LOS ANGELES - Memorial Coliseum (77,500) - Page 5 - SkyscraperCity
 

forums map | news magazine | posting guidelines

Go Back   SkyscraperCity > World Forums > Stadiums and Sport Arenas > Completed


Global Announcement

As a general reminder, please respect others and respect copyrights. Go here to familiarize yourself with our posting policy.


Reply

 
Thread Tools
Old August 20th, 2008, 11:59 PM   #81
Bigmac1212
Time for go to bed!
 
Bigmac1212's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Sun Devil Country
Posts: 1,058
Likes (Received): 227

I often wonder if the Coliseum will ever get renovated. It does seem to look a bit long in the tooth, metaphorically speaking. With the sucess of Southern California football, it seems like a great time to give the facility a much-needed renovation.
Bigmac1212 no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old August 21st, 2008, 04:45 AM   #82
eMKay
Registered User
 
eMKay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Buffalo, NY
Posts: 1,589
Likes (Received): 227

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bigmac1212 View Post
It won't. It's the current home of the University of Southern California (American) Football team. It could use a renovation, but I doubt it will ever be torn down.
So yes, it could easily host another Olympics.
__________________
BASEBALL America's pastime since 1791, Washington Nationals (Senators) est: 1901, Buffalo Bisons est: 1879
FOOTBALL Buffalo Bills est: 1960
SOCCER DC United est: 1995, Buffalo FC est: 2009
HOCKEY Buffalo Bisons/Sabres est: 1940/1970
BASKETBALL Buffalo Braves->LA Clippers est: 1970
eMKay no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old August 21st, 2008, 08:42 AM   #83
Marckymarc
Namasté
 
Marckymarc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: West Coast, USA
Posts: 999
Likes (Received): 283

Quote:
Originally Posted by salaverryo View Post
I can't understand why such a huge crowd for the Dodgers - Red Sox game. Were the tickets cheaper than usual?
1. It was a chance to relive history (Dodgers played there from 1958-61)

2. All proceeds from the game went to ThinkCure organization (Child cancer research)
Marckymarc no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old August 22nd, 2008, 07:13 PM   #84
merope
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 52
Likes (Received): 7

Quote:
Originally Posted by CharlieP View Post
Strictly speaking, London has already been the official host city for three Olympiads - 1908, 1944 and 1948.
Then Berlin gets two, since it was chosen for 1916, I think, before hosting in 1936. I believe Tokyo also would count for two as it was awarded the 1940 games and hosted in 1964. Chicago would be trying for its second games, as it was awarded the 1904 games, which were then switched to St. Louis to coincide with the World's Fair.

Interestingly, according to Wikipedia, the IOC does consider Stockholm to have been an official host in '56.
merope no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old August 24th, 2008, 08:22 PM   #85
Jim856796
Registered User
 
Jim856796's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Citizen of the World
Posts: 9,356
Likes (Received): 1034

If I had a project to renovate the Coliseum, I would remove the bottom 14 rows in the stadium and restore the track (and we wouldn't need that stupid Sun Deck anymore), build luxury suites and a roof covering the stands. I would either leave the seating bowl as is or convert the Coliseum into a two- or three-tier stadium.
__________________
I honestly think all development projects must be sustainable and futureproof.

You support the good projects... and oppose the bad.
Jim856796 no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old August 4th, 2009, 04:17 AM   #86
buytheredcar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 72
Likes (Received): 6

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim856796 View Post
If I had a project to renovate the Coliseum, I would remove the bottom 14 rows in the stadium and restore the track (and we wouldn't need that stupid Sun Deck anymore), build luxury suites and a roof covering the stands. I would either leave the seating bowl as is or convert the Coliseum into a two- or three-tier stadium.
Yeah, if there is a third Olympics. The city would have to tear those lower section built for football to make the field larger again..
buytheredcar no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old September 28th, 2010, 02:23 AM   #87
Dallas boi
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 223
Likes (Received): 4

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim856796 View Post
If I had a project to renovate the Coliseum, I would remove the bottom 14 rows in the stadium and restore the track (and we wouldn't need that stupid Sun Deck anymore), build luxury suites and a roof covering the stands. I would either leave the seating bowl as is or convert the Coliseum into a two- or three-tier stadium.
All of that would strip the Coliseum's national landmark status.

They heavily renovated Solider Field in Chicago and it was stripped of its national landmark status.
Dallas boi no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old September 28th, 2010, 03:04 AM   #88
ryebreadraz
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1,625
Likes (Received): 30

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dallas boi View Post
All of that would strip the Coliseum's national landmark status.

They heavily renovated Solider Field in Chicago and it was stripped of its national landmark status.
Not necessarily. When they explored a major renovation years ago they pretty much came to the conclusion that it can keep its landmark status as long as the peristyle remains. For example, this proposal would have still allowed the stadium to keep its status.

ryebreadraz no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old September 28th, 2010, 04:01 AM   #89
Dallas boi
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 223
Likes (Received): 4

Quote:
Originally Posted by ryebreadraz View Post
Not necessarily. When they explored a major renovation years ago they pretty much came to the conclusion that it can keep its landmark status as long as the peristyle remains. For example, this proposal would have still allowed the stadium to keep its status.

Renovations would have to be complementary to the most identifiable parts of the building so it can keep the National Historic Landmark.
Dallas boi no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old September 28th, 2010, 05:38 AM   #90
ryebreadraz
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1,625
Likes (Received): 30

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dallas boi View Post
Renovations would have to be complementary to the most identifiable parts of the building so it can keep the National Historic Landmark.
Which was deemed to be the peristyle. They did the work and so long as the peristyle remains and the rest isn't a completely different style, the status stays. You can add tiers, add a small roof, all that stuff that the rendering has and the status stays. Renovations can be done and the historic landmark status is not what keeps the Coliseum from being renovated. It is the Coliseum Commission.
ryebreadraz no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old September 28th, 2010, 06:16 AM   #91
Kenni
Administrator
 
Kenni's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Admin
Posts: 29,189

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim856796 View Post
If I had a project to renovate the Coliseum, I would remove the bottom 14 rows in the stadium and restore the track (and we wouldn't need that stupid Sun Deck anymore), build luxury suites and a roof covering the stands. I would either leave the seating bowl as is or convert the Coliseum into a two- or three-tier stadium.
I would do the same. Restore the track, keep the bowl, an maybe surround it with luxury boxes on top.

I wouldn't dare touch the peristyle.

I hear people here in LA (mostly people who don't know) saying, "awe, just tear that old thing down".

Sacrilege!!!!

This Grand Old Lady hosted 2 extremely successful Summer Olympics ('32 and '84), the first Super Bowl, and a World Series (1959 Dodgers vs White Sox).


1932 Summer Olympics


1959 World Series


Super Bowl I


1984 Summer Olympics
image hosted on flickr



Some more pics...............

image hosted on flickr


image hosted on flickr


image hosted on flickr


At the base of the main arch, you can see two big marble blocks....
the one on the right is a piece of the Coliseum in Rome.
And the other from the Altis Olympia, Greece.


image hosted on flickr


image hosted on flickr





Complete Roster of the Honorees of the 1984 Summer Olympics. Same display on the other end for the 1932 Summer Olympics

image hosted on flickr
Kenni no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old September 28th, 2010, 06:27 AM   #92
Kenni
Administrator
 
Kenni's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Admin
Posts: 29,189

And how could we forget the Los Angeles Swimming Stadium next to it. A historic Art-Deco landmark. Host to the swimming events for both Olympics.


image hosted on flickr


It has been renovated, here you can see the old mixed with the new..

image hosted on flickr


image hosted on flickr


1932 Summer Olympics



Brand Spanking New Complex (1928)

Kenni no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old September 28th, 2010, 07:45 AM   #93
ryebreadraz
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1,625
Likes (Received): 30

Why do we want to bring the track back? There aren't more than a handful of track and field events that would ever be there and they would be things like high school meets that would do so little while making the sightlines worse for all other events. I don't see the use of a track at all except for the memories and that's not near a good enough argument for me to make the stadium a worse place to watch a game.
ryebreadraz no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old September 28th, 2010, 11:05 AM   #94
Lord David
Registered User
 
Lord David's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 1,856
Likes (Received): 118

The answer is simple, make the field large enough to fit a track (in the event of another Olympics). Renovate the existing skyboxes and perhaps stretch it to the whole curve of the southern part of the stadium (or at least part of it).
To make the coliseum symmetrical again, make an exact copy of this skybox level at the northern part of the stadium.
Skyboxes should be accessible from the stadium outright, not that outside the stadium stairwell/lift idea from the 2016 LA Olympic bid proposal.
Remove the scoreboard and video screen and replace with modern widescreen LCD/LED panels.
Add similar video screens to the west (providing that the skybox level doesn't take up that area).
Refurbish all of the concourses inside (food stalls, toilets, and restaurants if any).
Replace all the seating with a dynamic pattern or design.

Well that's all I can think of, just some general improvements, after all, it won't be the city's NFL stadium, but will see regular use for Collage football games and will definitely be the city's Olympic Stadium again if they win a bid.
Lord David no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old September 28th, 2010, 11:27 AM   #95
slipperydog
Registered User
 
slipperydog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 4,992
Likes (Received): 4813

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lord David View Post
The answer is simple, make the field large enough to fit a track (in the event of another Olympics). Renovate the existing skyboxes and perhaps stretch it to the whole curve of the southern part of the stadium (or at least part of it).
To make the coliseum symmetrical again, make an exact copy of this skybox level at the northern part of the stadium.
Skyboxes should be accessible from the stadium outright, not that outside the stadium stairwell/lift idea from the 2016 LA Olympic bid proposal.
Remove the scoreboard and video screen and replace with modern widescreen LCD/LED panels.
Add similar video screens to the west (providing that the skybox level doesn't take up that area).
Refurbish all of the concourses inside (food stalls, toilets, and restaurants if any).
Replace all the seating with a dynamic pattern or design.

Well that's all I can think of, just some general improvements, after all, it won't be the city's NFL stadium, but will see regular use for Collage football games and will definitely be the city's Olympic Stadium again if they win a bid.
The most prominent reason a track will not be will not be added is that USC simply does not need it. A track would do nothing to enhance the stadium for USC football, and USC essentially controls any stadium improvements. Cosmetic improvements will continue, but there is no reason for a track. If and when an Olympics ever comes back to LA, they could investigate the possibility at that time.
slipperydog no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old February 2nd, 2011, 08:14 AM   #96
Jim856796
Registered User
 
Jim856796's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Citizen of the World
Posts: 9,356
Likes (Received): 1034

As of this writing, I wouldn't refer to the Memorial Coliseum as a "lady" per se. I would refer to it as a "Grand Old Gentleman" or a "Grand Old Superheavyweight". If I referred to a "gentleman" as a "Grand Old Lady", I would have my @$$ kicked by that gentleman. Not trying to be sexist or anything.

And I feel that the track should not have been removed at all during the mid-90s renovations. Whether USC needs it or not, it shouldn't matter.
__________________
I honestly think all development projects must be sustainable and futureproof.

You support the good projects... and oppose the bad.
Jim856796 no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old February 3rd, 2011, 03:29 AM   #97
buckeyejim
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 79
Likes (Received): 29

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim856796 View Post
And I feel that the track should not have been removed at all during the mid-90s renovations. Whether USC needs it or not, it shouldn't matter.
A track is only good when used for "track & field". A track forces the first rows way too far from the football field. Ohio Stadium and the Los Angeles Memoral Coliseum are much better football facilities now, since the tracks were removed and the playing fields in both stadiums were lowered.
buckeyejim no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old February 4th, 2011, 03:59 AM   #98
schulzte
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 124
Likes (Received): 23





How I would rebuild the Coliseum.

http://www.stadiumdrawings.blogspot.com
schulzte no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old March 27th, 2011, 03:43 PM   #99
Jim856796
Registered User
 
Jim856796's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Citizen of the World
Posts: 9,356
Likes (Received): 1034

Quote:
Originally Posted by xlchris View Post
The stadium in 1922. Found on wikipedia;

So the original stands of the LA Coliseum were earth embankments?
__________________
I honestly think all development projects must be sustainable and futureproof.

You support the good projects... and oppose the bad.
Jim856796 no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old March 28th, 2011, 04:21 AM   #100
will101
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: silicon valley or Salem
Posts: 5,507
Likes (Received): 3116

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim856796 View Post
So the original stands of the LA Coliseum were earth embankments?
No, the embankment was simply the structural support at the time. During the 1994-95 seismic retrofit, much deeper structural pilings were inserted.
will101 no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 


Reply

Tags
los angeles, usa

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
BOGOTÁ | Guía General de Proyectos danielacadauno Proyectos y Construcción 9548 Today 06:38 AM
Arquitectura popular, referentes, chapa y pintura manhuelofspain Demografía, territorio y urbanismo 287 February 16th, 2020 12:34 PM
CHINA | Ferrocarriles Kazurro Infraestructuras del resto del mundo 724 July 9th, 2019 10:35 AM
FORUM INDEX - Newcastle Forum ALPHABETICAL SUBJECT INDEX to factual posts on this forum Newcastle Historian Newcastle Metro Area 79 March 13th, 2012 10:29 AM


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 07:35 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
vBulletin Security provided by vBSecurity v2.2.2 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2020 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Feedback Buttons provided by Advanced Post Thanks / Like (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2020 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

SkyscraperCity ☆ In Urbanity We trust ☆ about us