|
|
| daily menu » rate the banner | guess the city | one on one |
|
|
#101 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Salem-Chennai
Posts: 14,789
Likes (Received): 873
|
This is divine part.....
Quote:
__________________
Click on----> அருள் முருகன்
தமிழ்நாடு/இந்தியா |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#102 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,864
Likes (Received): 49
|
Chandrayaan: orbital height reduced
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#103 | |
|
India under construction.
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: All
Posts: 3,935
Likes (Received): 227
|
First Lunar Orbit Reduction Manoeuvre of Chandrayaan-1 Successfully Carried Out
http://isro.org/pressrelease/Nov10_2008.htm Quote:
__________________
kabacreations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#104 |
|
Have a Nice Time....
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Salem-Tamilnadu
Posts: 3,191
Likes (Received): 2
|
Nice Explanation. Thanks. BTW why can't the final LO at 50km/50km or less instead of 100Km/100Km. Any specific reason.
__________________
Into_Salem Salem/Tamilnadu |
|
|
|
|
|
#105 |
|
India on the Moon
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: London / Bangalore
Posts: 60
Likes (Received): 0
|
![]() Well, maybe that could be the least possible distance before any object is sucked into the gravitational field of the moon ?
__________________
Cheers, Prash |
|
|
|
|
|
#106 |
|
Have a Nice Time....
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Salem-Tamilnadu
Posts: 3,191
Likes (Received): 2
|
Seems logical. Thanks
__________________
Into_Salem Salem/Tamilnadu |
|
|
|
|
|
#107 | |
|
MAA/BLR
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 138
Likes (Received): 0
|
Quote:
For orbits around the Moon or Planets , the necessary orbital speed varies in accordance with the orbital height above the surface, and, with the mass of the Moon or Planet. The bigger the planetary mass, the higher the speed needed to remain in orbit. The higher the orbital altitude , the lower the speed required to maintain that orbit. Typical figures are :- ...........................................Velecocity (Kms/sec) Height(Kms)####Moon####Mars####Earth####Jupiter 250..................1.57.........3.43........ 7.75.........42.05 1000..................1.34.........3.12.........7.35........41.83 10000..................0.65........1.79.........4.93........39.45 Source: ftp://ftp.amsat.org/amsat/articles/satgen/sgen315.txt
__________________
Inna Anthae Ebdi keerae Last edited by scdubagoor; November 10th, 2008 at 03:20 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#108 | |
|
Have a Nice Time....
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Salem-Tamilnadu
Posts: 3,191
Likes (Received): 2
|
Quote:
__________________
Into_Salem Salem/Tamilnadu |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#109 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,864
Likes (Received): 49
|
Chandrayaan nudged closer to moon
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#110 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Vellore, TN / Atlanta, GA
Posts: 63
Likes (Received): 0
|
First moon images.
Moon as viewed from a distance of 311200 Km. Taken on Nov 4th. We were reading all about this in the media, without any picture. Here it is now. I wonder what took ISRO a longer time than usual?
__________________
Our Hearts, Their Minds, One Hope! Support Asha for Education http://www.ashanet.org/atlanta |
|
|
|
|
|
#111 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,864
Likes (Received): 49
|
Chandrayaan-1 gets further closer to moon
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#112 |
|
The King
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Chennai
Posts: 1,758
Likes (Received): 92
|
A great achievement by Indian scientists and a proud moment for all its citizens.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#113 |
|
India under construction.
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: All
Posts: 3,935
Likes (Received): 227
|
wow finally an image of moon from chandrayaan. I wonder why is it not so clear. is it the distance from which it is taken or something else?
hope to see more pics from cy soon.
__________________
kabacreations |
|
|
|
|
|
#114 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Vellore, TN / Atlanta, GA
Posts: 63
Likes (Received): 0
|
Yeah, the picture was taken 311200Km from the moon, when the spacecraft was leaving earth's gravity.
__________________
Our Hearts, Their Minds, One Hope! Support Asha for Education http://www.ashanet.org/atlanta |
|
|
|
|
|
#115 |
|
Have a Nice Time....
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Salem-Tamilnadu
Posts: 3,191
Likes (Received): 2
|
Chandrayaan’s orbit further reduced
CHENNAI: One more firing of the engine on board Chandrayaan-1 on Tuesday evening reduced its periselene (nearest distance to the moon) from 187 km to 101 km. The firing of the engine lasted 31 seconds from 6.30 p.m.
The spacecraft has now an aposelene (farthest distance from the moon) of 255 km and a periselene of 101 km. In this orbit, Chandrayaan-1, takes two hours and nine minutes to go round the moon once. All sub-systems on board the spacecraft were working well, a spokesman of the Indian Space Research Organisation (ISRO) said from Bangalore. On Wednesday evening, the Spacecraft Control Centre (SCC) at Bangalore will issue commands to the spacecraft’s engine, called the Liquid Apogee Motor (LAM), for reducing its aposelene from 255 km to 100 km. (It is powered by liquid propellants). When it is done successfully, the spacecraft will be in its final circular orbit of 100 km above the moon. http://www.hindu.com/2008/11/12/stor...1261331200.htm
__________________
Into_Salem Salem/Tamilnadu |
|
|
|
|
|
#116 |
|
unBANNED
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 4,621
Likes (Received): 1
|
a look back and a better launch video..
ps. the DD camera man need to be sacked and these noobs be given the job.. atleast they had better commonsense. |
|
|
|
|
|
#117 |
|
Have a Nice Time....
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Salem-Tamilnadu
Posts: 3,191
Likes (Received): 2
|
Though coverage was nice, It looks the launch was a failure. What was this project.
__________________
Into_Salem Salem/Tamilnadu |
|
|
|
|
|
#118 |
|
India under construction.
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: All
Posts: 3,935
Likes (Received): 227
|
It is not a failure. it is PSLV which delivered chandrayaan.
if you thought that the rocket was falling then it is just an illusion, it is infact making a turn to change the trajectory.
__________________
kabacreations |
|
|
|
|
|
#119 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,505
Likes (Received): 0
|
Into_Salem,
I can see why you might think this was a failure... it may appear that the vehicle is not going straight up. But the fact is that because the earth is curved, the trajectory for the vehicle is also not vertically upwards. Most spacecraft are injected in an elliptical (sometimes circular or near-circular) orbit by the launch vehicle. Look at the launch videos of any launcher and they will look like this. Fusionist, There was no video by DD cameramen. There were ISRO static and tracking cameras that were used in the DD feed. The tracking camera automatically tracked the vessel - when it was obscured by clouds, it continued to track the vehicle so that when it broke out of the low clouds, the camera was there to capture it. There was no human involved and the cameras were programmed well in advance. They could have positioned a cameraman on the mainland to capture a long-shot view of the launch, but in good weather, the ISRO cameras capture the launch much better. |
|
|
|
|
|
#120 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,505
Likes (Received): 0
|
BTW, ISRO should learn how to name missions better in future. Instead of CY, it could have named the series as "Soma". Easier for everyone around the world to pronounce and remember and equally descriptive of the mission. The Soviet lunar missions were simply named Luna with a numeric suffix. Apollo is similarly easy to pronounce and remember. The name for the ISRO satellite that will study the Sun is Aditya - better than Chandrayaan. Could have been crisper (why not Surya, for instance) but will do.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|