|
|
|
| daily menu » rate the banner | guess the city | one on one |
|
|||||||
| Global Announcement |
|
SkyscraperCity needs your help to do some house cleaning! please click here for more info! |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#81 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,400
Likes (Received): 15
|
Quote:
Last edited by jamie_hunt; August 4th, 2007 at 04:49 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#82 |
|
Born in Baltimore
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Newberry, SC
Posts: 10,649
Likes (Received): 13
|
yes, silence. Sometimes it's golden. Other times, like these, it's dreadful.Come on 10 IH and 300 East Pratt! Please..............
__________________
Baltimore, my hometown. |
|
|
|
|
|
#83 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 1,231
Likes (Received): 13
|
The recent articles in both the Sun and BBJ about "City Development arm Seeking Proposals for New Arena Construction" are silent as to whether the total number of seats could be increased. I think reporters should have clarified this point. So does this mean that the seating total stays at 16k max or can it be increased if the consutant deems it beneficial? We need to look at the full specs going out to bidders. It must be included in that package. Can anyone get a hold of that? Any thoughts on this?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#84 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,400
Likes (Received): 15
|
Think it's a back-door way to get folks thinking about the issue and to see what can happen with private funding leading the way. Some developer could (conceivably) propose to build a 20K seat facility next to Camden Yards if, say, the city assembled the land and threw in development rights to the current Arena site.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#85 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 971
Likes (Received): 6
|
I still think Hale has the best idea from a financing point of view. His arena would be financed 1/3 by him, 1/3 by the concessionaire and 1/3 by the City/State.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#86 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,400
Likes (Received): 15
|
Is Hale's offer still on the table? Wonder if we'll have to wait 'til October to find out.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#87 | |
|
Charm City Ambassador
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Baltimore
Posts: 190
Likes (Received): 0
|
Missed this in the Examiner yesterday.
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#88 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 635
Likes (Received): 3
|
Why not build the 18-20k seat arena in Canton and build the 27k seat stadium for the united in Westport?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#89 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,400
Likes (Received): 15
|
Hmmm. Pat Turner had talked about a velodrome for his project in Westport but dropped it. Soccer might fit. Right now, teams are either playing in (American) football stadiums (NY in Giants Stadium, NE in Gillette) or "custom" parks (Colorado in "Dick's Sporting Goods Stadium"), but the latter are usually out in the 'burbs where most of the youth soccer players are.As for the arena, it would be helpful if it could take advantage of some of the existing parking for the two stadiums, rather than having another asphalt prairie in Canton. |
|
|
|
|
|
#90 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Baltimore
Posts: 2,098
Likes (Received): 3
|
An arena just won't fit between the stadia without MAJOR changes to the traffic pattern above. I really don't think it would work.
Wait...where did this Examiner reporter get a 15-20K figure? I thought Hale himself said he didn't want to go higher than 16K. 20K is more like it. Hell, I'd even take 18,000 just so the state's largest city can have the state's largest arena. Currently that's in College Park. (17,950)
__________________
Click here to see '10 Inner Harbor' and other Baltimore developments |
|
|
|
|
|
#91 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Baltimore
Posts: 2,098
Likes (Received): 3
|
It pisses me off that the city just cant seem to wrap its effing brain around the idea that we are losing out on millions and millions of dollars because we don't have an adequate arena. It's a shame.
It's absurd Maryland and Georgetown can't play annually alternating sites between the Verizon Center and the new Baltimore arena. It's silly that Towson or Loyola or Morgan State or Coppin can't bid to host a sub-regional. Its also silly that men's Terps team will never play an NCAA tournament game in their home state. Concerts, major presentations, comedy shows, boxing events, etc. If Hale wasn't to build a significant arena 18K+, then let him. If he does it at Canton, then that frees up a prime spot on the Westside. I should admit that I'd really like to keep it where it is.
__________________
Click here to see '10 Inner Harbor' and other Baltimore developments |
|
|
|
|
|
#92 |
|
B-MORE than u strive for!
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Baltimore/Columbia, Md.
Posts: 2,259
Likes (Received): 0
|
yeah, i would too, but that three years WITHOUT the blast would pretty much seal their fate as far as being here. now that hale has mentioned between 15k-20k, i wouldn't mind having it over in canton. but again, MAJOR redevelopments would have to be done.......to boston street imparticular.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#93 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Baltimore
Posts: 2,455
Likes (Received): 23
|
I've said it before and I'll say it again..the new arena has to be built on a different site. A city the size of Baltimore cannot be without any arena at all for the 3-4 years it will take to build a new one. As decrepit as it is, it still houses a significant number of events.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#94 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 25
Likes (Received): 0
|
I agree that the city can't go three years without an arena. Yet, I don't think that the city's "main" arena should be in Canton. I think the Downtown location is much more accessible, given that it's closer to 395, 83, the Parkway, and Light Rail. Plus, it's closer to the city's main north/south arterials.
The Canton location is closer to 95 on the north side of the tunnel, and I wonder if people coming from the south are going to be tempted to use Aliceanna and Eastern Avenue. And if they don't, I'm not sure either that Boston Street can handle the traffic; on top of that, it has a multi-track grade crossing between where the arena would be and I-95. Fortunately, there isn't any catenary, so it's easier to build over it, but they'd have to build over it even for the 16k arena. 4-5 extra possible thousand seems like too much for that area. So, I think that they should get Hale what he wants. Let him build his "smaller" arena in Canton, having events over there while the new Baltimore Arena, preferably on the same site as the current arena, is built -- a 20k seat arena with luxury boxes and other such amenities. More events at a new arena means more to do for conventioneers, possibly more conventions, and possibly more reservations at the convention hotel (another reason to have the new arena at the current site). I don't give Baltimore City government for knowing much of anything and I've felt that for a very long time. The same folks --the current Guv included-- commission a "Duh" report that tells us what we already know, and then no action is taken on it. Of course, these are the same folks who have been out to Portland and go to DC and NY and other places and still don't have a clue about mass transit. So, I'm not surprised that they don't know how much they're losing out on. Kansas City knows what's up, though. They have the newly-opened Sprint Arena --which might end up hosting the Big 12, in addition to all the other events they have scheduled-- and they're keeping Kemper Arena for smaller events. You'd think that with a Baltimore guy like David Cordish overseeing a major redevelopment project in their city (check out their "Power and Light" district), somebody in Baltimore government would be at least peripherally aware of what he's up to, look at what's happening and say "gee, maybe we could have two arenas, too." They're expanding their convention center, they have Power and Light coming in, and the new arena, and it's all in the same area. But Baltimore government can't even decide on a new arena. And their own commissioned report said the thing was inadequate. Arghhh. I'm thinking about UFC 78 coming up at the Prudential Center in Newark, NJ. I really think that events like that could and should be coming to Baltimore. They've had UFC in Columbus. Why not Baltimore? |
|
|
|
|
|
#95 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,400
Likes (Received): 15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#96 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Miami/Baltimore
Posts: 4,175
Likes (Received): 24
|
Just for imagination's sake, here is the new arena proposed for Glasgow, which was just awarded the 2014 Commonwealth Games. It's only 12,500 seats, but, man, is it a beauty - designed by Norman Foster. How would you like this on Baltimore's waterfront?
![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
#97 | |
|
Charm City Ambassador
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Baltimore
Posts: 190
Likes (Received): 0
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#98 |
|
Indeed
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Baltimore
Posts: 976
Likes (Received): 2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#99 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,400
Likes (Received): 15
|
Tough call. I'm sure it's beautiful, but these renderings aren't doing it for me. They make it look like a clam emerging from the mud.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#100 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Indian Ocean
Posts: 783
Likes (Received): 0
|
go ravens
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|