The dualling finishes at Crusader, the bit through Clifton will be a 4 lane single carriageway.
The M69 is a great raod and doesn't have nearly a fraction of the issues the M42 / A42 has. The original plans were to take it further but they were ditched way back when.The M69 does serve as a good link for Leicester and the Midlands but the road is no faster than the A42 is between here and Birmingham. The other problem is-similar to Nottingham, where the M69 finishes by Fosse Park you then have awful traffic as that dual carriageway goes through the built up suburbs towards the City Centre.
The A453 dualling will make a difference but the key sticking point will be as it is already- Clifton. Unless there is some type of bypass around Clifton it'll hit the same kind of problems.
The investments is massively welcome but we also need some long-term planning and thinking- not something the UK is very good at!
I agree, even with the proposals I think it is still likely to be a long queue of traffic through Clifton.Journeys through Clifton probably will not be much quicker off-peak, but I think peak-time congestion will be relieved due to the removal of the bottle neck.
I agree. It's capacity problems that cause the massive traffic jams in the peak periods. With the 2x2 lanes this capacity problem will be improved (although probably not entirely removed given the extra traffic the improved Clifton-J24 section will attract) . The traffic lights etc will mean it won't be much faster in the off-peak, but it's not normally congested then now anyway.I don't think there'll be such a big problem - the road will just be as wide as Queen's Drive, and I suspect traffic through Clifton will be very much like that along Queen's drive - 40mph, traffic lights every 200-500 metres, not very fast but not very slow, just what you'd expect on an urban trunk road. The important thing is the single-lane pinchpoint is removed which should see much fewer and shorter queues.
Hopefully the tram and its P&R will absorb the extra traffic volumes.I agree. It's capacity problems that cause the massive traffic jams in the peak periods. With the 2x2 lanes this capacity problem will be improved (although probably not entirely removed given the extra traffic the improved Clifton-J24 section will attract). The traffic lights etc will mean it won't be much faster in the off-peak, but it's not normally congested then now anyway.
I think building to motorway-standard is a little over the top, however continuing the A50 over the M1 to replace the A453 as a dual carriageway all the way to at least the Crusader Island (though preferably all the way to the flyover on the other side of Clifton) would be a good move.![]()
here we are gents - here's how this road should be built imho, of course it won't.
The A42 is upgraded to Motorway all the way to where it reaches the A50(m) spur shortly after a stretch running jointly with the M1
Notice that the A50 goes straight across the M1 for Nottingham bound traffic, irradicating the need for Nottm bound traffic to go further south over the horrible roundabout at Kegworth. It therefore onwards becomes the A50(m). Stoke bound Traffic from Nottingham does the same. It may even make the Notts-Derby transit quicker than using the A52 for South Nottingham people.
There is a tunnel under Clifton and the motorway finishes at the Wilford/Silverdale flyover and becomes the A453 once again.