One Bank Street (Heron Quays West) | Canary Wharf | up to 186m/186m | Pre-planning - Page 7

.Adam · April 29th, 2007, 09:40 PM

I think these are going to make such an impact onto the Canary Wharf skyline! these could be the start of huge improvement and variation on the skyline!

jef · April 30th, 2007, 09:07 AM

no, they are not, zed. sorry.

seafire.I · April 30th, 2007, 09:11 AM

so renderings will come out soon eh?..............CAN'T WAIT!

***gothicform*** · May 1st, 2007, 03:09 PM

yeah, can you send me the new versions please jef, not least because ive learned how to add proper placemarks, web links, photos and so on to it. ill do it with this and we'll have an ace thing ...

N1 · May 1st, 2007, 08:32 PM

I concur. These google renderings are absolutely amazing.

Brings me back to some of the first CW renderings that really blew me away. The ones from SN.com of CW 2008 at night with Columbus, North Quay and obviously the old RS design. With Columbus killed off and North Quay on hold, I think HQW, Marsh Wall and an improved RS is a pretty good trade off. They just need to hurry up to have it all ready next year

Btw; I can't see them breaking the grid either with HQW - and I think I prefer it that way. The grid is part of what makes CW unique.

DarJoLe · May 1st, 2007, 09:36 PM

I'm glad these will go ahead before North Quay, mainly because I've always felt Riverside South was potentially too far from the central CW cluster from the north and south and somewhat needed 'reigning' in to maintain the Wharf as a coherent 'place', and secondly, because I think North Quay is a natural extension, almost the beginnings of the 'last phase' of Canary Wharf.

ibiza · May 5th, 2007, 03:46 PM

I'm afraid if there's a real looser - at least in terms of how long it's gonna take to be starting - from JPMs decision to stay in the city it's HQW. With vacancy rates in CW as low as they are RS still gonna go forward. But with JPM not taking up one full tower at RS the buffer in free space for the future resulting from building RS gonna be far bigger. And therefore the need to build HQW to create additional space gonna be put into the unforeseeable future...

eXSBass · May 5th, 2007, 06:55 PM

Don't worry. Riverside South will probably be adapted to accomodate for companies who want a smaller space. It might be let out on a multi-tenancy agreement just like One Canada Square. Afterall, who wants the new Canary Wharf flagship to be dominated by just one company? I don't. The little companies will fill the building making way for Heron.

ibiza · May 6th, 2007, 12:43 AM

sure, as I said HQW will be built sooner or later - it's just to attractive for CWG to fill the last remaining space in their own grounds apart from 25 Churchill place which also gonna have to find a tenant before HQW can go forward - Wood warf in the contrary is a cooperation with other companies and therefore not as attractive. But the otherwise - if JPM came to CW - not too unlikely szenario that RS and HQW will rise at the same time is more or less shattered as it's gonna take quite some time to find enough smaller companies to fill RS..

gazzab1990 · May 25th, 2007, 01:30 PM

Any more news on these?

I'd really like these towers to go ahead, they're canary wharf's most attractive current proposal IMO

***wjfox*** · May 25th, 2007, 01:40 PM

If there's any news, rest assured it will be posted here.

london lad · June 1st, 2007, 11:10 PM

I noticed this from the application for RS which shows the buildings along Heron Quays.

The space for HQW appears to be taken up by two towers connected by a podium. 1 tower looks to be the same height as the other Bank St towers but the other at around 200m+

[IMG]http://i7.************/4v2z96d.jpg[/IMG]

DarJoLe · June 2nd, 2007, 12:08 AM

Intriguing. The aerial plan as well shows a central courtyard in the western tower.

london lad · June 2nd, 2007, 11:31 AM

can't say i'm too keen on another tower being the same height of the other Bank St towers.

Jonny 5 · June 2nd, 2007, 11:44 AM

The aerial plan doesn't match the elevation drawing.

The aerial still has the old design of Riverside South.

Newcastle Guy · June 2nd, 2007, 01:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by london lad

[IMG]http://i7.************/4v2z96d.jpg[/IMG]

That looks similar to the Rogers hright towers, I.e 214m and 155m

sudds · June 25th, 2007, 06:34 AM

hi zedferret

i actually produced that big image on the first page when i used to work at hayes davidson a few years back - in fact i've seen quite a few images on this site that i did, cool!

sudds

NothingBetterToDo · June 25th, 2007, 03:23 PM

very good work - how about a few ssc exclusive renders, wink wink, nudge nudge

***ill tonkso*** · June 25th, 2007, 04:31 PM

Well, that should help join RSS up with its mates.

sudds · June 26th, 2007, 01:25 AM

hi nbtd

well i'd love to but the 3d model is the property of hayes davidson and i don't work for them any more so it could be difficult

when i worked on this, and t5 for that matter, i was lucky enough to work with the richard rogers partnership which was a great experience, i got to go to theit offices and everything

sudds

May 5th, 2007, 06:55 PM	#128
eXSBass Tea. Earl grey. Hot. Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: Leeds, West Yorkshire Posts: 2,518 Likes (Received): 32	Don't worry. Riverside South will probably be adapted to accomodate for companies who want a smaller space. It might be let out on a multi-tenancy agreement just like One Canada Square. Afterall, who wants the new Canary Wharf flagship to be dominated by just one company? I don't. The little companies will fill the building making way for Heron. __________________ The world is my oyster.

June 2nd, 2007, 11:44 AM	#135
Jonny 5 Registered User Join Date: Oct 2002 Posts: 3,896 Likes (Received): 0	The aerial plan doesn't match the elevation drawing. The aerial still has the old design of Riverside South. __________________ If you watch the Internet backwards its a story about how a huge population of idiots was overthrown by a group of highly intelligent and sexless geeks. My SSP Diagram------﴾\__/﴿-----﴾\__/﴿----﴾\__/﴿ London Diagram -----﴾='.'=﴿----﴾='.'=﴿---﴾='.'=﴿ -----------------------------﴾"﴿_﴾"﴿---﴾"﴿_﴾"﴿---﴾"﴿_﴾"﴿ v¥v⁮⁮⁮⁮⁮⁮¥v¥v¥v¥v¥v¥v¥v¥v⁮⁮⁮⁮⁮⁮¥v¥v¥v¥v¥v¥v¥v¥v⁮⁮⁮⁮⁮⁮¥v¥v¥v¥v¥v¥v¥v¥v

June 25th, 2007, 03:23 PM	#138
NothingBetterToDo Better To Do Nothing Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: London Posts: 10,499 Likes (Received): 2	very good work - how about a few ssc exclusive renders, wink wink, nudge nudge __________________ My Pictures: London - Amsterdam - Copenhagen - Berlin - Oslo - Bergen - Prague - Dublin

June 25th, 2007, 04:31 PM	#139
*ill tonkso* Portsmouths Finest, Maybe Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Portsmouth Posts: 14,079 Likes (Received): 240	Well, that should help join RSS up with its mates. __________________ Official Skyscrapercity 'Support the Shard at London Bridge' Facebook Group! Ill-Tonkso.co.uk - My Portfolio Website

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes	Rate This Thread
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode	Rate This Thread:

April 29th, 2007, 09:40 PM	#121
.Adam Registered User Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: London Posts: 1,554 Likes (Received): 28	I think these are going to make such an impact onto the Canary Wharf skyline! these could be the start of huge improvement and variation on the skyline!

April 30th, 2007, 09:07 AM	#122
jef Registered User Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Brussels/London Posts: 3,362 Likes (Received): 0	no, they are not, zed. sorry.

April 30th, 2007, 09:11 AM	#123
seafire.I Registered User Join Date: Apr 2007 Posts: 24 Likes (Received): 0	so renderings will come out soon eh?..............CAN'T WAIT!

May 1st, 2007, 03:09 PM	#124
*gothicform* Bossman Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: not london Posts: 29,265 Likes (Received): 558	yeah, can you send me the new versions please jef, not least because ive learned how to add proper placemarks, web links, photos and so on to it. ill do it with this and we'll have an ace thing ...

May 1st, 2007, 08:32 PM	#125
N1 Registered User Join Date: Apr 2007 Posts: 346 Likes (Received): 0	I concur. These google renderings are absolutely amazing. Brings me back to some of the first CW renderings that really blew me away. The ones from SN.com of CW 2008 at night with Columbus, North Quay and obviously the old RS design. With Columbus killed off and North Quay on hold, I think HQW, Marsh Wall and an improved RS is a pretty good trade off. They just need to hurry up to have it all ready next year Btw; I can't see them breaking the grid either with HQW - and I think I prefer it that way. The grid is part of what makes CW unique.

May 1st, 2007, 09:36 PM	#126
DarJoLe Registered User Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: London Posts: 15,782 Likes (Received): 484	I'm glad these will go ahead before North Quay, mainly because I've always felt Riverside South was potentially too far from the central CW cluster from the north and south and somewhat needed 'reigning' in to maintain the Wharf as a coherent 'place', and secondly, because I think North Quay is a natural extension, almost the beginnings of the 'last phase' of Canary Wharf.

May 5th, 2007, 03:46 PM	#127
ibiza ....ENGAGE Join Date: Mar 2007 Posts: 1,116 Likes (Received): 0	I'm afraid if there's a real looser - at least in terms of how long it's gonna take to be starting - from JPMs decision to stay in the city it's HQW. With vacancy rates in CW as low as they are RS still gonna go forward. But with JPM not taking up one full tower at RS the buffer in free space for the future resulting from building RS gonna be far bigger. And therefore the need to build HQW to create additional space gonna be put into the unforeseeable future...

May 6th, 2007, 12:43 AM	#129
ibiza ....ENGAGE Join Date: Mar 2007 Posts: 1,116 Likes (Received): 0	sure, as I said HQW will be built sooner or later - it's just to attractive for CWG to fill the last remaining space in their own grounds apart from 25 Churchill place which also gonna have to find a tenant before HQW can go forward - Wood warf in the contrary is a cooperation with other companies and therefore not as attractive. But the otherwise - if JPM came to CW - not too unlikely szenario that RS and HQW will rise at the same time is more or less shattered as it's gonna take quite some time to find enough smaller companies to fill RS..

May 25th, 2007, 01:30 PM	#130
gazzab1990 SPAMMED Join Date: May 2007 Location: Plymouth, Devon Posts: 2,221 Likes (Received): 2	Any more news on these? I'd really like these towers to go ahead, they're canary wharf's most attractive current proposal IMO

May 25th, 2007, 01:40 PM	#131
*wjfox* Moderator Join Date: Nov 2002 Location: L O N D O N Posts: 35,736 Likes (Received): 1199	If there's any news, rest assured it will be posted here.

June 1st, 2007, 11:10 PM	#132
london lad Registered User Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: London Posts: 8,185 Likes (Received): 78	I noticed this from the application for RS which shows the buildings along Heron Quays. The space for HQW appears to be taken up by two towers connected by a podium. 1 tower looks to be the same height as the other Bank St towers but the other at around 200m+ [IMG]http://i7.************/4v2z96d.jpg[/IMG]

June 2nd, 2007, 12:08 AM	#133
DarJoLe Registered User Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: London Posts: 15,782 Likes (Received): 484	Intriguing. The aerial plan as well shows a central courtyard in the western tower.

June 2nd, 2007, 11:31 AM	#134
london lad Registered User Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: London Posts: 8,185 Likes (Received): 78	can't say i'm too keen on another tower being the same height of the other Bank St towers.

June 25th, 2007, 06:34 AM	#137
sudds Registered User Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: london Posts: 4 Likes (Received): 0	hi zedferret i actually produced that big image on the first page when i used to work at hayes davidson a few years back - in fact i've seen quite a few images on this site that i did, cool! sudds

June 26th, 2007, 01:25 AM	#140
sudds Registered User Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: london Posts: 4 Likes (Received): 0	hi nbtd well i'd love to but the 3d model is the property of hayes davidson and i don't work for them any more so it could be difficult when i worked on this, and t5 for that matter, i was lucky enough to work with the richard rogers partnership which was a great experience, i got to go to theit offices and everything sudds