
forums map  news magazine  posting guidelines 

Global Announcement 
As a general reminder, please respect others and respect copyrights. Go here to familiarize yourself with our posting policy. 

Thread Tools  Rating: 
April 29th, 2008, 07:42 PM  #21 
Urban Citizen
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Drammen
Posts: 418
Likes (Received): 6

[quote=Time69;20145156]Ok, and thanks for the pic, so it is like below then ? :
correct
__________________
_________

Sponsored Links  
Advertisement 

May 13th, 2008, 11:13 AM  #22 
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Paris
Posts: 104
Likes (Received): 1

Proposal for rationalizing this a bit :
We consider that there is a connex volume "C" for "communication core", that is the volume made by corridors, escalators, stairs, external walkways, etc. Then the volume "A" (not necessarily connex) for the appartments or flats. From there we consider 3 basic shapes : First the slab, that can be seen as an "infinite wall", or semi infinite, or a wall between two perpendicular walls, but creating a frontier between two exteriors, E1, and E2 : Then the plain tower, ie the building is globally a connex volume, an we consider one exterior : And then the open tower or atrium building from an open cylinder basic shape, that defines two exterior Ee (external exterior) Ei (internal exterior) : From there we can compose horizontally : So in fact seeing the "classic multi entry slab" as towers horizontally stacked together (which is what it is) Or vertically, for instance for the "Le Corbusier cité radieuse type" : Or for the "Bølerskogen type" : Anybody knows of related analysis of this kind ? 
May 17th, 2008, 11:08 AM  #23  
アンジュルム
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: アルフェナンデンライン
Posts: 41,214
Likes (Received): 85174

Quote:
I can't find any floor plans but on this picture you can see the doors every 3 floors from the corridors to the fire escape.
__________________
Support your Idols ｷﾀ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ ฅ(๑⊙д⊙๑)ฅ!! ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━!!!
Japan Projects & Construction 

Sponsored Links  
Advertisement 

May 17th, 2008, 02:26 PM  #24 
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Paris
Posts: 104
Likes (Received): 1

Interesting, the flats do not appear to have a "duplex set up" (meaning double height ceiling for part of the flat), but they are still each on two levels with balconies at each level ?
Last edited by Time69; May 18th, 2008 at 01:10 PM. 
May 18th, 2008, 09:28 AM  #25 
アンジュルム
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: アルフェナンデンライン
Posts: 41,214
Likes (Received): 85174

Yes, I found a floor plan, there are three balconies per apartment.
But some of the floors are also more mixed, to create different sized apartments. Here's a plan of an apartment that's on 1 floor, on the same corridor there are also the entries for the apartments that are only on the 2 other floors were you have to go up or down right after the front door.
__________________
Support your Idols ｷﾀ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ ฅ(๑⊙д⊙๑)ฅ!! ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━!!!
Japan Projects & Construction 
May 18th, 2008, 01:47 PM  #26 
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Paris
Posts: 104
Likes (Received): 1

Thanks a lot for the floor plans Momo, for some reason it is quite tough to find some for the Le Corbusier "cité radieuse", below one :
He really pushed the concept far, the flats being really "elongated" : The building is 19 meters thick and the flats only 3.66 meters wide, with 2.26 ceiling single height apparently from : http://benjamin.lisan.free.fr/Invent...onPourTous.htm Could you locate these buildings on google maps ? Its in below city : http://maps.google.fr/maps?f=q&hl=fr...67635&t=k&z=15 ? 
May 18th, 2008, 11:01 PM  #27 
アンジュルム
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: アルフェナンデンライン
Posts: 41,214
Likes (Received): 85174

There are 5 blocks located close to each other, 3 of them have an L shape with 1 high part with 3 or 4 corridors 10 or 13 floors including the ground floor with storage and garage boxes and 1 low part with only 2 corridors (7 floors). These have 2 elevators in the highest tower. The other 2 blocks have 3 corridors (10 floors) with only 1 elevator/staircases.
location: http://maps.google.fr/maps?f=q&hl=fr...,0.010042&z=17 Two more pictures of an Lshaped building And a picture of the corridor: here you can also find some more pictures of the interior (click on Foto's): http://www.directwonen.nl/koop/straa...ouseId=1097797
__________________
Support your Idols ｷﾀ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ ฅ(๑⊙д⊙๑)ฅ!! ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━!!!
Japan Projects & Construction 
May 19th, 2008, 02:05 PM  #28 
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Paris
Posts: 104
Likes (Received): 1

Thanks a lot for all the info Momo, below pic gives a feel of the "unusualness" of the resulting flats :
And this one also : Don't think many flats builded these days have windows in the bathrooms, let alone a balcony ! 
May 20th, 2008, 07:02 PM  #29 
アンジュルム
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: アルフェナンデンライン
Posts: 41,214
Likes (Received): 85174

I think the owners of this particular flat had some work done and converted one of the bedrooms into a bathroom. The floor plan has the original layout of the flats. They were all build as social housing as a rental flats, but some of them have been sold in the last 5 or so years. The strange layout is probably also the reason why it isn't sold for 2 years now.
__________________
Support your Idols ｷﾀ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ ฅ(๑⊙д⊙๑)ฅ!! ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━!!!
Japan Projects & Construction 
September 23rd, 2013, 01:18 PM  #30  
The last disciple
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Greifswald & Dresden
Posts: 821

I will try to give a natural justification of Time69's work and therefore the aim is to present his work to a wider audience. Throughout of the text I will use LaTexcode in the mathmode marked as $...$ or the code environment of vBulletin.
This approach tries to classify different types of commieblocks by considering each story in the perspective of a ground plan. My argumentation relies on a classical theorem of Topology, known as the "Jordan curve theorem". The statement of this theorem is the following: Quote:
Code:
\mathbb{R}^2 = \bigsqcup_{i=1}^3 S_i Thus one can identify the ground plan with the plane $\mathbb{R}^2$. We assume that in the plane a Jordan curve $J$ exists drawn as a rectangle with "smooth corners", so that we will not have any problems about continuity. In this plane we will distinguish between three entities and will consider them as sets in $\mathbb{R}^2$. I will adopt Time69's notation:
We now specialize and assume it is always true, that the Jordan curve $J$ is contained in $C$. We will define a new interior $I`$ as $I` := I \ (C \cup A)$. Further we demand that $C$ and $A$ are disjoint sets. By "radius of a Jordan curve $J$" we mean the radius of a circle in the plane such that the interior of the circle contains the interior of the Jordan curve $J$. Now 3 different cases pop up:
At this step we summarize that we have following pairwise disjoint sets which cover $\mathbb{R}^2$:
We say that a set $M_i$ is related to $M_j$ for $i, j \in \{1,2,3,4\}$, if there is a "spatial" connection $S$ between at least two subsets $A_i \subseteq M_i$ and $A_j \subseteq M_j$ with $A_i, A_j$ having nonvanishing Lebesgue measure in $\mathbb{R}^2$, such that $(S \cap M_i) \cup (S \cap M_j) = S$. This means that points of the spatial connection $S$ between $A_i$ and $A_j$ either lie in $M_i$ or in $M_j$. There is one special case if one considers the set $M_4 = A$, where elements already are spatial objects (i.e. have nonvanishing Lebesgue measure in the plane). So one would say that $M_4$ is related to $M_i$ for $i \in \{1,2,3,4\}$ if there exists an element $a \in M_4$ with a spatial connection to a subset of $M_i$ in the above sense. This relation $R$ can be diagrammatical depicted like Time69 did it. So for the first case, where $I` \equiv \emptyset$ and the radius $r$ is finite, we remark, that $O \equiv E$, so we have the following You could read Time69"s diagrams like this: One draws a connection between a set $M_i$ and $M_j$ if they are related to each other in the above definition. It is obvious that this relation $R$ is symmetric, but not necessarily reflexive, like the set $A$. The next case is $I` \ne \emptyset$ and the radius $r$ is finite. Then we have $O$ as a disjoint union of $I$ and $E$. We can translate our notation to the one of Time69 in this case:
And last case which results in two unbounded exteriors. Translating notation here means for instance
Multi entry slabs follow in our understanding as well: The advantage of this diagrammitcal description lies in the fact that one has a possibility of illustrating all possible relations between the sets $M_i$. But this diagrams should be used with care. Just because one can draw a diagram doesn't mean that this kind of relation truly exists, it might result in a contradiction. But Time69 gave in each case a concrete realization, which proves existence of all possibilities of relation between sets $M_i$ and $M_j$. The weakness of these diagrams is that it does not respect the cardinal directions. But out relation $R$ was defined in that way, that there needs to exist at least one spatial connection between objects, so it would not depict any underlying condensed information. So there does still exist a variation of ground plans for each apartment as an element of the set $A$. The same holds true when playing this abstraction on a greater scale, considering the orientation of commieblocks to each other. A lot more ingredients like distance or orientation of commieblocks to each other get important. Or the usage of green spaces, commercial areas, schools, kindergartens or the mixture of monolithic buildings to multi entry slabs are important as well. So there is no need to strip off information, only concrete realizations can be considered. Please feel free to highlight any mistakes in my understanding. Last edited by disciple9; September 24th, 2013 at 10:16 PM. 

January 17th, 2018, 12:52 AM  #31  
Ars longa, vita brevis
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 9,246
Likes (Received): 11368

This is a post following up on a debate I was having somewhere else, where it was offtopic. Therefore I thought of this thread as a better place for the continuation.
The point I was contesting was: Quote:
 buildings connected to each other,  forming what can IMO be described as enclosed inner spaces but with generous entry and exit in the form of street lanes (the inner spaces tend to be used for parking, playgrounds and utility annexes like thermal distribution points),  retaining a strict proximity to the street grid, and  offering space for various activities on the ground floors, at least three of them at the same time if not all four. This sort of commie urbanism has defined my upbringing so I found it very easy to find the examples, I only needed to look up on Google Maps the places where I grew up. I'll start with the neighbourhood where my paternal grandparents lived, whose main street looks like this: When seen from above, the connecting commieblocks form these rectangular enclosings that are loose compared to typical modern Western "street blocks" but are still perfectly visible: Inside the enclosures it looks like this: If you want to have a closer look click here. Coincidentally or not, in a different city, my maternal grandparents' block was part of a loosely connected set of blocks. This is how it looks from outside: And at the inside, displaying the exact same playground furniture from the 80s which TBH is freaking me out a bit right now: This being a much bigger city, it was just a tiny part of a massive district built from scratch at the same time, and where a lot of the blocks made up these loose rectangles which are visible from above: If you want to further explore, start from the courtyard I screenshot and work your way out if it: here. Finally, here's an example from my own hometown. The two blocks I have inhabited there have been of the isolated type, but there is plenty to show of the other kind, like this neighbourhood where some of my favourite schoolmates lived: From above: Google link: here
__________________
The Death of a Once Great City 

Sponsored Links  
Advertisement 

Thread Tools  
Rate This Thread  


Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
can they be considered as commie blocks?  sk  Commieblocks Fan Club  3  August 27th, 2007 09:28 PM 
Beautiful Commie blocks  Handsome  Cityscapes and Skyline Photos  12  October 26th, 2006 08:58 AM 
Commie blocks+skyline  Handsome  Cityscapes and Skyline Photos  21  June 20th, 2005 06:14 PM 
Commie Blocks to the MAXXX!  null  Cityscapes and Skyline Photos  12  May 5th, 2005 04:18 PM 