|
|
| daily menu » rate the banner | guess the city | one on one |
|
|||||||
| Railways Heavy rail: Intercity, Commuter and Freight |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#321 | |
|
té con pastas member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: South Ilercavonia
Posts: 5,819
Likes (Received): 173
|
Faptastic! Thankyou ![]() I've a question about Busan-Ulsan-Pohang Donghae Nambu Line. Yesterday I was looking at Daum Maps and I saw the line through Busan are doing works... and according to Wikipedia: Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#322 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 709
Likes (Received): 5
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#323 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 1
Likes (Received): 0
|
Does anyone know where I might be able to find a description of the railway signalling used in South Korea? It looks heavily influenced by Japanese designs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#324 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Sapporo
Posts: 996
Likes (Received): 36
|
Likely none in English, I have trouble finding anything in Japanese, and that's usually a reliable source for some substance. I don't know much about the signals themselves, my personal observations saw similarities to Japanese practice, though the blue indication (=green?) surprised me (there is also green, like in Japan). As far as train control, positive train control was instituted in 1969, with the adoption of an ATS-S system based on the type used by Japan National Railways. In the 1980's the Gyeongbu Line had five lamp type signals installed with ATS, allowing high speed running. Later, the Gyeongbu and Honam Lines had ATP with Eurobalise system installed. KTX is of course ATC, using the TVM430 track to train transmission system.
Last edited by k.k.jetcar; December 10th, 2012 at 05:03 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#326 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Sapporo
Posts: 996
Likes (Received): 36
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#327 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,810
Likes (Received): 40
|
Haha yes, it looks like the old NS 1600 series.
http://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/1600/1800_(locomotieftype) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NS_Class_1600 |
|
|
|
|
|
#328 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 39
Likes (Received): 0
|
Quote:
![]() http://locopage.piwigo.com/index?/search/824 Also not the last four locally built locos had side grills and windows opposite (upper/lower) to the other 90 locos, this photo is perfect example of the difference http://locopage.piwigo.com/picture?/1543/search/824
__________________
http://www.loco-photos.net/ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#329 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 10
Likes (Received): 0
|
Hey guys, I've just relaunched Kojects so we should have more frequent posts about rail in Korea coming up soon. The Donghae Nambu Line is definitely on the list. Like always there are a ton of projects coming up, so will keep you posted.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#330 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 39
Likes (Received): 0
|
I saw this on Kojects page:
"KORAIL is holding a naming contest for the new train which will replace the Saemeul at the end of this year" Can anyone give detailed info of these new trains, I guess they are electric? What about the Saemeul running over diesel and part electric and then diesel lines (example Seoul - Pohang) I understand all the DHC train sets are now running with GM locos pulling carriages, we like this
__________________
http://www.loco-photos.net/ |
|
|
|
|
|
#331 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 10
Likes (Received): 0
|
Quote:
The new trains will serve the same areas that Saemaul trains currently serve. Max speed will be 150km/h with 376 seats available. It appears they are electric. I'm guessing it may be very similar to the current Nuriro trains. Will look into the part elec/diesel thing and might post about it soon. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#332 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Sapporo
Posts: 996
Likes (Received): 36
|
There appears to have been some past speculation that a version of the Tilt Train Express (Hanvit 200) would be the replacement. The Hanvit 200 was detailed in an issue of Railers magazine a couple of years ago. The Nuriro option seems more viable though, if tilt is not needed (tilt is maintenance intensive).
|
|
|
|
|
|
#333 | ||
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 709
Likes (Received): 5
|
Quote:
The New EMU Trains : - 150km/h (Maximum Speed) - 6 Cars per One trainset ( 23 trainsets and 138 cars in total ) This is the draft design : ![]() ![]() ![]() Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#334 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 39
Likes (Received): 0
|
Quote:
So maybe the "Saemauel" trains running on partly diesel lines to Pohang and Iksan will continue with old cars and diesel locos?
__________________
http://www.loco-photos.net/ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#335 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 709
Likes (Received): 5
|
Quote:
Korail has a plan to send all 'Saemauel' trains into retirement till 2015 and introduce EMU type trains. The non-electified lines would have different options, of course. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#336 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 39
Likes (Received): 0
|
I think they just removed the "power cars" and pull the trains around with diesel locos using the same cars? The original loco hauled "Saemauel" had five figure numbers, and the PP_DHC have 3 numbers
__________________
http://www.loco-photos.net/ |
|
|
|
|
|
#337 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Manchester
Posts: 806
Likes (Received): 36
|
150km/h seems awfully slow for the replacement for the Saemaeul trains. Weren't they the fastest trains in South Korea until the KTX? And don't they already have the ITX working the Gyeongchun line at up to 180km/h? It seems like they should aim for a stepping stone between that train and the KTX, not more trains underneath the 200km/h line.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#338 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Sapporo
Posts: 996
Likes (Received): 36
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#339 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Manchester
Posts: 806
Likes (Received): 36
|
So then, the listed maximum speed is not the maximum speed of the train, but the maximum speed allowed by the track? If that's the case, it seems like they ought to be preparing for the upgrade plan the government is implementing to increase speeds nationwide. Is it likely that the train itself would be able to go faster on, for example, the Gyeongbu KTX line (which I assume it will operate on if it's totally replacing the Saemaeul trains)?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#340 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 709
Likes (Received): 5
|
Korail had a plan to introduce the so-called 'Vitzro(180km/h)'train to replace Saemauel trains several years ago, but the borad of audit and inspection tackled this plan for various reasons :
1. There're no upgrade plan to the lines in much demand such as Gyeongbu or Homan line. In these lines 150km/h trains would be sufficient. 2. 180km/h trains would not be sufficient for the lines which are planned to be upgraded to 180km/h ~ 230km/h, and it would be more efficient to introduce trains along the plan. Anyway in spite of the board's opposition, MLTM(Minstry of Land, Transportation and Martime Affairs) seems to introduce 200~230km/h EMU trains, according to this news. According to this news, MLTM has a plan to put all of Saemauel trains out of service till 2015 and introduce 200~230km/h EMU trains, if possible, to the lines where no KTX train is in service. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|