I'll be voting yes whatever the wording. I don't think in a million years it'll be an abortion on demand referendum though - not quite yet.
https://www.rte.ie/news/2017/0926/907522-cabinet_referendums/The Taoiseach has told the Dáil that the Government has agreed an "indicative timeline" for a standalone referendum on the Eighth Amendment of the Constitution next May or June.
The vote early next summer will be one of seven referendums that the Government is planning to hold over the next two years.
Leo Varadkar said the referendum on abortion would follow on from the recommendations of an all-party Oireachtas committee considering the issue, which is to report by Christmas.
Repealing the 8th Amendment simply removes this from the constitution, it doesn't make any legislation that actually provides for abortion.The State acknowledges the right to life of the unborn and, with due regard to the equal right to life of the mother, guarantees in its laws to respect, and, as far as practicable, by its laws to defend and vindicate that right.
Thats a very loaded phrase, I imagine most abortions must be done on demand unless the woman is unconscious and her life in immediate danger.How will you vote in next year's ABORTION referendum?
I won't be voting for "abortion on demand" though.
No it isn't. Who said it was a basic human right to murder a child coming out of the womb?Abortion should be legal for the full term of pregnancy because it's a basic human right that one has autonomy over one's body.
Your own choice. Not the child's choice.You can travel abroad to be euthanized and evade taxes too.
If you can find a way of getting it out without killing it or making it severely disabled, then let's keep all the unwanted babies alive then.No it isn't. Who said it was a basic human right to murder a child coming out of the womb?
Full pregnancy you say - so that is to the birth table right?
So the child is fully formed - and you think that's ok for abortion?
You'd better not vote then. You clearly don't have a clue what the referendum will be about!annnnnd we get a preview of how low quality the debate on this Referendum will be.
As I figured, people will focus entirely on the hypothetical subsequent government legislation that might be implemented after the 8th is repealed, when in reality the repeal has **** all to do with what comes after.
That's hilarious, do you even understand why we have referenda in this country?You'd better not vote then. You clearly don't have a clue what the referendum will be about!
No it isn't. Who said it was a basic human right to murder a child coming out of the womb?
Full pregnancy you say - so that is to the birth table right?
So the child is fully formed - and you think that's ok for abortion?
Repeal of the eighth, will only remove the legal condition that the unborn have an equal right to life as the pregnant woman.Reductio ad absurdum (Latin: "reduction to the absurd") is a form of argument in which a proposition is disproven by following its implications logically to an absurd consequence.[1]
Our euthanasia rules could also be rethought, and the same argument applied. However the constitution does not grant citizens the right to travel abroad for euthanasia, it does for abortion.You can travel abroad to be euthanized and evade taxes too. That doesn't mean it should be legal. It's not a good argument.
Moving abroad would make you tax resident in another country and is perfectly legal. Fleeing the country to avoid paying taxes you owe would be a crime and the taxes would still be owed on you return. Going abroad to have an abortion does not make you a criminal upon your return.This subsection shall not limit freedom to travel between the State and another state.
This subsection shall not limit freedom to obtain or make available, in the State, subject to such conditions as may be laid down by law, information relating to services lawfully available in another state.
There is now :yes:Pity there wasn't a "couldn't care less" option in the poll![]()
Rather a logical fallacy to that poll option tbh - if someone genuinely couldn't care less, they wouldn't take the time out of their busy lives to tell us they couldn't care less.There is now :yes:
I know, but anything for an easy life....Rather a logical fallacy to that poll option tbh - if someone genuinely couldn't care less, they wouldn't take the time out of their busy lives to tell us they couldn't care less.
Logically, at that point, there would still be quite a lot less they could care about.