|
|
| daily menu » rate the banner | guess the city | one on one |
|
|||||||
| Irish Architecture Forum For architecture in both the North and South |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#61 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: B*FAST
Posts: 479
Likes (Received): 0
|
As someone who has a West Belfast, nationalist background, I tick all the requisite boxes. Its just over the years I've come to realise that a united Ireland will probably never exist in the republican sense. But then so what? Partition arguably has worked. Certainly our border has existed longer now than many in mainland Europe, there hasn't even been breakaway regions (ie derry and armagh doing a south ossetia). But the main thing that has made me come to my conclusion is that Southeners would overwhelmingly reject the inclusion of NI in a referendum, especially now that they are all nouveaux riche. We would threaten that new new found prosperity, and when it comes to principles and money, no matter who you are the latter wins. Just look at how disasterous the Shinners are doing down South. No one down there gives a shit about four green fields anymore.
The way things are with Stormont is the way it will be. We will be bankrolled by London, and Dublin will pay in a bit to ease its conscious. But I would like to see NI stand more on its feet, hence my views on corporation tax etc. |
|
|
|
|
|
#62 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Buckna Co Antrim UK
Posts: 1,331
Likes (Received): 0
|
History is important but we should look at where we are now and think about the future. I am sure that some folk thousands of years ago who lived in say Palestine thought that there will always be a Roman Empire. Empires come and go. In 100 years we could be part of a Chinese federation who knows. NI works at the moment despite who is in government Sinn Fein/DUP. Can you believe who is running NI. 20 years ago-if forums were around and somebody said Sinn Fein/DUP will be in a coalition someday, a poster would have responded with 'pure comedy'. But look its happened and it seems to work. Lets just hope that things keep ticking along and politicians work for NI - they are getting paid enough.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#63 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: B*FAST
Posts: 479
Likes (Received): 0
|
Paid too much. Bunch of wasters. Stormont has more staff than Downing Street, and slightly less than the White House. 'Running NI' I think is relative. They are far too pampered up on that hill allowing them to indulge in their tribalist bollocks, which is egged on by an overblown local media that frankly has nothing to do anymore.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#64 | |
|
In the brig
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Dublin
Posts: 6,496
Likes (Received): 83
|
Quote:
If a majority in the North want a United Ireland then I dont see why any such concessions would be nessacary or desirable. Unionists would lose Island wide referenda everytime which would be needed for any concessions. That's democracy. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#65 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Buckna Co Antrim UK
Posts: 1,331
Likes (Received): 0
|
If a majority in the North want a United Ireland then I dont see why any such concessions would be nessacary or desirable. Unionists would lose Island wide referenda everytime which would be needed for any concessions. That's democracy.
Do you know anything about NI. For instance if say a majority voted for a united Ireland tomorrow 51% in favour - 49% against. Bearing in mind the VAST majority of unionists live in the east almost 700,000 out of say approx 900,000 province wide. Do you really believe that they will accept the irish state as its government. You actually believe this-you are naive. The east would be a no go area for Garda or irish officials. I would say that everybody in NI would understand this, and thats why it will not happen within your life time or mine. I say this as common sense simply because I live here and know what would happen. This is the reality of NI, do not be fooled. |
|
|
|
|
|
#66 |
|
Bossman
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: not london
Posts: 29,231
Likes (Received): 504
|
i have an idea... how about i rename this thread the irish unification thread or something and we then start again with another skybar?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#67 |
|
In the brig
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Dublin
Posts: 6,496
Likes (Received): 83
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#68 | |
|
In the brig
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Dublin
Posts: 6,496
Likes (Received): 83
|
Quote:
The problem from both the British and Irish point of view is that Unionists had a chance to govern themselves before and proved incapable of doing so without discrimination - a regime that had more in common with appartheid in South Africa and a system of Gerrymandering, intimidation and thuggery that was run form the old Stormont. The fact is they could not be trusted so had power sharing forced on them. Of course, the first time, the Unionists naturally did not want to give up the old ways (Sunningdale) and started a series of Paramilitary led strikes. This lead to the famous 'spongers' speech by Harold Wilson. So you think that if a majority of people want a United Ireland the two governments would give in to threats from a minority? Those days are long gone I think. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#69 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2005
Location: London, Dublin, Amsterdam, The Hague (currently)
Posts: 109
Likes (Received): 0
|
post removed
Last edited by Keano; September 15th, 2008 at 09:20 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#70 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: B*FAST
Posts: 479
Likes (Received): 0
|
"The east would be a no go area for Garda or irish officials"
I can just imagine it now, barricades going up in Cultra, declaring "Free Holywood". That would be quite a change. Seriously though, past behaviour suggests any topic will worm its way into the constitutional question. I've tried changing the subject already. Someone else's turn. |
|
|
|
|
|
#71 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 72
Likes (Received): 0
|
It wouldnt be the gardai or irish officials from Dublin,it would be the same people from both sides on the ground,same set up really,operations backed by Dublin with strong autonamy in Belfast and people elected there, in a few decades it could be a soft transition,with the backing of politicians and media after a period of peace & growth it could work, I dont see large proportions of the unionist community effectively bearing arms or carrying out violence on a considerable scale at such time,but if people on the ground felt otherwise then theres no way it could happen.
Last edited by cubix; September 14th, 2008 at 11:18 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#72 | |
|
Subliving
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Belfast
Posts: 11,764
Likes (Received): 223
|
Quote:
May as well give my own personally view about this. I am not a sectarian person, I'm a 'liberal' Catholic but I'm not a nationalist. I actually would like to remain part of the United Kingdom for the forseeable future. I take a more realistic view on this 'united Ireland' debate. The first point is that the people in the Republic, the majority at least, do not want Northern Ireland. We have a MASSIVE public sector, higher unemployment, we're seen by some as stubborn and sectarian and frankly we would cost too much. The British I don't think care either way, some I'm sure would love us to remain in the UK others would be happy to see us leave, but the majority just don't give it a thought. I don't think about it in my general day to day life, I tend to have more important things occupying my mind and only really think about when I see threads like this. If I'm perfectly frank, everyone is entitled to their opinion but some people should just not bother expressing this freedom as for some all that comes out is mis-informed bollox. Nothing in Northern Ireland or Irish history in general is clear cut and easily understood. It is certainly NOT the case that' Catholic = Nationalist Protestant = Unionist This is an incredibly stupid and naive mindset to have and at the cause of many issues and problems we suffered. You do, despite what some may think, have Catholic that are unionist or don't care just as we have protestants that are nationalist or again, don't care. I was born in 1986 and my generation, from the people I have met, my friends etc etc don't seem that worried or concerned about what will happen regarding the 'constitutional issue' in our lifetime. As I stated we have other things to do. I personally believe it is currently in our interest both social and economic to remain within the UK while co-operating with the Republic on political and economic affairs. When the time is right for a united Ireland, then yes it will happen. That time will not come for a VERY long time. A simple majority of 'Catholics' (wrongly assumed by several to be all nationalists), will not provide the basis for this reunification. I believe over 25% of Catholics would vote against such a move in this current time. As for Stormont. Its not the best system, but its something and its something that instils confidence in the business community both local, national and international. It also provides a somewhat strongish base of stability. I do not like the system they have in place nor some of the ministers and members of the assembly, but there is not much I can do about that when a majority of people in Northern Ireland continue to vote along tribal lines and not for parties that can actually delivery success and progress. I'll be honest, I'm an alliance supporter and believe they are the party that actually looks outside the Tribal Bubble and seeks to address issues that can actually make a difference. Well that's just my 2 cents in this discussion... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#73 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: B*FAST
Posts: 479
Likes (Received): 0
|
The more I hear, such as Belfastuniguy's comments, the more I wonder how we end up with the fools we have in Stormont. They really are not representative of the ordinary bloke on the ground. Maybe if Alliance had someone with real charisma they'd walk all over them. Who knows. As pointed above, the assumption that all Catholics would vote for a united Ireland is completely ridiculous. I wish the more extreme elements on the so called Protestant/Unionist side would realise that, they might lighten up about cross border co-operation and see it for what it is - promoting economic growth for the Island and co-ordinating public services for border communities to improve efficiency.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#74 |
|
Bossman
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: not london
Posts: 29,231
Likes (Received): 504
|
yes i remember reading that approximately a third of SDLP voters in the 70s and 80s were unionist catholics!... it was just who else could they vote for? lots of tactical voting going on to vote *against* the protestant parties.
i would have thought the one most obvious thing to help unite ireland would be simple... a very high speed rail link between dublin and belfast. you could do the entire line (and take in louth and lisburn) in 95 miles... express trains could run between dublin and belfast in 30 mins or there abouts! the effect would be obvious... just got to the low countries to see what this sort of thing does in action. |
|
|
|
|
|
#75 |
|
BANNED
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 42
Likes (Received): 0
|
Irelans has the less populaiton so far and expected to choose the correct person to elect , the politiics in Irelans are as the best as they can be . Politics were quite excellent even so far they were good evergy competition in politics .
|
|
|
|
|
|
#76 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 5,030
Likes (Received): 68
|
Aside from "uncle" Gregory and his erm comment about Tyrone's "international" game at Croke Park, its always the case that
Its one country. Two governments. Even if a united Ireland came about, its still would be one country and maybe a federal govt and provincial govts. Still one country. Two governments. Centralised isnt a big thing for Ireland. More an English/French/Prussian thing. What would have constituted a united Ireland for the 18th century Graftan parliament or Young Ireland even bore little resemblence to the ideas of Dev and certainly the reality of today. I guess if and when it comes about, it will be what people of that time define it, not what can be found in the side notes of a 70.s Wolfe Tones record. The structure the tone, the songs the flags will be a joint effort that will wish to transcend the past. We could do with starting to have a united Irish football (ie soccer if you are from Kerry or west belfast) and a united League. Last edited by heatonparkincakes; October 12th, 2008 at 02:49 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#77 |
|
Hero of Soviet Russia
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: The British Dominions Beyond the Seas
Posts: 217
Likes (Received): 0
|
Ireland's rightful place is within the United Kingdom!
Ireland should rejoin the UK, or rather the part of Ireland that is sadly not currently part of the UK should rejoin. Seriously what is the point of them staying out any longer? It is illogical. Any justification for them needing to leave no longer exists and i'm all for a United Ireland but not at the expense of the integrity of the Union. With Ireland rejoining, we can have both, a United Ireland and a United British Isles, and surely Ireland rejoining makes much more sense than another part of the UK leaving. Things seem to be going in that direction anyway with the establishment of the British Isles Council and the two states never having such a close relationship. Separatist sentiment in Ulster is declining. We have 3 nations in the UK and about a 3/rd of the 4th, we should have all 4.
Last edited by XenonII; October 12th, 2008 at 01:44 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#78 |
|
Hero of Soviet Russia
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: The British Dominions Beyond the Seas
Posts: 217
Likes (Received): 0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#79 | |
|
Hero of Soviet Russia
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: The British Dominions Beyond the Seas
Posts: 217
Likes (Received): 0
|
Quote:
I'm sure Ireland could do just as well in the UK as it is doing out and Northern Ireland has never been in better shape or the future looked so bright for the province. Northern Ireland is certainly not the UK's poorest region either, I believe that may be Cornwall. If Northern Ireland is really doing so terrible because it is not in union with southern Ireland, then that just sounds like another reason for southern Ireland to rejoin the UK to me! Doesn't it seem rather strange that England, Scotland, Wales and Ulster are all successfully united, but part of Ireland is still out in the cold after all these decades? What makes Ireland so "special" or "unique"? As far as I'm concerned Ireland is part of Britain and always has been (Britain is not synomnous with Great Britain otherwise Great Britain would've been called Britain) and the British Isles are far two small to be divided like it is at present, but I view that as only a temporary "solution" and reunification will come eventually. The Union is not gonna fracture any further and one day and I hope not to far in the distant future it will be restored. Like it should be. So just because there may be no apparent economic reason to rejoin (which is debateable) is no reason not to rejoin. The people should not be divided period. Last edited by XenonII; October 12th, 2008 at 01:49 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#80 | |
|
Hero of Soviet Russia
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: The British Dominions Beyond the Seas
Posts: 217
Likes (Received): 0
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|