daily menu » rate the banner | guess the city | one on one

Go Back   SkyscraperCity > Continental Forums > North American Skyscrapers Forum > Metropolis & States > Chicago


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old August 13th, 2008, 02:09 AM   #121
edsg25
BANNED
 
edsg25's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Chicago
Posts: 9,399
Likes (Received): 0

Quote:
Originally Posted by Frumie View Post
Tower plus park sounds like a winner. BTW does the park across from the Newberry Library qualify or is it too removed?
oh, I thought about it (and Water Tower Sq, too), but as nice as both are, they don't have blockbuster written all over them. Water Tower is too small and Newberry is too residential.

cbotnyse, I would think that the Franklin-Orleans bridge would work well for Loop access.
edsg25 no está en línea   Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
 
Old August 15th, 2008, 04:12 AM   #122
BVictor1
Chicago's #1 Fan
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,968
Likes (Received): 0

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nat76 View Post
I definitely think the developer needs to take their time on this site and come up with something exceptional here. Another component I would like to see added is some sort of footbridge stretching west across the north branch.

Nothing bulky. Something thin and twisting like a Calatrava-style bridge would be an interesting contrast to the freight rail just north of the site. The land west of the river is rather disjointed due to all of the rail running through it, but development is going up over there as well. The area is just too isolated from downtown right now. It would be nice to link that up a bit better.
there's no place to connect it to tje other side. it would have to do diagonally southwest-northeast. you have Fulton House and Riverbend directly across the way. Also, it would have to have the same clearance as all the other bridges to allow clearance of barges, commercial and private boats.

Just have them restore/reactivate the railroad bridge utilizing light rail as well as a pedestrain corssing. That bridge would also have to be raised because of it's lack of clearance.
BVictor1 no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old August 15th, 2008, 04:15 AM   #123
BVictor1
Chicago's #1 Fan
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,968
Likes (Received): 0

Quote:
Originally Posted by edsg25 View Post
I'm sure I'm in the minority here, but I respectfully disagree. Personally I think the location demands a stunning park. This special location that give the Chicago River its famous "Y" is a civic treasure. Given a choice, I'd put a park in place that measures up to the stature of the location and would be a center point along an extended river walk. Such a park would have some wonderful company in its setting, places that also enhance the water in front and the skyline behind it: Pittsubrgh's Golden Triangle and Manhattan's Battery Park.
You're right.

You're in the minority.

I'd only go along with a park covering the entire site if the Apparel Mart were demolished and a mega-tall tower were built in its place.
BVictor1 no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old August 23rd, 2008, 05:24 AM   #124
Nat76
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 130
Likes (Received): 0

Quote:
Originally Posted by BVictor1 View Post
there's no place to connect it to tje other side. it would have to do diagonally southwest-northeast. you have Fulton House and Riverbend directly across the way. Also, it would have to have the same clearance as all the other bridges to allow clearance of barges, commercial and private boats.

Just have them restore/reactivate the railroad bridge utilizing light rail as well as a pedestrain corssing. That bridge would also have to be raised because of it's lack of clearance.
I disagree here. There are two options for pedestrian bridges:

1) extend w. mart drive west over the river on the north side of the Wolf Pt. site
2) run a bridge diagonally southwest from the point.

The reason I cited Calatrava was that he is known for two things when it comes to bridges. The first being thin, graceful curving lines that don't obstruct views of the skyline. The second is his incredible appreciation for bridges including complex physics, cantilevered sections, etc. Realistically, either of those two routes would work, and someone could easily engineer a boat-friendly solution. This could include a center span that actually restracts toward land on either side. It could also include a two spans that meet in the middle with the ability to both turn 90 degrees clock or counter clock when something of significant height needs to come through.

The only remaining requirement is that the bridge span would need to be a good 15-20 feet above the water to eliminate the need to raise for barges. That's not a problem.
Nat76 no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old August 23rd, 2008, 05:50 AM   #125
Badgers77
Hi
 
Badgers77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,210
Likes (Received): 1

Is this project still alive at all? I'd love to have at last two more supertalls up for the 2016 olympics. There couldn't be a better place in downtown to put one, either.
Badgers77 no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old August 23rd, 2008, 06:17 AM   #126
i_am_hydrogen
muted
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Chicago
Posts: 7,192
Likes (Received): 8

It's very much alive.
i_am_hydrogen no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old January 23rd, 2009, 05:05 PM   #127
Sandeman
everything's looking up
 
Sandeman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 213
Likes (Received): 0

[Dr. Frankenstien] "IT'S ALIVE!!!" [Dr. Frankenstien]

nothing going on here with this... it must be a zombie
Sandeman no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old June 1st, 2009, 02:48 PM   #128
StevenW
Born in Baltimore
 
StevenW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Newberry, SC
Posts: 10,626
Likes (Received): 12

What is the status of this project now?
__________________
Baltimore, my hometown.
StevenW no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old June 4th, 2009, 08:14 PM   #129
ChicagoismynewBlog
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Chicago
Posts: 82
Likes (Received): 0

I'm sure the status for Wolf Point is non-existent right about now...too bad.

ChicagoismynewBlog no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old June 6th, 2009, 12:37 AM   #130
Tylow
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 131
Likes (Received): 2

Tylow no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old February 5th, 2011, 09:03 AM   #131
Jim856796
The Q&A Guy
 
Jim856796's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Citizen of the World
Posts: 6,743
Likes (Received): 7

I'm not sure that a supertall skyscraper should be put on the site of Wolf Point. Maybe if the Merchandise Mart buildings weren't so short. There can be pros and cons to any proposal on Wolf Point. If I had a plan for Wolf Point, I would put a 100-150 m tower with a floor area of no less than a million square feet on that site.
__________________
I honestly think all development projects must be dashing, sustainable, and futureproof.

You support the good projects... and oppose the bad.
Jim856796 no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old February 8th, 2011, 11:53 PM   #132
ChitownCity
Registered User
 
ChitownCity's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: CGO, IL
Posts: 1,354
Likes (Received): 1

^ I'll have it match the LaSelle building's height or mare slightly taller. they can go for a supertall when the west loop finally decides to expand....

Since you bumped this do u know anything new about it? still proposed? on hold? anything?...
ChitownCity no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old January 26th, 2012, 05:51 PM   #133
secondcity1
less is more
 
secondcity1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 985
Likes (Received): 0

Kennedys envision 3-tower development along Chicago River

http://www.suntimes.com/business/102...ago-river.html
__________________
"Make no little plans; they have no magic to stir men's blood" - Daniel H. Burnham
secondcity1 no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old January 27th, 2012, 01:17 AM   #134
desertpunk
Whiskey Tango Foxtrot
 
desertpunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: ELP ~ ABQ
Posts: 29,629
Likes (Received): 1358

3 60 story towers? I'm down with that!
__________________
We are floating in space...
desertpunk no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old February 12th, 2012, 08:38 AM   #135
Reinsdorf Sucks
Seven Costanza
 
Reinsdorf Sucks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Chicago
Posts: 355
Likes (Received): 0

Taller!
Reinsdorf Sucks no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old March 12th, 2012, 11:28 PM   #136
Jay
Registered User
 
Jay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Buenos Aires
Posts: 2,012
Likes (Received): 28

No supertalls are planned at the site? Cmon this is Chicago!
Jay no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old March 30th, 2012, 12:49 AM   #137
iloveclassicrock7
Vigilant Citizen
 
iloveclassicrock7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Tulsa
Posts: 1,241
Likes (Received): 31

I heard somewhere that they are announcing plans in april, or they are proposing it basically.
iloveclassicrock7 no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old May 9th, 2012, 02:17 AM   #138
iloveclassicrock7
Vigilant Citizen
 
iloveclassicrock7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Tulsa
Posts: 1,241
Likes (Received): 31

Here we go, this is about get real.

From Ald. Reilly

Quote:
I am writing to invite you to join me at a public presentation regarding a proposed development for the site located at 350 N. Orleans Street, commonly referred to as "Wolf Point."

Given the prominence of this property and the number of inquiries my office has received about the future development of this site, I have directed Hines Development Corporation and their team to start our community review process early, even before they take the initial step of filing a formal application with the City of Chicago. At this first community meeting, the Hines Development Team will present their proposed plan for the site; discuss their Traffic Study (commissioned at my request); and answer your questions about the Proposal.

The Applicant (Hines) has submitted a proposal for the development of three towers at this site, with Site "A" (West Tower) proposed as a residential, 525 foot tall structure containing 510 units and 200 parking stalls; Site "B" (South Tower) proposed as a 900 foot tall, mixed use structure containing 600 units and 885 parking stalls; and Site "C" (East Tower) proposed as a 750 foot tall, mixed use structure containing 200 parking stalls.

WHAT: 350 North Orleans (former Wolf Point site) Development Project

WHO: Hosted by Alderman Brendan Reilly, the River North Residents

Association (RNRA) and the Fulton River District Association (FRDA)

WHEN: Tuesday, May 29th at 5:30 P.M.

WHERE: Holiday Inn, 350 West Mart Center Drive - Wolf Point Ballroom

As you know, I make it a top priority to provide an open and transparent community review of all local development proposals. I hope you can join the RNRA, FRDA and me to engage in a direct dialogue with the Development Team to gain a better understanding of this proposal, share comments or concerns and receive answers to any questions you may have.
That is right, a 900 footer, a 750 footer, and 525 footer, and a meeting on the 29th of May, and the Kennedy's are behind this, time to get excited!
iloveclassicrock7 no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old May 9th, 2012, 04:40 AM   #139
desertpunk
Whiskey Tango Foxtrot
 
desertpunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: ELP ~ ABQ
Posts: 29,629
Likes (Received): 1358

Great news! Let's hope this one gets approved soon!
__________________
We are floating in space...
desertpunk no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old May 9th, 2012, 07:37 AM   #140
ChiSkyline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Chicago, Il
Posts: 288
Likes (Received): 26

Quote:
Originally Posted by iloveclassicrock7 View Post
Here we go, this is about get real.

From Ald. Reilly



That is right, a 900 footer, a 750 footer, and 525 footer, and a meeting on the 29th of May, and the Kennedy's are behind this, time to get excited!
Amazing find! Great news, I feel this seems more likely to happen.

Last edited by ChiSkyline; May 9th, 2012 at 07:45 AM.
ChiSkyline no está en línea   Reply With Quote


Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT +2. The time now is 01:35 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Feedback Buttons provided by Advanced Post Thanks / Like v3.1.2 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2013 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2013 DragonByte Technologies Ltd. (Resources saved on this page: MySQL 7.14%)

SkyscraperCity - In Urbanity We Trust

Hosted by Blacksun, dedicated to this site too!
Forum server management by DaiTengu