SkyscraperCity Forum banner

54 Fenchurch Street | City of London | 43m | 10 fl | Pro

9666 Views 25 Replies 14 Participants Last post by  Core Rising
54 Fenchurch Street

Aviva Life and Pension UK Ltd

dRMM Architects

This has been submitted for approval.

Immediately opposite 120 Fenchurch Street

The current building:

54 Fenchurch Street by corerising, on Flickr

54 Fenchurch Street by corerising, on Flickr

54 Fenchurch Street by corerising, on Flickr

The Proposal:

54 Fenchurch Street by corerising, on Flickr

54 Fenchurch Street by corerising, on Flickr

54 Fenchurch Street by corerising, on Flickr

54 Fenchurch Street by corerising, on Flickr

54 Fenchurch Street by corerising, on Flickr

54 Fenchurch Street by corerising, on Flickr

54 Fenchurch Street by corerising, on Flickr

54 Fenchurch Street by corerising, on Flickr

54 Fenchurch Street by corerising, on Flickr

54 Fenchurch Street by corerising, on Flickr

54 Fenchurch Street by corerising, on Flickr

54 Fenchurch Street by corerising, on Flickr

54 Fenchurch Street by corerising, on Flickr

54 Fenchurch Street by corerising, on Flickr

54 Fenchurch Street by corerising, on Flickr

54 Fenchurch Street by corerising, on Flickr
See less See more
19
  • Like
Reactions: 2
1 - 20 of 26 Posts
Usually a project of this size wouldn't warrant a thread of it's own, but I know some forumers would love a discussion considering what is being replaced. Reading the Design document, this building could be the start of the return of Portland Stone in City Developments.

Yet more random stone cladding? It's not 2002 anymore.
there are so many more buildings on that street that need to be seen to first!
I much prefer what's there now!
  • Like
Reactions: 2
Why are they proposing to print a pattern of reconstituted stone on top of glazing? Why wouldn't they just use real recon stone or print a interesting design on top of the glass?

Anyway, this proposal is spectacularly bad.
Thanks for the detailed info CR.

Just realised it's not stone! Still, the design is good overall in my opinion. But the current building is genuine stone and is pretty decent itself so it seems a shame it's being replaced.
I seriously hope it won't get approved! Not because what's there now is something that definitely needs to be retained(It is quite good Indeed though), but also because the proposal looks VERY cheap.
I tend to agree. The present structure, which appears 1950s period, is a good example of a streetscape with its mild rustication in the ground and first levels. Why can't they adapt this building to the 21st century and even add on a few floors for additional space. I fail to see why the weak replacement is so necessary, apart from providing more space (which is someting that can easily be overcome). Look at all the grand stone buildings in NYC that they have adapted without tearing down.

A few years ago the City was in favour of modernising and adapting existing structures to meet the needs of today and that were deemed perfectly acceptable. They seem to be paranoid about keeping dwellings circa 1880-1920 but buildings of the 1950s are worthless.

Difficult to judge how this new idea of glass to resemble 'stone' will look like but the shape and the awful roof glazing are definitely under par. Do infants really design these things?
See less See more
Glass printed with an opaque design is almost indistinguishable from plastic.

The only half decent example I have ever seen is the Wiel Arets building in Zürich:


But I can't imagine this much cheaper office block in Fenchurch Street will have the material quality to look as good, and I think the marble print is far superior to the recon-stone-studded-with-shells print.
See less See more
While the upper floors on the current building as really bland, the lower section is somewhat interesting and worth saving unless a fantastic proposal comes along - which this isn't. I'd much prefer the rest of the building demolished, with some form of modern building coming out of the retailed facade of the bottom two floors, set back as the original is to provide a small garden area.

That said I'd happily see this building go if something good was proposed here - the current proposal looks like a combination of the worst of the 80s (terrible marble facaded po-mo) with the worst of the 00s (random window placement, monolithic size pretending to be small).
  • Like
Reactions: 2
current building reminds me somewhat of what's getting demolished for the scalpel - individually, neither seems a truly tragic loss, but I can't help but wonder, when all such buildings have been replaced with C21st developments, won't we feel something missing?

the text of about portland stone permanence and lets not just do another glass box seems like it means well as a reaction to exactly that concern, in theory, but the execution doesn't look that convincing even in a render... and if there's one thing i've figured out in the past few years following this forum, it's that exteriors look cheaper and plasticcy compared to the renders more often than the inverse!
  • Like
Reactions: 1
The city of London seem to have no regard to the existing historic fabric of the city instead they are destroying another perfectly adaptable attractive building in favour of something far worse.
  • Like
Reactions: 1
The stone buildings across the road will also be making way for a modern building soon as well.

I don't know how old 54 Fenchurch is, someone said it was built in the 50's. If that's the case, it's a 60 year old or so stone building. And I think it's a shame it's going. Some of the stone facades aren't great, but this one is actually quite interesting and provides The City with a mix of modern and old building materials.

If all of the stone buildings disappear, The city is going to end up all glass and steel/plastic looking cladding, with little variety.

There are already some really terrible modern buildings in Fenchurch Street now. I don't mind the new design personally, but I don't think fake Portland Stone is a good replacement for genuine stone.

The more I look at the area, the more I wonder what direction The City is going in.
See less See more
And let's not even mention the fact that there are many way worse buildings on the same street. I don't know why but this particular loss upset me.
My god that is spectacularly ugly - Stone effect printed onto glass?

The existing building isn't anything special, especially in it's current rather drab state but at least it doesn't look like a monolithic slab that almost has a military bunker quality to it.

Actually made me laugh out loud that they referenced glass reflections in the More London development. It's sort of like one of those projects from my Uni design days where you just retrospectively pulled random references from thin air to support your knocked out night-before designs :D.
This is now approved..



A 10-storey building by dRMM has been given the green light by City of London planners.

The scheme at 51-54 Fenchurch Street features an all-glass curtain wall system which is broken up by solid, Portland Stone-coloured panels.

Sadie Morgan, director, said: “The façade treatment will be a world first. It combines an abstraction of Portland Stone with an all-glass façade, the effect of which will mean the building’s shifted form blends with its surroundings.”

It is the practice’s first major office block in the Square Mile and will increase the existing building’s floorspace by 2,000sq m to nearly 6,500sq m.

The building is being developed by Aviva Life & Pensions UK and will be let either as a headquarters building or on a floor-by-floor basis.

http://www.bdonline.co.uk/news/city-first-for-drmm/5070082.article
See less See more
1 - 20 of 26 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top