[munchymunch]

Telecast on February 16th at 10AM ET.

link

 

[ArcCrypts]

I think I found it unless it a coincidence that the map marker is right on top of the 801 Marquette.

*Edit, it's real. Bidclerk now shows the location of projects. Just found the Kraus-Anderson project as well.
Put September 12, 2016 on your calenders everyone.

 

[Scott16475]

I think I found it unless it a coincidence that the map marker is right on top of the 801 Marquette.

*Edit, it's real. Bidclerk now shows the location of projects. Just found the Kraus-Anderson project as well.
Put September 12, 2016 on your calenders everyone.

Nice find! Wish they would have put the height in the link

 

[munchymunch]

I think I found it unless it a coincidence that the map marker is right on top of the 801 Marquette.

*Edit, it's real. Bidclerk now shows the location of projects. Just found the Kraus-Anderson project as well.
Put September 12, 2016 on your calenders everyone.

It most likely won't start on that date.

 

[Scott16475]

It most likely won't start on that date.

OK, Mr. Buzzkill. :laugh:

 

[Jonathan Carver]

Telecast on February 16th at 10AM ET.

link

Is this when we will see a rendering of the proposed structure??

 

[smoothuser]

Is this when we will see a rendering of the proposed structure??

Probably not, the telecast in the past was just a phone call. But may be significant because this quarterly call has been used by them to announce the tower status in the past.

 

[nasa35]

new height, 921

 

[nBode]

That would be lovely, but; how? I'll believe it when I see it. Are they doubling units?

 

[kjharding]

On a completely unrelated note, I'm having flashbacks to the consortium fiasco....

 

[spectre000]

new height, 921

Throwing a height figure out with nothing else to back it up is _____.

 

[bapster2006]

Wow Nasa, thank you for sending me that rendering in a private message. It looks awesome!

just kidding.

 

[grant1simons2]

921' makes me think it's a joke.

 

[ArcCrypts]

921'... lol yea right, no way in minneapolis.


I'll believe it when I see it. Seriously doubt a new tallest is going to be built. Maybe in a couple decades but not now. Also the number just seems so random, especially with no proof. Just thrown out into the middle of the forum. How would the tower jump from the 50 story, 600 to 700 ft to over 900 ft.

Well, we will find out next week whether FSP added a bunch more floors to increase the height to over 900 ft, kept the same plan of 50 story, or if they decided on 3 stories, because if you do "inspect element" on the bidclerk TCF listing, you find a commented out code showing this.

<!--
<hr>
<h3 title="Structures">Structures</h3>
<ul class="projectDetails structures">

<li class="structureBox">
<div class="content">
<h4 title="Hotel / Motel">Hotel / Motel</h4>
<ul>

<li title="Addition" class="full">Addition</li>



<li title="3 stories" class="full">3 stories</li>


</ul>
</div>
</li>

</ul>
-->

Who's ready for 3 stories? Pretty sure that's not right though unless FSP wants to have a floor of residential, a floor of hotel, and a floor of office. But then again, this is Minneapolis.

(I did this on the several bidclerk listing, the Kraus Anderson one has all the heights and floors, and also found a 20 story 490k square foot office tower near Target Field station that was cancelled.)

 

[grant1simons2]

Yes 3 stories is the current size of the building right now. Your nonsense is just as crazy as 921'.

But then again, this is Minneapolis so we must suck right?

 

[ArcCrypts]

Yes 3 stories is the current size of the building right now. Your nonsense is just as crazy as 921'.

But then again, this is Minneapolis so we must suck right?

No, it's actually 4 stories unless one of the floors caved in recently.

Also I guess sarcasm is still not allowed on the forum these days.

 

[RedDutch]

new height, 921

One word....Cruel......especially from one that normally has insider info.

 

[Scott16475]

There's one of two explanations for Nasa's 'hit and run'.
1) It really is 921' as (I think) he's the one who said a while back that this building is going to be better than any of us expected.
OR
2) He was drunk.

I hope the correct answer is 1.

 

[mullen]

sure why not Minneapolis? i'll take it. the days of 50 story office only towers are over here. with stacked multi-uses 70-80 stories is perfectly doable.

it's fun to speculate on this building.

 

[spectre000]

new height, 921

Mod note. I'll give nasa35 a day or so to substantiate this number or I'm going to delete it. I don't really care if he wants to back it up with a made up story even. But don't just post a height figure without something to back it up. Real or otherwise. It smacks of "attention seeking". Frankly this is borderline trolling.

This site has been embarrassed before by lies. We're not doing it again.