|
|
| daily menu » rate the banner | guess the city | one on one |
|
|
#121 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 5,755
Likes (Received): 76
|
Quote:
Presuming that the Sheffield trial is a success I would imagine "phase 4" will be the tram-train conversions of the local services on the Wigan, Bolton, Rochdale, Glossop, Marple, Airport and Alti-Stockport lines and possibly the very expensive Didsbury to Stockport extension. The best Leigh will be able to hope for for a very long time is a BRT connection to town and to a possible railhead near by. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#122 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Milton Keynes - FASTEST GROWING CITY in the UK
Posts: 1,491
Likes (Received): 1
|
It appears that Kenyon Junction reopening (circa 2000) was tied in with the Xanadu project, the initial costs to be funded by the developers, with feeder buses provided to Xanadu, as well as Leigh town centre.
Now that a more 'affordable', modular, option is available, as well as the step change of official policy towards the route, I think these proposals should definitely be revived.
__________________
Progress is nothing unless shared by all. |
|
|
|
|
|
#123 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 15,654
|
Quote:
That leaves Stockport as the only planned but not publically funded route, the Airport loop and Trafford Centre need their respective owners to contribute. Call them 4b and Wigan, Bolton and Marple as 4a. I could see Leigh in a phase 5 but as I said very distant. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#124 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 5,755
Likes (Received): 76
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#125 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 15,654
|
Ahh I see we are talking about different kinds of transport, im talking about a radial city commuter feeding system and your talking about an interurban transport within the districts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#126 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 5,755
Likes (Received): 76
|
Yeah I suppose so. I think the point I was trying to make underneath my painfully convoluted prose was that while radial city commuter feeding systems may be the priority today; when phase 3 is completed and the remainder of the urban rail system is sorted out then they may not be the priority any longer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#127 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Milton Keynes - FASTEST GROWING CITY in the UK
Posts: 1,491
Likes (Received): 1
|
But Metrolink shows you could serve both those markets (city commuter, inner-suburban), whereas traditional rail served the outer-suburban>city well, but ignores the other (due to lack of stops, lack of frequency).
__________________
Progress is nothing unless shared by all. |
|
|
|
|
|
#128 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 5,755
Likes (Received): 76
|
True, but doesn't Metrolink do this well because it has big draws at the ends/along each line (Alti, Bury, the Quays). In cost benefit terms would a Metrolink line along the East Lancs or Rochdale Road be as lucrative as the present and proposed lines? Do enough people want to go to Middleton or Leigh that the line wouldn't make a loss?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#129 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 15,654
|
Leigh yes, it wont be competing with any other form of public transport if it is an eventual upgrade of the busway, whereas those other places you have bus routes and in some cases heavy rail as well, for example Salford.
Wigan too you would see competition if they converted the Atherton line between those using the tram (and stopping at all the minor stations) and those choosing an express service by heavy rail via the Bolton line. But you wouldnt see any competition from Buses besides the Trafford centre bus. |
|
|
|
|
|
#130 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 5,755
Likes (Received): 76
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#131 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 15,654
|
Yes the final stretch would be competing but conversley it would also be the only option for anyone in Salford who wanted to go to Leigh, even if Leigh would be the primary origin for most journeys. In fact just as it would be the route that people from Leigh accessed wider transport options it would also be the funnel for those from further afield to Leigh.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#132 | |
|
Nasty piece of work
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Manchester
Posts: 968
Likes (Received): 11
|
Quote:
Out of interest, people keep mentioning how the route 26 was changed to take longer in some sort of conspiracy theory. I'm very familar that route as it stands now, but I can't remember this quicker alternative route that it apparently used to operate on. Could someone enlighten me?
__________________
Why don't you light your tampon and blow your box apart, cos it's the only bang you're ever gonna get, sweetheart! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#133 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,794
Likes (Received): 17
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#134 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Milton Keynes - FASTEST GROWING CITY in the UK
Posts: 1,491
Likes (Received): 1
|
As mentioned in my previous posts concerning Kenyon Junction (Parkway), there was previously an 'GMexpress' route 34 Liverpool - Leigh - Manchester limited stop/express service, which started under GMT, continued under GM, became ran down under GMN, became peak hours only, and was eventually axed by First.
I think traffic towards the Liverpool/St Helens end of the route drifted off during the 1990s, as a result of competition from improved rail services (FNW introduced a proper Liverpool Lime St - Manchester - MIA semi-fast) and National Express Shuttle using the M62, making the 'whole' route less viable. X34 'The Spinning Jenny' only got reinstated thanks to 'Kickstart' funding.
__________________
Progress is nothing unless shared by all. |
|
|
|
|
|
#135 | ||
|
Nasty piece of work
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Manchester
Posts: 968
Likes (Received): 11
|
Quote:
Quote:
I'm a bit tipsy so quite frankly can't be arsed trawling to find the quote, but I'm sure someone specifically mentioned the 26 service being altered. Even if it was, I've just realised that is a pretty pointless argument given that the X34 is till in place...
__________________
Why don't you light your tampon and blow your box apart, cos it's the only bang you're ever gonna get, sweetheart! Last edited by Priscilla QOTD; August 19th, 2009 at 11:23 PM. Reason: Apalling drunken typos. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#136 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Milton Keynes - FASTEST GROWING CITY in the UK
Posts: 1,491
Likes (Received): 1
|
ISTR, the 34 Express still operated to Liverpool until about 1995/96ish, until it was cut to Lowton St Marys (was the destination on the blind), here is a photo of one at work.
Digging out some very old material, it appears to run the following route: 1990-1992: Liverpool - St. Helens - Earlestown - Leigh - Astley - Mcr (all run commercially) 1997 route split: Lowton/Leigh - Manchester run commercially by GMN, but Liverpool - Leigh run commercially by Lancashire Travel (aka Merseybus). I still think if Skelmersdale can warrant construction of a heavy rail link, then so can Leigh, but Kenyon Junction Parkway is a quicker, more affordable option.
__________________
Progress is nothing unless shared by all. |
|
|
|
|
|
#137 |
|
BANNED
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,670
Likes (Received): 0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#138 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Milton Keynes - FASTEST GROWING CITY in the UK
Posts: 1,491
Likes (Received): 1
|
I still don't understand why it is necessary for it to be a 'guided' busway.
I appreciate Adelaide and other non-UK systems are built better, but the poor quality of ones constructed here, such as Leeds, Bradford, with their dire 20mph limits, and very wobbly ride, or the late running Cambridgeshire project, doesn't give me much faith. Why can't a simple bus only road (like Runcorn Busway) be constructed, with proper enforcement of bus lanes on the A580? Nottingham manage very well on their heavily trafficked A52 (westbound towards Stapleford), with a similar 3 lanes+1 bus lane layout? Money saved by not having to fit/maintain guided wheels to the buses could be invested elsewhere.
__________________
Progress is nothing unless shared by all. |
|
|
|
|
|
#139 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,794
Likes (Received): 17
|
Quote:
The guidewheel techology is not expensive - the extra cost relates rather to driver training; and the fact that, once trained, specialised drivers will need to be paid on a premium rate. The concrete guided track is slightly more expensive per km to construct than a bus-only road, but the maintainance costs are far lower. Your question as to why they could not simply run the buses along the A580 is a good one, though. I suppose that the logic is that the new-build residential areas relate much more closely to the old railway than they do to the East Lancs Road. But there is a basic presumption that bus services along a busway would be commercailly viable, where the old express buses along the A580 were not. I hope we shall see. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#140 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Milton Keynes - FASTEST GROWING CITY in the UK
Posts: 1,491
Likes (Received): 1
|
Cross City Bus Route plans revealed/consultation starts:
Quote:
I welcome the intention to reconfigure the Piccadilly / Newton St junction, but feel they have missed a trick by ignoring Stevenson Square or Piccadilly Station as part of the city centre route.
__________________
Progress is nothing unless shared by all. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|