Skyscraper City Forum banner
3761 - 3780 of 6449 Posts

·
Lurker
Joined
·
342 Posts
As far as I know, shouldnt be anything that is approved to start construction except the tramline and the bus/tram/boat station.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
461 Posts
Could someone, please, remind me, what is under construction in Skeppsbron area?
Phase 1 is tramline and a new transportation hub at the pier, trams and buses will stop there and also ferries.

Second phase is buildings. They have completed the fjärrvärmerör (english?) and at the moment I think they are prepping the ground. No building have been shown yet but the plan with real city-block structure and public bottomfloors is almost through :banana:
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
342 Posts
I is ridiculuos, Skeppsbron will be a huge failure. It is not dense enough. It should have been twice as dense as what now will be built there.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
461 Posts
I is ridiculuos, Skeppsbron will be a huge failure. It is not dense enough. It should have been twice as dense as what now will be built there.
I think it's harsh to call it a huge failure. In comparision to what Älvstranden Utveckling has contributed before (Eriksberg, Sannegårdshamnen...) this is actually the first attempt to build a real city with open bottom floors and closed blocks.
It's also good to remember that the plan for the buildings isn't finished yet and that there is an ongoing debate among the top politicans in GBG to increase the density of Skeppsbrons new development, so there is still a chance that we will see higher and denser buildings.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,640 Posts
I think it's harsh to call it a huge failure. In comparision to what Älvstranden Utveckling has contributed before (Eriksberg, Sannegårdshamnen...) this is actually the first attempt to build a real city with open bottom floors and closed blocks.
It's also good to remember that the plan for the buildings isn't finished yet and that there is an ongoing debate among the top politicans in GBG to increase the density of Skeppsbrons new development, so there is still a chance that we will see higher and denser buildings.
I agree that it wont be a total failure but I doubt we'll see an increase in height or density, the red seem determined to run with the lowered proposal. :eek:hno:
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,147 Posts
Wallenstam får inte förtäta

Wallenstam får inte förtäta i sitt fastighetsbestånd på Djurgårdsgatan i Majorna.
Fastighetsägaren vill bygga på sin fastighet i kvarteret Vita Björn med 50 lägenheter. Stadsbyggnadskontoret anser att femvåningshusen blir för höga om en eller två våningar byggs till.
Man tycker att höjden inte skulle passa ihop med de väsentlig lägre landshövdingehusen på andra sidan gatan.
Det är relativt ovanligt numera att sådana här ansökningar om förtätning inte godkänns av kontoret- och byggnadsnämnden.
I samma område, på Amiralitetsgatan på motsatta sidan Vita Björn, håller smma fastighetsägare på att bygga ett nytt hyreshus.
http://sverigesradio.se/sida/artikel.aspx?programid=104&artikel=5684277
 
3761 - 3780 of 6449 Posts
Top