|
|
| daily menu » rate the banner | guess the city | one on one |
|
|||||||
| Stadiums and Sport Arenas » completed | under construction | proposed |
| View Poll Results: - | |||
| - |
|
0 | 0% |
| - |
|
0 | 0% |
| Voters: 0. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 | |
|
Amat victoria curam...
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 66
Likes (Received): 1
|
British Stadiums - 15 Largest Countdown!
A summary of the UK's largest (though not necessarily best!) stadia. Note - Have included those currently under construction, but not those still in the planning stages. Also please note that they are not in order of what I think is 'best', but purely in order of capacity... Enjoy!
Britain's Top 15 Stadiums in terms of size: 1) Wembley Stadium, London: English national football stadium. Capacity - 90,000 (Under Construction - opens 2006) 2) Twickenham Stadium, London: English national rugby stadium. Capacity – 83,000 (Currently being expanded from 75-83,000) 3) Old Trafford, Manchester: Home of Manchester United F.C. Capacity – 75,000 (Currently being expanded from 68-75,000) 4) Millennium Stadium, Cardiff: Welsh national football and rugby stadium. Capacity – 73,000 5) Murrayfield, Edinburgh: Scottish national rugby stadium. Capacity – 67,000 6) New Anfield, Liverpool: New home of Liverpool F.C. Capacity – 61,000 (Groundwork just begun – Opens 2007/2008) 7) Celtic Park, Glasgow: Home of Celtic F.C. Capacity – 61,000 8) Emirates Stadium, London: New home of Arsenal F.C. Capacity – 60,000 (Under Construction – opens 2006) 9) Hampden Park, Glasgow: Scottish national football stadium. Capacity - 53,000 10) St. James' Park, Newcastle: Home of Newcastle United F.C. Capacity – 53,000 11) Ibrox Stadium, Glasgow: Home of Rangers F.C. Capacity – 51,000 12) Stadium of Light, Sunderland: Home of Sunderland A.F.C. Capacity – 49,000 13) City of Manchester Stadium, Manchester: Home of Manchester City F.C. Capacity – 48,000 14) Villa Park, Birmingham: Home of Aston Villa F.C. Capacity – 44,000 15) Stamford Bridge, London: Home of Chelsea F.C. Capacity – 43,000
__________________
Last edited by SouthBank; December 1st, 2004 at 10:38 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 13
Likes (Received): 0
|
The UK should definitely host a world cup! Dont bother with the olympics..this is what u d do best!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Registered Win
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Kyoto
Posts: 3,654
Likes (Received): 15
|
We could host a world cup no bother - and it'd be a bloody spectacular one at that, especially when wembly stadium is finished. Scotland is jealous of that beast!!
Dont want to nit-pick, but Parkheads capacity is 60,832 to be precise.. lol. And what a stadium it is too! Just been voted the most atmospheric stadium in britain by the BBC, and with good reason. Deserves its nick-name : "Paradise" |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Registered Win
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Kyoto
Posts: 3,654
Likes (Received): 15
|
just a few more pics of Celtic Park, these do it slightly more justice, sorry if im being a bit too obsessive, but Celtic are my team, afterall...
__________________
On the run, 'til we're caught, in New York |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Amat victoria curam...
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 66
Likes (Received): 1
|
I would love to see a British World Cup, it would be as good if not better than anywhere else, but it'll never happen - there would need to be three seperate home teams automatically qualifying (England, Wales, Scotland). Guess they could have a mini-tournament to decide who qualifies automatically - might be a bit of a foregone conclusion though... Also, even if those problems were sorted, two of the best stadiums (Twickenham and Murrayfield) couldn't be used because they are owned by rugby associations who don't generally allow football at their stadiums - ridiculous as that is. The English bid for the 2006 World Cup, for example, didn't include Twickenham.
The Boy David - no probs, second pic is definitely worth posting. Agreed that Parkhead is an awesome stadium, as good as Old Trafford. Will edit the Celtic Park capacity to 61,000 since I'm rounding up/down to nearest 1000. Welcome any other additional pictures or suggestions...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: England
Posts: 553
Likes (Received): 1
|
I think if the UK was to host a WC, it should be either just England, or Scotland, Wales and NI host it, it would be too problematic for a UK wide competition
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Islington
Posts: 1,981
Likes (Received): 51
|
Some newer renderings of the Arsenal stadium.
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 360 dgree views http://www.arsenal.com/clublevel/index.htm# |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Craaaaaazy Mutha F^cka
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Glasgow
Posts: 780
Likes (Received): 2
|
Yeah i think that Scotland wasted its chance ten years ago when they redeveloped murrayfield and Hampden.
We could have had a Millenium stadium or Wembley, if the West, East prejudices did not exist. Imagine a stadium half way between the two citeis on the M8, with a direct rail link and complete sports campus, that is what Scotland should be working to in 30 years or so when they need redeveloped agaion |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Prepare to die.
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Wakefield, Little Satan
Posts: 21,061
Likes (Received): 215
|
Quote:
__________________
This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Mmm, Danone
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Manchester
Posts: 1,778
Likes (Received): 5
|
Rubbish point : The City Of Manchester Stadium was also used for the 2002 Commonwealth Games, albeit at a 38,000 capacity.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
NW London baby!
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: London
Posts: 4,094
Likes (Received): 7
|
As football was invented in Britain, Britain should have the world cup at least every 30 years imo. We are the home of football after all.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Profile of the Rising Sun
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Kirkcaldy, Scotland
Posts: 2,821
Likes (Received): 0
|
[QUOTE=SouthBank]two of the best stadiums (Twickenham and Murrayfield) couldn't be used because they are owned by rugby associations who don't generally allow football at their stadiums - ridiculous as that is. The English bid for the 2006 World Cup, for example, didn't include Twickenham. QUOTE]
Murryfield is used for football aswell as rugby. Hearts play their European games there (and may move there) and it was part of the bid for the European Championship in 2008 by Scotland and Ireland. We could have done with Croke Park for that bid but we may try again. Even though Switzerland/Austria won it UEFA said that the Scot/Irish bid was a close runner up and that we should try again but I think Scotlnad may go it alone if we do put in another bid. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Longvieew
Posts: 951
Likes (Received): 0
|
Quote:
By my reckoning the 4 Edinburgh derbies could attract 50,000+ each. Probably even sell outs if there were £10 tickets (268,000 fans) in addittion to Hearts V Celtic/Rangers (4 matches) and Hibs vs Celtic/Rangers (another 4 matches). That'd give a potential 800,000 spectators rather than the current 215,000 for those 12 games. It doesn't take a genius to see that both scottish rugby, football and the paying public could all benefit. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,230
Likes (Received): 1
|
The new Wembley is really nice.
Last edited by empersouf; December 3rd, 2004 at 06:29 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Bradford/Sydney
Posts: 312
Likes (Received): 0
|
Beautiful stadiums. Im Proud England is thehome of football, i'd be even prouder if we were given a chance to exhibit these fine stadiums in a world cup.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Supermoto scratcher!
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Lisbon
Posts: 4,656
Likes (Received): 4
|
[QUOTE=carlspannard]Some newer renderings of the Arsenal stadium.
Interior looks like "da Luz" portuguese stadium and exterior a little bit like "do Dragão" portuguese stadium! emirates?? major sponsor isn`t it? probably the money guys! |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
oemoemenemoe
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Groningen
Posts: 1,496
Likes (Received): 0
|
Really impressive and huge stadiums. It's interesting to see that a lot of stadiums look to have been expanded over the years and although its not noticable on the inside, you can clearly see it on the outside, which gives a feeling of tradition and history to it, more so than a brand new stadium.
Just my observation
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Fairy Godmother
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Manchester
Posts: 540
Likes (Received): 0
|
Horrary! More of the City of Manchester Stadium... (it should have been much bigger, but as usual, London grabbed the money for itself).
![]() ![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Islington
Posts: 1,981
Likes (Received): 51
|
[QUOTE=Lss911]
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Eindhoven de gextuh
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Eindhoven
Posts: 1,564
Likes (Received): 2
|
whenever i see english stadiums, my harts starts beating faster and faster
... but why is the new stadium name of arsenal so fucked up... emirates stadium
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|