|
|
| daily menu » rate the banner | guess the city | one on one |
|
|
#81 | |
|
wind-up merchant
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 15,877
Likes (Received): 8
|
Quote:
You can add HMS Dauntless a Type 45. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#82 | |
|
Bossman
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: not london
Posts: 29,162
Likes (Received): 486
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#83 |
|
Portsmouths Finest, Maybe
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Portsmouth
Posts: 14,092
Likes (Received): 213
|
They are building a new link road into Portsmouth Naval Base direct from the Moterway to get HGV Traffic out of the City Centre
Fantastic news, has needed to be done for years.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#84 | |||
|
Chief Bureaucrat
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 6,848
Likes (Received): 1
|
Quote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of...yal_Navy_ships Quote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Royal_F...y#Active_ships Quote:
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#85 | |
|
wind-up merchant
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 15,877
Likes (Received): 8
|
Quote:
British Army - 114,000 French Army - 112,000 Italian Army - 104,000 German Army - 91,000 Spanish Army - 89,000 Polish Army - 65,000 ....hmmm |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#86 |
|
Bossman
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: not london
Posts: 29,162
Likes (Received): 486
|
very true actually... they have all scaled down their armies massively compared to the other bits of their armed forces, all except the british.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#87 |
|
Chief Bureaucrat
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 6,848
Likes (Received): 1
|
Could someone show a list of the largest (100%) professional armies in the world? Surely the British Army is one of the largest?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#88 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: London
Posts: 3,980
Likes (Received): 1
|
Our army is a silly size for 2010.
Either we're going to now specialise in drawn out counter insurgency over the next 20 years - in which case it needs to be bigger or we accept that as an Island in a strategically advantageous part of the world where we're very unlikely to be invaded and that now the cold war has ended we have no need for 25000 troops to be stationed in Germany, that it needs to be a lot smaller (80-90,000) but more mobile. I actually think that, barring the need for a few more destroyers, frigates and corvettes for piracy patrols our navy is just about the right size for this day and age with our current commitments and is still one of the few 'true' blue water navies around at the moment. We just need the new carriers to survive the SDR to remain a top notch navy. |
|
|
|
|
|
#89 |
|
Chief Bureaucrat
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 6,848
Likes (Received): 1
|
I'm quite sure that the SDR will bring the troops out of Germany and re-role the army away from heavy stuff (tanks, et al.) and towards infantry & specialist, counter-insurgency/expeditionary duties. The 1st Division will be massively altered. Not sure about overall troop numbers though: it would be difficult to reduce the numbers too much with the current over-stretch. Perhaps a longer-term reduction in numbers, for the post-Afghanistan era.
If Fox has his way, the SDR should pave the way for a larger surface fleet (frigates, corvettes, OPVs) in the longer run. With the aircraft carriers built, the fleet can be built around them. And once their construction is out of the way, the budget & shipyards will be freed to construct a few larger vessels (replacements for Ocean, Albion and Bulwark for instance) as well as frigates in the 2020s. RFA vessels to be built abroad though? Frankly it's the RAF which is going to be buggered! Last edited by Manchester Planner; June 6th, 2010 at 09:15 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#90 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: London
Posts: 3,980
Likes (Received): 1
|
Only problem with the withdrawal from Germany is it will cost us more in the short term because thanks to short sighted selling off of facilities we have nowhere to house them!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#91 |
|
Chief Bureaucrat
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 6,848
Likes (Received): 1
|
Yup, annoying but there you go: it needs to be done. It will save loads in the long-term and hopefully the SDR will be bold enough to move this forward.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#92 |
|
wind-up merchant
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 15,877
Likes (Received): 8
|
There is a list on wikipedia but that's armed forces including reserve, navy and airforces. I got those numbers by searching out each european army. Was surprised at many of the figures. Would have through Germany and Poland would have bigger armies considering the past. Although once you head towards Asia their armies are massive. In Europe we have one of the biggest armies and we have the largest navy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#93 |
|
Chief Bureaucrat
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 6,848
Likes (Received): 1
|
Some of the Asian armed forces are unbelievably huge. East Asia is like Europe 100 years ago. Pakistan, India, China, N Korea, S Korea, Japan, Russia, the US forces in E Asia... it's all ready to go...
![]() Saying that, the combined forces of Europe (EU/NATO countries of Europe) are impressive. |
|
|
|
|
|
#94 |
|
wind-up merchant
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 15,877
Likes (Received): 8
|
Also considering that we've building 7 new bigger subs, 4 more bigger destroyers and 2 massive aircraft carries in terms of total tonnage will the navy size increase?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#95 |
|
Chief Bureaucrat
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 6,848
Likes (Received): 1
|
Quite possibly - T45s are larger than the T42s, Astutes are larger than the S and T classes, the QE-class carriers are 130,000 tonnes versus the 66,000 tonnes of the 3 current carriers, the River-class OPVs replaced smaller vessels (and are essentially corvettes), and also the new C1/C2 frigates will be larger than the T22/23 frigates.
Will be interesting to see whether the new SSBNs will be larger than the Vanguards and also what will replace Ocean, Albion & Bulwark in the 2020s - I'm still hopeful for 2 or 3 light carriers (commando/helicopter carriers) with amphib capabilities (like the Australian Canberra-class) which would be near the 30,000 tonne mark. The Royal Navy has, since the mid-1990s, been transforming itself into a navy of fewer, but larger vessels, and I would imagine this will continue until we have a 100% blue-water, post-Cold War navy. We're nearly there: just need the QE-class carriers and T22/23 frigate replacements. Oh and, finally, new vessels for the RFA! Last edited by Manchester Planner; June 6th, 2010 at 11:29 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#96 |
|
Portsmouths Finest, Maybe
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Portsmouth
Posts: 14,092
Likes (Received): 213
|
One thing people need to remember as well is the new ships may be bigger but, due to better technology, the crews are much smaller. This is somewhat beneficial to running costs and whilst the number of matlo's may be dropping, the force projection and power does not drop as much with it. If you get what I mean?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#97 |
|
Chief Bureaucrat
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 6,848
Likes (Received): 1
|
Greater efficiencies... Gideon likes the sound of that!
![]() Hmm... maybe you can have that aircraft carrier after all... then again, maybe not... |
|
|
|
|
|
#98 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: London
Posts: 3,980
Likes (Received): 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#99 |
|
Bossman
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: not london
Posts: 29,162
Likes (Received): 486
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#100 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,604
Likes (Received): 18
|
Quote:
Not to mention that the UK survives by importing 99% of its trade by volume over the seas and has political committments/obligations around the world. And the UK is of course comparatively richer than India.
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Tags |
| biggest navy in europe, blue water navy, england, royal navy, so143 = assface, the queen is german |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|