MEGATALLS: 500m+ skyscrapers/towers from around the world - SkyscraperCity
 

forums map | news magazine | posting guidelines

Go Back   SkyscraperCity > Continental Forums > OZScrapers > Urban Spaces > Beyond Australia & New Zealand

Beyond Australia & New Zealand A local perspective on what's happening overseas


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old March 28th, 2008, 02:33 PM   #1
CULWULLA
Registered User
 
CULWULLA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 70,813
Likes (Received): 21004

MEGATALLS: 500m+ skyscrapers/towers from around the world

Its time for a thread on the really tall skyscrapers & towers that are either uc or planned.
Ive chosen 500m or half a kilometre as new benchmark. 300m seems to be an easy height to achieve these days with now 100s of bldgs/towers uc or planned around the globe./

In 2008, we have just 1 megatall skyscraper being the 509m Taipei 101.
Also we have 2 towers being 553m CN Tower & 540m Ostankino Tower.

thread links to megatalls


COMPLETED

Taipei 101,
Taiwan
101st/509m
2004
https://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=84566

----------------------------------------------

UNDERCONSTRUCTION

Burj Dubai,
Dubai,UAE
162st/818m
2006-2009
https://www.skyscrapercity.com/showth...34013&page=215

Shanghai Centre,
China
128st/632m
2008-2011
https://www.skyscrapercity.com/showth...391698&page=39

The Pentominium,
Dubai, UAE
120st/619m/roof 516m
2008-2011
https://www.skyscrapercity.com/showth...451708&page=19

China 117 Tower,
Tianjin, China
117st/600m
https://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=558031



Abraj Al Abait Hotel
Mecca
80st/595m
2007-2011
https://www.skyscrapercity.com/showth...334299&page=72


Barwa Tower,
Doha
108st/570m
2008-2011
https://www.skyscrapercity.com/showth...=304395&page=7

Freedom Tower
New York, USA
108st/541m
2008-2011
https://www.skyscrapercity.com/showth...19362&page=166


Federation Tower
Moscow
93st/506m
2007-2010
https://www.skyscrapercity.com/showth...320686&page=67

Burj Al Alam,
Dubai, UAE
108st/501m
2008-2011
https://www.skyscrapercity.com/showth...325591&page=18

ON HOLD

Russia Tower,
Moscow
118st/612m
2008-2011
https://www.skyscrapercity.com/showth...396624&page=38

Spire,
Chicago, USA
150st/610m
2008-2011
https://www.skyscrapercity.com/showth...34232&page=180

---------------------------------------------------------------------------


APPROVED

One Dubai
Dubai, UAE
201st/850m
https://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=620512

Anara
Dubai, UAE
125st/655m
https://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=656046

Sangam DMC Landmark Tower,
Seoul, Korea
130st/640m
https://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=516927

Korean Rail Corp tower,
Seoul
150st/615m
https://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=457263

Incheon Towers,
China
150st/610m x2
https://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=480186

Dubai towers
Dubai
94st/550m
https://www.skyscrapercity.com/showth...415209&page=12


Lotte Tower,
Busan
130st/510m
2008-2011
https://www.skyscrapercity.com/showth...248313&page=15

Pingan International Finance Centre,
Shenzen,China
100st/508m
https://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=517647

------------------------------------



PROPOSED

City Tower,
Sao Paulo
650m
https://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=595819

Lotte Super Tower,
Seoul
112st/555m
https://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=474259

Haewundae Tourism Resort,
Busan
117st/517m
https://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=549955

Fanhai International Twin Towers,
Beijing,China
505m x2
https://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=564812

Nanjing Lu Supertall,
Tianjin,China
130st/500m
https://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=457855

-----------------------------------
OTHER STRUCTURES -UC OR PLANNED OVER 500M


Completed

CN Tower,
Toronto
Canada
553m
1976
http://www.cntower.com


Completed

Ostankino Tower,
Moscow
540m
1967
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ostankino_Tower

----------------------------
Underconstruction

Tokyo Sky Tree,
Tokyo
611m
2010
https://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=346504

Guangzhou TV Tower,
China
610m
2009
https://www.skyscrapercity.com/showth...410003&page=37

-----------------------------


Approved
Pagcor Tower,
Manilla
655m
https://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=527282

Approved


Proposed
Oryx Tower,
Doha
600m
https://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=476443

Approved
Solar Tower,
Buronga,NSW
Australia
600m
https://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=166806

Approved
Port Tower Complex,
Karachi
593m
https://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=466319

Proposed
Skytower,
Bengalooru
560m
https://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=572243

Proposed
The Constellation,
Doha
500m
https://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=516304
__________________
Church Hill tower- 1797, Macquarie Tower-1818, St James Church -1822, Garden Palace- 1879, Sydney Harbour Bridge -1932, Sydney Opera House- 1973, Sydney Tower- 1981, Crown Sydney- 2021, twin towers- 2024, supertall 2025 https://www.buildsydney.com/forum

Last edited by CULWULLA; January 21st, 2009 at 11:08 AM.
CULWULLA no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old March 28th, 2008, 03:07 PM   #2
Anberlin
Registered User
 
Anberlin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 1,927
Likes (Received): 34

Hahaha. When's Australia going to be up with all them?
Anberlin no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old March 28th, 2008, 03:25 PM   #3
SEQ92
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,316
Likes (Received): 4

Our tallest buildings are not even half or a third of some of these!
SEQ92 no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old March 28th, 2008, 03:29 PM   #4
redbaron_012
Registered User
 
redbaron_012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 12,244
Likes (Received): 3681

We came very close in the 1880's......then nearly in the 1990's.......Don't think we will get a third try!....for tallest anyway?
__________________
"Make no small plans, for they have not power to stir the blood" - Daniel H. Burnham
redbaron_012 no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old March 28th, 2008, 03:33 PM   #5
Bullswool
Perthite
 
Bullswool's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Perth
Posts: 8,013
Likes (Received): 790

To think we have only just hit the 300m mark a few years ago X_X....
Bullswool no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old March 28th, 2008, 04:10 PM   #6
CULWULLA
Registered User
 
CULWULLA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 70,813
Likes (Received): 21004

we have the solar tower.lol
__________________
Church Hill tower- 1797, Macquarie Tower-1818, St James Church -1822, Garden Palace- 1879, Sydney Harbour Bridge -1932, Sydney Opera House- 1973, Sydney Tower- 1981, Crown Sydney- 2021, twin towers- 2024, supertall 2025 https://www.buildsydney.com/forum
CULWULLA no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old March 28th, 2008, 04:41 PM   #7
Assa
Registered User
 
Assa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Birmingham
Posts: 821
Likes (Received): 155

Good thread Culwulla - just what I was looking for. No mention of the other 3 behemoths planned for Arabia - Al Burj, Mile High & City of Silk though? I thought AB & MH were both approved despite the lack of final designs in the public domain (despite Sky Towers best efforts )
Assa no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old March 28th, 2008, 04:59 PM   #8
Grollo
Developer
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: melbourne
Posts: 7,444
Likes (Received): 1947

Lotte Tower is not under construction yet.
__________________
https://www.southbankbybeulah.com/
Grollo no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old March 28th, 2008, 05:18 PM   #9
Densetsu
Non-registered User!
 
Densetsu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,685
Likes (Received): 129

i hope this thread will has its own section in world development forum
Densetsu no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old March 28th, 2008, 07:17 PM   #10
LeMoN-SK
Regular Fool
 
LeMoN-SK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Bratislava
Posts: 2,851
Likes (Received): 81

Incheon Towers are in Korea, not China.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Grollo View Post
Lotte Tower is not under construction yet.
Well, this kinda looks like U/C.

LeMoN-SK no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old March 28th, 2008, 08:52 PM   #11
Zollern
Registered User
 
Zollern's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 394
Likes (Received): 15


Isn't this the low-rise section?
It's very hard to get a straight answer on the tower part of this project which would indicate that it isn't happening (yet). Llike some others when the low-rise is being built the thread is titled "Under Construction", which gives the misleading impression that the tower itself is UC, when it's not.
Zollern no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old March 29th, 2008, 12:18 AM   #12
CULWULLA
Registered User
 
CULWULLA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 70,813
Likes (Received): 21004

^but they are "underconstruction". they have moved from being approved with the site being prepared for a skyscraper .im not going into prep stage or demolition. im simplfying it s status, its either moving forward or still a drawing in an architects office.
__________________
Church Hill tower- 1797, Macquarie Tower-1818, St James Church -1822, Garden Palace- 1879, Sydney Harbour Bridge -1932, Sydney Opera House- 1973, Sydney Tower- 1981, Crown Sydney- 2021, twin towers- 2024, supertall 2025 https://www.buildsydney.com/forum
CULWULLA no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old March 29th, 2008, 05:06 AM   #13
CULWULLA
Registered User
 
CULWULLA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 70,813
Likes (Received): 21004

it doesnt seem right how SWFC and ICC missout on megatall/. both only metres under 500m and dont use a spire.much taller bldg then 350m federation tower in moscow or 417m freedom in nYC
__________________
Church Hill tower- 1797, Macquarie Tower-1818, St James Church -1822, Garden Palace- 1879, Sydney Harbour Bridge -1932, Sydney Opera House- 1973, Sydney Tower- 1981, Crown Sydney- 2021, twin towers- 2024, supertall 2025 https://www.buildsydney.com/forum
CULWULLA no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old March 29th, 2008, 07:24 AM   #14
redbaron_012
Registered User
 
redbaron_012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 12,244
Likes (Received): 3681

Quote:
Originally Posted by CULWULLA View Post
it doesnt seem right how SWFC and ICC missout on megatall/. both only metres under 500m and dont use a spire.much taller bldg then 350m federation tower in moscow or 417m freedom in nYC
Cul, I understand exactly how you feel...you know I do...
__________________
"Make no small plans, for they have not power to stir the blood" - Daniel H. Burnham
redbaron_012 no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old March 29th, 2008, 10:48 AM   #15
acc521
Do you expect me to talk?
 
acc521's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Melbourne, Perth, London
Posts: 7,613
Likes (Received): 451

Spire counting towards height or not. Is there actually some sort of international standard on this because it seems to be an issue that pops up on random threads all the time?
acc521 no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old March 29th, 2008, 11:13 AM   #16
CULWULLA
Registered User
 
CULWULLA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 70,813
Likes (Received): 21004

^yes ,back in 1996 when 452m Petronas Towers were completed, the CTBUH decided to make up dif catorgories towards heights. Sears tower was 442m but had 80m spires that didnt count because they were antennea. Petronas was about 400m without its spires but because they were intricate to there design they became part of its overall height.
So yes, any building that has a spire which is intricate to its design, is counted as its height. In other words, imagine the bldg without its spire. if it looks incomplete, then it should have its spire as its height- eg Chrysler Building.
The Council on Tall Buildings and Urban Habitat is an organisation in US who decides buildings heights
www.ctbuh.org
__________________
Church Hill tower- 1797, Macquarie Tower-1818, St James Church -1822, Garden Palace- 1879, Sydney Harbour Bridge -1932, Sydney Opera House- 1973, Sydney Tower- 1981, Crown Sydney- 2021, twin towers- 2024, supertall 2025 https://www.buildsydney.com/forum

Last edited by CULWULLA; March 29th, 2008 at 11:35 AM.
CULWULLA no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old March 30th, 2008, 04:09 AM   #17
redbaron_012
Registered User
 
redbaron_012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 12,244
Likes (Received): 3681

Another good example is the Empire State Building.....Its mast is integral to its design and see the top of the mast as the official height of the building ( Where King Kong fought the biplanes ) but the tall antenna mounted on top is not counted except as overall height. I wonder if the masts above Sears and John Hancock towers in Chicago didn't have antenna's attached whether they would be accepted as part of the design? The JH in particular looks like the twin masts are part of it's profile?....These masts are similar construction to the mast above Sydney Tower.
__________________
"Make no small plans, for they have not power to stir the blood" - Daniel H. Burnham
redbaron_012 no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old March 31st, 2008, 02:33 AM   #18
CULWULLA
Registered User
 
CULWULLA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 70,813
Likes (Received): 21004

yes, ive always seen ESB as 449m not 381m. i think its antenna should be counted. also with John hancock. its twin spires are part of its design. would look wierd without it. maybe same for sears?
__________________
Church Hill tower- 1797, Macquarie Tower-1818, St James Church -1822, Garden Palace- 1879, Sydney Harbour Bridge -1932, Sydney Opera House- 1973, Sydney Tower- 1981, Crown Sydney- 2021, twin towers- 2024, supertall 2025 https://www.buildsydney.com/forum
CULWULLA no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old March 31st, 2008, 02:52 AM   #19
mkclassic
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 265
Likes (Received): 0

Quote:
Originally Posted by CULWULLA View Post
yes, ive always seen ESB as 449m not 381m. i think its antenna should be counted. also with John hancock. its twin spires are part of its design. would look wierd without it. maybe same for sears?
Well, I've always believed the opposite. Spires, attenas, masts simply do not count, because they do not serve a functional or habitual purpose, and hence I prefer to count buildings to roof. Thus Eureka wins over Q1!
mkclassic no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old March 31st, 2008, 07:38 AM   #20
gho
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Brisbane, Queensland
Posts: 374
Likes (Received): 59

I agree with mk, especially in towers with 50m+ spires that serve no purpose. If anything antennas should be counted over spires, as they actually do something.
gho no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 


Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
How many +200m/+300m/+400m and +500m skyscrapers does you city have? www.sercan.de Architecture 49 December 19th, 2007 07:50 PM
Impressive skyscrapers from all over the world skyracer Cityscapes and Skyline Photos 2 July 7th, 2006 05:40 AM
Towers and Skyscrapers with observation decks in Brazil Obelixx Arquitetura e Discussões Urbanas 11 July 7th, 2006 12:21 AM
Quadruple residential towers - Skyscrapers don't have to be big NiceGuy 2D Drawings 5 December 5th, 2005 01:33 AM


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 11:32 AM. • styleid: 14


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
vBulletin Security provided by vBSecurity v2.2.2 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2020 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Feedback Buttons provided by Advanced Post Thanks / Like (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2020 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

SkyscraperCity ☆ In Urbanity We trust ☆ about us