|
|
| daily menu » rate the banner | guess the city | one on one |
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Tregunter 3 | |||
| 10 |
   
|
7 | 4.07% |
| 9.5 |
  
|
0 | 0% |
| 9 |
  
|
3 | 1.74% |
| 8.5 |
  
|
6 | 3.49% |
| 8 |
  
|
4 | 2.33% |
| 7.5 |
  
|
9 | 5.23% |
| 7 |
|
27 | 15.70% |
| 6.5 |
|
12 | 6.98% |
| 6 |
|
16 | 9.30% |
| 5.5 |
|
13 | 7.56% |
| 5 |
|
29 | 16.86% |
| 4.5 |
|
11 | 6.40% |
| 4 |
|
14 | 8.14% |
| 3.5 |
|
5 | 2.91% |
| 3 or less |
|
16 | 9.30% |
| Voters: 172. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
June 8th, 2003, 12:05 AM
|
#1 |
|
By Spirit
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: S I N G A P O R E
Posts: 26,215
Likes (Received): 1
|
#274 l Tregunter 3 l HONG KONG l 220m l 66fl
Tregunter 3
Hong Kong, China HEIGHT: 220m/721 feet FLOORS: 66 floors COMPLETION: 1993 ARCHITECT: Chung Wah Nan Architects/ Rocco Design Ltd The lower portion of the tower is in an X shape, which houses one unit in each of its wings. For the upper floors, two wings set back and the sleek main shaft remaining houses the 28 duplexes and a triplex.   
Last edited by ZZ-II; July 22nd, 2008 at 06:50 PM. |
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
|
|
June 8th, 2003, 12:09 AM
|
#2 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 2,679
Likes (Received): 2
|
5/10, not my taste.
|
|
|
|
|
June 8th, 2003, 02:11 AM
|
#3 |
|
Finishing this fight
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Middelburg(The Netherlands)
Posts: 1,301
Likes (Received): 1
|
Ah the back is just really bad!I can't get any worse then that.
5.0/10
__________________
The message you have entered is too short. Please lengthen your message to at least 2 characters. |
|
|
|
|
June 8th, 2003, 02:28 AM
|
#4 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
Likes (Received):
|
5.5/10
|
|
|
|
June 8th, 2003, 08:04 PM
|
#5 |
|
Forever Travelling
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 6,353
Likes (Received): 15
|
 very sad building , very 
|
|
|
|
|
June 9th, 2003, 01:29 AM
|
#6 |
|
By Spirit
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: S I N G A P O R E
Posts: 26,215
Likes (Received): 1
|
5.5/10
The front is ok, a bit dark but the back is disgusting. |
|
|
|
|
June 9th, 2003, 02:11 PM
|
#7 |
|
24/7
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Lleida
Posts: 18,813
Likes (Received): 24
|
4.5/10
Ugly ugly... 
|
|
|
|
|
June 9th, 2003, 05:07 PM
|
#8 |
|
Don't be that guy!
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 1,098
Likes (Received): 0
|
ugly...4/10
__________________
I often dream of huge numb buildings, jet black sinister architecture. Being installed when nobody sees. Their appearence so sudden that few would take notice. |
|
|
|
|
June 9th, 2003, 09:12 PM
|
#9 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Almere - The Netherlands
Posts: 2,141
Likes (Received): 0
|
The back is really awful!!! 4
|
|
|
|
|
June 19th, 2003, 06:09 PM
|
#10 |
|
Here Since 2002
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Sydney/Metro Manila
Posts: 6,715
Likes (Received): 2
|
5/10 i thought this was looking good, until i saw that back
__________________
dafuq I've been here ten years?! |
|
|
|
|
June 20th, 2003, 08:40 PM
|
#11 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 403
Likes (Received): 0
|
5.5/10 - the front isn't too bad - there's good contrast between the glass and concrete, and the lighter spandrels help to tie the two parts of the design together. Plus, the "wings" at each side, and the indentations help avoid monotony.
But the roof isn't good at all- various sections of the building simply stop, as if they'd been sliced off, and they aren't tied together at all - it simply looks cheap, careless, and chaotic. And that back - cheap looking, dull and almost ugly (the only reason I let it get by with "almost" is that it isn't a flat expanse), with rows of windows like holes in a cheese grater - they should have carried the glass around from the front.
__________________
Liz L Art Deco rules! |
|
|
|
|
July 29th, 2003, 03:26 PM
|
#12 |
|
Dublin
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 93
Likes (Received): 0
|
6/10 out of pity
|
|
|
|
|
August 7th, 2003, 10:38 AM
|
#13 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Jakarta (Tanah Tinggi)
Posts: 2,889
Likes (Received): 0
|
4/10. says enough i quess...
|
|
|
|
|
August 7th, 2003, 11:52 PM
|
#14 |
|
Tribune Tower
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 2,920
Likes (Received): 0
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
August 25th, 2003, 08:23 PM
|
#15 |
|
Right Here, Right Now
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Stockholm
Posts: 2,655
Likes (Received): 0
|
I don't like it, 5/10
__________________
Higher and higher, straight up we'll climb |
|
|
|
|
August 27th, 2003, 02:55 PM
|
#16 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Copenhagen
Posts: 460
Likes (Received): 1
|
5/10 The front is pretty good, but the back is ugly !
|
|
|
|
|
August 28th, 2003, 12:35 PM
|
#17 |
|
postings fürs herz ♥
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: milão - mas eu sou do brasil!
Posts: 4,219
Likes (Received): 3372
|
6/10
|
|
|
|
|
August 28th, 2003, 01:43 PM
|
#18 |
|
The Monkey King
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Singapore 新加坡 Singapura சிங்கப்ப
Posts: 11,897
Likes (Received): 0
|
Looks like they run out of glass.
 5/10.
__________________
Majulah Singapura 前进吧，新加坡！Onward Singapore முன்னேறட்டும் சிங்கப்பூர் "My Settlement of Singapore continues to thrive most wonderfully - it is all and everything I could wish and, if no untimely fate awaits it, promises to become the Emporium and the pride of the East" - Sir Thomas Stamford Raffles, 10th September 1820 |
|
|
|
|
August 29th, 2003, 12:20 PM
|
#19 |
|
architect by day
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 3,059
Likes (Received): 0
|
hmph..dunno about this one...
7/10 i spose...
__________________
kr.au |
|
|
|
|
August 30th, 2003, 03:14 PM
|
#20 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
Likes (Received):
|
This one is not bad at all for a residential!
7.5 
|
|
|
|
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
Linear Mode
|
|
All times are GMT +2. The time now is 11:37 AM.