BUENOS AIRES | Ritz Carlton Puerto Madero | 260m | 61 fl | Pro

6780 Views 5 Replies 5 Participants Last post by Ecopolisia, Mar 28, 2021

EMArg

Discussion Starter · Oct 2, 2017

New proposal at the Puerto Madero neighborhood, Buenos Aires. Credits to the forumers who collected the information at the Argentine and Latinscrapers sub-forums.

RENDERS

VIDEO

See less See more

Save

Reactions: 5

1 - 6 of 6 Posts

EMArg

Discussion Starter · #2 · Oct 2, 2017

Text taken from their facebook fanpage:

🤗 Nos acercamos al fin de semana con una primicia exclusiva:
¿The Ritz-Carlton en Puerto Madero?
🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟

Grupo desarrollador argentino está en tratativas para acompañar el desembarco de la cadena de lujo en el país, que hace años tiene intenciones de hacer pie en Puerto Madero.

Según pudo averiguar NuevoMadero.com, el proyecto está avanzado y sería en el extremo sur del Dique 1, al lado de ArtMaria, en un terreno privado que está a la venta desde hace tiempo.

"The Ritz-Carlton Hotel & Residences" estaría compuesto por 150 rooms & Suites y 220 appartments particulares. Pero eso no es todo: sería la torre más alta del país, con 260 metros 🌇🌆.
¡Pronto tendremos más novedades!

Translation of the most relevant information:

Location: Dique 1 of Puerto Madero, at the empty terrain of the ArtMaria complex
150 Hotel Rooms & 220 Apartments
If built: the tallest tower of Argentina with 260 meters high

Save

Reactions: 4

Zaz965

· #3 · Oct 2, 2017

gorgeous...I hope it will be aproved

Save

Reactions: 4

DarkLite

· #4 · Oct 4, 2017

Finally a new skyscraper for Buenos Aires. This will be the city's second building to surpass the two hundred meter threshold.

Save

Reactions: 2

midrise

· #5 · Mar 23, 2021

Look's like this sailed into oblivion.....it was not very attractive for this site/location.....they need a more dynamic addition for this area.....a real statement.

Save

Ecopolisia

· #6 · Mar 28, 2021

midrise said:
Look's like this sailed into oblivion.....it was not very attractive for this site/location.....they need a more dynamic addition for this area.....a real statement.

Hmm to some of what you just said there(not quite a real statement according to my books, hmm?).because for - or likely the majority in here - me it was sure per definition attractive and for sure dynamic (weirdly you can't observe that thoroughly enough to know that it's exactly what it's, hmm?)as it possible it can be, when it comes to design. At least to its currently adjacent neighboring buildings, that's for sure. But, if they can get one with a better and ((even)) more dynamic design, then I'll be openminded and acceptable for that, too, yeah. Sure. Good that that has been settled down and clarified, I suppose😅😉👍✌🌈

Save

1 - 6 of 6 Posts

This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.

Top Contributors this Month