Many lines, like the Hallam line linking Sheffield - Leeds via Barnsley, Wakefield and Castleford, and Sheffield - Huddersfield have 35 year old Pacers running on them, whose scrapping was promised in 2010, in sharp contrast to the investment London and the South East gets. And we know there will be similar horror stories elsewhere.Rail passengers in Britain are travelling on the oldest carriages since records began, research has found.
Customers are using trains that were typically built in the mid-1990s, making them 21-years-old on average.
That is older than at any point in publicly available records.
The findings come as passengers face a rise in fares by an average of 3.4% – the biggest in five years – as of tomorrow.
The Office of Rail and Road, which produced the statistics, has previously said older trains can mean worse reliability, less comfortable journeys and poorer performance.
Travellers using the Caledonian Sleeper service between London and Scotland have to put up with Britain’s oldest trains at 42 years.
Merseyrail has the second-oldest fleet at 38 years. Stephen Joseph of the Campaign for Better Transport said it shows “just how far the railways have to go to modernise”.
He said: “We’ve been promised new trains by several train operators... we now want to see these promises turn into reality."
British trains have the oldest carriages since records began, says research
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/laughing-stock-british-trains-oldest-11777192
Many lines, like the Hallam line linking Sheffield - Leeds via Barnsley, Wakefield and Castleford, and Sheffield - Huddersfield have 35 year old Pacers running on them, whose scrapping was promised in 2010, in sharp contrast to the investment London and the South East gets. And we know there will be similar horror stories elsewhere.
The average life expectancy of these trains and carriages is normally between 35 and 40 years, so there's nothing odd in 30 to 40 year stock being still around. .
In a recent article in Modern Rail magazine a writer was complaining that rolling stock owners were scrapping trains far too early. I think it was a mixture of them, the operating companies and the government who were just losing the head of themselves in the search for shiny new train orders. They also came in for criticism for not having enough ambition to sell their disused stock to other companies/ countries. Why privatisation has led to this spendthrift attitude I don't know, or at least can't remember what the article implied.
The investment has largely been down in the South East. Up North and in the South West, most of it is old and worn out. Our trains are already 35 years old. They'd go apeshit if our Pacers started running in the South East. And as for new trains, all we can expect are hand me downs from other parts of the network. That isn't good enough. The last time we did get brand new trains in our area that weren't hand me downs was back in 1959 - almost 60 years ago!!!!
Indeed. The 458/460 rebuild was a nightmare when the level of corrosion in some of the units was uncovered. Now they're going to be surplus to requirements long before the ROSCO's recouped the investment.
Refurbs are frought with difficulties. I visited the Arriva depot at Crewe late last year with RAIL mag for a feature on the work they do. There was a lot of unplanned work being done to some units because of the corrosion that was found once the units had been stripped back.
1) Railway rolling stock is expensive so that's why it will be used for a long time;
2) If they think those cars are old, they should come to Romania. The can see the glance of old sleeping cars... 'cause we have some former D.B. (German Railways, former West German) sleeping cars made between 1959 and 1972 (most of them are made after 1962, but I once had the chance to spot one from 1959). They are nasty if there's too hot (no air conditiong), but they are superbe! Look for WLABmh 174 and 175 or vagoane de dormit 71-31.
It's market forces rather than logic, with a bit of government intervention on top. The cost of constructing a train fleet is an increasingly small proportion of the lifetime cost of it. That means the 'waste' of replacing reasonably new fleets can be justified economically. The newest trains are designed to be so much more efficient and maintainable that there's a compelling reason to replace trains only a decade or so old.
A factor people start to forget is that privatisation was more than 20 years ago. For a lot of railway-minded people this was an epoch, with everything before being old, and everything after being new. The simultaneous move to apply accessibility regulations adds to that. Therefore, when we hear about post-privatisation fleets being replaced (like the Class 458s) we think it's a great waste since they're still 'new'.
A notable factor in this is that trains from the late BR/early privatisation period came at a time of rapid technological development when we hadn't quite settled things. We moved from very traditional big-chunks-of-metal traction systems to semiconductor systems, which have now been succeeded by even better technologies. This means that mid-life trains are likely to be actually more expensive to maintain than older ones using more rudimentary technology. It's easy to keep something going indefinitely if a well-equipped workshop is all you need to make any replacement parts. Early semiconductors aren't produced any more, and they can't be replaced piecemeal with new systems.
Speaking of old trains, one of the things we are seeing is less than spectacular success in refurbishing them to a modern standard. A big reason for this is that the cost of a new train is largely the complex components inside rather than the bodyshell and other big heavy bits of metal. When you refurbish an old train, you end up stripping it back to these big bits of metal and then install new components. If the components are most of the cost, then the process of refurbishing is actually going to involve most of the cost of building a new train, but without the 30-40 year service life ahead of it and with the complexity of shoe-horning components into an often-rusted body not designed for them. The Class 319 and 321 refurbishment programmes aren't going well at all for exactly that reason. The HST refurbishments aren't so bad because all that really needs done are the new doors and the retention toilets, as the traction systems are all in the power cars and were replaced only a decade ago anyway.
The government is happy to see this level of competition. The ROSCOs made too much money at privatisation and they're now facing the consequences. Most of these amazing new rolling stock introductions are funded by new entrants who have nothing to lose from leasing costs going down.
The difference between London commuterland and the rest of the country is about the value of optimisation. Outside of London there's plenty of enhancements to be made just by adding a few more trains to the track and making them a bit longer. Around London these are no longer possible, due to packed timetables, maxed out platform lengths and depots that can't take more trains. The only way to increase capacity is to replace the existing trains regardless of how modern they may be.
Some of these ex-London trains are probably going to end up used elsewhere through novel schemes. Porterbrook are working with Alstom on hydrogen power packs for their 321s, which would make them useful on much more of the network. Batteries, hydrogen and diesel engines are novel things which the traditional ROSCOs are going to end up plowing a lot of money into, as otherwise their assets will simply be worthless. There's not enough electrification happening or planned to absorb ex-London trains now. For a while that's what the ROSCOs were planning on - they even thought they could send nearly 40-year-old EMUs displaced by Crossrail over to Cardiff.
Hello. Do you have any picture with those old carriges?
Finally. I really wan't to try the Sleeper but I'm waiting for the new carriages
If we at the subject one of the old British trains, we have to mention class 313 of Great Northern which should be soon gone as class 717 is finally getting introduced on services to Moorgate Station.
BTW, any news when are they going to remove class 313 from Southern operations? They are around 40 years old...