|
|
| daily menu » rate the banner | guess the city | one on one |
|
|||||||
| Manchester Metro Area For Manchester, Salford and the surrounding area. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#21 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Manchester
Posts: 1,440
Likes (Received): 1
|
Iv just noticed, one of the runways points pretty much at Salford Quays. Is there any chance serious air traffic to barton would stop any possible super tall being built there???
image hosted on flickr
__________________
Contribute |
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Still Lurking
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Manchester
Posts: 1,348
Likes (Received): 0
|
I wouldn’t have thought so, even if they upgrade the place they are still only targeting private jets, helicopters, and small commercial. Its still a good 2/3 miles away from the Quays anyway, but this kind of traffic isn’t ever going to be a problem.
I don’t think the Quays is likely to have anything very tall in this cycle anyway; there is just far too much land available to justify it. It’s hard enough to make the returns stack up for it in town, despite the relatively high land values. |
|
|
|
|
|
#23 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Manchester
Posts: 168
Likes (Received): 0
|
Quote:
of Westminster the same about London? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Benefit Scrounger
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: M20
Posts: 8,097
Likes (Received): 4
|
All landings come in from the west mostly (wind permitting) anyway. The Barton viaduct to the east is a pretty big obstacle and they manage to get past that so some tall 3 miles away aint gonna bother em.
__________________
Visit The Trafford Spade Museum - Bring The Kids. Ample Parking and Excellent Gift Shop Right Next Door |
|
|
|
|
|
#25 | |
|
Clean-shaven and foolish
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,359
Likes (Received): 0
|
FAO Angry Salford Councillors
Quote:
__________________
"I feel close to the rebelliousness and vigour of the youth
here. Perhaps time will seperate us, but nobody can deny that here, behind the windows of Manchester, there is an insane love of football, of celebration and of music." Eric Daniel Pierre Cantona |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#26 |
|
10th February 2008
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Manchester
Posts: 26,424
Likes (Received): 278
|
Jet hub plan revealed
Chris Barry 4/ 3/2008 PEEL Holdings' airports division hopes to create Manchester's second commercial airport, at Barton. It has recently renamed Barton Aerodrome as City Airport, Manchester, and is hoping to make it a hub for business aviation. Managing director Andrew Simpson said there was `no question' of the new facility rivalling Manchester airport, but it would complement services there. He said "We are in discussions about making City Airport Manchester a business and general aviation airport. There has been a massive rise in business travel - executives using small corporate jets as they are quicker. "Manchester airport is very busy with larger jets and international flag carriers, and it's not an effective use of its facilities to have small aircraft going through there." Peel owns the land with Manchester city council (should be fun. get the knives ready) and the plans hinge on how the development would be funded. Mr Simpson says: "We're at an early stage, assessing how to make it happen. It would need new facilities and a new runway. "We believe the development of City Airport Manchester' is important from a regional point of view. If Manchester is going to be a world class business city it needs to have easily accessible facilities for scheduled carriers and also for smaller jets" Meanwhile, Peel's largest and most popular airport, Liverpool John Lennon will make a maiden profit this year, says Mr Simpson. Boosted by worldwide interest in Liverpool as a consequence of the Capital of Culture, record numbers of people are expected this year. Last year saw an 11 per cent hike in passenger numbers to 5.5 million. Peel also owns Durham Tees Valley Airport, Robin Hood Airport in Doncaster and a 50 per cent interest in Sheffield City Airport. |
|
|
|
|
|
#27 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Manchester
Posts: 1,440
Likes (Received): 1
|
What are the odds of a tarmac runway?
__________________
Contribute |
|
|
|
|
|
#28 |
|
sjwmoore
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Warrington
Posts: 1,381
Likes (Received): 0
|
Zero!
What a load of nonsense, a grass airstrip that hosts private light aircraft and a flying club. Who on earth is going to fly in on a business trip in a Cessna? The old airport site on Hough End Fields would even be preferable for a heliport type affair, you would be in town in no time. |
|
|
|
|
|
#29 |
|
Mancunian Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Stalybridge, Manchester
Posts: 6,159
Likes (Received): 13
|
no one of course, that's why they want to attract private jets!
__________________
Britain is Great, Manchester is Greater! |
|
|
|
|
|
#30 | ||
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 49
Likes (Received): 0
|
Quote:
Quote:
Peel already own all the farmland around City Airport, so ownership is not an issue. The site is an existing licenced airfield - far easier to gain approval from the CAA than it would be to create a new operation. The airspace is also geared up to accomdate CAM's operation. The ownership of the airfield itself actually sits wholly with Manchester Ship Canal Developments, which is a joint venture between Manchester CC and Peel. Peel have the controlling (51% IIRC) shareholding. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#31 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 6,738
Likes (Received): 0
|
Would be great to have this as a mini version of city airport in Canary Wharf.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#32 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Manchester
Posts: 1,440
Likes (Received): 1
|
We could get the Top Gear team to race different methods of Transport across Gtr MCR.
Clarkson ragging it down the ship canal* (*obviously under great frustration due to the locks) heheheh. Seriously though, what are the objections to this proposal? Does anyone stand to lose out?
__________________
Contribute |
|
|
|
|
|
#33 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 6,738
Likes (Received): 0
|
Locals who would get more noise I suspect.
Green campaigners. Liverpool and Manchester airports are odd ones, as they are both owned by the same companies that are planning to make City Airport. |
|
|
|
|
|
#34 |
|
Mancunian Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Stalybridge, Manchester
Posts: 6,159
Likes (Received): 13
|
Will the Stig last 5 minutes on a tram through Langworthy?
__________________
Britain is Great, Manchester is Greater! |
|
|
|
|
|
#35 |
|
Mmm, Danone
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Manchester
Posts: 1,778
Likes (Received): 5
|
Peel are planning on laying down a 1200m+ tarmac, possibly at the furthest end of the field (furthest from the club house and hangar that is).
|
|
|
|
|
|
#36 |
|
Mancunian Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Stalybridge, Manchester
Posts: 6,159
Likes (Received): 13
|
dgnr8!! Where've you been?! Good to have you back!
__________________
Britain is Great, Manchester is Greater! |
|
|
|
|
|
#37 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Manchester
Posts: 1,440
Likes (Received): 1
|
Thanks for the update dgnr8. The longest hypotenuse of the field though is less than 1km.
Would they go into the next field? image hosted on flickr
__________________
Contribute |
|
|
|
|
|
#38 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Manchester
Posts: 1,440
Likes (Received): 1
|
__________________
Contribute |
|
|
|
|
|
#39 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 49
Likes (Received): 0
|
Mez.
The last suggestion is probably more likely, the first would be difficult for several reasons: 1. As you've said it isn't long enough. 1200m is really the minimum for corporate jet use 2. It disables the use of the entire airfield during the construction project for the hard runway. 3. It points directly at the Barton High Level Bridge and the under construction Salford Reds Stadium - these obstacles would create significant problems for arriving and departing aircraft. The existing grass runway is offset slightly to the North however as it is a visual runway only (i.e. pilots land by looking out of the window and not by instruments), these obstructions are acceptable. Corporate Jets will require an instrument runway, so clear approach paths are needed. 4. It would demolish two listed buildings (control tower and main hangar). My understanding is that the other fields surrounding the airfield are already in Peel's ownership. I think though that the runway would be about 400m shorter than your line as the railway line to Port Salford needs to run through the North East side of it. |
|
|
|
|
|
#40 |
|
CAN'T BE ARSED
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Manchester
Posts: 4,859
Likes (Received): 0
|
I really hope this new "City Airport"....takes off so to speak. I've been thinking recently that Manchester was busy enough for 2 airports, it's the first time I've read anything about it though today, on this forum.
All very exciting. As for the name change issue a few pages back. Meh!! Who really cares? Doesn't Salford benefit from having the UK's 3rd busiest airport just a few miles away? When will all this "Salford" nonsense end? OK it has city status, but would it gain such status today, as it stands? I doubt it. I think of Salford as being a bit like Brooklyn, which is also it's own city, but nobody else thinks of it that way.It's Brooklyn, New York. Salford, Manchester, end of.
__________________
New and improved! |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Tags |
| airports, airports of north england |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|