#035 l AT&T Corporate Center l CHICAGO l 307m l 60fl - Page 3

AtlanticaC5 · August 31st, 2003, 01:49 PM

I don't like the spires on the roof, but the rest is quite OK. 7.5/10

de flatneuroot · August 31st, 2003, 02:42 PM

5/10

A very ugly building IMO but a 5 for its hight

September 1st, 2003, 05:59 PM

8/10

SOM did a nice job on this postmodern building. Fits in next to Sears nicely.

Monkey · October 4th, 2003, 10:18 AM

Ah, SOM again! This time in one of their lighter, more playful moments.

But they totally wimped out at the top! 7.5.

Kommentare · October 4th, 2003, 02:49 PM

Not more than 6.0/10

October 4th, 2003, 06:02 PM

9.5

I love it. I looks awesome next to Sears and 311 S. Wacker.

***SeeMacau*** · October 5th, 2003, 11:40 AM

Don't like this one
6/10

FloTownballer · November 2nd, 2003, 07:38 AM

I really like this building it looks lod but yet modern I like that 9/10

MCC · November 7th, 2003, 04:48 AM

8.5/10

Fabio · November 8th, 2003, 02:07 AM

8/10

looks too massive, but interesting.

November 13th, 2003, 07:00 AM

6/10
Tall building but not very good design. Looks too huge for its height.

Trances · November 13th, 2003, 07:13 PM

I Do like this one heaps of features
Height, Spires and Width !
Cladding in great and gives it the tower and older look !

alex3000 · November 17th, 2003, 09:25 AM

6/10

Aquarius · January 17th, 2004, 07:18 PM

Ancient design to be of 1989 6/10

Style™ · February 8th, 2004, 03:59 AM

9.5/10. I really like this one!

London™ · February 26th, 2004, 01:36 AM

5/10 I was horrified when I first saw this building in real life. It should have been placed in NYC Midtown, not Chicago.

Wisma · March 5th, 2004, 10:56 PM

7/10 Nothing special but I think it suits well in the skyline of Chicago.

7 World Trade · April 3rd, 2004, 04:24 AM

really, i don't think they should put spires on this building. it just doesn't look quite right. creating a better and more apparent roof would have been a better idea. the architecture's more atlantan than chicagoan though

8.5/10

Schroedinger's Cat · June 28th, 2004, 01:29 PM

6.5/10

Orfeo · June 28th, 2004, 02:01 PM

7/10

View Poll Results: AT&T Corporate Center, Chicago
10	43	8.50%
9.5	8	1.58%
9	28	5.53%
8.5	36	7.11%
8	80	15.81%
7.5	58	11.46%
7	64	12.65%
6.5	36	7.11%
6	36	7.11%
5.5	18	3.56%
5	21	4.15%
4.5	11	2.17%
4	14	2.77%
3.5	12	2.37%
3 or less	41	8.10%
Voters: 506. You may not vote on this poll

August 31st, 2003, 01:49 PM	#41
AtlanticaC5 Right Here, Right Now Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Stockholm Posts: 2,655 Likes (Received): 0	I don't like the spires on the roof, but the rest is quite OK. 7.5/10 __________________ Higher and higher, straight up we'll climb

August 31st, 2003, 02:42 PM	#42
de flatneuroot Lord of the Lampposts Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: Rotterdam Posts: 1,387 Likes (Received): 0	5/10 A very ugly building IMO but a 5 for its hight __________________ "Nationalism is an infantile disease. It has the measles of mankind." (Albert Einstein, 1921). http://www.youtube.com/user/StreetlightsOfSander

October 4th, 2003, 02:49 PM	#45
Kommentare Registered User Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: Kaunas, Lithuania Posts: 447 Likes (Received): 0	Not more than 6.0/10 __________________ X

November 2nd, 2003, 07:38 AM	#48
FloTownballer Enjoy The Cola! Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: Columbia, SC Posts: 110 Likes (Received): 0	I really like this building it looks lod but yet modern I like that 9/10 __________________ Yep, SC is still a backwater, backwood, backwards ass state but I live in Columbia so its all OK, because we have brains here.

September 1st, 2003, 05:59 PM	#43
SFtoBoise Guest Posts: n/a Likes (Received):	8/10 SOM did a nice job on this postmodern building. Fits in next to Sears nicely.

October 4th, 2003, 10:18 AM	#44
Monkey Londinium langur Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Londinium Posts: 14,616 Likes (Received): 1	Ah, SOM again! This time in one of their lighter, more playful moments. But they totally wimped out at the top! 7.5.

October 4th, 2003, 06:02 PM	#46
TPX Guest Posts: n/a Likes (Received):	9.5 I love it. I looks awesome next to Sears and 311 S. Wacker.

October 5th, 2003, 11:40 AM	#47
*SeeMacau* Moderator Join Date: Sep 2002 Posts: 14,923 Likes (Received): 48	Don't like this one 6/10

November 7th, 2003, 04:48 AM	#49
MCC Made in Indy Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: Indianapolis Posts: 825 Likes (Received): 0	8.5/10

November 8th, 2003, 02:07 AM	#50
Fabio Go Habs! Go! Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: Montréal-QC Posts: 5,092 Likes (Received): 2	8/10 looks too massive, but interesting.

November 13th, 2003, 07:00 AM	#51
manx_bkk Guest Posts: n/a Likes (Received):	6/10 Tall building but not very good design. Looks too huge for its height.

November 13th, 2003, 07:13 PM	#52
Trances , , and , Fade to Black. Join Date: May 2003 Location: Living in London Posts: 7,896 Likes (Received): 4	I Do like this one heaps of features Height, Spires and Width ! Cladding in great and gives it the tower and older look ! __________________ "Are we ready to go farther or have we already gone to far?" “He who controls the present, controls the past. He who controls the past, controls the future.”

November 17th, 2003, 09:25 AM	#53
alex3000 I'm not Chinese Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Los Angeles Posts: 1,347 Likes (Received): 1	6/10 __________________ California must protect its borders from AUSTRIA.

January 17th, 2004, 07:18 PM	#54
Aquarius Nooo, ya no Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: Barcelona Posts: 1,254 Likes (Received): 3	Ancient design to be of 1989 6/10

February 8th, 2004, 03:59 AM	#55
Style™ King of the Queen Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: Charlotte, NC Posts: 2,146 Likes (Received): 0	9.5/10. I really like this one! __________________ Queen City Pulse

February 26th, 2004, 01:36 AM	#56
London™ K-Mod Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: London ON Posts: 657 Likes (Received): 0	5/10 I was horrified when I first saw this building in real life. It should have been placed in NYC Midtown, not Chicago.

March 5th, 2004, 10:56 PM	#57
Wisma Registered User Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: Jakarta (Tanah Tinggi) Posts: 2,889 Likes (Received): 0	7/10 Nothing special but I think it suits well in the skyline of Chicago.

April 3rd, 2004, 04:24 AM	#58
7 World Trade Long live the Twins! Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: SF Bay Area Posts: 1,116 Likes (Received): 0	really, i don't think they should put spires on this building. it just doesn't look quite right. creating a better and more apparent roof would have been a better idea. the architecture's more atlantan than chicagoan though 8.5/10 __________________ UNWAVERING SUPPORTER OF THE REBUILDING OF THE WTC TWIN TOWERS Team Twin Towers- Standing Tall Together Twin Towers Alliance- What the People want-What New York Needs-What America Deserves The Ground Zero Rebuilding Scandal- Justin Berzon's complete story of the WTC rebuilding scandal Proud fan of NASCAR drivers Kevin Harvick and Scott Wimmer

June 28th, 2004, 01:29 PM	#59
Schroedinger's Cat Krakus rodowity Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: Kraków Posts: 5,751 Likes (Received): 0	6.5/10 __________________ 1923 1925 1927 1928 1929 1930 1931 1933 1934 1936 1938 1947 1948 1949 1950 1951 1953 1966 1976 1978 1981 1991 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011

June 28th, 2004, 02:01 PM	#60
Orfeo Registered User Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: Brisbane Posts: 3,392 Likes (Received): 14	7/10

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode