|
|
| daily menu » rate the banner | guess the city | one on one |
|
|
#21 | |||
|
Blah de da
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Chicken City
Posts: 2,209
Likes (Received): 48
|
Quote:
![]() Quote:
Quote:
And as for your note on form, there truly is only so much you can do with a baseball stadium, especially given the confines of the site and the demands for modern concourses. To us, perhaps, but apparently not to the future owners.
__________________
"Now that's what I call a dead parrot." |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
BANNED
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Dallas/Amarillo TEXAS
Posts: 1,105
Likes (Received): 0
|
Future owners, this stadium will be in the Steinbrenner family for the next 200 years.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
sucks
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Sannozay
Posts: 1,646
Likes (Received): 4
|
1.3 billion for a cleaner version of what they have? Why not hire a maid?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,233
Likes (Received): 0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,233
Likes (Received): 0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#26 | |
|
Blah de da
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Chicken City
Posts: 2,209
Likes (Received): 48
|
Quote:
The quote I recall for a renovation was on the order of $500M, not including the costs associated with any temporary relocation to who-knows-where while the renovations were being completed. In the end the renovations wouldn't resolve issues such as handicap access, improved sightlines, etc to the degree a new stadium would. Plus the structure would've required additional structural upgrades again the not-too-distant future, or at least sooner than this new stadium would. I'm not saying a renovation couldn't be made cost-effective, but the long term yield obviously didn't convince the team's owners.
__________________
"Now that's what I call a dead parrot." |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#27 |
|
BANNED
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Dallas/Amarillo TEXAS
Posts: 1,105
Likes (Received): 0
|
![]() So they built a smaller stadium?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#28 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 36
Likes (Received): 0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#29 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Nijmegen & Utrecht
Posts: 1,318
Likes (Received): 0
|
meaning 30.000 fans are not able to pay a seat in the new stadium and being dumped? Or were there alot of empty seats in the old stadium?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#30 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2005
Location: NYC
Posts: 754
Likes (Received): 0
|
30,000 seats cut? More like 6,000. This is easily the biggest baseball stadium in construction seat wise int he last 30 years (the others have had less seats). In fact when this stadium is done it wil still bei nthe top 3 in seating capacity.
I dont see why some of you are making such a big huff about how much a building costs. Especially DallasBrink who seems to have something against the Yankees? But limestone is very expensive, it is not as cheap like brick or other outside wall materials. And you can't 'clean' up the old stadium. Like I said before the old stadium looks nothing like its original form. It was almost completely demolished in the last renovation and the stadium there is nothing but a 1970's peice of architecture. All its art deco granduer was gone with renovation. |
|
|
|
|
|
#31 |
|
BANNED
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Dallas/Amarillo TEXAS
Posts: 1,105
Likes (Received): 0
|
Still, those 6000 fans are more loyal fans then those pompas but fucks in those heated boxes. Pussys, they cant fight the elements with the rest of us. If i was a Yankee fan (thank god im not) I would be mad as hell and be going Ape shit over this.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#32 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 1,405
Likes (Received): 5
|
The new Twins ballpark (40,000 seats, about 60 suites, to 54,000 and I think about 60 suites) is going to have a Facade composed of limestone and glass and the cost is less than half of this ($522 million to $1.3 billion), so some outrage is warranted. Having the extra "grand concourse" really increases the size and materials required, and land in NY and what ever else they manage to blow this on (also they may be using a support system that requires more steel than normal, which would make a suprisingly big difference)
|
|
|
|
|
|
#33 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2005
Location: NYC
Posts: 754
Likes (Received): 0
|
Yes but this is the trend in baseball in general, not just Yankees Stadium (the Mets fans should be more pissed, they lost 9-11k seats?)
|
|
|
|
|
|
#34 | |
|
BANNED
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Dallas/Amarillo TEXAS
Posts: 1,105
Likes (Received): 0
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#35 |
|
Member, Winifred Fan Club
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Santa Cruz, CA
Posts: 2,381
Likes (Received): 3
|
Article in today's NY Times says $800 million. And they're not over budget.
However, they're building CitiField over part of the current Shea Stadium parking lot, unlike the Yankees who build over parkland and are required to find and construct replacement parkland. The plan is the site where the current Yankee Stadium is will be cleared and turned into parkland. A parking garage will be built underneath the replacement park. And the Mets also do not have to have a new train station built for them. Plus, the land in Queens is more available than the land in the Bronx so doubtless it'll be cheaper to build in Queens. And the Mets are building an even smaller park... I think it was what.. .43,000 vs. the Yankees 50,000? So the Yankee Stadium construction is more complex than CitiField construction. Last edited by bagel; February 14th, 2008 at 12:11 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#36 |
|
aspiring cyborg
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: NYC | KYIV | MINSK
Posts: 18,749
Likes (Received): 250
|
Ugly and overpriced.
__________________
The Future Is Now - join us for intellectually stimulating and informative discussions |
|
|
|
|
|
#37 |
|
Proximamente CASAHUS.COM
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Guadalajara
Posts: 996
Likes (Received): 4
|
any pictures of the stadium?
__________________
GUADALAJARA, MEXICO RUMBO AL AÑO 2030.. JUEGOS PANAMERICANOS, JVC, ESTADIO CHIVAS, TORRES EN PUERTA DE HIERRO... |
|
|
|
|
|
#38 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Pohang
Posts: 1,433
Likes (Received): 1
|
Is this stadium made of gold? I can't believe that a stadium which is not a dome and has the capacity of a little more than 50K cost 1.3 billion dollars.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#39 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 2,869
Likes (Received): 6
|
Like the Cowboys stadium it will simply have nicer amenities than most. Most stadiums are very basic with maybe a decent roof. On top of that, roofs simply aren't as expensive as most seem to think. I remember the Cotton Bowl survey. A roof was gonna be about $200 million for a steel structure that would cover the entire roof.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#40 |
|
©
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Townsville
Posts: 7,575
Likes (Received): 115
|
What a rip off.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Tags |
| new york city, stadium, yankee |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|