daily menu » rate the banner | guess the city | one on one

Go Back   SkyscraperCity > World Development News Forums > Supertalls > Proposed Supertalls


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old May 26th, 2009, 01:17 AM   #21
AmericanSkyscraper22
Registered User
 
AmericanSkyscraper22's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Toronto
Posts: 353
Likes (Received): 0

is that second tall tower part of the development or an already built building?
and what is the height of the big one?
AmericanSkyscraper22 no está en línea   Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
 
Old May 26th, 2009, 01:34 AM   #22
LukaChile
*
 
LukaChile's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Santiago
Posts: 2,264
Likes (Received): 1

Looks so cool, i like! :drove:
__________________
tumblr
LukaChile no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old May 26th, 2009, 01:46 AM   #23
jCav
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 63
Likes (Received): 0

Copy and paste, no joke (Bank o' America NYC).

To me, it doesn't seem like it would fit in. I still like it though. Just skeptical...
jCav no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old May 26th, 2009, 06:38 AM   #24
Jim856796
The Q&A Guy
 
Jim856796's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Citizen of the World
Posts: 6,743
Likes (Received): 7

I don't like this proposal. I would much rather prefer a reclad of the existing hotel over this stupid proposal.
__________________
I honestly think all development projects must be dashing, sustainable, and futureproof.

You support the good projects... and oppose the bad.
Jim856796 no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old May 26th, 2009, 07:37 AM   #25
dachacon
Registered User
 
dachacon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 789
Likes (Received): 0

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim856796 View Post
I don't like this proposal. I would much rather prefer a reclad of the existing hotel over this stupid proposal.
you have never seen the hotel in real life have you?
this is alot better than what is standing there now.
dachacon no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old May 26th, 2009, 07:39 AM   #26
dachacon
Registered User
 
dachacon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 789
Likes (Received): 0

Quote:
Originally Posted by AmericanSkyscraper22 View Post
is that second tall tower part of the development or an already built building?
and what is the height of the big one?
heights have not been revealed and won't be until the project goes to the land use committee in about a year. to give you an estimate 60 stories times 13.5 equals 810ft. and the spire adds about 200ft. so 1010ft. which would qualify for a super tall.
dachacon no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old May 26th, 2009, 09:56 AM   #27
-Corey-
Je suis tout ā vous
 
-Corey-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 14,920
Likes (Received): 686

Wow another supertall for California
__________________

๏̯͡๏๏̯͡๏
-Corey- no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old May 26th, 2009, 10:17 AM   #28
Jim856796
The Q&A Guy
 
Jim856796's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Citizen of the World
Posts: 6,743
Likes (Received): 7

Quote:
Originally Posted by dachacon View Post
you have never seen the hotel in real life have you?
this is alot better than what is standing there now.
I have during the '84 Olympics, and I reject this new tower, and there is nothing you can do to make me like it. The existing hotel has 900 rooms, the new hotel tower has only 700 rooms, so unless they change the plans to match the number of rooms in the current hotel, I don't want this piece of crap tower built. The Wilshire Grand is starting to look like the Hotel Pennsylvania of the West. Hotel Pennsylvania in New York City is also under threat of demolition to make way for a new office tower proposal which is growing stale.
__________________
I honestly think all development projects must be dashing, sustainable, and futureproof.

You support the good projects... and oppose the bad.
Jim856796 no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old June 2nd, 2009, 10:46 AM   #29
dachacon
Registered User
 
dachacon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 789
Likes (Received): 0

i appreciate your opinion and was not trying to change your mind, just wanted to read your reason behind your thinking. its nice to meet someone who brings opposition to a project, it breaks the boring replies of nice proposal or great building.
time to ruffle some feathers.
dachacon no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old June 2nd, 2009, 10:09 PM   #30
AmericanSkyscraper22
Registered User
 
AmericanSkyscraper22's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Toronto
Posts: 353
Likes (Received): 0

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim856796 View Post
I have during the '84 Olympics, and I reject this new tower, and there is nothing you can do to make me like it. The existing hotel has 900 rooms, the new hotel tower has only 700 rooms, so unless they change the plans to match the number of rooms in the current hotel, I don't want this piece of crap tower built. The Wilshire Grand is starting to look like the Hotel Pennsylvania of the West. Hotel Pennsylvania in New York City is also under threat of demolition to make way for a new office tower proposal which is growing stale.
i undertsand your objection, but this building, although with less rooms, will spice up the skyline and be more asthetically pleasing than the previous building
AmericanSkyscraper22 no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old July 21st, 2009, 05:27 AM   #31
unmentioned
Registered User
 
unmentioned's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: New York City
Posts: 406
Likes (Received): 4

Blithely denouncing something as "stupid" and a "piece of crap" won't make anyone on here want to hear your opinions.
__________________
This is not RuPaul's Best Friend Race
unmentioned no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old July 24th, 2009, 05:23 PM   #32
wnweber
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 9
Likes (Received): 0

Beautiful! The Wiltshire Grand is long over due...
wnweber no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old July 26th, 2009, 04:46 AM   #33
Jim856796
The Q&A Guy
 
Jim856796's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Citizen of the World
Posts: 6,743
Likes (Received): 7

Quote:
Originally Posted by AmericanSkyscraper22 View Post
i undertsand your objection, but this building, although with less rooms, will spice up the skyline and be more asthetically pleasing than the previous building
Apparently, there is a portion of the old Wilshire Grand that is used for offices. I have changed my mind. The tower should get built, but increase the number of rooms to less than 900 and its height should be between 850-900 feet.
__________________
I honestly think all development projects must be dashing, sustainable, and futureproof.

You support the good projects... and oppose the bad.
Jim856796 no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old July 31st, 2009, 01:32 PM   #34
mossimoh
Registered User
 
mossimoh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Perth
Posts: 4,866
Likes (Received): 4

A great looking building!
mossimoh no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old August 6th, 2009, 09:53 AM   #35
pittsteelers247
Registered User
 
pittsteelers247's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 97
Likes (Received): 0

Any recent news on this project?
__________________
Tigers love pepper... they hate cinnamon.
pittsteelers247 no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old August 7th, 2009, 07:56 AM   #36
punk_oi
Registered User
 
punk_oi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 433
Likes (Received): 0

L.A. could use a new devolopment..this project would really stand out imo
punk_oi no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old August 8th, 2009, 08:34 AM   #37
XLucky4LifeX
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 56
Likes (Received): 0

Just hurry and get it approved =D
XLucky4LifeX no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old December 24th, 2009, 02:27 AM   #38
WiGgLz01
BANNED
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Puyallup
Posts: 3,385
Likes (Received): 0

so so so very nice, cant wait
WiGgLz01 no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old December 24th, 2009, 02:38 AM   #39
Kenny
SSC Super Moderator
 
Kenny's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Los Angeles | San Salvador
Posts: 18,185
Likes (Received): 472

We need more towers in Downtown, this one would be the first with a spire. City ordinance says all buildings MUST have a Helipad for emergency evacuations, that's why L.A. only has flat top buildings, this one will break the mold.

Built now!

Quote:
Originally Posted by philip View Post
Wow! and this is in my city, please build it now. Question: How long has it been since we have not seen a new skyscraper? Answer: Too Long.
You forget the soon to be inaugurated Ritz Carlton (54 stories) Hotel.

Kenny no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old January 1st, 2010, 06:11 PM   #40
adam_uk
Registered User
 
adam_uk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: london
Posts: 198
Likes (Received): 0

wow very sexy.
__________________
adam the great
adam_uk no está en línea   Reply With Quote


Reply

Tags
los angeles, tower, wilshire grand

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT +2. The time now is 10:02 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Feedback Buttons provided by Advanced Post Thanks / Like v3.1.2 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2013 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2013 DragonByte Technologies Ltd. (Resources saved on this page: MySQL 25.00%)

SkyscraperCity - In Urbanity We Trust

Hosted by Blacksun, dedicated to this site too!
Forum server management by DaiTengu