Maybe it's just me, but I'm quite fond of the idea of a long row of 400'-ers. I like the incessant, dramatic verticality.Hm, I kind of liked it when it was shorter but oh well.
Maybe they could make it like 330 so it doesn't look like a long row of 400 footers.
This is the problem with hard height limits, everyone just builds to the top and you end up with no variety in heights.Hm, I kind of liked it when it was shorter but oh well.
Maybe they could make it like 330 so it doesn't look like a long row of 400 footers.
Me too. I think it will look great. It kind of reminds me of those rows of same-height towers along Central Park in NYC.Maybe it's just me, but I'm quite fond of the idea of a long row of 400'-ers. I like the incessant, dramatic verticality.
Perhaps I just shun sunlight.The floorplates are too large on all three of those, creating a wall of buildings along second. I think the new code mandates 10,800 max average. Assuming that's correct, the standard may have to be revisited.
As a downtowner, I can tell you this is already the case.I don't want a "boom". I want a continuous loud siren, sound reverberates all over the city and doesn't stop.