Ibrox 700milion rebuild - Page 6

TheC · January 13th, 2008, 06:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Boards

What a plonker. Yes, a little peice of me died when Celic Park got the opening ceremony and by christ it hurts. Everyone knows the build quality at Celtic Park makes GH1 look like a German built nuclear bunker.

Christ, one prick leaves and another returns. Actually have you been suffering an identity crisis Boards?

Celtic Park cost considerably more than Ibrox over the years. Always amazing that since 1995 Glasgow has had more structural engineers (in blue) than the remainder of Europe put together.

Dressing rooms and press areas have been revamped and trust me-if any ground out-with Hampden is used for a European final in Scotland it'll be Celtic Park.

Enjoy the Rugby sevens- assuming the ground ain't waterlogged!

Boards · January 13th, 2008, 06:41 PM

The only prick here is you

crusty_bint · January 13th, 2008, 06:50 PM

I think you'll both find that you're a pair of fannies.

Now shut the fuck up about this Celtic and Rangers pish.

Boards, I know you've made up with wiggles now and so are probably a bit bored but toe the line eh, same for the rest of you (minus the bit about wiggles).

architect-steve · January 13th, 2008, 08:18 PM

Dear oh dear this does seem to have caused quite a stir....... can't think why when you all claim, to be here having an interest in architecture..............

I understand detailed news should be released by the club very soon, which should clear things up.

crusty_bint · January 13th, 2008, 08:36 PM

dont think your part in this little drama has gone unnoticed ...pal.

Its pathetic, the teams can sign up to all the anti-bigotry schemes Holyrood can come up with but neither side will EVER be able to mention, let alone discuss the other. This is 2008, get a grip of yourselves.

architect-steve · January 13th, 2008, 09:54 PM

Who are you talking too?

crusty_bint · January 13th, 2008, 10:02 PM

Every****.

***The Boy David*** · January 13th, 2008, 10:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crusty_bint

This is 2008, get a grip of yourselves.

Good stuff Crusty.

Words of wisdom if ever I've heard them.

clyde built · January 13th, 2008, 10:49 PM

Its a no brainier celtic fans will rubbish and be jealous of Rangers great plans its just human nature it would be the exact same if it was the other way round. Celtic park as it is just now is a cheep as chips stadium but you must applaud Mr McCann for such a good quick fix and loads a big stadiums around europe are crap. £280 million dose seem a bit cheep for such a stadium if you look at the dallas cowboys knewone that will only be 10 000 more seats.

Is the new developmeent at ibrox not on a par money wise with Renfrew riverside?

GlasgowMan · January 13th, 2008, 11:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by clyde built

Its a no brainier celtic fans will rubbish and be jealous of Rangers great plans its just human nature it would be the exact same if it was the other way round. Celtic park as it is just now is a cheep as chips stadium but you must applaud Mr McCann for such a good quick fix and loads a big stadiums around europe are crap. £280 million dose seem a bit cheep for such a stadium if you look at the dallas cowboys knewone that will only be 10 000 more seats.

Is the new developmeent at ibrox not on a par money wise with Renfrew riverside?

Like I said before, I would love it this happen, I am just a bit doubtful because Rangers don’t have £400 million. Am I not allowed to question where Rangers are getting this money from?

Rangers haven’t stated they even know where it’s coming from.

You can accuse Celtic fans off being jealous etc, but I easily say you are looking at this development trough blue tinted glasses.

Do you know were Rangers are getting at least £400 million from?

The day this was “leaked” to the press a Rangers fan called in a football phone-in saying Eithad Airways are the company buying the naming rights to the new Ibrox, for a start he couldn’t even pronounce there name right, secondly I suspect he came up with their name as they have their name plastered around Stamford Bridge, thirdly, its total bullshite.

Just to clarified, I am 100% for this development, I am not jealous or bitter, I am just very sceptical about Rangers and this sum up money.

crusty_bint · January 13th, 2008, 11:13 PM

Clydebuilt, are you deliberately trying to perpetuate this bullshit? Glasgowman, are you a total idiot? Give it a fucking rest!!!!

Kentigern · January 14th, 2008, 12:10 AM

Cosimo63 · January 14th, 2008, 12:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by clyde built

Its a no brainier celtic fans will rubbish and be jealous of Rangers great plans its just human nature it would be the exact same if it was the other way round. Celtic park as it is just now is a cheep as chips stadium but you must applaud Mr McCann for such a good quick fix and loads a big stadiums around europe are crap. £280 million dose seem a bit cheep for such a stadium if you look at the dallas cowboys knewone that will only be 10 000 more seats.

Is the new developmeent at ibrox not on a par money wise with Renfrew riverside?

Excuse me Amigo, why do you state Celtic park is a "cheep as chips stadium " could you please explain why CP is, & Ibrox isnay ?

I cant see any difference, apart from the Ibrox frontage & Celtic park is 20% larger i dont see much difference between the stadiums.

As far as i can see the 3 stands & infills at the corners at ibrox are built with the same materials as Celtic park.
Are you wearing blue tinted glasses ?

Chief · January 14th, 2008, 12:44 AM

Abandon hope all ye who enter... leave this thread well alone I say, and leave the dogs to it.

A bit like Sona in Prison Break, now I think about it!

clyde built · January 14th, 2008, 01:22 AM

I am sure Mr McCann is on record as saying this is he not? Also did it not cost something like 30 million for the 3 new sides of celtic park? Also a director who is in the construction industry had a falling out with the board who approved the spec due to it being so cheap and would be so costly to maintain after 25 to 30 years it will be cheaper to re-build? Also if you have been to celtic park you will relies its built for maximum value and the main stand is held up by support beams between games to help support the roof and removed/ hinged up into the roof when games are being played. Also due to its poor construction dose it not have to safety inspections a year instead of one like Ibrox and Hampden?

I am not slagging celtic I am applauding Fergus McCann on a great job. As celtic could very well be dead today with out his leadership and vision. So stop being a paranoid Tim LOL.

gorgu · January 14th, 2008, 04:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by clyde built

I am sure Mr McCann is on record as saying this is he not? Also did it not cost something like 30 million for the 3 new sides of celtic park? Also a director who is in the construction industry had a falling out with the board who approved the spec due to it being so cheap and would be so costly to maintain after 25 to 30 years it will be cheaper to re-build? Also if you have been to celtic park you will relies its built for maximum value and the main stand is held up by support beams between games to help support the roof and removed/ hinged up into the roof when games are being played. Also due to its poor construction dose it not have to safety inspections a year instead of one like Ibrox and Hampden?

I am not slagging celtic I am applauding Fergus McCann on a great job. As celtic could very well be dead today with out his leadership and vision. So stop being a paranoid Tim LOL.

I believe celtic will probably be able to afford a new stadium coimpletely if they keep turning fifteen million profit for the next 20 years!

Rebuilding both Ibrox and Parkhead and seeling Hapden and Murrayfiled should be the way sport in this country heads!

Snudge · January 14th, 2008, 09:33 AM

For fucks sake,

can we all agree that a £700m redevelopment of Ibrox would be a good thing for Glasgow?

can we also agree that the figures seem a bit adventurous for Rangers, or almost any club for that matter, in the present financial climate and wait for further details.

We are talking about massive new developments, the build quality of Celtic Park, Uefa 5 star acreditation and we can't even get fucking Scottish Cup games played due to pitch conditions, I think we have forgotten why the stadiums are built in the first place.

milton · January 14th, 2008, 12:56 PM

I'm a Dons fan, and despite being ritually abused at both Celtic Park and Ibrox, they are both WAY better stadiums to watch a game of fitba at than Hampden.
Way better.

As to this nonsense about Ibrox, I got bored halfway down that article. The guy makes some fair points about the finane being pie in the sky, but really, does that surprise anyone? £700million. Come on.
However, he does undermine his own position with bollocks like " the main stand is listed, that's why they're talking about redevelopment, not a move", as a comparison to the case of Arsenal.
Um, does he not realise that Highbury was/is also listed? Guess not.

At the end of the day, if any project goes ahead that helps regenerate Govan, it's a good thing, yes?
So let's hope something happens.

Skyescraper · January 14th, 2008, 02:04 PM

Celtic Park's not half bad considering it appears to have been built almost entirely of Mecano!

milton · January 14th, 2008, 02:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Skyescraper

Celtic Park's not half bad considering it appears to have been built almost entirely of Mecano!

Totally.
For all the slagging CP gets, I'd be over the moon if my team had a stadium like that (and the fans to fill it of course).

January 13th, 2008, 06:41 PM	#102
Boards Cunty Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: In the Screaming Trees Posts: 9,056 Likes (Received): 60	The only prick here is you __________________ I've always been considered an asshole for about as long as I can remember. That's just my style.

January 13th, 2008, 06:50 PM	#103
crusty_bint control yourself Join Date: May 2004 Location: InYourFace Posts: 3,294 Likes (Received): 0	I think you'll both find that you're a pair of fannies. Now shut the fuck up about this Celtic and Rangers pish. Boards, I know you've made up with wiggles now and so are probably a bit bored but toe the line eh, same for the rest of you (minus the bit about wiggles). __________________ A great place and its people are not renewed lightly. The caked layers of grime grow warm, like homely coats. But yet they will be dislodged and men will still be warm. The old coats are discarded. The old ice is loosed. The old seeds are awake. Slip out of darkness, it is time.

January 13th, 2008, 08:36 PM	#105
crusty_bint control yourself Join Date: May 2004 Location: InYourFace Posts: 3,294 Likes (Received): 0	dont think your part in this little drama has gone unnoticed ...pal. Its pathetic, the teams can sign up to all the anti-bigotry schemes Holyrood can come up with but neither side will EVER be able to mention, let alone discuss the other. This is 2008, get a grip of yourselves. __________________ A great place and its people are not renewed lightly. The caked layers of grime grow warm, like homely coats. But yet they will be dislodged and men will still be warm. The old coats are discarded. The old ice is loosed. The old seeds are awake. Slip out of darkness, it is time.

January 13th, 2008, 10:02 PM	#107
crusty_bint control yourself Join Date: May 2004 Location: InYourFace Posts: 3,294 Likes (Received): 0	Every****. __________________ A great place and its people are not renewed lightly. The caked layers of grime grow warm, like homely coats. But yet they will be dislodged and men will still be warm. The old coats are discarded. The old ice is loosed. The old seeds are awake. Slip out of darkness, it is time.

January 13th, 2008, 11:13 PM	#111
crusty_bint control yourself Join Date: May 2004 Location: InYourFace Posts: 3,294 Likes (Received): 0	Clydebuilt, are you deliberately trying to perpetuate this bullshit? Glasgowman, are you a total idiot? Give it a fucking rest!!!! __________________ A great place and its people are not renewed lightly. The caked layers of grime grow warm, like homely coats. But yet they will be dislodged and men will still be warm. The old coats are discarded. The old ice is loosed. The old seeds are awake. Slip out of darkness, it is time.

January 13th, 2008, 08:18 PM	#104
architect-steve Registered User Join Date: May 2007 Location: Glasgow Posts: 66 Likes (Received): 0	Dear oh dear this does seem to have caused quite a stir....... can't think why when you all claim, to be here having an interest in architecture.............. I understand detailed news should be released by the club very soon, which should clear things up.

January 13th, 2008, 09:54 PM	#106
architect-steve Registered User Join Date: May 2007 Location: Glasgow Posts: 66 Likes (Received): 0	Who are you talking too?

January 13th, 2008, 10:49 PM	#109
clyde built Registered User Join Date: Jun 2006 Posts: 99 Likes (Received): 0	Its a no brainier celtic fans will rubbish and be jealous of Rangers great plans its just human nature it would be the exact same if it was the other way round. Celtic park as it is just now is a cheep as chips stadium but you must applaud Mr McCann for such a good quick fix and loads a big stadiums around europe are crap. £280 million dose seem a bit cheep for such a stadium if you look at the dallas cowboys knewone that will only be 10 000 more seats. Is the new developmeent at ibrox not on a par money wise with Renfrew riverside?

January 14th, 2008, 12:10 AM	#112
Kentigern Local man Join Date: Apr 2005 Posts: 376 Likes (Received): 0

January 14th, 2008, 12:44 AM	#114
Chief Izzle Bizzle Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: London Posts: 1,478 Likes (Received): 0	Abandon hope all ye who enter... leave this thread well alone I say, and leave the dogs to it. A bit like Sona in Prison Break, now I think about it! __________________ "What's the difference between Mexico and New Mexico?"

January 14th, 2008, 01:22 AM	#115
clyde built Registered User Join Date: Jun 2006 Posts: 99 Likes (Received): 0	I am sure Mr McCann is on record as saying this is he not? Also did it not cost something like 30 million for the 3 new sides of celtic park? Also a director who is in the construction industry had a falling out with the board who approved the spec due to it being so cheap and would be so costly to maintain after 25 to 30 years it will be cheaper to re-build? Also if you have been to celtic park you will relies its built for maximum value and the main stand is held up by support beams between games to help support the roof and removed/ hinged up into the roof when games are being played. Also due to its poor construction dose it not have to safety inspections a year instead of one like Ibrox and Hampden? I am not slagging celtic I am applauding Fergus McCann on a great job. As celtic could very well be dead today with out his leadership and vision. So stop being a paranoid Tim LOL.

January 14th, 2008, 09:33 AM	#117
Snudge Registered User Join Date: Dec 2006 Posts: 125 Likes (Received): 0	For fucks sake, can we all agree that a £700m redevelopment of Ibrox would be a good thing for Glasgow? can we also agree that the figures seem a bit adventurous for Rangers, or almost any club for that matter, in the present financial climate and wait for further details. We are talking about massive new developments, the build quality of Celtic Park, Uefa 5 star acreditation and we can't even get fucking Scottish Cup games played due to pitch conditions, I think we have forgotten why the stadiums are built in the first place.

January 14th, 2008, 12:56 PM	#118
milton A new low Join Date: May 2006 Posts: 2,381 Likes (Received): 91	I'm a Dons fan, and despite being ritually abused at both Celtic Park and Ibrox, they are both WAY better stadiums to watch a game of fitba at than Hampden. Way better. As to this nonsense about Ibrox, I got bored halfway down that article. The guy makes some fair points about the finane being pie in the sky, but really, does that surprise anyone? £700million. Come on. However, he does undermine his own position with bollocks like " the main stand is listed, that's why they're talking about redevelopment, not a move", as a comparison to the case of Arsenal. Um, does he not realise that Highbury was/is also listed? Guess not. At the end of the day, if any project goes ahead that helps regenerate Govan, it's a good thing, yes? So let's hope something happens.

January 14th, 2008, 02:04 PM	#119
Skyescraper Sgitheanach Join Date: May 2004 Location: Glasgow Posts: 278 Likes (Received): 4	Celtic Park's not half bad considering it appears to have been built almost entirely of Mecano!

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes	Rate This Thread
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode	Rate This Thread: