MUMBAI | Palais Royale | 320m | 1050ft | 75 fl | U/C - Page 4

JamesKRoberts · February 25th, 2010, 01:48 PM

It's not THAT ugly, I agree it's not the most appealing building, but it is afterall a residential building. When you have to accommodate for balconies it's harder to have that "sleek" design.

Jim856796 · February 26th, 2010, 06:37 AM

A 66-storey residential tower should not even measure 320 feet high. I think it should be the same height as the Imperial Towers.

snapdragon · February 26th, 2010, 06:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by VRS

great up date...its this will be the tallest tower at Mumbai..??

Hmm If build upto the current projected .it will be 30% taller than the current
tallest building in Mumbai.

I know all of you hate this building ,but I personally love it and I think is a good start for India.

India101 · February 26th, 2010, 07:19 AM

Jim, the building has raised floor heights. Notice how large the windows are. Thats another reason it looks short in the renders and one other this building is 100m wide.

Hindustani · February 28th, 2010, 02:13 AM

this one is strictly okay.

***desertpunk*** · February 28th, 2010, 08:28 AM

I really think this one's going to look a lot better than that hamhanded rendering. it's overscaled somewhat and the design is uninspired but as Mumbai rises around it, it should find its place in the skyline. I don't like everything being put up in Dubai but the overall effect is just spectacular. I'm hoping for the same here.

kingsc · February 28th, 2010, 08:37 AM

Oh construction pics made me a little sad lol. The design looks cheap and outdated. I have to agree it doesn't look that tall, compared to the other buildings surrounding it.

elcid1911 · March 2nd, 2010, 01:26 AM

This is Mumbai's fast growth..they want to build so many buildings that they forget to make proper designs for them. Don't like this building at all and it doesn't look 320m..

The Patel · March 23rd, 2010, 10:28 PM

Any updates on this project?

India101 · March 24th, 2010, 08:04 AM

Now that the thread has been bumped may as well post a update of the worlds fastest growing pile of sh*t

Posted by IndiansUnite in Indian forum

Quote:

Originally Posted by IndiansUnite

March 18
Copyright Horia

Quote:

Originally Posted by IndiansUnite

A closer look -

March 19
Copyright Roland

preppy · March 24th, 2010, 08:29 AM

Beautiful.

Blue Flame · March 24th, 2010, 05:29 PM

Yeah, the truth is, I think this will look older, but it will still look decent. And very massive! Where is this in relation to the DB Tower, the second supertall for Mumbai?

Ahmad Rashid Ahmad · March 24th, 2010, 09:22 PM

On which floor they are working on????

elcid1911 · March 24th, 2010, 09:38 PM

Probably on the 20th

mcdonnell77 · March 25th, 2010, 12:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by India101

Yes we all know its hideous

so we don't need a 100 comments saying the same thing.

About the height, the builder said it would be 320.

Is that 320 inches? Because its deffinately not metres.

ssd1 · March 30th, 2010, 07:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JamesKRoberts

It's not THAT ugly, I agree it's not the most appealing building, but it is afterall a residential building. When you have to accommodate for balconies it's harder to have that "sleek" design.

Unnacceptable - normally.

bonivison · March 31st, 2010, 08:28 AM

can see nothing

leo!ssc · March 31st, 2010, 04:08 PM

Surprise =)

bhargavsura · May 6th, 2010, 02:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mcdonnell77

Is that 320 inches? Because its deffinately not metres.

Take a guess.

skyscraper100 · May 6th, 2010, 08:12 PM

not bad. its 320m? what a tall one. maybe itll look better when finished

February 25th, 2010, 01:48 PM	#61
JamesKRoberts Blame it on me Join Date: Feb 2010 Posts: 2 Likes (Received): 0	It's not THAT ugly, I agree it's not the most appealing building, but it is afterall a residential building. When you have to accommodate for balconies it's harder to have that "sleek" design. __________________ My new 152inch plasma!!!!!

February 26th, 2010, 06:37 AM	#62
Jim856796 The Q&A Guy Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: Citizen of the World Posts: 6,746 Likes (Received): 7	A 66-storey residential tower should not even measure 320 feet high. I think it should be the same height as the Imperial Towers. __________________ I honestly think all development projects must be dashing, sustainable, and futureproof. You support the good projects... and oppose the bad.

February 26th, 2010, 07:19 AM	#64
India101 . Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: Sydney ~ Mumbai Posts: 9,638 Likes (Received): 436	Jim, the building has raised floor heights. Notice how large the windows are. Thats another reason it looks short in the renders and one other this building is 100m wide. __________________ ███████ ███████ ███████

February 28th, 2010, 08:37 AM	#67
kingsc Registered User Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: Brooklyn Posts: 2,564 Likes (Received): 2	Oh construction pics made me a little sad lol. The design looks cheap and outdated. I have to agree it doesn't look that tall, compared to the other buildings surrounding it. __________________ Supertalls for all http://www.skyscrapercity.com/group.php?groupid=288 You could be a memeber

March 2nd, 2010, 01:26 AM	#68
elcid1911 Registered User Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: Lisbon Posts: 1,031 Likes (Received): 1	This is Mumbai's fast growth..they want to build so many buildings that they forget to make proper designs for them. Don't like this building at all and it doesn't look 320m.. __________________ Skyscrapercity Thread Website

February 28th, 2010, 02:13 AM	#65
Hindustani Registered User Join Date: Jul 2004 Posts: 4,015 Likes (Received): 7	this one is strictly okay.

February 28th, 2010, 08:28 AM	#66
*desertpunk* Whiskey Tango Foxtrot Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: ELP ~ ABQ Posts: 29,640 Likes (Received): 1368	I really think this one's going to look a lot better than that hamhanded rendering. it's overscaled somewhat and the design is uninspired but as Mumbai rises around it, it should find its place in the skyline. I don't like everything being put up in Dubai but the overall effect is just spectacular. I'm hoping for the same here.

March 23rd, 2010, 10:28 PM	#69
The Patel Registered User Join Date: Aug 2009 Posts: 153 Likes (Received): 0	Any updates on this project?

March 24th, 2010, 08:29 AM	#71
preppy BANNED Join Date: Mar 2010 Posts: 106 Likes (Received): 0	Beautiful.

March 24th, 2010, 05:29 PM	#72
Blue Flame Get Silly! Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: Lexington,KY Posts: 1,573 Likes (Received): 22	Yeah, the truth is, I think this will look older, but it will still look decent. And very massive! Where is this in relation to the DB Tower, the second supertall for Mumbai? __________________ A cynic is nothing but a realist with experience.

March 24th, 2010, 09:22 PM	#73
Ahmad Rashid Ahmad Sapphire Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: Madinah - Lahore Posts: 13,433 Likes (Received): 689	On which floor they are working on???? __________________ EVIL KILLER Lahore Karachi Islamabad The Centaurus Lahore Ring Road Pakistan: Pictures of Roads / Highways / Motorways

March 24th, 2010, 09:38 PM	#74
elcid1911 Registered User Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: Lisbon Posts: 1,031 Likes (Received): 1	Probably on the 20th __________________ Skyscrapercity Thread Website

March 31st, 2010, 08:28 AM	#77
bonivison Registered User Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Beijing Posts: 777 Likes (Received): 1	can see nothing __________________ www.sohu.com

March 31st, 2010, 04:08 PM	#78
leo!ssc LeoAus Join Date: Jun 2009 Posts: 1,178 Likes (Received): 126	Surprise =) __________________ facebook.com/leoaus

May 6th, 2010, 08:12 PM	#80
skyscraper100 >: Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: Manila Posts: 2,563 Likes (Received): 1	not bad. its 320m? what a tall one. maybe itll look better when finished __________________ Possibilities are Endless Visit my 3d Designs thread: ~skyscraper100 designs [CENTER]

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode