daily menu » rate the banner | guess the city | one on one

Go Back   SkyscraperCity > European Forums > UK & Ireland Architecture Forums > Skybar > The Barracks

The Barracks For military and defence issues.


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old June 6th, 2010, 06:37 PM   #81
andysimo123
wind-up merchant
 
andysimo123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 15,877
Likes (Received): 8

Quote:
Originally Posted by AdmiralAnthony View Post
With all our cutbacks what does our ravaged fleet look like now?
Am i right in thinking we now have left currently:

2 carriers
1 LPH
2 LPD's
4 LSD's
1 x Argus
6 destroyers (5 x 42'S, 1 x 45)
17 frigates
4 patrol ships
1 ocean survey ship
2 coastal survey ships
14 mine sweepers
1 repair ship

4 SSBN
8 SSN

tankers/supply ships? How many are left?

That's a pretty piss poor fleet in all honesty :-(
Most European navys are piss poor. Infact nearly all are. For example the Israeli navy consist of gun boats and afew large patrol ships. Other navies such as the Spanish, French and Italian navys still aren't as big. The Indian Navy, a country with 1 billion people has less Destroyers and Frigates than the Royal Navy. I can think of only countries like the USA and China who have massive navies.
You can add HMS Dauntless a Type 45.
andysimo123 no está en línea   Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
 
Old June 6th, 2010, 06:47 PM   #82
gothicform
Bossman
 
gothicform's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: not london
Posts: 29,162
Likes (Received): 486

Quote:
Originally Posted by andysimo123 View Post
Most European navys are piss poor. Infact nearly all are. For example the Israeli navy consist of gun boats and afew large patrol ships. Other navies such as the Spanish, French and Italian navys still aren't as big. The Indian Navy, a country with 1 billion people has less Destroyers and Frigates than the Royal Navy. I can think of only countries like the USA and China who have massive navies.
You can add HMS Dauntless a Type 45.
most european countries have bigger armies than we do and are not islands. we NEED a navy.
gothicform no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old June 6th, 2010, 06:51 PM   #83
ill tonkso
Portsmouths Finest, Maybe
 
ill tonkso's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Portsmouth
Posts: 14,092
Likes (Received): 213

They are building a new link road into Portsmouth Naval Base direct from the Moterway to get HGV Traffic out of the City Centre Fantastic news, has needed to be done for years.
ill tonkso no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old June 6th, 2010, 07:26 PM   #84
Manchester Planner
Chief Bureaucrat
 
Manchester Planner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 6,848
Likes (Received): 1

Quote:
Originally Posted by AdmiralAnthony View Post
With all our cutbacks what does our ravaged fleet look like now?
Am i right in thinking we now have left currently:

2 carriers
1 LPH
2 LPD's
4 LSD's
1 x Argus
6 destroyers (5 x 42'S, 1 x 45)
17 frigates
4 patrol ships
1 ocean survey ship
2 coastal survey ships
14 mine sweepers
1 repair ship

4 SSBN
8 SSN
Accurate list of RN ships & subs on Wikipedia:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of...yal_Navy_ships

Quote:
tankers/supply ships? How many are left?
Again, have a look on Wikipedia:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Royal_F...y#Active_ships

Quote:
That's a pretty piss poor fleet in all honesty :-(
Still the best in Europe and second or third best in the world!!
Manchester Planner no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old June 6th, 2010, 07:43 PM   #85
andysimo123
wind-up merchant
 
andysimo123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 15,877
Likes (Received): 8

Quote:
Originally Posted by gothicform View Post
most european countries have bigger armies than we do and are not islands. we NEED a navy.
Standard active forces.......
British Army - 114,000
French Army - 112,000
Italian Army - 104,000
German Army - 91,000
Spanish Army - 89,000
Polish Army - 65,000

....hmmm
andysimo123 no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old June 6th, 2010, 08:17 PM   #86
gothicform
Bossman
 
gothicform's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: not london
Posts: 29,162
Likes (Received): 486

very true actually... they have all scaled down their armies massively compared to the other bits of their armed forces, all except the british.
gothicform no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old June 6th, 2010, 08:53 PM   #87
Manchester Planner
Chief Bureaucrat
 
Manchester Planner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 6,848
Likes (Received): 1

Quote:
Originally Posted by andysimo123 View Post
Standard active forces.......
British Army - 114,000
French Army - 112,000
Italian Army - 104,000
German Army - 91,000
Spanish Army - 89,000
Polish Army - 65,000

....hmmm
Could someone show a list of the largest (100%) professional armies in the world? Surely the British Army is one of the largest?
Manchester Planner no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old June 6th, 2010, 09:01 PM   #88
madjackmcmad
Registered User
 
madjackmcmad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: London
Posts: 3,980
Likes (Received): 1

Our army is a silly size for 2010.

Either we're going to now specialise in drawn out counter insurgency over the next 20 years - in which case it needs to be bigger or we accept that as an Island in a strategically advantageous part of the world where we're very unlikely to be invaded and that now the cold war has ended we have no need for 25000 troops to be stationed in Germany, that it needs to be a lot smaller (80-90,000) but more mobile.


I actually think that, barring the need for a few more destroyers, frigates and corvettes for piracy patrols our navy is just about the right size for this day and age with our current commitments and is still one of the few 'true' blue water navies around at the moment.

We just need the new carriers to survive the SDR to remain a top notch navy.
madjackmcmad no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old June 6th, 2010, 09:09 PM   #89
Manchester Planner
Chief Bureaucrat
 
Manchester Planner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 6,848
Likes (Received): 1

I'm quite sure that the SDR will bring the troops out of Germany and re-role the army away from heavy stuff (tanks, et al.) and towards infantry & specialist, counter-insurgency/expeditionary duties. The 1st Division will be massively altered. Not sure about overall troop numbers though: it would be difficult to reduce the numbers too much with the current over-stretch. Perhaps a longer-term reduction in numbers, for the post-Afghanistan era.

If Fox has his way, the SDR should pave the way for a larger surface fleet (frigates, corvettes, OPVs) in the longer run. With the aircraft carriers built, the fleet can be built around them. And once their construction is out of the way, the budget & shipyards will be freed to construct a few larger vessels (replacements for Ocean, Albion and Bulwark for instance) as well as frigates in the 2020s.

RFA vessels to be built abroad though?

Frankly it's the RAF which is going to be buggered!

Last edited by Manchester Planner; June 6th, 2010 at 09:15 PM.
Manchester Planner no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old June 6th, 2010, 09:15 PM   #90
madjackmcmad
Registered User
 
madjackmcmad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: London
Posts: 3,980
Likes (Received): 1

Only problem with the withdrawal from Germany is it will cost us more in the short term because thanks to short sighted selling off of facilities we have nowhere to house them!
madjackmcmad no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old June 6th, 2010, 09:18 PM   #91
Manchester Planner
Chief Bureaucrat
 
Manchester Planner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 6,848
Likes (Received): 1

Yup, annoying but there you go: it needs to be done. It will save loads in the long-term and hopefully the SDR will be bold enough to move this forward.
Manchester Planner no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old June 6th, 2010, 10:06 PM   #92
andysimo123
wind-up merchant
 
andysimo123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 15,877
Likes (Received): 8

Quote:
Originally Posted by Manchester Planner View Post
Could someone show a list of the largest (100%) professional armies in the world? Surely the British Army is one of the largest?
There is a list on wikipedia but that's armed forces including reserve, navy and airforces. I got those numbers by searching out each european army. Was surprised at many of the figures. Would have through Germany and Poland would have bigger armies considering the past. Although once you head towards Asia their armies are massive. In Europe we have one of the biggest armies and we have the largest navy.
andysimo123 no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old June 6th, 2010, 10:10 PM   #93
Manchester Planner
Chief Bureaucrat
 
Manchester Planner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 6,848
Likes (Received): 1

Some of the Asian armed forces are unbelievably huge. East Asia is like Europe 100 years ago. Pakistan, India, China, N Korea, S Korea, Japan, Russia, the US forces in E Asia... it's all ready to go...

Saying that, the combined forces of Europe (EU/NATO countries of Europe) are impressive.
Manchester Planner no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old June 6th, 2010, 10:16 PM   #94
andysimo123
wind-up merchant
 
andysimo123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 15,877
Likes (Received): 8

Also considering that we've building 7 new bigger subs, 4 more bigger destroyers and 2 massive aircraft carries in terms of total tonnage will the navy size increase?
andysimo123 no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old June 6th, 2010, 11:23 PM   #95
Manchester Planner
Chief Bureaucrat
 
Manchester Planner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 6,848
Likes (Received): 1

Quite possibly - T45s are larger than the T42s, Astutes are larger than the S and T classes, the QE-class carriers are 130,000 tonnes versus the 66,000 tonnes of the 3 current carriers, the River-class OPVs replaced smaller vessels (and are essentially corvettes), and also the new C1/C2 frigates will be larger than the T22/23 frigates.

Will be interesting to see whether the new SSBNs will be larger than the Vanguards and also what will replace Ocean, Albion & Bulwark in the 2020s - I'm still hopeful for 2 or 3 light carriers (commando/helicopter carriers) with amphib capabilities (like the Australian Canberra-class) which would be near the 30,000 tonne mark.

The Royal Navy has, since the mid-1990s, been transforming itself into a navy of fewer, but larger vessels, and I would imagine this will continue until we have a 100% blue-water, post-Cold War navy. We're nearly there: just need the QE-class carriers and T22/23 frigate replacements. Oh and, finally, new vessels for the RFA!

Last edited by Manchester Planner; June 6th, 2010 at 11:29 PM.
Manchester Planner no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old June 7th, 2010, 01:00 AM   #96
ill tonkso
Portsmouths Finest, Maybe
 
ill tonkso's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Portsmouth
Posts: 14,092
Likes (Received): 213

One thing people need to remember as well is the new ships may be bigger but, due to better technology, the crews are much smaller. This is somewhat beneficial to running costs and whilst the number of matlo's may be dropping, the force projection and power does not drop as much with it. If you get what I mean?
ill tonkso no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old June 7th, 2010, 01:05 AM   #97
Manchester Planner
Chief Bureaucrat
 
Manchester Planner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 6,848
Likes (Received): 1

Greater efficiencies... Gideon likes the sound of that!


Hmm... maybe you can have that aircraft carrier after all... then again, maybe not...
Manchester Planner no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old June 7th, 2010, 01:02 PM   #98
madjackmcmad
Registered User
 
madjackmcmad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: London
Posts: 3,980
Likes (Received): 1

Quote:
Originally Posted by Manchester Planner View Post
Navy? What's this navy thing you speak of?
madjackmcmad no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old June 7th, 2010, 01:21 PM   #99
gothicform
Bossman
 
gothicform's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: not london
Posts: 29,162
Likes (Received): 486



Quote:
Originally Posted by Manchester Planner View Post


i remember that navy thing... we did it punting at oxford. jolly good stuff too!
gothicform no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old June 7th, 2010, 01:49 PM   #100
TallBox
Registered User
 
TallBox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,604
Likes (Received): 18

Quote:
Originally Posted by andysimo123 View Post
Most European navys are piss poor. Infact nearly all are. For example the Israeli navy consist of gun boats and afew large patrol ships. Other navies such as the Spanish, French and Italian navys still aren't as big. The Indian Navy, a country with 1 billion people has less Destroyers and Frigates than the Royal Navy. I can think of only countries like the USA and China who have massive navies.
You can add HMS Dauntless a Type 45.
Yes but that's an unfair comparison. Only the French and US navies from the ones you listed have a similar number of overseas territorities, dependencies, and defence agreements as the UK does.

Not to mention that the UK survives by importing 99% of its trade by volume over the seas and has political committments/obligations around the world.

And the UK is of course comparatively richer than India.

TallBox no está en línea   Reply With Quote


Reply

Tags
biggest navy in europe, blue water navy, england, royal navy, so143 = assface, the queen is german

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT +2. The time now is 02:25 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Feedback Buttons provided by Advanced Post Thanks / Like v3.1.2 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2013 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2013 DragonByte Technologies Ltd. (Resources saved on this page: MySQL 25.00%)

SkyscraperCity - In Urbanity We Trust

Hosted by Blacksun, dedicated to this site too!
Forum server management by DaiTengu