Shows what I know about photography. If you hadn't told me these were bad I would have said they are some of the nicest Buffalo photos I've ever seen.
No doubt! If not better and bigger.Buffalo is such a beautiful city! I don't know why people keep moving from there. If I visit US, the city it will be in the top of my list.
I wonder if Buffalo kept the groth rate from 50's and 60's: Metro Buffalo would have about 2,5 million people. Imagine the skyline. It would be something like Toronto.
That's quite a jump for TO over 10 years - were there some annexations or methodology changes that occured during that period? Knowing that comparing US to Canadian census figures can be like comparing apples and oranges sometimes.Buffalo -- 1,089,230 (US Census 1950)
Toronto -- 1,262,000 (Canada Census 1951)
Buffalo -- 1,306,957 (US Census 1960)
Toronto -- 1,919,000 (Canada Census 1961)
If air conditioning violated the laws of thermodynamics, that quite possibly could have happened. Remember, people like to leave the northeast because it's "cold", and then move down south where it's "warm", and then apparently proceed to sit around in AC all day (be it at home, work, or in the car).I'm preparing a thread with that thematic: "what if the big cities back in 30's, 40's, 50's and 60's kept the same growth rate?" Imagine a Detroit as big as Chicago, Cleveland as Dallas-Fort Worth, Pittsburgh as Atlanta, Youngstown as Austin...
The Buffalo figures, in all those years, are the sum of Erie and Niagara counties. About Toronto, those are the official figures from Canadian Census for metropolitan areas. Probably, metro Toronto grow in area too in that period.That's quite a jump for TO over 10 years - were there some annexations or methodology changes that occured during that period? Knowing that comparing US to Canadian census figures can be like comparing apples and oranges sometimes.
Or maybe bayviews will claim 650000 Mexican immigrants moved in during that timeframe only because of goodwill and acceptance from the general poplace and not because of any tangible economic policy changes.
So much for Toronto surpassing Buffalo during Buffalo's heyday as well, it seems it had been growing faster for some time and just happened to pass at about the same time Buffalo peaked, making the difference thereafter more pronounced.