SkyscraperCity Forum banner

City Buildings, Corporation Street.

12834 Views 177 Replies 43 Participants Last post by  heatonparkincakes
What can you say? More glass, more curves , more daring architecture for Manchester.

Oh yes. :)

First impression anyone?









http://www.maghull-group.co.uk/downloads.htm

Sorry about the delay. If these have already been seen, I'm off? :runaway:
See less See more
4
1 - 20 of 178 Posts
They have been seen but not as large, from those i'm not as worried as I was when I first saw them...cheers jrb
There's a fair bit of this skybox stuff knocking around in proposals at the minute. I like em personally but I'm not a huge fan of this scheme, those renders make it look poorly considered, and insensitive. Has it got through planning like this?
rolybling said:
They have been seen but not as large, from those i'm not as worried as I was when I first saw them...cheers jrb
No probs Roly.
b4mmy said:
There's a fair bit of this skybox stuff knocking around in proposals at the minute. I like em personally but I'm not a huge fan of this scheme, those renders make it look poorly considered, and insensitive. Has it got through planning like this?
Don't know B4mmy. Might be worth looking at the MCC planning site.
See less See more
I wish I could talk all architectural like but I can't, I just think it looks so much better in jerb's new improved shot from the front of Victoria Station. It encloses that vista[?] nicely...just looks better than that crumbling down wreck that sits there now, it is quite daring too.
I remember when Ian Allen used to have an office in that building. My mum accompanied me when I was about 12 trying to get my hands on the latest bus spotting book. Right, I'm "out", I've said it. Don't be mean to me!
I Like it.

b4mmy said:
There's a fair bit of this skybox stuff knocking around in proposals at the minute. I like em personally but I'm not a huge fan of this scheme, those renders make it look poorly considered, and insensitive. Has it got through planning like this?
I'm not sure that I follow your insensitive line, P4mmy. I think the preservation of the nice sandstone building ensures that it's in keeping with the Co-op buildings and Vic Station, The lower glass bit ties in nicely with the Urbis and looks suitably modern and the top bit is quite radical and unique for Manchester and this area from what i've seen- so much so that I don't feel that it clashes with existing buildings and looks good enough not to degrade it's surroundings......imHo of course :)
See less See more
I like the concept. The renders arnt great, so hopefully the end product will be much better.
GShutty said:
I'm not sure that I follow your insensitive line, P4mmy. I think the preservation of the nice sandstone building ensures that it's in keeping with the Co-op buildings and Vic Station, The lower glass bit ties in nicely with the Urbis and looks suitably modern and the top bit is quite radical and unique for Manchester and this area from what i've seen- so much so that I don't feel that it clashes with existing buildings and looks good enough not to degrade it's surroundings......imHo of course :)
Got to agree with you GShutty. It certainly ties in with the surrounding buildings. Hopefully the redevelopment of Victoria Station will be just as daring?
See less See more
I like it too. Very swish.
GShutty said:
I'm not sure that I follow your insensitive line, P4mmy. I think the preservation of the nice sandstone building ensures that it's in keeping with the Co-op buildings and Vic Station, The lower glass bit ties in nicely with the Urbis and looks suitably modern and the top bit is quite radical and unique for Manchester and this area from what i've seen- so much so that I don't feel that it clashes with existing buildings and looks good enough not to degrade it's surroundings......imHo of course :)
Well I'm prepared to put my reputation on the line, so I've just written to Maghull to see if I can talk em into something a bit better. Chances are these images were done in a hurry to get the application extended beyond April 2006 anyway.
See less See more
b4mmy said:
Well I'm prepared to put my reputation on the line, so I've just written to Maghull to see if I can talk em into something a bit better. Chances are these images were done in a hurry to get the application extended beyond April 2006 anyway.
Never one to miss a chance b4mmy.

The hard nosed business man. :)
See less See more
jrb said:
Never one to miss a chance b4mmy.
.... got mouths to feed jerb! :)
jrb said:
Got to agree with you GShutty. It certainly ties in with the surrounding buildings. Hopefully the redevelopment of Victoria Station will be just as daring?
B4mmy said:
Well I'm prepared to put my reputation on the line, so I've just written to Maghull to see if I can talk em into something a bit better. Chances are these images were done in a hurry to get the application extended beyond April 2006 anyway.
JRB I reckon with the NQ, GQ and now Red Bank on one side and the ASK/Greengate proposal on the other that Vic Station's redevelopment is inevitable and if they're going to do it, I think there's a desire at MCC to see it done properly.

B4mmy, what are your particular objections and what would you propose? Be good to hear an inside opinion. I accept that the current proposal has essentially 3 elements to it- but personally feel that they work well together and with the existing surroundings.
See less See more
I like the boxy top bit.

I like the curvey glassy bottom bit.

I like the old building.

But I don't think they work at all well together. It makes me think of Frankenstein's Monster, all badly stitched together from different bits. So it gets the UUUURGHHHH buzzer from me. No. I don't like it.
So I don't like it.
See less See more
GShutty said:
B4mmy, what are your particular objections and what would you propose?
Its this particular image that offends me the most: the one on the left



Nothing matches, and whats going on with this boxes. I would be staggered if this got built like this, there is no sympathy, no homogeny, no consideration, nearly no design, and its damned ugly. I know you're thinking that I might have accidentally absorbed some of Longshanks dna during a site-to-site transport but I haven't. I love shiny and new... but this is just plain bloody offensive. It just smacks of 'indicative proposal' and is a failed and desperate attempt at contemporary styling.

Has anyone seen my tricorder.
See less See more
Not sure myself, Mr Sight. It's going to be a hit or miss. I wish they've just leave the boxes off the top. Don't mind the glassy part at the back, because it goes with the Urbis.
b4mmy said:
.... got mouths to feed jerb! :)
B4mmy you could do me a favor, if and when you've got time?

I'm sure we'd all be very grateful. :wink2:

And I'm sure you won't mind? :)

Don't worry I'm not after a job or anything like that.

I'll PM you soon.
See less See more
1 - 20 of 178 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top