SkyscraperCity Forum banner
1 - 15 of 15 Posts

·
Moderator
Joined
·
7,349 Posts
Not sure, but maybe you've answered your own question. They must be up to something from what you described, presumably some sort of site clearance?

Incidentally, just noticed it links right up to the back of the Premier Inn and TGI Friday site, as well as directly opposite the plethora of developments across Kirkstal Rd, so isn't too isolated from domestic type development.
 

·
Moderator
Joined
·
7,349 Posts

·
Moderator
Joined
·
7,349 Posts
There was a report on the national news recently that the buy to let market is exploding out of control again and will soon surpass the pre-crash levels, and their recent tax changes about to go live are partly to try to dampen that particular market down a bit.
 

·
Moderator
Joined
·
7,349 Posts

·
Moderator
Joined
·
7,349 Posts
Ah, wishful thinking, the tallest part would be 17 stories, and others at 15, but that's not bad for Kirkstall Road.

I just want them to get on with something as that whole portion of Kirkstall Road has looked awful like a massive bomb site for years - I'd be happy with an estate of bungalows now.
 

·
Moderator
Joined
·
7,349 Posts
Here are some new images of the revised City Reach scheme.

It looks to be a massive and comprehensive plan which would totally transform this now rather run down A65 approach into Leeds (also with the adjacent Tannery proposal). Very ambitious, but as usual it is a case of will it actually happen?

Full 2 Sep 2021 presentation slides here -
https://democracy.leeds.gov.uk/documents/b27513/City Plans Panel - 2nd September 2021 - Presentation Slides 02nd-Sep-2021 13.30 City Plans Panel.pdf?T=9

1991019

Overall scheme, with complete Otter Island development in the foreground

1991020


1991021


1991022

Proposed view from Kirkstall Road
 

·
Moderator
Joined
·
7,349 Posts
It was a rude comment, I'm sure the room went quiet in shock, and some little comments were made after by other members saying its not like communist housing.
 

·
Moderator
Joined
·
7,349 Posts
I can't face watching the plans panel meeting for this or any other residential schemes now. Expect the same tedious arguments about the amount of green space, 3 bedroom apartments, affordable housing, trees, children's play areas, NIMBY's objecting. I'm not saying these things aren't important, I just wish they were sorted (if they are policy) before they went to panel.
I did listen in, and you're not far off, certainly the amount of 3 bedroom units was a hot topic, although they did agree that as it was policy compliant they couldn't do much about it so it was comfortably passed, but also that they are looking to get the policy reviewed in the future to make the balance of units more localised.

The level of affordable units is high but they did mention some government funding is in for this, which was time limited so had to get it pushed through promptly.
 
1 - 15 of 15 Posts
Top