|
|
| daily menu » rate the banner | guess the city | one on one |
|
|
#561 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,568
Likes (Received): 25
|
Is it refused that's the old scheme surely? this one's not even gone into planning yet has it?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#562 |
|
ONE WORLD
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: london
Posts: 7,176
Likes (Received): 262
|
completely fucks up any skyline view of the London Eye. Surely that kind of massing is out of date?? A taller, graceful tower would have been more in keeping; reminds me of how Guy's Hospital impacts on the Shard.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#563 |
|
The Q&A Guy
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Citizen of the World
Posts: 6,747
Likes (Received): 7
|
So if the Elizabeth House Redevelopment buildings had their permission refused, does this mean that Elizabeth House will never be replaced with a brand-new building?
__________________
I honestly think all development projects must be dashing, sustainable, and futureproof. You support the good projects... and oppose the bad. |
|
|
|
|
|
#564 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: London (the southern half)
Posts: 309
Likes (Received): 0
|
New designs submitted and website updated:
http://elizabethhousewaterloo.co.uk/index.htm ![]() Much, much better than the last scheme, although i'm incredulous whether it will: 1) get approved (It is now taller than the shell centre tower) 2) the blocky massing will be anything other than a blot on the skyline |
|
|
|
|
|
#565 |
|
Ampersands & What
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: London/ Nottingham
Posts: 4,841
|
I agree its much better than the old scheme, but still far from looking.. nice.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#566 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: London (the southern half)
Posts: 309
Likes (Received): 0
|
Yeah part of me thinks it's not the kind of scheme that should be built in such a prominent location, but thinking pragmatically, we're not going to get a better building than this. Also it's better than the 60s shite it's replacing which is always nice.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#567 |
|
Not the Builder
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Kingdom of Hanover
Posts: 1,206
Likes (Received): 17
|
Stacked boxes. Meh.
This definitely is way better than the previous proposal but that just shows how bad the old scheme was. |
|
|
|
|
|
#568 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: London (the southern half)
Posts: 309
Likes (Received): 0
|
Another render:
![]() With the Shell centre redevelopment, we could have another cluster emerging |
|
|
|
|
|
#569 |
|
Take Your Meds!
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: St Bananas
Posts: 312
Likes (Received): 1
|
It's hard to get worked up about this one. Much better than what's there, but buildings on stilts rarely work: too scary to walk under at night, and they are somehow intimidating. The gallery on the ground floor is great. How well this all works depends on the Shell Centre.
Anyway, I just feel sorry for that tree. It has to live in perpetual shadow with that overhang above it. |
|
|
|
|
|
#570 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: London
Posts: 643
Likes (Received): 38
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#571 |
|
Not the Builder
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Kingdom of Hanover
Posts: 1,206
Likes (Received): 17
|
Doon Street Tower http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=349637
|
|
|
|
|
|
#572 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Portsmouth
Posts: 8,957
Likes (Received): 18
|
Not much to go on, but it looks much better than the previous slab. I'm getting a slightly Tokyo vibe from it for some reason. Perhaps they really did listen to the feedback we gave.
Looking at the site posted above, the public spaces with the overhanging building look quite interesting, at least to me. Last edited by Newcastle Guy; April 3rd, 2012 at 02:03 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#573 |
|
cartoon policeman
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Londres
Posts: 2,972
Likes (Received): 46
|
Much, much better. Still ugly, but much better.
__________________
dibble music |
|
|
|
|
|
#574 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: NW London
Posts: 2,258
Likes (Received): 70
|
I like it, the stacked-box building at least. Removing the dated skywalk and opening up the ground level running parellel between EH and Waterloo could be a huge improvement in terms of not only much needed public space to let the station breath, but also in helping out with access to other parts of this area. The central square could be a bit of genius design by bringing some life to York Road. At the moment it's like walking down a street flanked by blank walls.
The second building still sucks though. |
|
|
|
|
|
#575 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Portsmouth
Posts: 8,957
Likes (Received): 18
|
Some more views:
![]() ![]() ![]() Some of the previous images for comparison: ![]() ![]() Vs.
Last edited by Newcastle Guy; April 3rd, 2012 at 03:00 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#576 |
|
Ampersands & What
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: London/ Nottingham
Posts: 4,841
|
It's very featureless from groundlevel. Also very overbearing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#577 |
|
Portsmouths Finest, Maybe
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Portsmouth
Posts: 14,137
Likes (Received): 218
|
That's what I thought, it's nice that it slants inwards towards Waterloo, but it looks oppressive. Doesn't work with the Station Frontage at all.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#578 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 85
Likes (Received): 1
|
It's a step in the right direction. The previous design was so dire I was getting ready to set up a campaign against it. It's still not that great, and given the constraints of the site it will probably never end up that good. But it's still an improvement over the last idea!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#579 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,568
Likes (Received): 25
|
I think I'm more offended by Doon street tower than this proposal. The massing compliments the shell centre well as do the elevations which are simple yet viewed obliquely give the impression of solidity which I think is so much better than just a glass box.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#580 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: In exile and in the redwoods
Posts: 173
Likes (Received): 0
|
Quote:
i think the most offensive thing about waterloo is the crappy public realm, its a car crash, railings, uneven, its just crap. does anyone know what happened with the winning proposal for the redevelopment of the waterloo area? is it happening? |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|