SkyscraperCity banner

1 - 17 of 17 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
8 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
I've seen a lot people calling supertall skyscrapers unnecessary. Some people think that those tall skyscrapers are useless to our society. Are you agree with them?
 

·
Moderator
Joined
·
19,541 Posts
unless people want the entire planet to be urban, which sadly some people do, skyscrapers are very necessary. Imagine modern China without skyscrapers. There wouldn't be any natural beauty left. It'd be all mountains and an ocean of lowrise and midrise housing. Also, office parks. Lots of people have strong feelings about office parks :D
 

·
~ Mysterious Entity ~
Joined
·
4,850 Posts
unless people want the entire planet to be urban, which sadly some people do, skyscrapers are very necessary. Imagine modern China without skyscrapers. There wouldn't be any natural beauty left. It'd be all mountains and an ocean of lowrise and midrise housing. Also, office parks. Lots of people have strong feelings about office parks :D
Well that's not quite true. Just look at the density level in the city-proper of Paris which has very few people living in skyscrapers (with the majority living in low and mid rise apartment buildings), and a density of about 21,000/km2. China has about 1,403,500,365 people living in it. If they were all living as densely of Paris, that would require about 66,826.2 km2 which would be about 0.7% of China's land area of 9,596,961 km2. Less than one percent. Less total land than what Wikipedia lists for the combined land covered by the US's three largest metro areas (about 75,372 km2).

Skyscrapers might make for a more efficient use of land, but very rarely can they be called "necessary".
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
256 Posts
With our rapidly growing population Skyscrapers and in general tall buildings are absolutely necessary they saves so much space jut in 6 years New Yorks population went up by half a million .
 

·
quì riposo,quì nonlavoro
Joined
·
4,046 Posts
It depends how efficiently they use those skyscrapers.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
190 Posts
Tall buildings are necessery in big cities where you have to staff all these people somewhere.
But yes, in my opinion supertalls higher than 400 metres are unecessary.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
18,447 Posts
For sure they are not necessary. They are built largely to glorify some person or organization. And while this counts as a "benefit" (as long as it is their money and not the public's) there is a much greater benefit from building, say, a dozen 15 story buildings and the livable environment that goes with them.

That isn't to say that they don't make economic sense in a few places. But not in the great majority of places they are built.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
679 Posts
For many random people (outside skyscrapers websites) skyscrapers are necessary only in few particular areas in big metropolis. And supertall skyscrapers 300m+ are not necessary at all (cf. Tokyo, Toronto, Singapore, Paris, etc).
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
282 Posts
Skyscrapers exceeding 300m are unnecessary.

The floor plat efficiency becomes increasing inefficient as it gets taller. There is also increasingly complex and expensive provisions needed for fire protection, cleaning and maintenance of the external facade.

For CBD, upto 250 300m will be more than sufficient.
For residential buildings, perhaps the bulk of the buildings can be between 15 to 25 storeys.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
4,225 Posts
Was Versailles necessary? Or the Taj Mahal? Or the Sistine chapel? These things are only ever about showing off. We do them because we can.
 
1 - 17 of 17 Posts
Top