|
|
|
| daily menu » rate the banner | guess the city | one on one |
|
|||||||
| London Metro Area London Calling... |
| Global Announcement |
|
SkyscraperCity needs your help to do some house cleaning! please click here for more info! |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#21 |
|
Surveying a town near you
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Bristol
Posts: 884
Likes (Received): 1
|
theyre nice towers with a slender design, but do they have to have greenery on top or is this just another eco-friendly fad that seems to be incorporated into a lot of towers now? i like the idea of the roof garden in fenchurch street as it will be publicly accessible, but in designs like this it just seems to be a way of pushing through planning permission on environmental grounds. i think they should concentare on making the gound/public area pleasant instead of thinking about trees 120 m in the sky.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Oxford, London
Posts: 1,644
Likes (Received): 0
|
Well to be fair they are replacing Britain's oldest brewery. I would prefer Young's to stay, converted into housing and shops as seen in much of the old Docklands, but if their demolition is agreed, then I'd support this project.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2005
Location: London
Posts: 1,134
Likes (Received): 16
|
I like the scheme if there's no alternative. That area of wandsworth has a lot of potential. However that potential should have been realised years ago. The reasons I suspect it has not, is that there's no real mass transit provision nearby. The borough of Wandsworth itself certainly does, but just not right there around that part of town.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,534
Likes (Received): 28
|
The towers look great. Is there any rehabilitation of the brewery buildings included in this project?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: L O N D O N
Posts: 35,731
Likes (Received): 1194
|
This was submitted for planning permission last week according to London Lad.
Would be nice to see some more renderings... can anyone get on the council website and have a look?
__________________
FutureTimeline.net - a timeline of future history |
|
|
|
|
|
#26 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: London
Posts: 8,184
Likes (Received): 78
|
Cant find anything on the planning pages yet. Anybody know the correct address for Youngs Ram Brewery??
http://www.minervaplc.co.uk/investors/comnews/?id=13395 Ram Brewery, London SW18 – Scheme design finalised and planning application submitted last week for a 1 million sq.ft. mixed-use residential-led scheme. |
|
|
|
|
|
#27 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: London
Posts: 8,184
Likes (Received): 78
|
Planning docs online ( all B&W sadly
1x112m & 1x 145m. One will have a public viewing platform. http://www.wandsworth.gov.uk/gis/sea...DAURI=PLANNING |
|
|
|
|
|
#28 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Portsmouth
Posts: 8,956
Likes (Received): 23
|
I wasn't expecting these to be that tall. It seems they are now 32 and 42 stories, must have had a height increase. I hope they get approved, I like them alot
|
|
|
|
|
|
#29 |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: L O N D O N
Posts: 35,731
Likes (Received): 1194
|
__________________
FutureTimeline.net - a timeline of future history |
|
|
|
|
|
#30 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Portsmouth
Posts: 8,956
Likes (Received): 23
|
AGL I think. That's what it says on the elevations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#31 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Camden Town
Posts: 2,185
Likes (Received): 0
|
I don't have much hope of these being approved at their current height, this being Wandsworth and all.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#32 |
|
Bossman
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: not london
Posts: 29,265
Likes (Received): 558
|
the heights for the buildings are 145.5 metres AGL and 114m AGL. there is also a 51m tall included in the proposals.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#33 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: London
Posts: 8,184
Likes (Received): 78
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#34 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,607
Likes (Received): 36
|
I really don't understand why they shouldn't wandsworth is really a bit of no mans land of main roads and roundabouts...atleast they will give this area a landmark to give it some idendity.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#35 |
|
BLAND
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: London
Posts: 8,532
Likes (Received): 149
|
The chance of these being built in 'village Wandsworth' is remote in the extreme
__________________
Quote: "Everything in life is our fault...but that's not our fault" (By a friend of Quentin Crisp) www.jclodge.com (my singer sisters site) The headlines read: 'another footballer is charged with sexual miscontuct'! Is it pure coincidence that a mans Scrotum resembles a brain - requisite with both hemispheres, and its truncated spinal cord - always in search of sensation? (Mark Joseph 2008) |
|
|
|
|
|
#36 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,607
Likes (Received): 36
|
village?? oh so it's a small little village now.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#37 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Camden Town
Posts: 2,185
Likes (Received): 0
|
It's ridicules estate agent speak. I've heard the term 'village' being applied to even less deserving areas, ever heard of Connaught 'village'? It's the area around Conaught Square and Conaught Street, between Marble Arch and Lancaster Gate. Apparently a dense urban area comprising of 5 storey Victorian townhouses, 30s mansion blocks and 60s high-rise flates qualifies as a village now!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#38 |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: L O N D O N
Posts: 35,731
Likes (Received): 1194
|
Absolutely NO WAY are these going to be approved. We know what's going to happen here - at least a 50m height reduction for the tallest; new application submitted; council and local residents still unhappy; developers sent back to the drawing board. The usual story. Might as well close this thread now... seriously.
__________________
FutureTimeline.net - a timeline of future history |
|
|
|
|
|
#39 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: London
Posts: 8,184
Likes (Received): 78
|
More than likely.
The thing is that theres already a 30 storey block ( the big white block at the top of this pic)in the immediate area but as ever with those who are going to complain they will be blind to it just as they will be oblivious to the very busy traffic island the site sits on but will kick up a stink to these towers ruining the ambiance of the area. [IMG]http://i32.************/vhyygz.jpg[/IMG] |
|
|
|
|
|
#40 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Portsmouth
Posts: 8,956
Likes (Received): 23
|
Quote:
![]() I like these. Elegant, curvy, slender towers. It would be a real shame if the council were stupid enough to listen to any NIMBYs. And you know the stupidest thing, when these NIMBYs come out, they are only usually a small percentage of the area's population. yet they moan so loudly, they manage to make it look like the schemes are opposed by everyone, and they get their own way. It's annoying. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|