daily menu » rate the banner | guess the city | one on one

Go Back   SkyscraperCity > European Forums > UK & Ireland Architecture Forums > Projects and Construction > London Metro Area

London Metro Area London Calling...


Reply

 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old February 3rd, 2012, 08:42 PM   #101
jack_jones
Registered User
 
jack_jones's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 243
Likes (Received): 7

Wow that looks nice!
jack_jones no está en línea   Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
 
Old May 17th, 2012, 11:24 PM   #102
mogwai83
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: London
Posts: 639
Likes (Received): 5

Quote:
Residents speak out against proposed Island towers

Plans to build the second tallest residential building in the country on the Isle of Dogs are being strongly opposed by councillors and residents. The Cuba Street proposal is for two towers reaching nearly 150m into the sky 439 homes, a 120-room hotel and office space. If approved it will be the tallest residential building in the UK after The Shard, bigger than the nearby Landmark Development and Pan Peninsula...................
Link to original article...
mogwai83 no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old May 17th, 2012, 11:25 PM   #103
gegloma01
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Bruxelles
Posts: 1,157
Likes (Received): 102

Police officer?
gegloma01 no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old May 18th, 2012, 11:23 AM   #104
jamiefearon
Registered User
 
jamiefearon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: London
Posts: 762
Likes (Received): 87

They look a little like Dildos. Nice
jamiefearon no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old May 18th, 2012, 12:24 PM   #105
MatthewGen
Registered Don
 
MatthewGen's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Chicago
Posts: 378
Likes (Received): 1

Why do people insist on complaining how 'Squashed' its becoming in London.. What the hell do you expect living in one of the world capitals! Move away from the big city If you don't like it..? Can't have it every way!
__________________
as i kiss the sky..
MatthewGen no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old May 18th, 2012, 04:10 PM   #106
benchaney
Anomaly XB-6783746
 
benchaney's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: London
Posts: 71
Likes (Received): 6

People need to accept that its the 21st century and highrises bring London out of the past. Build I say!
benchaney está en línea ahora   Reply With Quote
Old May 18th, 2012, 05:21 PM   #107
Cat man do
Founder of the 'Gy'.
 
Cat man do's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Carrbridge/Highlands
Posts: 2,058
Likes (Received): 38

At 150m they are hardly the highest residentaisl in the UK .. not even Canary wharf!
Cat man do está en línea ahora   Reply With Quote
Old May 18th, 2012, 07:33 PM   #108
Willrocks10
Waffles
 
Willrocks10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 672
Likes (Received): 8

They look nice. I would probably give them 8/10.
__________________

Save the United Kingdom: http://bettertogether.net/ and http://www.britishunity.org/

My website: http://willrocks10.webs.com/
My YouTube channel: http://www.youtube.com/user/westhamwill10?feature=mhee
Try this game where you design London's Skyline: http://www.hayesdavidson.com/skyline/
Willrocks10 no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old May 19th, 2012, 03:50 PM   #109
Pennypacker
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 621
Likes (Received): 30

Quote:
Originally Posted by mogwai83 View Post
If buildings of this height are supposedly unsuitable for the Isle of fucking Dogs then where are they suitable?

Absolute madness.
Pennypacker no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old May 19th, 2012, 11:39 PM   #110
delores
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,568
Likes (Received): 25

The lady complaining about her view and light is a bit of a hypocrite, did she not realise by the very fact of living in the landmark tower she has done exactly what she is complaining about?
delores no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old May 20th, 2012, 01:33 PM   #111
randolph
Registered User
 
randolph's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: London
Posts: 1,695
Likes (Received): 9

These schemes are sent to tease us - get us excited - keep us waitimg and hoping for years when in the end they never materialise or are drastically reduced in hieght or redsigned. CW would be full of such towers if all that had been proposed had been actually built.

As to local objectors I am lost for words - even more lost for words that they should be taken seriously in a place like the northern end of the IOD
randolph está en línea ahora   Reply With Quote
Old May 20th, 2012, 05:18 PM   #112
Black Cat
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,495
Likes (Received): 14

Reading a little background on this project, it sees that there is no planning issue if the proposed towers are no higher than the existing Landmark tower, so the only issue is adding a few more stories and a few more units, and that there are no height restrictions being crossed. Seems that the points raised by the complainers are pretty bogus.
Black Cat no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old May 21st, 2012, 11:03 AM   #113
TallBox
Registered User
 
TallBox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,607
Likes (Received): 19

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jaeger View Post
Nice

I like it! Reminds me of the old version of the Pinnacle (back when it was called the DIFA tower) which at the time was quite a nice looking design too...

TallBox no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old October 13th, 2012, 03:30 PM   #114
e14dude
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 1
Likes (Received): 0

I'm currently living in a flat the Landmark. Just bought a new house so not too bothered what happens her either way.

I think the main concern with the local residents is how tall the buildings are compared to the floor space, combined with the fact that it's off-set from the main road with incredibly small access roads which are already at capacity anyway.

If you compare the two sites pre-build. The landmark intersects the two main roads on the Island, Marsh Wall + Westferry road. It's a large development with lots of space around the buildings. Plenty of access into the site and relatively minimal disruption to local residents.

Cuba street... it's a very small plot, off the main road, with a one way road system surrounding it and very small access roads. It's important to note that these two access roads are very well used, when they've been blocked its caused massive traffic jams.

You cannot really compare the two developments and say "well if landmark can build 40 floors so can we".

I really think it's a bad spot for such a large building and will overly burden the immediate area. But I don't really care I'm moving out


e14dude no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old March 5th, 2013, 03:29 PM   #115
woodgnome
CEO, Dingly Dell Corp.
 
woodgnome's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: London
Posts: 696
Likes (Received): 114

Cuba Street tower at Canary Wharf could be scrapped

-- Link to Wharf article --

A construction group behind plans to build a 54 storey development on the doorstep of Canary Wharf is threatening to scrap its proposal. Turkish firm Agaoglu Group is reported to be considering the future of the scheme due to pressure from the Greater London Authority for it to reduce the size of the tower.

The company has long planned for the development at Cuba Street, on the Isle of Dogs, but has faced opposition over its 157 metre height. The two towers - the second of which would be 40 storeys - would include around 400 homes, a five-star hotel and office space.

However Agaoglu Group owner Ali Agaoglu said talks had reached a stalemate. In an interview with Arabian Business he said the "municipality is trying to reduce it to 40 floors and it's a major problem". He said this would see the scheme lose its "essence" and threatened to cancel the project unless the GLA relents.

An application for the site was made to Tower Hamlets Council back in 2011 but was pulled due to opposition to the project. The developer is in talks with interested parties before putting in another application. Mayor Boris Johnson would have the final say over the scheme.
__________________
London is not a city. It is more like a country, and living in it is like living in Holland or Belgium. Its completeness makes it deceptive - there are sidewalks from one frontier to the other - and its hugeness makes it possible for everyone to invent his own city. My London is not your London, though everyone's Washington, DC is pretty much the same.
The London Embassy - Paul Theroux
woodgnome no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old March 5th, 2013, 04:01 PM   #116
gravesVpelli
Registered User
 
gravesVpelli's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: London/Canberra
Posts: 256
Likes (Received): 28

[QUOTE=woodgnome;100928583]Cuba Street tower at Canary Wharf could be scrapped

"municipality is trying to reduce it to 40 floors and it's a major problem".

That seems perfectly reasonable to me, given the location. 40 stories is sufficiently high to make an impact. Why doesn't he accept this with a similar reduction in height for the second tower?
gravesVpelli no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old March 5th, 2013, 04:09 PM   #117
Bottlefall
Registered User
 
Bottlefall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 241
Likes (Received): 12

Quote:
Originally Posted by woodgnome View Post
Cuba Street tower at Canary Wharf could be scrapped

-- Link to Wharf article --

A construction group behind plans to build a 54 storey development on the doorstep of Canary Wharf is threatening to scrap its proposal. Turkish firm Agaoglu Group is reported to be considering the future of the scheme due to pressure from the Greater London Authority for it to reduce the size of the tower.

The company has long planned for the development at Cuba Street, on the Isle of Dogs, but has faced opposition over its 157 metre height. The two towers - the second of which would be 40 storeys - would include around 400 homes, a five-star hotel and office space.

However Agaoglu Group owner Ali Agaoglu said talks had reached a stalemate. In an interview with Arabian Business he said the "municipality is trying to reduce it to 40 floors and it's a major problem". He said this would see the scheme lose its "essence" and threatened to cancel the project unless the GLA relents.

An application for the site was made to Tower Hamlets Council back in 2011 but was pulled due to opposition to the project. The developer is in talks with interested parties before putting in another application. Mayor Boris Johnson would have the final say over the scheme.
Every developer should take similar stance! I'm getting sick tired of nymbistic idiots and frankly don't have the patience to wait for the death of that generation. Lets see how many investors those buffoons will lose before they wake up!
Bottlefall no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old March 5th, 2013, 04:09 PM   #118
london lad
Registered User
 
london lad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: London
Posts: 8,155
Likes (Received): 45

Seriously who would be a developer proposing something new on the Isle of Dogs? Any negative impact a tower would have here is going to make very little difference if its 40 or 54 floors so why have this in planning limbo for the best part of two years and the real fear it will now be cancelled. Surely a bit of variety on the relatively few plots around here suitable for towers is better than a wall of towers in the 40 floor range.
london lad no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old March 5th, 2013, 04:23 PM   #119
gothicform
Bossman
 
gothicform's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: not london
Posts: 29,225
Likes (Received): 503

Quote:
Originally Posted by london lad View Post
Seriously who would be a developer proposing something new on the Isle of Dogs? Any negative impact a tower would have here is going to make very little difference if its 40 or 54 floors so why have this in planning limbo for the best part of two years and the real fear it will now be cancelled. Surely a bit of variety on the relatively few plots around here suitable for towers is better than a wall of towers in the 40 floor range.
cancelling isn't so easy if the developer carries some of the forward value of their finished development on their balance sheet - as they are actually allowed to. it leads to a huge writedown. junking projects can end up quite complicated...
gothicform no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old March 5th, 2013, 04:32 PM   #120
benchaney
Anomaly XB-6783746
 
benchaney's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: London
Posts: 71
Likes (Received): 6

Couldn't they simply agree on 46 floors In between the two
benchaney está en línea ahora   Reply With Quote


Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT +2. The time now is 06:32 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Feedback Buttons provided by Advanced Post Thanks / Like v3.1.2 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2013 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2013 DragonByte Technologies Ltd. (Resources saved on this page: MySQL 21.43%)

SkyscraperCity - In Urbanity We Trust

Hosted by Blacksun, dedicated to this site too!
Forum server management by DaiTengu