|
|
| daily menu » rate the banner | guess the city | one on one |
|
|||||||
| London Metro Area London Calling... |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#101 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 243
Likes (Received): 7
|
Wow that looks nice!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#102 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: London
Posts: 639
Likes (Received): 5
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#103 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Bruxelles
Posts: 1,157
Likes (Received): 102
|
Police officer?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#104 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: London
Posts: 762
Likes (Received): 87
|
They look a little like Dildos. Nice
|
|
|
|
|
|
#105 |
|
Registered Don
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Chicago
Posts: 378
Likes (Received): 1
|
Why do people insist on complaining how 'Squashed' its becoming in London.. What the hell do you expect living in one of the world capitals! Move away from the big city If you don't like it..? Can't have it every way!
__________________
as i kiss the sky.. |
|
|
|
|
|
#106 |
|
Anomaly XB-6783746
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: London
Posts: 71
Likes (Received): 6
|
People need to accept that its the 21st century and highrises bring London out of the past. Build I say!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#107 |
|
Founder of the 'Gy'.
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Carrbridge/Highlands
Posts: 2,058
Likes (Received): 38
|
At 150m they are hardly the highest residentaisl in the UK .. not even Canary wharf!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#108 |
|
Waffles
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 672
Likes (Received): 8
|
They look nice. I would probably give them 8/10.
__________________
Save the United Kingdom: http://bettertogether.net/ and http://www.britishunity.org/ My website: http://willrocks10.webs.com/ My YouTube channel: http://www.youtube.com/user/westhamwill10?feature=mhee Try this game where you design London's Skyline: http://www.hayesdavidson.com/skyline/ |
|
|
|
|
|
#109 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 621
Likes (Received): 30
|
Quote:
Absolute madness. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#110 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,568
Likes (Received): 25
|
The lady complaining about her view and light is a bit of a hypocrite, did she not realise by the very fact of living in the landmark tower she has done exactly what she is complaining about?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#111 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: London
Posts: 1,695
Likes (Received): 9
|
These schemes are sent to tease us - get us excited - keep us waitimg and hoping for years when in the end they never materialise or are drastically reduced in hieght or redsigned. CW would be full of such towers if all that had been proposed had been actually built.
As to local objectors I am lost for words - even more lost for words that they should be taken seriously in a place like the northern end of the IOD
__________________
Check out my tunes!! http://www.myspace.com/cpcollective http://www.myspace.com/ryedereden http://www.myspace.com/randolphryeder1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#112 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,495
Likes (Received): 14
|
Reading a little background on this project, it sees that there is no planning issue if the proposed towers are no higher than the existing Landmark tower, so the only issue is adding a few more stories and a few more units, and that there are no height restrictions being crossed. Seems that the points raised by the complainers are pretty bogus.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#113 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,607
Likes (Received): 19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#114 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 1
Likes (Received): 0
|
I'm currently living in a flat the Landmark. Just bought a new house so not too bothered what happens her either way.
I think the main concern with the local residents is how tall the buildings are compared to the floor space, combined with the fact that it's off-set from the main road with incredibly small access roads which are already at capacity anyway. If you compare the two sites pre-build. The landmark intersects the two main roads on the Island, Marsh Wall + Westferry road. It's a large development with lots of space around the buildings. Plenty of access into the site and relatively minimal disruption to local residents. Cuba street... it's a very small plot, off the main road, with a one way road system surrounding it and very small access roads. It's important to note that these two access roads are very well used, when they've been blocked its caused massive traffic jams. You cannot really compare the two developments and say "well if landmark can build 40 floors so can we". I really think it's a bad spot for such a large building and will overly burden the immediate area. But I don't really care I'm moving out ![]() ![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
#115 |
|
CEO, Dingly Dell Corp.
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: London
Posts: 696
Likes (Received): 114
|
Cuba Street tower at Canary Wharf could be scrapped
-- Link to Wharf article -- A construction group behind plans to build a 54 storey development on the doorstep of Canary Wharf is threatening to scrap its proposal. Turkish firm Agaoglu Group is reported to be considering the future of the scheme due to pressure from the Greater London Authority for it to reduce the size of the tower. The company has long planned for the development at Cuba Street, on the Isle of Dogs, but has faced opposition over its 157 metre height. The two towers - the second of which would be 40 storeys - would include around 400 homes, a five-star hotel and office space. However Agaoglu Group owner Ali Agaoglu said talks had reached a stalemate. In an interview with Arabian Business he said the "municipality is trying to reduce it to 40 floors and it's a major problem". He said this would see the scheme lose its "essence" and threatened to cancel the project unless the GLA relents. An application for the site was made to Tower Hamlets Council back in 2011 but was pulled due to opposition to the project. The developer is in talks with interested parties before putting in another application. Mayor Boris Johnson would have the final say over the scheme.
__________________
London is not a city. It is more like a country, and living in it is like living in Holland or Belgium. Its completeness makes it deceptive - there are sidewalks from one frontier to the other - and its hugeness makes it possible for everyone to invent his own city. My London is not your London, though everyone's Washington, DC is pretty much the same. The London Embassy - Paul Theroux |
|
|
|
|
|
#116 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: London/Canberra
Posts: 256
Likes (Received): 28
|
[QUOTE=woodgnome;100928583]Cuba Street tower at Canary Wharf could be scrapped
"municipality is trying to reduce it to 40 floors and it's a major problem". That seems perfectly reasonable to me, given the location. 40 stories is sufficiently high to make an impact. Why doesn't he accept this with a similar reduction in height for the second tower? |
|
|
|
|
|
#117 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 241
Likes (Received): 12
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#118 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: London
Posts: 8,155
Likes (Received): 45
|
Seriously who would be a developer proposing something new on the Isle of Dogs? Any negative impact a tower would have here is going to make very little difference if its 40 or 54 floors so why have this in planning limbo for the best part of two years and the real fear it will now be cancelled. Surely a bit of variety on the relatively few plots around here suitable for towers is better than a wall of towers in the 40 floor range.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#119 | |
|
Bossman
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: not london
Posts: 29,225
Likes (Received): 503
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#120 |
|
Anomaly XB-6783746
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: London
Posts: 71
Likes (Received): 6
|
Couldn't they simply agree on 46 floors In between the two
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|