daily menu » rate the banner | guess the city | one on one

Go Back   SkyscraperCity > World Forums > Stadiums and Sport Arenas

Stadiums and Sport Arenas » completed | under construction | proposed


View Poll Results: -
- 0 0%
- 0 0%
Voters: 0. You may not vote on this poll

Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old November 19th, 2004, 11:12 AM   #1
SouthBank
Amat victoria curam...
 
SouthBank's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 66
Likes (Received): 1

British Stadiums - 15 Largest Countdown!

A summary of the UK's largest (though not necessarily best!) stadia. Note - Have included those currently under construction, but not those still in the planning stages. Also please note that they are not in order of what I think is 'best', but purely in order of capacity... Enjoy!


Britain's Top 15 Stadiums in terms of size:

1) Wembley Stadium, London: English national football stadium.
Capacity - 90,000
(Under Construction - opens 2006)







2) Twickenham Stadium, London: English national rugby stadium.
Capacity – 83,000
(Currently being expanded from 75-83,000)







3) Old Trafford, Manchester: Home of Manchester United F.C.
Capacity – 75,000
(Currently being expanded from 68-75,000)







4) Millennium Stadium, Cardiff: Welsh national football and rugby stadium.
Capacity – 73,000







5) Murrayfield, Edinburgh: Scottish national rugby stadium.
Capacity – 67,000







6) New Anfield, Liverpool: New home of Liverpool F.C.
Capacity – 61,000
(Groundwork just begun – Opens 2007/2008)







7) Celtic Park, Glasgow: Home of Celtic F.C.
Capacity – 61,000







8) Emirates Stadium, London: New home of Arsenal F.C.
Capacity – 60,000
(Under Construction – opens 2006)







9) Hampden Park, Glasgow: Scottish national football stadium.
Capacity - 53,000







10) St. James' Park, Newcastle: Home of Newcastle United F.C.
Capacity – 53,000







11) Ibrox Stadium, Glasgow: Home of Rangers F.C.
Capacity – 51,000







12) Stadium of Light, Sunderland: Home of Sunderland A.F.C.
Capacity – 49,000







13) City of Manchester Stadium, Manchester: Home of Manchester City F.C.
Capacity – 48,000







14) Villa Park, Birmingham: Home of Aston Villa F.C.
Capacity – 44,000







15) Stamford Bridge, London: Home of Chelsea F.C.
Capacity – 43,000



__________________

Vititor Osornino liked this post

Last edited by SouthBank; December 1st, 2004 at 11:38 PM.
SouthBank no está en línea   Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
 
Old November 19th, 2004, 12:11 PM   #2
DTGR
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 13
Likes (Received): 0

The UK should definitely host a world cup! Dont bother with the olympics..this is what u d do best!!
DTGR no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old November 19th, 2004, 06:20 PM   #3
The Boy David
Registered Win
 
The Boy David's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Kyoto
Posts: 3,656
Likes (Received): 15

We could host a world cup no bother - and it'd be a bloody spectacular one at that, especially when wembly stadium is finished. Scotland is jealous of that beast!!
Dont want to nit-pick, but Parkheads capacity is 60,832 to be precise.. lol. And what a stadium it is too! Just been voted the most atmospheric stadium in britain by the BBC, and with good reason.
Deserves its nick-name : "Paradise"
__________________
On the run, 'til we're caught, in New York

Vititor Osornino liked this post
The Boy David no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old November 19th, 2004, 06:30 PM   #4
The Boy David
Registered Win
 
The Boy David's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Kyoto
Posts: 3,656
Likes (Received): 15

just a few more pics of Celtic Park, these do it slightly more justice, sorry if im being a bit too obsessive, but Celtic are my team, afterall...



__________________
On the run, 'til we're caught, in New York
The Boy David no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old November 19th, 2004, 07:06 PM   #5
SouthBank
Amat victoria curam...
 
SouthBank's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 66
Likes (Received): 1

I would love to see a British World Cup, it would be as good if not better than anywhere else, but it'll never happen - there would need to be three seperate home teams automatically qualifying (England, Wales, Scotland). Guess they could have a mini-tournament to decide who qualifies automatically - might be a bit of a foregone conclusion though... Also, even if those problems were sorted, two of the best stadiums (Twickenham and Murrayfield) couldn't be used because they are owned by rugby associations who don't generally allow football at their stadiums - ridiculous as that is. The English bid for the 2006 World Cup, for example, didn't include Twickenham.

The Boy David - no probs, second pic is definitely worth posting. Agreed that Parkhead is an awesome stadium, as good as Old Trafford. Will edit the Celtic Park capacity to 61,000 since I'm rounding up/down to nearest 1000.

Welcome any other additional pictures or suggestions...
SouthBank no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old November 19th, 2004, 11:31 PM   #6
high_flyer
Registered User
 
high_flyer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: England
Posts: 553
Likes (Received): 1

I think if the UK was to host a WC, it should be either just England, or Scotland, Wales and NI host it, it would be too problematic for a UK wide competition
high_flyer no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old November 20th, 2004, 02:47 PM   #7
carlspannoosh
Registered User
 
carlspannoosh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Islington
Posts: 1,985
Likes (Received): 52

Some newer renderings of the Arsenal stadium.












360 dgree views
http://www.arsenal.com/clublevel/index.htm#
carlspannoosh no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old November 21st, 2004, 02:33 AM   #8
gorgu
Craaaaaazy Mutha F^cka
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Glasgow
Posts: 780
Likes (Received): 4

Yeah i think that Scotland wasted its chance ten years ago when they redeveloped murrayfield and Hampden.

We could have had a Millenium stadium or Wembley, if the West, East prejudices did not exist. Imagine a stadium half way between the two citeis on the M8, with a direct rail link and complete sports campus, that is what Scotland should be working to in 30 years or so when they need redeveloped agaion
gorgu no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old November 23rd, 2004, 03:20 PM   #9
CharlieP
Prepare to die.
 
CharlieP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Wakefield, Little Satan
Posts: 21,068
Likes (Received): 218

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Boy David
Dont want to nit-pick, but Parkheads capacity is 60,832 to be precise.. lol. And what a stadium it is too! Just been voted the most atmospheric stadium in britain by the BBC, and with good reason.
Deserves its nick-name : "Paradise"
When are they going to finish it?
__________________
This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
CharlieP no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old November 23rd, 2004, 03:49 PM   #10
dgnr8
Mmm, Danone
 
dgnr8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Manchester
Posts: 1,778
Likes (Received): 5

Rubbish point : The City Of Manchester Stadium was also used for the 2002 Commonwealth Games, albeit at a 38,000 capacity.
dgnr8 no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old November 23rd, 2004, 06:35 PM   #11
Sitback
NW London baby!
 
Sitback's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: London
Posts: 4,102
Likes (Received): 10

As football was invented in Britain, Britain should have the world cup at least every 30 years imo. We are the home of football after all.
Sitback no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old November 30th, 2004, 10:18 PM   #12
cinosanap
Profile of the Rising Sun
 
cinosanap's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Kirkcaldy, Scotland
Posts: 2,821
Likes (Received): 0

[QUOTE=SouthBank]two of the best stadiums (Twickenham and Murrayfield) couldn't be used because they are owned by rugby associations who don't generally allow football at their stadiums - ridiculous as that is. The English bid for the 2006 World Cup, for example, didn't include Twickenham. QUOTE]

Murryfield is used for football aswell as rugby. Hearts play their European games there (and may move there) and it was part of the bid for the European Championship in 2008 by Scotland and Ireland. We could have done with Croke Park for that bid but we may try again. Even though Switzerland/Austria won it UEFA said that the Scot/Irish bid was a close runner up and that we should try again but I think Scotlnad may go it alone if we do put in another bid.
cinosanap no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old December 3rd, 2004, 04:06 AM   #13
Iain1974
Registered User
 
Iain1974's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Longvieew
Posts: 951
Likes (Received): 0

Quote:
Originally Posted by cinosanap
Murryfield is used for football aswell as rugby. Hearts play their European games there (and may move there) and it was part of the bid for the European Championship in 2008 by Scotland and Ireland. We could have done with Croke Park for that bid but we may try again. Even though Switzerland/Austria won it UEFA said that the Scot/Irish bid was a close runner up and that we should try again but I think Scotlnad may go it alone if we do put in another bid.
Given the current state of Scottish Rugby and the pathetic crowds at WC99 in Scotland I don't see why the SRU don't swallow their pride and allow big Edinburgh football games at Murrayfield.

By my reckoning the 4 Edinburgh derbies could attract 50,000+ each. Probably even sell outs if there were £10 tickets (268,000 fans) in addittion to Hearts V Celtic/Rangers (4 matches) and Hibs vs Celtic/Rangers (another 4 matches).

That'd give a potential 800,000 spectators rather than the current 215,000 for those 12 games. It doesn't take a genius to see that both scottish rugby, football and the paying public could all benefit.
Iain1974 no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old December 3rd, 2004, 07:23 PM   #14
empersouf
Registered User
 
empersouf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,230
Likes (Received): 1

The new Wembley is really nice.

Last edited by empersouf; December 3rd, 2004 at 07:29 PM.
empersouf no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old December 15th, 2004, 01:15 AM   #15
easysurfer
Registered User
 
easysurfer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Bradford/Sydney
Posts: 312
Likes (Received): 0

Beautiful stadiums. Im Proud England is thehome of football, i'd be even prouder if we were given a chance to exhibit these fine stadiums in a world cup.
easysurfer no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old December 15th, 2004, 01:37 AM   #16
Lss911
Supermoto scratcher!
 
Lss911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Lisbon
Posts: 4,656
Likes (Received): 4

[QUOTE=carlspannard]Some newer renderings of the Arsenal stadium.


Interior looks like "da Luz" portuguese stadium and exterior a little bit like "do Dragão" portuguese stadium! emirates?? major sponsor isn`t it? probably the money guys!
Lss911 no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old December 15th, 2004, 01:44 AM   #17
th0m
oemoemenemoe
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Groningen
Posts: 1,496
Likes (Received): 0

Really impressive and huge stadiums. It's interesting to see that a lot of stadiums look to have been expanded over the years and although its not noticable on the inside, you can clearly see it on the outside, which gives a feeling of tradition and history to it, more so than a brand new stadium.

Just my observation
th0m no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old December 15th, 2004, 02:19 AM   #18
spacepostman
Fairy Godmother
 
spacepostman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Manchester
Posts: 540
Likes (Received): 0

Horrary! More of the City of Manchester Stadium... (it should have been much bigger, but as usual, London grabbed the money for itself).





spacepostman no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old December 15th, 2004, 03:00 AM   #19
carlspannoosh
Registered User
 
carlspannoosh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Islington
Posts: 1,985
Likes (Received): 52

[QUOTE=Lss911]
Quote:
Originally Posted by carlspannard
Some newer renderings of the Arsenal stadium.


Interior looks like "da Luz" portuguese stadium and exterior a little bit like "do Dragão" portuguese stadium! emirates?? major sponsor isn`t it? probably the money guys!
Yes it looks like Da Luz but thats not a bad thing.The roof looks quite different to Da Luz though. Emirates will be the sponsors for the stadium over the next 15 years and during this time it will be officially known as The Emirates Stadium.No offence Emirates but it makes me want to throw up. I would feel the same if it was called the Coca Cola or AXA Insurance stadium.I couldve possibly lived with the Rolls Royce stadium but it doesnt matter,to me its The Arsenal Stadium and fcuk sponsors.
carlspannoosh no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old December 15th, 2004, 03:17 PM   #20
Balleke
Eindhoven de gextuh
 
Balleke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Eindhoven
Posts: 1,564
Likes (Received): 2

whenever i see english stadiums, my harts starts beating faster and faster... but why is the new stadium name of arsenal so fucked up... emirates stadium
Balleke no está en línea   Reply With Quote


Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT +2. The time now is 04:05 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Feedback Buttons provided by Advanced Post Thanks / Like v3.1.2 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2013 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2013 DragonByte Technologies Ltd. (Resources saved on this page: MySQL 20.00%)

SkyscraperCity - In Urbanity We Trust

Hosted by Blacksun, dedicated to this site too!
Forum server management by DaiTengu