RULES & BUILDING LIST - read before making thread! - Page 3

mystad · October 15th, 2002, 09:29 PM

Anybody who rates any of these buildings "0" has no business posting in this forum.

DrumCorpsAlum · November 2nd, 2002, 07:16 AM

JHouse, I've noticed that we usually tend to agree when rating these things. Especially tonight.

SteelCity32 · November 11th, 2002, 11:57 PM

I would like to see it changed to 20 options. I have no clue why.

Jasonhouse · April 18th, 2003, 07:33 AM

Great work Raffles!

Wu-Gambino · April 19th, 2003, 09:53 PM

Could somebody do that for Rate Our Skylines? There are way too many double posts.

james2390 · April 25th, 2003, 07:42 PM

i pressed the wrong button so theres no poll

Jasonhouse · May 1st, 2003, 09:59 PM

20 is too many. Jan doesn't want that kind of drag on the server.

chongqinghero · May 2nd, 2003, 06:36 PM

Great work Raffles!!

renell · May 2nd, 2003, 08:09 PM

r u not including "Atomium, Brussels" since i also made a ROT in it

RafflesCity · May 4th, 2003, 02:02 PM

I havent included it yet for the time being as it isnt really a skyscraper and there is a new section being proposed. Your thread might be moved there

Wu-Gambino · May 10th, 2003, 02:10 AM

Is is like "Rate other towers"?

Wu-Gambino · May 10th, 2003, 04:00 AM

Will there ever be the World's 201-300?

New Jack City · May 10th, 2003, 04:03 AM

I think it would be cool if we can rate fellow member's buildings and towers.

RafflesCity · May 10th, 2003, 10:38 PM

Thats a vision. Nothing concrete is planned yet although it could be explored. Jasonhouse should know more

RafflesCity · May 10th, 2003, 10:41 PM

<table cellpadding=4 cellspacing=0 width=98% class="quoteBox">
<td align=left valign=center> <smallfont> <b>Quote</B> <I>originally posted by Napptown </i></b> </smallfont> </td>
<tr><td align=left valign=top>Is is like "Rate other towers"?</td></tr>
</table>

It will most likely be a section for all other forms of architecture/architects and shorter buildings. I have no idea when it will be opened though

Jasonhouse · May 13th, 2003, 08:14 AM

The further we go down the list, the harder it is to compile good images of the buildings. Especially ones that we are allowed to use.

I had origionally hoped to do the World's Top 500, but that seems like more of a long-term wish than anything.

If you want to see the Top 200 extended, start helping out by creating threads for the missing buildings in the 101-200 list. Once it is completed, we will stock the 201-300 list with several threads, and then open a new place for it.

Also , I have been considering adding another mod or two to help stock these lists, but these people need to be DEDICATED. I'm not quite sure that there is another bloke out there as awesome as Raffles, but I'm all ears.

RafflesCity · May 13th, 2003, 08:37 AM

heh..thanks Jason..actually BGT and Napptown have helped out slightly

For me the greatest challenge to do a top 300 would be to maintain an accurate and up-to-date list. One has to constantly watch out for buildings that just get completed and with each new addition, the rankings change. It isnt an easy task and needs DEDICATION. (think 3 times before you volunteer youself)

I have worked out a rudimentary list of the top300 just in case though. And quite fortunately, there are a number of buildings in the Open forum that are part of that list. However, if we want to go further, we will need a new strategy: by getting members to help in creating threads;we can always call upon members from different cities to help provide pictures. Thats the advantage of a global forum like this.

But I think we need to consider the pros and cons of a top300 list

New Jack City · June 20th, 2003, 10:37 PM

<table cellpadding=4 cellspacing=0 width=98% class="quoteBox">
<td align=left valign=center> <smallfont> <b>Quote</B> <I>originally posted by RafflesCity </i></b> </smallfont> </td>
<tr><td align=left valign=top>heh..thanks Jason..actually BGT and Napptown have helped out slightly

For me the greatest challenge to do a top 300 would be to maintain an accurate and up-to-date list. One has to constantly watch out for buildings that just get completed and with each new addition, the rankings change. It isnt an easy task and needs DEDICATION. (think 3 times before you volunteer youself)

I have worked out a rudimentary list of the top300 just in case though. And quite fortunately, there are a number of buildings in the Open forum that are part of that list. However, if we want to go further, we will need a new strategy: by getting members to help in creating threads;we can always call upon members from different cities to help provide pictures. Thats the advantage of a global forum like this.

But I think we need to consider the pros and cons of a top300 list

</td></tr>
</table>

A Top 300 would be real tough, but it doesn't sound like a bad idea. Though how short in height would #300 be?

Also, when will we get a Rate Our Talls Open Forum Stats chart? I can't wait to see how that would turn out! We have plenty of different and various skyscrapers here that you can't find in the the ROT Top 100 and 200 sections.

RafflesCity · June 21st, 2003, 02:19 AM

<table cellpadding=4 cellspacing=0 width=98% class="quoteBox">
<td align=left valign=center> <smallfont> <b>Quote</B> <I>originally posted by savethewtc </i></b> </smallfont> </td>
<tr><td align=left valign=top><table cellpadding=4 cellspacing=0 width=98% class="quoteBox">
<td align=left valign=center> <smallfont> <b>Quote</B> <I>originally posted by RafflesCity </i></b> </smallfont> </td>
<tr><td align=left valign=top>heh..thanks Jason..actually BGT and Napptown have helped out slightly

For me the greatest challenge to do a top 300 would be to maintain an accurate and up-to-date list. One has to constantly watch out for buildings that just get completed and with each new addition, the rankings change. It isnt an easy task and needs DEDICATION. (think 3 times before you volunteer youself)

I have worked out a rudimentary list of the top300 just in case though. And quite fortunately, there are a number of buildings in the Open forum that are part of that list. However, if we want to go further, we will need a new strategy: by getting members to help in creating threads;we can always call upon members from different cities to help provide pictures. Thats the advantage of a global forum like this.

But I think we need to consider the pros and cons of a top300 list

</td></tr>
</table>

A Top 300 would be real tough, but it doesn't sound like a bad idea. Though how short in height would #300 be?

Also, when will we get a Rate Our Talls Open Forum Stats chart? I can't wait to see how that would turn out! We have plenty of different and various skyscrapers here that you can't find in the the ROT Top 100 and 200 sections.</td></tr>
</table>

Great enthusiasm!

At the moment, #300 would be around 198 or 199m (653ft) tall. So anything less would be out.

I have no idea when a stats chart will be created for the Open Forum, although I could ask Jan about it. But first I'll have to check if all the polls have the correct format

New Jack City · June 21st, 2003, 02:26 AM

<table cellpadding=4 cellspacing=0 width=98% class="quoteBox">
<td align=left valign=center> <smallfont> <b>Quote</B> <I>originally posted by RafflesCity </i></b> </smallfont>

Great enthusiasm!

At the moment, #300 would be around 198 or 199m (653ft) tall. So anything less would be out.

I have no idea when a stats chart will be created for the Open Forum, although I could ask Jan about it. But first I'll have to check if all the polls have the correct format

</td></tr>
</table>

I'd love to help if needed.

Only 653 feet?! Let's get this started!

I thought it would be in the 500 foot range.

November 2nd, 2002, 07:16 AM	#42
DrumCorpsAlum Phoenix, AZ/Camden, SC Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: Phoenix, AZ/Camden, SC Posts: 320 Likes (Received): 0	JHouse, I've noticed that we usually tend to agree when rating these things. Especially tonight. __________________ http://www.galleychronicles.com http://www.facebook.com/DrumCorpsAlum

November 11th, 2002, 11:57 PM	#43
SteelCity32 Don't be that guy! Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: Pittsburgh Posts: 1,098 Likes (Received): 0	I would like to see it changed to 20 options. I have no clue why. __________________ I often dream of huge numb buildings, jet black sinister architecture. Being installed when nobody sees. Their appearence so sudden that few would take notice.

May 2nd, 2003, 06:36 PM	#48
chongqinghero Registered User Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Chongqing Posts: 81 Likes (Received): 2	Great work Raffles!! __________________ http://album.chinaren.com/album/39/204177.jpg

May 2nd, 2003, 08:09 PM	#49
renell Here Since 2002 Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: Sydney/Metro Manila Posts: 6,715 Likes (Received): 2	r u not including "Atomium, Brussels" since i also made a ROT in it __________________ dafuq I've been here ten years?!

June 21st, 2003, 02:26 AM	#60
New Jack City User Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: NYC Posts: 5,651 Likes (Received): 1	<table cellpadding=4 cellspacing=0 width=98% class="quoteBox"> <td align=left valign=center> <smallfont> <b>Quote</B> <I>originally posted by RafflesCity </i></b> </smallfont> Great enthusiasm! At the moment, #300 would be around 198 or 199m (653ft) tall. So anything less would be out. I have no idea when a stats chart will be created for the Open Forum, although I could ask Jan about it. But first I'll have to check if all the polls have the correct format</td></tr> </table> I'd love to help if needed. Only 653 feet?! Let's get this started! I thought it would be in the 500 foot range.

October 15th, 2002, 09:29 PM	#41
mystad Bad Motivator Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Shorewood Posts: 52 Likes (Received): 0	Anybody who rates any of these buildings "0" has no business posting in this forum.

April 18th, 2003, 07:33 AM	#44
Jasonhouse Registered User Join Date: Jul 2002 Posts: 12,268 Likes (Received): 7	Great work Raffles!

April 19th, 2003, 09:53 PM	#45
Wu-Gambino Registered User Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: Indianapolis Posts: 2,679 Likes (Received): 2	Could somebody do that for Rate Our Skylines? There are way too many double posts.

April 25th, 2003, 07:42 PM	#46
james2390 Tribune Tower Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Chicago, IL Posts: 2,920 Likes (Received): 0	i pressed the wrong button so theres no poll

May 1st, 2003, 09:59 PM	#47
Jasonhouse Registered User Join Date: Jul 2002 Posts: 12,268 Likes (Received): 7	20 is too many. Jan doesn't want that kind of drag on the server.

May 4th, 2003, 02:02 PM	#50
RafflesCity By Spirit Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: S I N G A P O R E Posts: 26,215 Likes (Received): 1	I havent included it yet for the time being as it isnt really a skyscraper and there is a new section being proposed. Your thread might be moved there

May 10th, 2003, 02:10 AM	#51
Wu-Gambino Registered User Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: Indianapolis Posts: 2,679 Likes (Received): 2	Is is like "Rate other towers"?

May 10th, 2003, 04:00 AM	#52
Wu-Gambino Registered User Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: Indianapolis Posts: 2,679 Likes (Received): 2	Will there ever be the World's 201-300?

May 10th, 2003, 04:03 AM	#53
New Jack City User Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: NYC Posts: 5,651 Likes (Received): 1	I think it would be cool if we can rate fellow member's buildings and towers.

May 10th, 2003, 10:38 PM	#54
RafflesCity By Spirit Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: S I N G A P O R E Posts: 26,215 Likes (Received): 1	Thats a vision. Nothing concrete is planned yet although it could be explored. Jasonhouse should know more

May 10th, 2003, 10:41 PM	#55
RafflesCity By Spirit Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: S I N G A P O R E Posts: 26,215 Likes (Received): 1	<table cellpadding=4 cellspacing=0 width=98% class="quoteBox"> <td align=left valign=center> <smallfont> <b>Quote</B> <I>originally posted by Napptown </i></b> </smallfont> </td> <tr><td align=left valign=top>Is is like "Rate other towers"?</td></tr> </table> It will most likely be a section for all other forms of architecture/architects and shorter buildings. I have no idea when it will be opened though

May 13th, 2003, 08:14 AM	#56
Jasonhouse Registered User Join Date: Jul 2002 Posts: 12,268 Likes (Received): 7	The further we go down the list, the harder it is to compile good images of the buildings. Especially ones that we are allowed to use. I had origionally hoped to do the World's Top 500, but that seems like more of a long-term wish than anything. If you want to see the Top 200 extended, start helping out by creating threads for the missing buildings in the 101-200 list. Once it is completed, we will stock the 201-300 list with several threads, and then open a new place for it. Also , I have been considering adding another mod or two to help stock these lists, but these people need to be DEDICATED. I'm not quite sure that there is another bloke out there as awesome as Raffles, but I'm all ears.

May 13th, 2003, 08:37 AM	#57
RafflesCity By Spirit Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: S I N G A P O R E Posts: 26,215 Likes (Received): 1	heh..thanks Jason..actually BGT and Napptown have helped out slightly For me the greatest challenge to do a top 300 would be to maintain an accurate and up-to-date list. One has to constantly watch out for buildings that just get completed and with each new addition, the rankings change. It isnt an easy task and needs DEDICATION. (think 3 times before you volunteer youself) I have worked out a rudimentary list of the top300 just in case though. And quite fortunately, there are a number of buildings in the Open forum that are part of that list. However, if we want to go further, we will need a new strategy: by getting members to help in creating threads;we can always call upon members from different cities to help provide pictures. Thats the advantage of a global forum like this. But I think we need to consider the pros and cons of a top300 list

June 20th, 2003, 10:37 PM	#58
New Jack City User Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: NYC Posts: 5,651 Likes (Received): 1	<table cellpadding=4 cellspacing=0 width=98% class="quoteBox"> <td align=left valign=center> <smallfont> <b>Quote</B> <I>originally posted by RafflesCity </i></b> </smallfont> </td> <tr><td align=left valign=top>heh..thanks Jason..actually BGT and Napptown have helped out slightly For me the greatest challenge to do a top 300 would be to maintain an accurate and up-to-date list. One has to constantly watch out for buildings that just get completed and with each new addition, the rankings change. It isnt an easy task and needs DEDICATION. (think 3 times before you volunteer youself) I have worked out a rudimentary list of the top300 just in case though. And quite fortunately, there are a number of buildings in the Open forum that are part of that list. However, if we want to go further, we will need a new strategy: by getting members to help in creating threads;we can always call upon members from different cities to help provide pictures. Thats the advantage of a global forum like this. But I think we need to consider the pros and cons of a top300 list </td></tr> </table> A Top 300 would be real tough, but it doesn't sound like a bad idea. Though how short in height would #300 be? Also, when will we get a Rate Our Talls Open Forum Stats chart? I can't wait to see how that would turn out! We have plenty of different and various skyscrapers here that you can't find in the the ROT Top 100 and 200 sections.

June 21st, 2003, 02:19 AM	#59
RafflesCity By Spirit Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: S I N G A P O R E Posts: 26,215 Likes (Received): 1	<table cellpadding=4 cellspacing=0 width=98% class="quoteBox"> <td align=left valign=center> <smallfont> <b>Quote</B> <I>originally posted by savethewtc </i></b> </smallfont> </td> <tr><td align=left valign=top><table cellpadding=4 cellspacing=0 width=98% class="quoteBox"> <td align=left valign=center> <smallfont> <b>Quote</B> <I>originally posted by RafflesCity </i></b> </smallfont> </td> <tr><td align=left valign=top>heh..thanks Jason..actually BGT and Napptown have helped out slightly For me the greatest challenge to do a top 300 would be to maintain an accurate and up-to-date list. One has to constantly watch out for buildings that just get completed and with each new addition, the rankings change. It isnt an easy task and needs DEDICATION. (think 3 times before you volunteer youself) I have worked out a rudimentary list of the top300 just in case though. And quite fortunately, there are a number of buildings in the Open forum that are part of that list. However, if we want to go further, we will need a new strategy: by getting members to help in creating threads;we can always call upon members from different cities to help provide pictures. Thats the advantage of a global forum like this. But I think we need to consider the pros and cons of a top300 list </td></tr> </table> A Top 300 would be real tough, but it doesn't sound like a bad idea. Though how short in height would #300 be? Also, when will we get a Rate Our Talls Open Forum Stats chart? I can't wait to see how that would turn out! We have plenty of different and various skyscrapers here that you can't find in the the ROT Top 100 and 200 sections.</td></tr> </table> Great enthusiasm! At the moment, #300 would be around 198 or 199m (653ft) tall. So anything less would be out. I have no idea when a stats chart will be created for the Open Forum, although I could ask Jan about it. But first I'll have to check if all the polls have the correct format

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode