NZ | Economy Thread - Page 5 - SkyscraperCity
 

forums map | news magazine | posting guidelines

Go Back   SkyscraperCity > Continental Forums > OZScrapers > Local Projects & Discussions > KiwiScrapers

KiwiScrapers Kia Kaha » Auckland | Wellington | Christchurch | Hamilton | Regional Cities


Global Announcement

As a general reminder, please respect others and respect copyrights. Go here to familiarize yourself with our posting policy.


Reply

 
Thread Tools
Old October 27th, 2006, 01:04 PM   #81
Kiss the Rain
WoyaoDaJb
 
Kiss the Rain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: 中国威海(WEIHAI)-Christchurch
Posts: 939
Likes (Received): 20

The problem with the NZ economy is that, in my opinion, people take the amount of readily avaliable jobs(usually low skill) for granted, combined with the safety created by minimum wage act, people lose any innovations to seek higher education and just live in the comfort zone and only take up those unskilled, none to low tech jobs. This is why NZ is so vulunerable to world economic crisis like a sudden drop of world price, we are too dependent on the farming industry and natural resources to create wealth, what with the government being very reluntant to help grow the industrial sector and very poor funding for scientific research.
__________________
---
Kiss the Rain no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old October 31st, 2006, 12:54 AM   #82
SYDNEY
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Likes (Received):

Confidence at 18 month high


Oct 31, 2006

Business confidence has hit an 18 month high, in the latest National Bank business outlook. Chief Economist Cameron Bagrie says businesses are more upbeat about their own activity. He says firms' profit expectations are also up, boosted by lower fuel prices adding to the discretionary income of consumers.

Bagrie says economic activity is beginning to increase after a lull over most of the year and other confidence surveys also point towards an economy that's reflating. He says the economy is on track for around 2.5% growth.
  Reply With Quote
Old October 31st, 2006, 06:00 AM   #83
bluegrass
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 39
Likes (Received): 0

..

Last edited by bluegrass; April 3rd, 2019 at 01:07 PM. Reason: ..
bluegrass no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old October 31st, 2006, 06:13 AM   #84
bluegrass
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 39
Likes (Received): 0

.,

Last edited by bluegrass; April 3rd, 2019 at 01:07 PM. Reason: ..
bluegrass no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old October 31st, 2006, 11:51 AM   #85
Neitzsche
Random
 
Neitzsche's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Auckland / Vancouver
Posts: 1,223
Likes (Received): 380

Quote:
Originally Posted by heyitsmechris View Post
Not to mention the fact that Australia has a right-wing party which means Capitalism can thrive as opposed to the left-wing regime in New Zealand where Capitalism is being smothered.
Is that really a bad thing? Being a small fish what would stop NZ being smothered by overseas capital buying everything and subsequently all profit being shipped off shore? This one does my head in as I'm for "the market" but, given our relative position of weakness how do we protect from being owned by people who don't live here and who don't give a shit about NZ? Oz at least has the resource base to compete with the big boys. I really struggle trying to figure out where the line should be drawn.
Neitzsche no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old October 31st, 2006, 12:49 PM   #86
flyin_higher
Kiwi Contributor
 
flyin_higher's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Auckland
Posts: 4,871
Likes (Received): 1365

Well in terms of foreign ownership, Aussie already owns 80% of our banks. But thats not necessarily a bad thing, they still invest in NZ (ie; new bank buildings, etc) and we still retain a level of control here in NZ. I'd rather Aussie owned them than the Americans or someone else anyway..
__________________

Tāmaki Makaurau
flyin_higher no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old October 31st, 2006, 10:47 PM   #87
dubious
Registered User
 
dubious's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Canberra, ACT
Posts: 237
Likes (Received): 0

Quote:
Originally Posted by heyitsmechris View Post
I love the way you compare New Zealand to Luxembourg, I mean the two countries are so alike...one is a couple of small islands out in the middle of nowhere; while the other a piece of land smaller than Rhode Island wedged in between the 3rd, the 6th and the 17th biggest economies in the world, not to mention that 400 million (rich) people live very nearby.
I wasn't comparing NZ to Luxembourg at all. My point was that a large population doesn't directly translate to a successful economy.
dubious no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old October 31st, 2006, 10:51 PM   #88
Kane007
12 Solo's so far!
 
Kane007's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: North Shore City
Posts: 2,593
Likes (Received): 1

Quote:
Originally Posted by dubious View Post
I wasn't comparing NZ to Luxembourg at all. My point was that a large population doesn't directly translate to a successful economy.
Luxembourg. Now thats interesting because I remember reading something in Time magazine from the early 90's at the break up of the USSR, that actually stated their economy was no bigger than Luzembourgs and that was with 300m prisoners. The advantages of a centrally planed economy versus a social democratic one.

Last edited by Kane007; October 31st, 2006 at 10:56 PM. Reason: Too many S's in CCCP
Kane007 no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old November 1st, 2006, 06:02 AM   #89
Marky Mark
Registered User
 
Marky Mark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Tauranga NZ , Melbourne OZ
Posts: 6,154
Likes (Received): 160

Hope there is some Large Towers in that Apartment figure !




Strong rise in building consents
31 October 2006

The home building boom is getting a second wind, with rising consent numbers for the past three months, and a 6.1 per cent gain in September.


One bank economist said the recent consents figures suggested the low point in the house building cycle had passed, though interest rates were higher than two years ago.

Statistics New Zealand figures out yesterday showed 2472 consents were issued in September, the most since March 2005.

House building was increasing with growth in net migration and consumer confidence rising to a 13-month high, Deutsche Bank said.

Net migration in the year to September was 13,200, while there were consents granted for almost 26,000 homes.

The latest figures included consents for 493 apartments, almost double the number in the previous two months, and the highest level since February.

The total rise in consents since June was almost 29 per cent, though there is a normal lift in consents and building work in spring.

The 26,000 building consents issued for the year compared with the 32,000 annual peak in 2004, at the top of the building boom.

Excluding apartments, core consents for new homes rose 1.2 per cent in September. That was up more than 5 per cent on a year ago, after a dip earlier this year.

Master Builders Federation chief executive Pieter Burghout said consent numbers and values were holding steady across most industry sectors and regions. Most builders had at least 12 months of committed work, he said.

Overall, the annual year to date construction spending was just more than $11 billion, up 2.1 per cent on the September 2005 year, he said.

The September figures show a strong surge in consents in Auckland, with almost 800 consents issued in the month, up 255 on the same month last year, indicating growth in apartment building plans.

There were 150 consents in the Wellington region, down 110 from the same month last year, though that was an unusually high figure. Wellington City Council staff said building work remained at a "reasonably high level".

ANZ Bank economists said the latest national rise in consents would not be welcomed by the Reserve Bank, which wanted to see a rebalancing away from domestic spending towards exports.

The Reserve Bank would be "especially wary" of any rising trend in consents because that could keep pushing up building costs.

Deutsche Bank chief economist Darren Gibbs estimated the average price to build a home was $1221 a square metre in the three months to September, up 10 per cent on the same period last year.

Latest official inflation figures showed a 6 per cent rise in construction costs.

However, UBS economist Robin Clements said a closing of the gap between demand for new housing and the increased supply of homes was consistent with reduced house price inflation.

"Increased building activity need not be inconsistent with a further cooling in house price inflation," he said.
__________________
www.rosswatson.com Gorgous Art Work !
I'm Not Gay , but I think my Boyfriend Is !
Marky Mark no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old November 3rd, 2006, 06:28 AM   #90
bluegrass
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 39
Likes (Received): 0

,.

Last edited by bluegrass; April 3rd, 2019 at 01:07 PM. Reason: ..
bluegrass no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old November 3rd, 2006, 06:30 AM   #91
bluegrass
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 39
Likes (Received): 0

..

Last edited by bluegrass; April 3rd, 2019 at 01:07 PM. Reason: ..
bluegrass no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old November 3rd, 2006, 06:33 AM   #92
bluegrass
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 39
Likes (Received): 0

..

Last edited by bluegrass; April 3rd, 2019 at 01:07 PM. Reason: ..
bluegrass no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old November 3rd, 2006, 06:37 AM   #93
bluegrass
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 39
Likes (Received): 0

..

Last edited by bluegrass; April 3rd, 2019 at 01:06 PM. Reason: ..
bluegrass no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old November 3rd, 2006, 06:39 AM   #94
Kane007
12 Solo's so far!
 
Kane007's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: North Shore City
Posts: 2,593
Likes (Received): 1

Quote:
Originally Posted by heyitsmechris View Post
A large population definately helps...although not as much as a large landmass.
Just like Japan!
Kane007 no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old November 3rd, 2006, 06:42 AM   #95
bluegrass
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 39
Likes (Received): 0

..

Last edited by bluegrass; April 3rd, 2019 at 01:06 PM. Reason: ..
bluegrass no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old November 3rd, 2006, 09:25 AM   #96
OverseasKiwi
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 18
Likes (Received): 0

Quote:
Originally Posted by heyitsmechris View Post
A large population definately helps...although not as much as a large landmass.

india...1billion +

stagnant growth for 40+ years.
OverseasKiwi no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old November 3rd, 2006, 10:01 AM   #97
bluegrass
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 39
Likes (Received): 0

..

Last edited by bluegrass; April 3rd, 2019 at 01:06 PM. Reason: ..
bluegrass no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old November 3rd, 2006, 10:27 AM   #98
Kane007
12 Solo's so far!
 
Kane007's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: North Shore City
Posts: 2,593
Likes (Received): 1

Large land mass theory, hmmm.

1 Russia
2 Canada
3 China
4 USA
5 Brazil
6 Australia
7 India
8 Argentina
9 Kazakhstan
10 Sudan

I see atleast 2 of these top 10 that NZ is economically more powerful than.

But the UK, Germany, Switzerland, Austria, Spain, Portugal, Italy, Israel, Sth Korea, Singapore, etc, don't fit anywhere in these top 10 listings, whether by geographical size, population, resources.
Kane007 no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old November 3rd, 2006, 12:20 PM   #99
flyin_higher
Kiwi Contributor
 
flyin_higher's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Auckland
Posts: 4,871
Likes (Received): 1365

Quote:
Originally Posted by heyitsmechris View Post
Australian owned banks control more of the market share than that, and it's in their best interests to invest in their New Zealand subsidiaries as it increases their bottom line. What's wrong with American ownership?
Just personal preference, mainly to do with relative size and distance
__________________

Tāmaki Makaurau
flyin_higher no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old November 3rd, 2006, 01:47 PM   #100
Kiss the Rain
WoyaoDaJb
 
Kiss the Rain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: 中国威海(WEIHAI)-Christchurch
Posts: 939
Likes (Received): 20

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kane007 View Post
Large land mass theory, hmmm.

1 Russia
2 Canada
3 China
4 USA
5 Brazil
6 Australia
7 India
8 Argentina
9 Kazakhstan
10 Sudan

I see atleast 2 of these top 10 that NZ is economically more powerful than.

But the UK, Germany, Switzerland, Austria, Spain, Portugal, Italy, Israel, Sth Korea, Singapore, etc, don't fit anywhere in these top 10 listings, whether by geographical size, population, resources.
Land mass doesnt mean bull if it's not productive, russia has the largest land mass so you would expect them to have the highest agriculture output, but since it lacks the right climate and fertile soil, it doesnt give as much economical advantage as what people think.
Yea, sudan is definitely larger than nz and we are so much richer than them, wow, now we have something to brag about!!!! =_=
__________________
---
Kiss the Rain no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 


Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT +2. The time now is 01:55 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
vBulletin Security provided by vBSecurity v2.2.2 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2020 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Feedback Buttons provided by Advanced Post Thanks / Like (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2020 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

SkyscraperCity ☆ In Urbanity We trust ☆ about us