. The Pinnacle 288m
4. Leadenhall 225m
5. Fenchurch St 160m
BodgeJob1 no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old December 16th, 2010, 02:36 PM   #4907
strandeed
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Newcastle Upon Tyne
Posts: 650
Likes (Received): 107

that walkie talkie abomination is a disgrace
strandeed no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old December 16th, 2010, 06:37 PM   #4908
Lord Razzle
Registered User
 
Lord Razzle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Stevenage
Posts: 37
Likes (Received): 0

Quote:
Originally Posted by strandeed View Post
that walkie talkie abomination is a disgrace
Totally Disagree....what a unique building...in a unique city. Just like the shard and the leadenhall build....pinnacle is a nice building but its been done before apart from the skirt of glass at the base....the ''walkie talkie'' is perfect for london

Last edited by Lord Razzle; December 16th, 2010 at 06:42 PM.
Lord Razzle no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old December 16th, 2010, 06:50 PM   #4909
PortoNuts
Registered User
 
PortoNuts's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Porto
Posts: 23,946
Likes (Received): 7197

Quote:
The skyline’s the limit for London

It is not even completed, yet the skyscraper known as the Shard has already set a record for London’s tallest building, surpassing the 235-metre tall One Canada Square in Canary Wharf, east London. When completed in 2012, it will be the tallest building in the European Union. It will be used for offices, residences and a hotel.

Growing up out of the morass of Victorian railway arches and hospitals at its base on the south side of London Bridge, the Shard is a feat of engineering and an important reminder that construction is a complex process. The revealing of the innards of the building has captured the imagination of visitors and residents of London: many have been enthralled at realising the process behind building skyscrapers, which are built around a concrete lift core.

In fact, when it comes to the Shard, it is the engineering rather than the architectural vision that has received most attention. And when the building eventually gets covered in 11,000 panes of glass, it will not be half as impressive as it is now.

The Shard was first mooted as a project over 10 years ago by the Sellar Property Group. It belongs to a different economic and political timeframe, one which sits uneasily with contemporary aesthetic judgments. The initial plan was to build an even taller skyscraper, but the planning permission was refused in 2000. As a result, the developers brought in a new architect, Renzo Piano. This was a smart move to smooth the project’s progress given that Lord Rogers, who Piano had worked with on the Pompidou Centre in Paris, was by that time an adviser to the then-London mayor, Ken Livingstone.

The final pinnacle form of the Shard is supposed to have been inspired by the spires huddled around St Paul’s Cathedral in Canaletto’s eighteenth-century paintings. But this seems nonsensical: the Shard will be three times the height of the cathedral. In fact, Piano’s professed inspiration is rather cynical. For years, the open views to St Paul’s were sacrosanct, partially because of a sentimental attachment to Canaletto’s paintings, in which St Paul’s rises above London’s other churches. The impact of this almost 300-year-old series of paintings has been reinforced by images of the cathedral surviving the Blitz and the strange fetishistic cult that Prince Charles is building around his beloved St Paul’s dome.

Piano, though, has used this rhetoric of spires against his critics. (Indeed, the Shard takes its name from a criticism of the project by English Heritage, which advises the government on historical preservation.) He has argued that the building’s shape means it intrudes less on the skyline than a rectilinear skyscraper – which is like arguing for a conventional bullet over a rubber one on aesthetic grounds. In fact, if anything, the building, with its tapering floor and slowly shrinking floor plates, merely monumentalises the economics of its structure. The lucky few who will get to own one of the apartments at the narrow top of the building will need to spend around £10million.

We can expect more of the guff about slender forms mimicking the church spires. Despite the fact that London mayor Boris Johnson has toned down his anti-tall building rhetoric, the London View Management Framework, published this year by the mayor’s office, increases the protection of the capital’s viewing corridors, detailing no fewer than 26 protected views in the city.

Johnson has concocted this labyrinth of sightlines because he knows that the City of London, the beating heart of Europe’s financial services industry, needs projects like the Shard. One only needs to look at the rental prices. In 2006, Transport for London agreed to rent 200,000 square feet in the Shard at a cost of around £38.50 per square foot. In June 2010, Sellar bought out the contract and now aims to charge as much as £70 per square foot – an astonishing figure that helps turn London into one of the most expensive cities in the world for office rental. In addition, the timing of the financial downturn has left London with a deficit of hotel spaces before the Olympics. The Shard will also have a five-star luxury hotel occupying 18 floors.

The aesthetic arguments appear farcical in the face of these social, economic and technical factors. Therefore, the question of what the ultimate form of the building will be has appeared nowhere near as exciting as the technicalities behind its construction.

The Shard was built by using ‘jump lifts’ that rise in the permanent shaft as the building gets taller. The contractors, Mace, are working under a fixed-price contract, introduced to get the £2 billion project finished in time for the London Olympics. As a result they began the substructure and superstructure at the same time; 550 tonnes of steel columns had to be threaded through the piling of Southwark Towers, which was demolished to make way for the Shard. Engineers scanned in a photocopy of a microfiche record of a hand-drawn original and fitted in each of the 100 or so steel columns. When it came to construction-time they all fitted perfectly.

These details may seem trivial but they are, in fact, important. They show that we have the technology to build in a concentrated way in the centre of London despite all the archaeology and infrastructure that lies beneath the surface. It is the planning obsession with preserving views that holds development back.

In the next few years, London Bridge will become an island of modern development. London Bridge Place, a 17-storey tower, will be built next to the Shard. London Bridge station, a busy but ugly commuter hub, will also get a makeover.

Even Boris secretly knows that the future for busy, wealthy cities like London is to build upwards. Rather than consigning modernity to small stretches around train stations, though, we should be integrating these structures into a more dynamic urbanism. For instance, we should be thinking about how public sections could be linked into the raised walkways of the South Bank. If we are to enjoy the benefits of high-rises we should be thinking of how we can best connect them at higher levels rather than how to avoid looking at them altogether.
http://www.spiked-online.com/index.p...article/10008/
__________________
Got one head for money and one head for sin..
PortoNuts no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old December 16th, 2010, 07:01 PM   #4910
PortoNuts
Registered User
 
PortoNuts's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Porto
Posts: 23,946
Likes (Received): 7197

__________________
Got one head for money and one head for sin..
PortoNuts no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old December 16th, 2010, 09:57 PM   #4911
turnipus
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 10
Likes (Received): 0

Quote:
Originally Posted by PortoNuts View Post
Interesting article, although I disagree with the stance against the aesthetic claims since the cathedral spire poking up above the city makes a really nice counterpoint to the shard.

It's apparently negative outlook combined with resignation to the fact that it's economically necessary to build up might help to convince a few more tall building doubters though.
turnipus no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old December 17th, 2010, 12:51 AM   #4912
AUTOTHRILL
chill
 
AUTOTHRILL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: London | Liverpool
Posts: 4,736
Likes (Received): 1955

Agreed!
__________________
I hate this username
AUTOTHRILL no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old December 17th, 2010, 10:12 AM   #4913
ajaaronjoe
BANNED
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 627
Likes (Received): 39

image hosted on flickr
ajaaronjoe no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old December 17th, 2010, 12:52 PM   #4914
Tubeman
Jubilation
 
Tubeman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: London SE15
Posts: 18,973
Likes (Received): 3254

Quote:
Originally Posted by london_marcus View Post
Parliament hill on Hamstead heath i think
Yes, it is Parliament Hill
Tubeman no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old December 17th, 2010, 03:17 PM   #4915
Turbosnail
Registered User
 
Turbosnail's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,993
Likes (Received): 266

Quote:
Originally Posted by strandeed View Post
that walkie talkie abomination is a disgrace
That's a really ignorant comment to make. If you knew anything about Fenchurch Street, you would know that the architects have worked hard to open up views at street level for the benefit of the public realm. This means the building has been drawn back from it's maximum possible footprint to enhance surrounding historical buildings. The result is the top heavy appearance of the building which I don't think will be as bad as people are making out. This render does not do it any favours.
Turbosnail no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old December 17th, 2010, 06:19 PM   #4916
Stairz
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 6,589
Likes (Received): 1422

...
__________________
..

Last edited by Stairz; August 13th, 2014 at 09:52 AM.
Stairz no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old December 17th, 2010, 06:54 PM   #4917
adschi
Registered User
 
adschi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: North Essex
Posts: 1,211
Likes (Received): 30

...
__________________
My flickr.
adschi no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old December 17th, 2010, 08:46 PM   #4918
PortoNuts
Registered User
 
PortoNuts's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Porto
Posts: 23,946
Likes (Received): 7197

by anthonySE1.

[IMG]http://i55.************/j6sd2p.jpg[/IMG]
__________________
Got one head for money and one head for sin..
PortoNuts no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old December 17th, 2010, 08:59 PM   #4919
Frothy
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 26
Likes (Received): 1

Quote:
Originally Posted by CheekySlut View Post
The Thames hasn't frozen over since 1814 C:3≈
Whoa, I didn't know that, pretty impressive.
Frothy no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old December 17th, 2010, 09:10 PM   #4920
london_marcus
Registered User
 
london_marcus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: London
Posts: 655
Likes (Received): 38

the reason the river used to freeze over was because the arches of London bridge were smaller..slowing down the rivers current. the new bridges allows the river to flow much faster.
london_marcus no está en línea   Reply With Quote


Reply

Tags
32 london bridge street, london, london bridge tower, renzo piano, southwark, the shard, the shard of glass

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Related topics on SkyscraperCity


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 12:05 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Feedback Buttons provided by Advanced Post Thanks / Like (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2017 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2017 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

SkyscraperCity ☆ In Urbanity We trust ☆ about us | privacy policy | DMCA policy

Hosted by Blacksun, dedicated to this site too!
Forum server management by DaiTengu