|
|
| daily menu » rate the banner | guess the city | one on one |
|
|
#1 |
|
Hotel Business
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Riga/Amsterdam
Posts: 796
Likes (Received): 0
|
RIGA | Skanstes Virsotnes | 4 x 76m | 4 x 24 fl | Com
Skanstes Virsotnes
RIGA, LATVIA ![]() "Skanstes Virsotnes" (Skanstes Peaks) is a project developed by "Merks" construction company and is containing 4 residential highrises - each 24 floors high (90 metres). From top floors there will be splendid view towards the Old Town which is just 2-3 km away. The project is a part of a major area development of so called Skanstes street area, where several other projects have already been completed (Rietumu Capital Centre, Arena Riga) and many other proposed and a few under construction. PROJECT INFO: Construction: 2006 - 2008 (I and II), 2007 - ? (III and IV) Architect: KVA Architects, Finland Developer: Merks Building use: Residential Website: http://www.skanstes-virsotnes.lv ![]() ![]() ![]()
Last edited by LatvianGG; December 1st, 2007 at 07:06 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
-Riga-
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Riga
Posts: 840
Likes (Received): 26
|
Poor renders...
![]() But. Why SV each building height is 76 meters? Where did You get that info? |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Hotel Business
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Riga/Amsterdam
Posts: 796
Likes (Received): 0
|
Some construction pictures by nomels:
![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Hotel Business
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Riga/Amsterdam
Posts: 796
Likes (Received): 0
|
Quote:
76m is true, I know a guy who is construction manager of SV 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,053
|
they should be in a commie suburb not there
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
-Riga-
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Riga
Posts: 840
Likes (Received): 26
|
Corrections - Architect: KVA Architects, Finalnd
Hmm... 76m ?!?!? ![]() Something I can't understand: Pictures form Construction magazine ''Latvijas Buvnieciba'' http://www.lilita.lv/i.php?z=61# (Sorry for quality) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() and finally, what do you think about it? 76m or 90m ??? |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Hotel Business
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Riga/Amsterdam
Posts: 796
Likes (Received): 0
|
Could be changed by the second architect. I assume that 90m would be the right height, it sounds better too :p
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 4,983
Likes (Received): 15
|
From me - taken today:
From Academy of Science, 21st floor (got there by spiralling ladder) ![]() Evening view. Three years ago whole landscape here consisted of ugly shacks and meadows
__________________
Wondermondo - an armchair guide to world attractions - most interesting landmarks and attractions in the world! Ambermarks - landmarks of Latvia |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
-Riga-
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Riga
Posts: 840
Likes (Received): 26
|
Thanks, good quality pictures.
http://img98.imageshack.us/img98/259...a1dec07vx6.jpg But lookin at this picture again, we can see that Skanstes Virsotnes should'nt be so hight (90m). Currently Skanstes Virsotne I has height (~22fl/~70m) Something here is wrong.... Explanation according as Gatis picture:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Hotel Business
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Riga/Amsterdam
Posts: 796
Likes (Received): 0
|
Well, seems I was right after all
But you never know it until it will be finished. Maybe they will put a big communications mast or something and with it the height will be about 90m
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Used User
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Copenhagen
Posts: 4,156
Likes (Received): 53
|
Modern commieblocks? reminds me to much of all the ugly residential towers you find in Asia
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Adventurous!
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Trondheim
Posts: 11,264
Likes (Received): 262
|
Agree with Oelanddk on this one, exept that in Asia its somehow great too see suchs an enourmes among of insanely ugly and tall residential high-rises making up an insanely dense area (such as HK)!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
copyright
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Riga City
Posts: 122
Likes (Received): 0
|
__________________
Z-Towers in 2009 Check out this http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=412691 P.S. Latvia Rullz |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
-Riga-
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Riga
Posts: 840
Likes (Received): 26
|
Photo update. Photos by Nomels
![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
always on
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: tallinn/Tartu
Posts: 4,529
Likes (Received): 1
|
i agree, shamefully ugly.
__________________
not ready yet |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 4,983
Likes (Received): 15
|
Finnish highrise design + Estonian investor + local permitting institutions = this result.If that would be the only case, I wouldnt say this. There were good locally produced designs proposed and even winning the official tenders... and as usual, replaced by Finns in hard-to-understand ways. Happily at least in the case of "Spice" highrise the usual quality Finnish design (which also did not win in the open design tender but was imposed by Merks anyway) was rejected by then newly established City Architect office and there was done more serious tendering and finally something more decent has been approved.
__________________
Wondermondo - an armchair guide to world attractions - most interesting landmarks and attractions in the world! Ambermarks - landmarks of Latvia |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
mumbling imprecations
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,432
Likes (Received): 0
|
That's really shameful and depressing!
![]() Thanks to Nomels for the photos of this ugly monstrosity, and to Martins for posting them. Gati, as always thanks for your insight. Riga deserves MUCH better than this!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
-Riga-
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Riga
Posts: 840
Likes (Received): 26
|
More photos. Photos from LATIO.LV
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Good photos, unseen angles, poor building architecture, great Skanstes skyline!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Labor Omnia Vincit
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Riga
Posts: 3,649
Likes (Received): 0
|
Today, the first highrise of this complex was officially put into operation. Simultaneously with a building there has been put into operation an arranged well adjoining territory, and also a two-level parking for 525 cars.
__________________
There are no borders, there are only obstacles |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
BANNED
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 103
Likes (Received): 0
|
When I first saw this project I thought that they are ugly as hell, but when I recently visited that site in a sunny day I changed my mind. Now I quite like them and I wouldn't mind living into one
A lot better high rise project than panorama plaza, that's for sure!
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|