|
|
| daily menu » rate the banner | guess the city | one on one |
|
|||||||
| Midwest and Plains » Development News | Includes all plains states, MN, WI, IL, IN, OH, MO |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#21 |
|
Fresh Coast
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,704
Likes (Received): 0
|
Milwaukee
Milwaukee Mark, I always liked the shot you had of both the Downtown and East-side skylines, can you post that again?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
King of Flyover Country
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Columbus
Posts: 973
Likes (Received): 0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 | |
|
Fuck The Bullshit!
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: iNdY!
Posts: 437
Likes (Received): 0
|
Ya Know,
Quote:
__________________
Indianapolis. EVERYTHING you NEED & NOTHIN ya DONT! ;-) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Indianapolis/Lafayette
Posts: 3,493
Likes (Received): 1
|
the skyline is defianitly going to change a bit.
__________________
Peter- "Geesh, Meg is in there taking a nap under water!". |
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Fuck The Bullshit!
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: iNdY!
Posts: 437
Likes (Received): 0
|
This Is True
For better or for worse, but yes... It's also intriguing to see how "long" our skyline really is! Just think you can barely see One Indiana Square in the 2nd two pics AND it will look so much more fresh soon!!
__________________
Indianapolis. EVERYTHING you NEED & NOTHIN ya DONT! ;-) |
|
|
|
|
|
#26 |
|
BANNED
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: KCMO
Posts: 194
Likes (Received): 0
|
That's a nice photo of Clayton MO from the air, but I've seen better.
Why is St Louis barely visible and way in the background? Clayton has a better skyline - sans arch, of course -but St Louis has more character(s). |
|
|
|
|
|
#27 | |
|
The Jive is Alive.
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: St. Louis
Posts: 1,559
Likes (Received): 0
|
Quote:
I'm partial to this one:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#28 |
|
BANNED
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 531
Likes (Received): 0
|
Here are a couple more of Milwaukee, thanks to www.urban-photos.com:
http://www.urban-photos.com/page.php...10045&detail=1 http://www.urban-photos.com/page.php...10109&detail=1 |
|
|
|
|
|
#29 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 312
Likes (Received): 0
|
Yeah, that's more or less it, but it think it gets better as you move upriver so the angle cuts across the street grid more. Plus I'm in love with the steam plant these days, especially with LOS looming behind it. It's not the densest view of downtown, but I think it's one of the most interesting. The JWM might ruin it, though.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#30 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 12
Likes (Received): 0
|
I think this may be my favorite shot of KC - it has to be the best panoramic I've seen for capturing from Downtown through to the Plaza, including the Nelson Atkins (don't miss it at the far right)
|
|
|
|
|
|
#31 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Milwaukee
Posts: 548
Likes (Received): 0
|
[QUOTE=JivecitySTL;15332006]Clayton has a better skyline than St. Louis (minus the Arch)????? LOLOLOLOL. I want whatever dope you're smoking!
I'll hit it!
__________________
transplanted. 303 --->317---> 414 |
|
|
|
|
|
#32 |
|
american forester
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 147
Likes (Received): 0
|
wow. this is a neat angle! except it misses the east side "2nd" skyline just on the fringe of the picture
__________________
For-um-er Milwaukeean. (UWMilwaukeeJay) |
|
|
|
|
|
#33 |
|
american forester
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 147
Likes (Received): 0
|
LOL I can see why though...I can not say there is one photo that sticks out. There is always something missing that needs to be covered
__________________
For-um-er Milwaukeean. (UWMilwaukeeJay) |
|
|
|
|
|
#34 |
|
american forester
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 147
Likes (Received): 0
|
Now, how many Midwestern cities can say there on an isthmus?
__________________
For-um-er Milwaukeean. (UWMilwaukeeJay) |
|
|
|
|
|
#35 | |
|
BANNED
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: KCMO
Posts: 194
Likes (Received): 0
|
Quote:
Here's the in-betweens.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#36 |
|
BANNED
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: KCMO
Posts: 194
Likes (Received): 0
|
Last edited by gridley; September 13th, 2007 at 07:07 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#37 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: City of Minneapolis
Posts: 3,028
Likes (Received): 0
|
__________________
Minneapolis AND St. Paul: pop. 669,769 in 108 sq. miles |
|
|
|
|
|
#38 |
|
User, Registered
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Milwaukee
Posts: 367
Likes (Received): 0
|
That certainly is a killer pic. I didn't really think so much at first, but once I looked at the highway and noticed the tractor-trailer on it and how SMALL it looks(seems like a toy!), WOW! This is some crazy zoom and I love it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#39 |
|
muted
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Chicago
Posts: 7,191
Likes (Received): 8
|
Feel free to post more than one shot from this point. I renamed this thread "The Great Midwestern Photo Thread" and stickied it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#40 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: City of Minneapolis
Posts: 3,028
Likes (Received): 0
|
__________________
Minneapolis AND St. Paul: pop. 669,769 in 108 sq. miles |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|