NEW YORK | One Manhattan Square | 258m | 847ft | 72 fl | T/O - SkyscraperCity
 

forums map | news magazine | posting guidelines

Go Back   SkyscraperCity > World Development News Forums > Skyscrapers

Skyscrapers Discussions of projects under construction between 200-299m/650-999ft tall.
» Proposed Skyscrapers


Global Announcement

As a general reminder, please respect others and respect copyrights. Go here to familiarize yourself with our posting policy.


Reply

 
Thread Tools
Old November 4th, 2013, 10:02 AM   #1
desertpunk
Whiskey Tango Foxtrot
 
desertpunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: ELP ~ ABQ
Posts: 55,637
Likes (Received): 54031

NEW YORK | One Manhattan Square | 258m | 847ft | 72 fl | T/O



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Demolition Scheduled to Begin at Extell’s Pathmark Site Soon



Quote:
It’s been almost a year since the Pathmark store at 227 Cherry St. closed to make way for a massive new residential tower from Gary Barnett’s Extell Development Company. Extell has not disclosed specific plans for the site, but pre-construction work is apparently getting underway sometime soon.

Fencing went up around the parcel, just north of the Manhattan Bridge, this past May. Barnett, one of Manhattan’s most prolific and powerful real estate developers, purchased the development site for $150 million. In the past several days, elected officials as well as tenant leaders and the Two Bridges Neighborhood Council have been told that “asbestos abatement” will begin in the near future, followed by building demolition.

There’s no evidence of any recent activity in the Buildings Department database, but Extell’s contractor has been setting the stage for the asbestos and building demo work. Trever Holland, the tenant association president of Two Bridges Tower (the rental building adjacent to the Pathmark site), sent an email to residents last night indicating that Extell reps were signaling the start of demolition in “the next few weeks.”

[...]

Under current zoning, the main Pathmark site could accommodate a building of nearly one-million square feet. Previous development schemes have envisioned a tower rising at least 55 stories, but it’s possible the building could be even taller.


Last edited by desertpunk; April 25th, 2016 at 05:29 AM.
desertpunk no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old December 12th, 2013, 10:45 PM   #2
Vertical_Gotham
Registered User
 
Vertical_Gotham's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 4,438
Likes (Received): 6503

Extell Files For Demolition of Former Cherry Street Pathmark Store
http://www.thelodownny.com/leslog/20...ark-store.html

Quote:
A few weeks ago we noted that demolition was imminent at at the former Pathmark site on Cherry Street. Now, almost a year after the large supermarket in the Two Bridges area closed, paperwork has been filed to take down the one-story building. Extell Development Corp., which is planning a very large residential tower (with ground floor grocery), has filed a full demolition request with the Department of Buildings. No word yet on Extell’s specific blueprint for the site alongside the Manhattan Bridge.
__________________

desertpunk, Zaz965 liked this post
Vertical_Gotham no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old December 13th, 2013, 04:09 AM   #3
desertpunk
Whiskey Tango Foxtrot
 
desertpunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: ELP ~ ABQ
Posts: 55,637
Likes (Received): 54031

I never shopped at that Pathmark but I hear you could get cans of tomato paste for 69 cents.
__________________
We are floating in space...

Subsequence, Zaz965 liked this post
desertpunk no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old December 14th, 2013, 12:24 AM   #4
towerpower123
Let's Revive our Cities
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Howell/Newark, NJ
Posts: 2,449
Likes (Received): 4325

About time! That Pathmark is a stain on the urban landscape! I went there a few days before it closed and the floor was like one big stain itself. Pathmark is by no means a nice grocery store to begin with, and they are quickly spiraling towards bankruptcy.
__________________
If I don't say otherwise, all of my images are on my blog,
http://urbanismvsmodernism.blogspot.com/?view=sidebar

186 Newark, NJ Development projects MAPPED
https://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=1874870
http://urbanismvsmodernism.blogspot....l?view=sidebar

See my DeviantArt account at http://towerpower123.deviantart.com/

bozenBDJ, charmedone liked this post
towerpower123 no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old December 20th, 2013, 09:35 PM   #5
desertpunk
Whiskey Tango Foxtrot
 
desertpunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: ELP ~ ABQ
Posts: 55,637
Likes (Received): 54031

Extell's Lower East Side Tower May Be Over 70 Stories Tall

Quote:
Extell, the Gary Barnett-led team of mustache-twirling scoundrels behind One57 and various other megatowers, has already filed paperwork for the demolition of the Cherry Street Pathmark in order to proceed with a giant tower seven years in the making. And, according to The Lo-Down, that tower may rise even taller than previously expected. Although rumors from several years ago suggested that a single tower at the site could rise above 55 stories, Two Bridges President Victor Papa has been meeting with Extell and says that they are planning an as-of-right building that could rise over 70 stories. This, clearly, would completely dwarf anything in the surrounding area, and, as Lo-Down puts it, "is certain to transform the predominantly low-income community alongside the East River." Other details about the tower—architect, design, whether or not any of the units will be affordable—have yet to be decided on and/or revealed.
desertpunk no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old December 20th, 2013, 09:38 PM   #6
Ghostface79
Registered User
 
Ghostface79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: NYC
Posts: 1,550
Likes (Received): 4682

Wow! Didn't see that coming
__________________

Vertical_Gotham, Zaz965 liked this post
Ghostface79 no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old December 20th, 2013, 09:42 PM   #7
Vertical_Gotham
Registered User
 
Vertical_Gotham's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 4,438
Likes (Received): 6503

Wow! Very interesting. Gary loves his "of right" projects and rightfully so...This thing will tower big time in this area. IMO, if there will be a tall tower at 14th street, this is the perfect spot.
Vertical_Gotham no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old December 20th, 2013, 09:55 PM   #8
hunser
Steinway to Heaven |¦┆┊
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Wien
Posts: 1,837
Likes (Received): 5055

Slowly but surely I'm losing track of all the proposed 200m+ buildings in New York. Never would have thought that could happen one day lol ... Re: 227 Cherry: height should be close to ~270m, which is damn tall for this area.
hunser no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old December 20th, 2013, 10:13 PM   #9
Lowkey Lion
Registered User
 
Lowkey Lion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 119
Likes (Received): 64

How tall are we looking at here, gentlemen? Is 270 meters (885 feet where I'm from) what we're expecting?
Lowkey Lion no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old December 20th, 2013, 10:28 PM   #10
germantower
i ♥ NY
 
germantower's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 4,866
Likes (Received): 2466

Somewhere between 250 and 300m i think. Less and more is very unlikely. IMO.
__________________
more SHoP less BIG
germantower no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old December 21st, 2013, 12:45 PM   #11
iamtheSTIG
Registered User
 
iamtheSTIG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Nottingham - The city of Robin Hood
Posts: 5,161
Likes (Received): 6766

Another 200m tower? Brilliant!

Where abouts is this in Manhattan? Is it towards downtown, like around where 50 Leonard is?
iamtheSTIG está en línea ahora   Reply With Quote
Old December 21st, 2013, 01:25 PM   #12
germantower
i ♥ NY
 
germantower's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 4,866
Likes (Received): 2466



copyright: Google
__________________
more SHoP less BIG

TowerVerre:), iamtheSTIG, Zaz965 liked this post
germantower no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old December 21st, 2013, 01:44 PM   #13
Eric Offereins
The only way is up
 
Eric Offereins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Rotterdam
Posts: 78,287
Likes (Received): 50232

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lowkey Lion View Post
How tall are we looking at here, gentlemen? Is 270 meters (885 feet where I'm from) what we're expecting?
70 x 4 = 280 meter doesn't look unreasonable.
Eric Offereins no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old December 21st, 2013, 02:13 PM   #14
germantower
i ♥ NY
 
germantower's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 4,866
Likes (Received): 2466

Plus a possible retail base and a roof feature. Even a supertall seems POSSIBLE! Even a floor height of 3,8m make a supertall possible. It´s all about hope guys. :-)
__________________
more SHoP less BIG
germantower no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old December 21st, 2013, 02:18 PM   #15
tim1807
faster than buildings
 
tim1807's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Den Helder
Posts: 10,324
Likes (Received): 5353

Another 277 tower in NY, that is confusing, we already have 277 Park Avenue.
I think it will be taller than the Trump World Tower (262.4) which has 72 floors.
tim1807 no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old December 22nd, 2013, 12:16 AM   #16
Manitopiaaa
Illuminati Leader
 
Manitopiaaa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Alexandria, Nova, The Crown Commonwealth of Virginia (see sig)
Posts: 4,573
Likes (Received): 11142

Quote:
Originally Posted by tim1807 View Post
Another 277 tower in NY, that is confusing, we already have 277 Park Avenue.
I think it will be taller than the Trump World Tower (262.4) which has 72 floors.
227, not 277
__________________


Atlanta (6,775,511) - Boston (8,285,407) - Chicago (9,866,910) - Cleveland (3,599,264) - Dallas (7,948,477) - Denver (3,572,798) - Detroit (5,353,002) - Houston (7,183,143)
Los Angeles (18,764,814) - Miami (6,913,262) - Minneapolis (3,999,565) - New York (22,679,948) - Orlando (4,096,575) - Philadelphia (7,204,035) - Phoenix (4,911,851)
Portland (3,239,335) - San Diego (3,343,364) - San Francisco (9,666,055) - Seattle (4,853,364) - Tampa (3,142,663) - Washington (9,796,147)
Manitopiaaa no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old December 22nd, 2013, 01:58 AM   #17
desertpunk
Whiskey Tango Foxtrot
 
desertpunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: ELP ~ ABQ
Posts: 55,637
Likes (Received): 54031

Quote:
Originally Posted by germantower View Post
Somewhere between 250 and 300m i think. Less and more is very unlikely. IMO.
It will be grossly over-scaled for the existing neighborhood at such a height yet it appears that the zoning actually allows it! Which presents a real dilemma for the city: rezone the area in response to outrage over the tower and guarantee a lonely Tour Montparnasse that will loom over the area for decades, or unleash a wave of taller buildings in the LES to the dismay of the locals. Either way, expect some fireworks here...
__________________
We are floating in space...

Zaz965 liked this post
desertpunk no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old December 22nd, 2013, 01:25 PM   #18
RobertWalpole
BANNED
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 4,606
Likes (Received): 2521

I don't think that this will be anything special. It's in a lousy location with limited subway access and is surrounded by public housing projects.
__________________

Zaz965 liked this post
RobertWalpole no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old December 22nd, 2013, 01:31 PM   #19
germantower
i ♥ NY
 
germantower's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 4,866
Likes (Received): 2466

But imagine the views from a height of 200m+, isn´t this a selling aspect? Also, a prestige tower could be a catalyst for further developments and a change for this neighborhood. :-)
__________________
more SHoP less BIG
germantower no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old December 23rd, 2013, 03:19 AM   #20
rencharles
We will never forget
 
rencharles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 579
Likes (Received): 94

Amazing. I'm excited about it. But for the other side I prefer to be cautious, especially after the 217 West 57th Street.
rencharles no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 


Reply

Tags
227 cherry street, 252 south street, one manhattan square

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT +2. The time now is 12:27 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
vBulletin Security provided by vBSecurity v2.2.2 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2019 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Feedback Buttons provided by Advanced Post Thanks / Like (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2019 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

SkyscraperCity ☆ In Urbanity We trust ☆ about us