|
|
| daily menu » rate the banner | guess the city | one on one |
|
|
#121 | |
|
BANNED
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Chicago
Posts: 9,399
Likes (Received): 0
|
Quote:
cbotnyse, I would think that the Franklin-Orleans bridge would work well for Loop access. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#122 | |
|
Chicago's #1 Fan
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,968
Likes (Received): 0
|
Quote:
Just have them restore/reactivate the railroad bridge utilizing light rail as well as a pedestrain corssing. That bridge would also have to be raised because of it's lack of clearance. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#123 | |
|
Chicago's #1 Fan
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,968
Likes (Received): 0
|
Quote:
You're in the minority. I'd only go along with a park covering the entire site if the Apparel Mart were demolished and a mega-tall tower were built in its place. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#124 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 130
Likes (Received): 0
|
Quote:
1) extend w. mart drive west over the river on the north side of the Wolf Pt. site 2) run a bridge diagonally southwest from the point. The reason I cited Calatrava was that he is known for two things when it comes to bridges. The first being thin, graceful curving lines that don't obstruct views of the skyline. The second is his incredible appreciation for bridges including complex physics, cantilevered sections, etc. Realistically, either of those two routes would work, and someone could easily engineer a boat-friendly solution. This could include a center span that actually restracts toward land on either side. It could also include a two spans that meet in the middle with the ability to both turn 90 degrees clock or counter clock when something of significant height needs to come through. The only remaining requirement is that the bridge span would need to be a good 15-20 feet above the water to eliminate the need to raise for barges. That's not a problem. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#125 |
|
Hi
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,210
Likes (Received): 1
|
Is this project still alive at all? I'd love to have at last two more supertalls up for the 2016 olympics. There couldn't be a better place in downtown to put one, either.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#126 |
|
muted
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Chicago
Posts: 7,192
Likes (Received): 8
|
It's very much alive.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#127 |
|
everything's looking up
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 213
Likes (Received): 0
|
[Dr. Frankenstien] "IT'S ALIVE!!!" [Dr. Frankenstien]
nothing going on here with this... it must be a zombie |
|
|
|
|
|
#128 |
|
Born in Baltimore
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Newberry, SC
Posts: 10,626
Likes (Received): 12
|
What is the status of this project now?
__________________
Baltimore, my hometown. |
|
|
|
|
|
#129 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Chicago
Posts: 82
Likes (Received): 0
|
I'm sure the status for Wolf Point is non-existent right about now...too bad.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#130 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 131
Likes (Received): 2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#131 |
|
The Q&A Guy
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Citizen of the World
Posts: 6,743
Likes (Received): 7
|
I'm not sure that a supertall skyscraper should be put on the site of Wolf Point. Maybe if the Merchandise Mart buildings weren't so short. There can be pros and cons to any proposal on Wolf Point. If I had a plan for Wolf Point, I would put a 100-150 m tower with a floor area of no less than a million square feet on that site.
__________________
I honestly think all development projects must be dashing, sustainable, and futureproof. You support the good projects... and oppose the bad. |
|
|
|
|
|
#132 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2010
Location: CGO, IL
Posts: 1,354
Likes (Received): 1
|
^ I'll have it match the LaSelle building's height or mare slightly taller. they can go for a supertall when the west loop finally decides to expand....
Since you bumped this do u know anything new about it? still proposed? on hold? anything?... |
|
|
|
|
|
#133 |
|
less is more
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 985
Likes (Received): 0
|
Kennedys envision 3-tower development along Chicago River
http://www.suntimes.com/business/102...ago-river.html
__________________
"Make no little plans; they have no magic to stir men's blood" - Daniel H. Burnham |
|
|
|
|
|
#134 |
|
Whiskey Tango Foxtrot
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: ELP ~ ABQ
Posts: 29,629
Likes (Received): 1358
|
3 60 story towers? I'm down with that!
__________________
We are floating in space... |
|
|
|
|
|
#135 |
|
Seven Costanza
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Chicago
Posts: 355
Likes (Received): 0
|
Taller!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#136 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Buenos Aires
Posts: 2,012
Likes (Received): 28
|
No supertalls are planned at the site? Cmon this is Chicago!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#137 |
|
Vigilant Citizen
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Tulsa
Posts: 1,241
Likes (Received): 31
|
I heard somewhere that they are announcing plans in april, or they are proposing it basically.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#138 | |
|
Vigilant Citizen
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Tulsa
Posts: 1,241
Likes (Received): 31
|
Here we go, this is about get real.
From Ald. Reilly Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#139 |
|
Whiskey Tango Foxtrot
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: ELP ~ ABQ
Posts: 29,629
Likes (Received): 1358
|
Great news! Let's hope this one gets approved soon!
__________________
We are floating in space... |
|
|
|
|
|
#140 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Chicago, Il
Posts: 288
Likes (Received): 26
|
Amazing find! Great news, I feel this seems more likely to happen.
Last edited by ChiSkyline; May 9th, 2012 at 07:45 AM. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|